The efficacy of adalimumab in psoriatic arthritis concomitant to overlapping primary biliary cholangitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis: a case report

Overlap syndrome of seronegative primary biliary cholangitis and small duct primary sclerosing cholangitis: a first case report and literature review

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are distinct liver diseases. Cases combining PBC and PSC, are extremely rare. Here, we present a case of a 39-year-old woman with a history of colonic Crohn's disease treated with azathioprine. Discontinuation of the medication was prompted by abnormal liver function tests, but subsequent evaluations revealed persistent liver injury. Extensive diagnostic investigations, including imaging, serological tests, and liver biopsy, were conducted leading to a diagnosis of PBC-PSC overlap syndrome based on the presence of concentric lamellar fibrosis and chronic non-suppurative destructive cholangitis. The patient responded well to ursodeoxycholic acid treatment. This case emphasizes the importance of recognizing and diagnosing rare overlap syndromes, particularly those involving PBC and PSC, to ensure appropriate management and improve patient outcomes.

A patient with primary biliary cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary sclerosing cholangitis variant syndrome

Overlap between autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and either primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is not rare and has extensively been reported. We herein report the first well documented case of triple overlap. A 68-year-old male patient presented with asymptomatic PBC including normal alkaline phosphatase serum level, developed AIH five years later, associated with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography biliary changes typical for PSC. Despite treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and mycophenolate mofetil, owing to prednisone and azathioprine intolerance, he continued to have interface hepatitis and developed increasing fibrosis at follow-up liver biopsy. Our case report raises awareness for this rare and difficult to diagnose and treat clinical phenotype.

The Use of Biologics in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biologics are well established in the treatment of many immuno-inflammatory diseases including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, although primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is closely associated with IBD, the role of biologics in PSC remains uncertain. Many new biologics are becoming available to treat IBD, and this review aims to use the experience of biologics in PSC so far to guide more effective evaluation of emerging therapies in the future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antibodies to TNF-α were the first biologics used in IBD, and retrospective analysis suggests that they may have some benefit in PSC, even though an early randomised controlled trial (RCT) showed no effect. Mechanistic studies suggest that TNF-α may have a pathogenic role in PSC. An antibody to integrin α4β7 is effective in IBD, and there are emerging data on its effects in PSC, although no RCT data are available. Mechanistic studies suggest that interrupting the migration of lymphocytes is relevant in PSC. Two biologics, targeting vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1), and lysyl oxidase-like 2 (LOXL2) have been tested in RCTs. The trial of anti-VAP1 is ongoing, whilst the anti-LOXL2 trial was negative.

SUMMARY

Anti-TNF antibodies may benefit PSC when used to treat concomitant IBD, and this may be a direct effect on the liver in a subgroup of patients, or may be an indirect effect of treating IBD. Similarly, anti-integrin therapy may benefit a subset of patients with IBD and PSC. RCTs could decide the role of emerging biologics in PSC, although future trials should be guided by biomarkers that could predict response to the pathway being targeted.

Harmful Effects and Potential Benefits of Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF)-α on the Liver

Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents represent an effective treatment for chronic inflammatory diseases. However, some concerns about their potentially undesirable effects on liver function have been reported. On the other hand, evidence of their therapeutic effects on certain liver diseases is accumulating. Many data showed the safety of anti-TNF-α in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C and in liver transplanted patients even if a strict follow-up and prophylaxis are recommended in well-defined subgroups. On the other side, anti-TNF-α-induced liver injury is not a rare event. However, it is often reversible after anti-TNF-α withdrawal. Anti-TNF-α agents have been tested in advanced stages of severe alcoholic hepatitis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Limited data on the efficacy of anti-TNF-α in patients with autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis are also available. In this review, we explored the hepatic safety concerns in patients receiving anti-TNF-α agents with and without pre-existent hepatic diseases. In addition, the available evidence on their potential benefits in the treatment of specific hepatic diseases is discussed.