Deep learning diagnostic and severity-stratification for interstitial lung diseases and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in digital lung auscultations and ultrasonography: clinical protocol for an observational case-control study

Exploring the deep learning of artificial intelligence in nursing: a concept analysis with Walker and Avant's approach

BACKGROUND

In recent years, increased attention has been given to using deep learning (DL) of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare to address nursing challenges. The adoption of new technologies in nursing needs to be improved, and AI in nursing is still in its early stages. However, the current literature needs more clarity, which affects clinical practice, research, and theory development. This study aimed to clarify the meaning of deep learning and identify the defining attributes of artificial intelligence within nursing.

METHODS

We conducted a concept analysis of the deep learning of AI in nursing care using Walker and Avant's 8-step approach. Our search strategy employed Boolean techniques and MeSH terms across databases, including BMC, CINAHL, ClinicalKey for Nursing, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, SpringerLink and Spinger Nature, ProQuest, PubMed, and Web of Science. By focusing on relevant keywords in titles and abstracts from articles published between 2018 and 2024, we initially found 571 sources.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven articles that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in this study. The attributes of evidence included four themes: focus and immersion, coding and understanding, arranging layers and algorithms, and implementing within the process of use cases to modify recommendations. Antecedents, unclear systems and communication, insufficient data management knowledge and support, and compound challenges can lead to suffering and risky caregiving tasks. Applying deep learning techniques enables nurses to simulate scenarios, predict outcomes, and plan care more precisely. Embracing deep learning equipment allows nurses to make better decisions. It empowers them with enhanced knowledge while ensuring adequate support and resources essential for caregiver and patient well-being. Access to necessary equipment is vital for high-quality home healthcare.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a clearer understanding of the use of deep learning in nursing and its implications for nursing practice. Future research should focus on exploring the impact of deep learning on healthcare operations management through quantitative and qualitative studies. Additionally, developing a framework to guide the integration of deep learning into nursing practice is recommended to facilitate its adoption and implementation.

Optimized fuzzy K-nearest neighbor approach for accurate lung cancer prediction based on radial endobronchial ultrasonography

Radial endobronchial ultrasonography (R-EBUS) has been a surge in the development of new ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases beyond the central airway. However, it faces challenges in accurately pinpointing the location of abnormal lesions. Therefore, this study proposes an improved machine learning model aimed at distinguishing between malignant lung disease (MLD) from benign lung disease (BLD) through R-EBUS features. An enhanced manta ray foraging optimization based on elite perturbation search and cyclic mutation strategy (ECMRFO) is introduced at first. Experimental validation on 29 test functions from CEC 2017 demonstrates that ECMRFO exhibits superior optimization capabilities and robustness compared to other competing algorithms. Subsequently, it was combined with fuzzy k-nearest neighbor for the classification prediction of BLD and MLD. Experimental results indicate that the proposed modal achieves a remarkable prediction accuracy of up to 99.38%. Additionally, parameters such as R-EBUS1 Circle-dense sign, R-EBUS2 Hemi-dense sign, R-EBUS5 Onionskin sign and CCT5 mediastinum lymph node are identified as having significant clinical diagnostic value.

A Novel Automatic Algorithm to Support Lung Ultrasound Non-Expert Physicians in Interstitial Pneumonia Evaluation: A Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION

Lung ultrasound (LUS) is widely used in clinical practice for identifying interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and assessing their progression. Although high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) remains the gold standard for evaluating the severity of ILDs, LUS can be performed as a screening method or as a follow-up tool post-HRCT. Minimum training is needed to better identify typical lesions, and the integration of innovative artificial intelligence (AI) automatic algorithms may enhance diagnostic efficiency.

AIM

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel AI algorithm in automatic ILD recognition and scoring in comparison to an expert LUS sonographer. The "SensUS Lung" device, equipped with an automatic algorithm, was employed for the automatic recognition of the typical ILD patterns and to calculate an index grading of the interstitial involvement.

METHODS

We selected 33 Caucasian patients in follow-up for ILDs exhibiting typical HRCT patterns (honeycombing, ground glass, fibrosis). An expert physician evaluated all patients with LUS on twelve segments (six per side). Next, blinded to the previous evaluation, an untrained operator, a non-expert in LUS, performed the exam with the SensUS device equipped with the automatic algorithm ("SensUS Lung") using the same protocol. Pulmonary functional tests (PFT) and DLCO were conducted for all patients, categorizing them as having reduced or preserved DLCO. The SensUS device indicated different grades of interstitial involvement named Lung Staging that were scored from 0 (absent) to 4 (peak), which was compared to the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS score) by dividing it by the number of segments evaluated. Statistical analyses were done with Wilcoxon tests for paired values or Mann-Whitney for unpaired samples, and correlations were performed using Spearman analysis; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Lung Staging was non-inferior to LUS score in identifying the risk of ILDs (median SensUS 1 [0-2] vs. LUS 0.67 [0.25-1.54]; p = 0.84). Furthermore, the grade of interstitial pulmonary involvement detected with the SensUS device is directly related to the LUS score (r = 0.607, p = 0.002). Lung Staging values were inversely correlated with forced expiratory volume at first second (FEV1%, r = -0.40, p = 0.027), forced vital capacity (FVC%, r = -0.39, p = 0.03) and forced expiratory flow (FEF) at 25th percentile (FEF25%, r = -0.39, p = 0.02) while results directly correlated with FEF25-75% (r = 0.45, p = 0.04) and FEF75% (r = 0.43, p = 0.01). Finally, in patients with reduced DLCO, the Lung Staging was significantly higher, overlapping the LUS (reduced median 1 [1-2] vs. preserved 0 [0-1], p = 0.001), and overlapping the LUS (reduced median 18 [4-20] vs. preserved 5.5 [2-9], p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the considered AI automatic algorithm may assist non-expert physicians in LUS, resulting in non-inferior-to-expert LUS despite a tendency to overestimate ILD lesions. Therefore, the AI algorithm has the potential to support physicians, particularly non-expert LUS sonographers, in daily clinical practice to monitor patients with ILDs. The adopted device is user-friendly, offering a fully automatic real-time analysis. However, it needs proper training in basic skills.