Evolution of treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated at Frankfurt University Hospital in 2012-2018

Shall We Screen Lung Cancer with Volume Computed Tomography in Austria? A Cost-Effectiveness Modelling Study

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of a lung cancer screening (LCS) program using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in Austria. An existing decision tree with an integrated Markov model was used to analyze the cost-effectiveness of LCS versus no screening from a healthcare payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. A simulation was conducted to model annual LCS for an asymptomatic high-risk population cohort aged 50-74 with a smoking history using the Dutch-Belgian Lung Cancer Screening Study (NEderlands-Leuvens Longkanker ScreeningsONderzoek, NELSON) screening outcomes. The principal measure utilized to assess cost-effectiveness was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Sensitivity and scenario analyses were employed to determine uncertainties surrounding the key model inputs. At an uptake rate of 50%, 300,277 eligible individuals would participate in the LCS program, yielding 56,122 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 84,049 life years gained compared to no screening, with an ICER of EUR 24,627 per QALY gained or EUR 16,444 per life-year saved. Additionally, LCS led to the detection of 25,893 additional early-stage lung cancers and averted 11,906 premature lung cancer deaths. It was estimated that LCS would incur EUR 945 million additional screening costs and EUR 386 million additional treatment costs. These estimates were robust in sensitivity analyses. Implementation of annual LCS with LDCT for a high-risk population, using the NELSON screening outcomes, is cost-effective in Austria, at a threshold of EUR 50,000 per QALY.

Antibiotic treatment and survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an effective mode of treatment. Despite their efficacy, responses to ICIs have been shown to differ based on several factors; for example, antibiotic use prior to and/or during immunotherapy has been associated with lower survival in NSCLC patients. The objective of this study is to provide an updated review of the literature and to fill in important knowledge gaps by accounting for potential confounding in the relationship between ICIs and survival.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on peer-reviewed studies that examined the effects of antibiotic use on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. We searched MEDLINE for studies published up to June 30th, 2023 that included NSCLC patients treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents, who received antibiotics before and/or during immunotherapy, and included a control group who did not receive antibiotics and had available data on the associations between antibiotics and OS and PFS. We calculated aggregated crude OS and PFS for all studies, and only for studies that reported multivariable hazard ratios (HRs). Risk of bias was assessed using a funnel plot. All results were synthesized and displayed using the metaphor statistical package in R, version 4.2.1.

Results

Nineteen studies, conducted between 2017 and 2022, met the inclusion criteria, and included 2,932 patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC. Compared to those who did not receive antibiotics, immunotherapy patients who did had a significantly reduced PFS (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44) and OS (HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.23-1.99). Adjusted HRs were even more pronounced (OS HRadj: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.23-2.27, PFS HRadj: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.16-2.32).

Conclusions

NSCLC patients treated with antibiotics have significantly lowered survival compared with patients not treated with antibiotics. These results support the hypothesis that antibiotic use in conjunction with ICI among NSCLC patients lowers survival. Limitations of this analysis include the use of studies available only on a single database, limiting the literature search to NSCLC patients, which may impact the generalizability of results to other cancer patient populations, and the inability to account for and adjust the estimates for the same variables (e.g., age, sex) across all studies. Nevertheless, our findings underscore the importance of taking antibiotic use into consideration when using ICIs to treat NSCLC and suggest that confounders should be taken into account when designing future similar studies.