Development of a prognostic nomogram for sepsis associated-acute respiratory failure patients on 30-day mortality in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study

The value of five scoring systems in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure

Our study aimed to identify the optimal scoring system for predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure (SA-ARF). All data were taken from the fourth version of the Markets in Intensive Care Medicine (MIMIC-IV) database. Independent risk factors for death in hospitals were confirmed by regression analysis. The predictive value of the five scoring systems was evaluated by receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan‒Meier curves showed the impact of acute physiology score III (APSIII) on survival and prognosis in patients with SA-ARF. Decision curve analysis (DCA) identified a scoring system with the highest net clinical benefit. ROC curve analysis showed that APS III (AUC: 0.755, 95% Cl 0.714-0.768) and Logical Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) (AUC: 0.731, 95% Cl 0.717-0.7745) were better than Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (AUC: 0.727, 95% CI 0.713-0.741), Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS) (AUC: 0.706, 95% CI 0.691-0.720) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (AUC: 0.606, 95% CI 0.590-0.621) in assessing in-hospital mortality. Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis patients in the high-APS III score group had a considerably poorer median survival time. The DCA curve showed that APS III may provide better clinical benefits for patients. We demonstrated that the APS III score is an excellent predictor of in-hospital mortality.

An early warning model for predicting major adverse kidney events within 30 days in sepsis patients

Background

In sepsis patients, kidney damage is among the most dangerous complications, with a high mortality rate. In addition, major adverse kidney events within 30 days (MAKE30) served as a comprehensive and unbiased clinical outcome measure for sepsis patients due to the recent shift toward targeting patient-centered renal outcomes in clinical research. However, the underlying predictive model for the prediction of MAKE30 in sepsis patients has not been reported in any study.

Methods

A cohort of 2,849 sepsis patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was selected and subsequently allocated into a training set (n = 2,137, 75%) and a validation set (n = 712, 25%) through randomization. In addition, 142 sepsis patients from the Xi'An No. 3 Hospital as an external validation group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to ascertain the independent predictors of MAKE30. Subsequently, a nomogram was developed utilizing these predictors, with an area under curve (AUC) above 0.6. The performance of nomogram was assessed through calibration curve, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The secondary outcome was 30-day mortality, persistent renal dysfunction (PRD), and new renal replacement therapy (RRT). MAKE30 were a composite of death, PRD, new RRT.

Results

The construction of the nomogram was based on several independent predictors (AUC above 0.6), including age, respiratory rate (RR), PaO2, lactate, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN). The predictive model demonstrated satisfactory discrimination for MAKE30, with an AUC of 0.740, 0.753, and 0.821 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the simple prediction model exhibited superior predictive value compared to the SOFA model in both the training (AUC = 0.710) and validation (AUC = 0.692) cohorts. The nomogram demonstrated satisfactory calibration and clinical utility as evidenced by the calibration curve and DCA. Additionally, the predictive model exhibited excellent accuracy in forecasting 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.737), PRD (AUC = 0.639), and new RRT (AUC = 0.846) within the training dataset. Additionally, the model displayed predictive power for 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.765), PRD (AUC = 0.667), and new RRT (AUC = 0.783) in the validation set.

Conclusion

The proposed nomogram holds the potential to estimate the risk of MAKE30 promptly and efficiently in sepsis patients within the initial 24 h of admission, thereby equipping healthcare professionals with valuable insights to facilitate personalized interventions.

Establishment and validation of a predictive model for respiratory failure within 48 h following admission in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study

Objective: The objective of this study is to identify patients with sepsis who are at a high risk of respiratory failure. Methods: Data of 1,738 patients with sepsis admitted to Dongyang People's Hospital from June 2013 to May 2023 were collected, including the age at admission, blood indicators, and physiological indicators. Independent risk factors for respiratory failure during hospitalization in the modeling population were analyzed to establish a nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the discriminative ability, the GiViTI calibration graph was used to evaluate the calibration, and the decline curve analysis (DCA) curve was used to evaluate and predict the clinical validity. The model was compared with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) system, and the ensemble model using the validation population. Results: Ten independent risk factors for respiratory failure in patients with sepsis were included in the final logistic model. The AUC values of the prediction model in the modeling population and validation population were 0.792 and 0.807, respectively, both with good fit between the predicted possibility and the observed event. The DCA curves were far away from the two extreme curves, indicating good clinical benefits. Based on the AUC values in the validation population, this model showed higher discrimination power than the SOFA score (AUC: 0.682; p < 0.001) and NEWS (AUC: 0.520; p < 0.001), and it was comparable to the ensemble model (AUC: 0.758; p = 0.180). Conclusion: Our model had good performance in predicting the risk of respiratory failure in patients with sepsis within 48 h following admission.

An Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Mortality Risk of Septic Shock Patients During Hospitalization: A ten Years Retrospective Analysis

Purpose

We intend to develop a nomogram for predicting the mortality risk of hospitalized septic shock patients.

Patients and Methods

Data were collected from patients hospitalized with septic shock in Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in China, over 10 years between January 2013 and January 2023. The eligible study participants were divided into modeling and validation groups. Factors independently related to the mortality in the modeling group were obtained by stepwise regression analysis. A logistic regression model and a nomogram were built. The model was evaluated based on the discrimination power (the area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristic, AUC), the calibration degree and decision curve analysis. In the validation group, the discrimination powers of the logistic regression model, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scoring model and machine learning model were compared.

Results

A total of 1253 patients, including 878 patients in the modeling group and 375 patients in the validation group, were included in this study. Age, respiratory failure, serum cholinesterase, lactic acid, blood phosphorus, blood magnesium, total bilirubin, and pH were independent risk factors related to the mortality risk of septic shock. The AUCs of the prediction model for the modeling and validation groups were 0.881 and 0.868, respectively. The models had a good calibration degree and clinical applicability. The AUC of the SOFA model for the validation population was 0.799, significantly lower than that of our model. The AUCs of the random forest and ensemble models were 0.865 and 0.863, respectively, comparable to that of our logistical prediction model.

Conclusion

The model established in this study can effectively predict the mortality risk in patients hospitalized with septic shock. Thus, the model could be used clinically to determine the best therapy or management for patients with septic shock.