Cervical spine reposition errors after cervical flexion and extension

Cervical Proprioception Assessed through Targeted Head Repositioning: Validation of a Clinical Test Based on Optoelectronic Measures

Neck proprioception is commonly assessed with head repositioning tests. In such a test, an operator rotates the head of a blindfolded individual to a target position. After returning to the rest position, the participant actively repositions the head to the target. Joint Position Error (JPE) is the angular difference between the target angle (however oriented in a 3D space) and the actively reached positions (the smaller the difference, the better the proprioception). This study aimed to validate a head-to-target (HTT) repositioning test using an optoelectronic system for also measuring the components of the JPE in the horizontal, frontal, and sagittal planes. The head movements requested by the operator consisted of 30° left-right rotations and 25° flexion-extension. The operators or subjects could not obtain these movements without modest rotations in other planes. Two operators were involved. Twenty-six healthy participants (13 women) were recruited (mean (SD): 33.4 (6.3) years). The subjects’ JPE in the requested (intended) plane of motion (JPEint-component) was a few degrees only and smaller for flexion-extensions than for left-right rotations (right rotation: 5.39° (5.29°); left rotation: 5.03° (4.51°), extension: 1.79° (3.94°); flexion: 0.54° (4.35°)). Participants’ average error in unintended planes was around 1° or less. Inter-operator consistency and agreement were high. The smallest detectable change, at p < 0.05, for JPEint-component ranged between 4.5° and 6.98°. This method of optoelectronic measurement in HTT repositioning tests provides results with good metric properties, fostering application to clinical studies.

Outcomes of active cervical therapeutic exercise on dynamic intervertebral foramen changes in neck pain patients with disc herniation

BACKGROUND

To better understand biomechanical factors that affect intervertebral alignment throughout active therapeutic exercise, it is necessary to determine spinal kinematics when subjects perform spinal exercises. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of active cervical therapeutic exercise on intervertebral foramen changes in neck pain patients with disc herniation.

METHODS

Thirty diagnosed C4/5 and/or C5/6 disc-herniated patients receiving an 8-week cervical therapeutic exercise program were followed up with videofluoroscopic images. The dynamic changes in the foramen were computed at different timepoints, including the neutral position, end-range positions in cervical flexion-extension, protrusion-retraction, and lateral flexion movements.

RESULTS

The results showed that the active cervical flexion, retraction, and lateral flexion away from the affected side movements increased the area of the patients' intervertebral foramen; while the active extension, protrusion, and lateral flexion toward the affected side reduced the areas of intervertebral foramen before treatment. After the treatment, the active cervical flexion significantly increased the C2/3, C3/4, and C6/7 foramen area by 5.02-8.67% (p = 0.001 ~ 0.029), and the extension exercise significantly reduced the C2/3 and C4/5 area by 5.12-9.18% (p = 0.001 ~ 0.006) compared to the baseline. Active retraction movement significantly increased the foramen area from C2/3 to C6/7 by 3.82-8.66% (p = 0.002 ~ 0.036 with exception of C5/6). Active lateral flexion away from the affected side significantly increased the foramen by 3.71-6.78% (p = 0.007 ~ 0.046 with exception of C6/7).

CONCLUSIONS

The 8-week therapeutic exercises including repeated cervical retraction, extension, and lateral flexion movements to the lesion led to significant changes and improvements in intervertebral foramen areas of the patients with disc herniation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN61539024.

Reliability of Cervicocephalic Proprioception Assessment: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reliability and, where possible, the validity of cervicocephalic proprioceptive (CCP) tests in healthy adults and clinical populations.

METHODS

A systematic search, utilizing 7 databases from the earliest possible date to April 14, 2021, identified studies that measured reliability of CCP tests. Studies were screened for eligibility, and included studies were appraised using Quality Appraisal Tool for Studies of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) and Quality Assessment and Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 Tool (QUADAS-2) tools. Validity outcomes were assessed for included studies.

RESULTS

Of 34 included studies, 29 investigated reliability for sense of position tests, 10 involved sense of movement tests, and 1 used a sense of force test. The head to neutral test was reliable and valid when 6 or more repetitions were performed within the test, discriminating between those with and without neck pain. Head tracking tests were reliable with 6 repetitions, and 1 study found discriminative validity in a whiplash population. Studies that found discriminative validity in sense of position reported mean joint position error generally >4.5° in the neck pain group and <4.5° in the asymptomatic group. No sense of force test was applied to a clinical population. Convergent validity analysis showed that these proprioceptive tests have low correlations with each other.

CONCLUSION

The reliability and validity of CCP tests for sense of position and movement are dependent upon equipment and repetitions. Six repetitions are generally required for good reliability, and joint position error >4.5° is likely to indicate impairment in sense of position.

Effects of experimental pain on the cervical spine reposition errors

BACKGROUND

Healthy subjects showed normal variance of cervical spine reposition errors of approximately 2 degrees. Effects of experimental pain on cervical spine reposition errors were unknown; thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of experimental pain on cervical spine reposition errors.

METHODS

A repeated measured study design was applied. Thirty healthy subjects (12 males) were recruited. Reposition errors were extracted from upright cervical positions before and after cervical flexion movement in healthy subjects before and during experimental neck pain. Cervical spine reposition errors were calculated based on anatomical landmarks of each cervical joint. Reposition errors were extracted in degrees as constant errors and absolute errors for further statistical analysis. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA) was applied to analyse experimental pain effects on either constant errors or absolute errors of different cervical joints.

RESULTS

The cervical spine showed non-significant difference in reposition errors regarding the constant errors (P>0.05) while larger reposition errors regarding the absolute errors during experimental pain compared to before experimental pain (P<0.001). In addition, the pain level joint (C4/C5) and its adjacent joints (C3/C4 and C5/C6) indicated larger reposition errors regarding absolute errors (P=0.035, P=0.329 and P=0.103, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study firstly investigated the cervical spine reposition errors in experimental neck pain and further found the joints adjacent to the pain level showed larger errors compared to the distant joints regarding absolute errors. It may imply that the larger reposition errors in specific cervical joint indicate probable injury or pain existed adjacent to the joints.

The global end-ranges of neck flexion and extension do not represent the maximum rotational ranges of the cervical intervertebral joints in healthy adults - an observational study

Background

In clinical diagnosis, the maximum motion of a cervical joint is thought to be found at the joint’s end-range and it is this perception that forms the basis for the interpretation of flexion/extension imaging studies.

There have however, been representative cases of joints producing their maximum motion before end-range, but this phenomenon is yet to be quantified.

Purpose

To provide a quantitative assessment of the difference between maximum joint motion and joint end-range in healthy subjects. Secondarily to classify joints into type based on their motion and to assess the proportions of these joint types.

Study design

This is an observational study.

Subject sample

Thirty-three healthy subjects participated in the study.

Outcome measures

Maximum motion, end-range motion and surplus motion (the difference between maximum motion and end-range) in degrees were extracted from each cervical joint.

Methods

Thirty-three subjects performed one flexion and one extension motion excursion under video fluoroscopy. The motion excursions were divided into 10% epochs, from which maximum motion, end-range and surplus motion were extracted. Surplus motion was then assessed in quartiles and joints were classified into type according to end-range.

Results

For flexion 48.9% and for extension 47.2% of joints produced maximum motion before joint end-range (type S). For flexion 45.9% and for extension 46.8% of joints produced maximum motion at joint end-range (type C). For flexion 5.2% of joints and for extension 6.1% of joints concluded their motion anti-directionally (type A).

Significant differences were found for C2/C3 (P = 0.000), C3/C4 (P = 0.001) and C4/C5 (P = 0.005) in flexion and C1/C2 (P = 0.004), C3/C4 (P = 0.013) and C6/C7 (P = 0.013) in extension when comparing the joint end- range of type C and type S.

The average pro-directional (motion in the direction of neck motion) surplus motion was 2.41° ± 2.12° with a range of (0.07° -14.23°) for flexion and 2.02° ± 1.70° with a range of (0.04°-6.97°) for extension.

Conclusion

This is the first study to categorise joints by type of motion. It cannot be assumed that end-range is a demonstration of a joint’s maximum motion, as type S constituted approximately half of the joints analysed in this study.

Joint position error after neck protraction-retraction movements in healthy office workers: a cross-sectional study

Since the upper cervical spine (UCS) has been regarded to be distinct from the lower cervical spine (LCS), joint position error (JPE) needs to be tested separately for both regions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the JPE after cervical protraction/retraction movements, involving opposite movements of extension and flexion for the UCS and LCS. These movements are frequently performed during office work. Cervical JPEs were tracked in thirty healthy office workers while performing four tests of cervical pro-retraction movements with variations in vision and movement direction, and assessed using the Kinect head tracker (Microsoft Corp), placed in front of each participant. The JPE was expressed in constant (CE), absolute (AE) and variable errors (VE). Multilevel linear models evaluated main and interaction effects of vision, movement direction, cervical region and sex. Slightly larger JPEs have been found in the UCS. Vision showed no effect on any outcome variable. No effect exceeded typical measurement errors reported for the Kinect head tracker. This study showed, that JPEs after pro-retraction movements of the head and neck may differ for UCS and LCS. The differences were small and not beyond measurement error reported for the Kinect.

Recurrent neck pain patients exhibit altered joint motion pattern during cervical flexion and extension movements

BACKGROUND

Impaired sensorimotor ability has been demonstrated in recurrent neck pain patients. It is however not clear if cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity in recurrent neck pain patients are different from asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Cervical flexion and extension motions were examined by video-fluoroscopy and pressure pain thresholds were assessed bilaterally over C2/C3, C5/C6 facet joints and right tibialis anterior in eighteen recurrent neck pain patients and eighteen healthy subjects. Individual joint motion was analyzed by dividing fluoroscopic videos into 10 epochs. The motion opposite to the primary direction (anti-directional motion) and motion along with the primary direction (pro-directional motion) of each joint were extracted across epochs. Total joint motion was the sum of anti-directional and pro-directional motions. Joint motion variability was represented by the variance of joint motions across epochs.

FINDINGS

Compared to controls, recurrent neck pain patients showed: 1) decreased anti-directional motion at C2/C3 and C3/C4 (P < 0.05) and increased anti-directional motion at C5/C6 and C6/C7 (P < 0.05) during extension motion. 2) Increased overall anti-direction motion during flexion motion (P < 0.05). 3) Lower joint motion variability at C3/C4 during extension motion (P < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

Recurrent neck pain patients showed a redistribution of anti-directional motion between the middle cervical spine and the lower cervical spine during cervical extension and increased overall anti-directional motion during cervical flexion compared with healthy controls. The anti-directional motion was more sensitive to neck pain compared to other cervical joint motion parameters in the present study.

Head repositioning accuracy is influenced by experimental neck pain in those most accurate but not when adding a cognitive task

Background and aims Neck pain can impair perception of cervical movement, but how this is affected by attention is unknown. In this study, the effects of experimental neck pain on head repositioning accuracy during standardized head movements were investigated. Methods Experimental neck pain was induced by injecting hypertonic saline into the right splenius capitis muscle in 28 healthy participants (12 women). Isotonic saline was used as control. Participants were blindfolded while performing standardized head movements from neutral (start) to either right-rotation, left-rotation, flexion or extension, then back to neutral (end). Movements were triplicated for each direction, separated by 5-s, and performed with or without a cognitive task at baseline, immediately after the injection, and 5-min after pain disappeared. Repositioning accuracy was assessed by 3-dimensional recordings of head movement and defined as the difference between start and end position. Participants were grouped into most/least accurate based on a median split of head repositioning accuracy for each movement direction at baseline without the cognitive task. Results The most accurate group got less accurate following hypertonic injection during right-rotation without a cognitive task, compared with the least accurate group and the isotonic condition (p < 0.01). No group difference was found when testing head repositioning accuracy while the participants where distracted by the cognitive task. Conclusions Experimental neck pain alters head repositioning accuracy in healthy participants, but only in those who are most accurate at baseline. Interestingly, this impairment was no longer present when a cognitive task was added to the head repositioning accuracy test. Implications The results adds to our understanding of what factor may influence the head repositioning accuracy test when used in clinical practice and thereby how the results should be interpreted.

Repeatability of Cervical Joint Flexion and Extension Within and Between Days

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate within- and between-day repeatability of free and unrestricted healthy cervical flexion and extension motion when assessing dynamic cervical spine motion.

METHODS

Fluoroscopy videos of 2 repeated cervical flexion and 2 repeated extension motions were examined for within-day repeatability (20-second interval) for 18 participants (6 females) and between-day repeatability (1-week interval) for 15 participants (6 females). The dynamic cervical motions were free and unrestricted from neutral to end range. The flexion videos and extension videos were evenly divided into 10% epochs of the C0-to-C7 range of motion. Within-day and between-day repeatability of joint motion angles (all 7 joints and epochs, respectively) was tested in a repeated-measures analysis of variance. Joint motion angle differences between repetitions were calculated for each epoch and joint (7 joints), and these joint motion angle differences between within-day and between-day repetitions were tested in mixed-model analysis of variance.

RESULTS

For all joints and epochs, respectively, no significant differences were found in joint motion angle between within-day or between-day repetitions. There were no significant effects of joint motion angle differences between within-day and between-day repetitions. The average within-day joint motion angle differences across all joints and epochs were 0.00° ± 2.98° and 0.00° ± 3.05° for flexion and extension, respectively. The average between-day joint motion angle differences were 0.02° ± 2.56° and 0.05° ± 2.40° for flexion and extension, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report the within-day and between-day joint motion angle differences of repeated cervical flexion and extension. This study supports the idea that cervical joints repeat their motion accurately.

Experimental cervical interspinous ligament pain altered cervical joint motion during dynamic extension movement

BACKGROUND

Although the cervical interspinous ligament is a potential source of neck pain, the effects on cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity has never been investigated. The understanding of the relationship will broaden our understanding of cervical biomechanics and improve diagnosis and treatment of neck pain.

METHODS

Fluoroscopy videos of cervical flexion and extension movements and pressure pain thresholds over bilateral C2/C3 and C5/C6 facet joints were collected in fifteen healthy subjects before and after injections of hypertonic and isotonic saline in C4/C5 ISL. The videos were divided into 10 even epochs and the motion of individual joints during each epoch was extracted. Joint motion parameters including anti-directional motion, pro-directional motion, total joint motion and joint motion variability were extracted across epochs. Joint motion parameters and PPTs were compared before and after injection of hypertonic and isotonic saline separately.

FINDINGS

Compared with baselines: hypertonic saline injection 1) decreased anti-directional motion and joint motion variability at C4/C5 (P < 0.05) and increased at C2/C3 (P < 0.05) during extension; 2) increased total joint motion of C0/C1 during first half range (P < 0.05) and decreased during second half range of extension, and total joint motion of C2/C3 increased during second half range of extension (P < 0.05) and; 3) increased pressure pain thresholds over left C2/C3 facet joint (P < 0.01).

INTERPRETATION

The cervical interspinous ligament pain redistributed anti-directional motion between C4/C5 and C2/C3 during dynamic extension and decreased pressure pain sensitivity over the left C2/C3 facet joint.

Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies

Background

Literature is still limited regarding reports of non-invasive assessment of the cervical range of motion in normal subjects. Investigations into compensatory motions, defined as the contribution of an additional direction to the required motion, are also limited.

The objectives of this work were to develop and assess a reliable method for measuring the cervical range of motion in order to investigate motion and compensatory strategies.

Methods and data collection

Ninety-seven no neck-related pain subjects (no severe cervical pathology, 57 women, age: 28.3 ± 7.5y. old, BMI: 22.5 ± 3.2 kg/m²) underwent a non-invasive cervical range of motion assessment protocol. In-vivo head’s motion relative to the thorax was assessed through the measurement of the main angular amplitudes in the 3 directions (flexion/extension, axial rotations and lateral inclinations) and associated compensatory motions using an opto-electronic acquisition system.

Results

The principal motion reproducibility resulted in intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.86. The following maximum ranges of motion were found: 127.4 ± 15.1° of flexion/extension, 89.3 ± 12° of lateral inclinations and 146.4 ± 13° of axial rotations after 6 outlier exclusions. Compensatory motions highly depend on the associated principal motion: for flexion/extension: (3.5 ± 7.6;-2.1 ± 7.8°), for rotation: (25.7 ± 17.9°;0.4 ± 4.7)°, for inclination: (22.9 ± 34.7°;-0.04 ± 8.7°). Age, BMI and weight significantly correlated with flexions (p < 0.032). Motion patterns were identified through clustering.

Conclusions

This kinematic analysis has been proven to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the cervical range of motion. The non-unicity and variability of motion patterns through the clustering of motion strategy identification have been shown. Compensatory motions contributed to such motion pattern definition despite presenting significant intra-individual variability.

Origin of neck pain and direction of movement influence dynamic cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity

BACKGROUND

Patients with neck pain normally showed alterations in cervical motion and pressure pain sensitivity. Cervical joints show scattered motions opposite to (anti-directional) the primary motion direction (pro-directional) during dynamic cervical flexion and extension. This study aimed to assess dynamic cervical joint motion and pressure pain sensitivity when pain originated from different cervical muscles which may have clinical relevance in diagnosis of impairments related with neck pain.

METHODS

Fluoroscopic video recordings of cervical flexion and extension were collected from fifteen healthy subjects before and during hypertonic saline-induced pain in right multifidus and trapezius muscles. Cervical flexion and extension motions were divided into 10 epochs with respect to time. Pro-directional, anti-directional, and total joint motion were extracted across epochs as well as joint motion variability. Pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were assessed bilaterally over C2/C3 and C5/C6 facet joints.

FINDINGS

Compared with baseline: 1) Multifidus muscle pain increased the C3/C4 anti-directional motion (P < 0.01), decreased the C6/C7 anti-directional motion (P < 0.05) during extension, and redistributed total joint motion between joints and between half ranges during flexion (P < 0.05). 2) Trapezius muscle pain decreased pro-directional motion (P < 0.05), anti-directional motion (P < 0.05), and joint motion variability (P < 0.05) during extension. 3) Trapezius and multifidus muscle pain increased the PPTs bilaterally over C2/C3 and on the left side of C5/C6 facet joints (P < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

The direction of motion influenced the effects of experimental muscle pain on dynamic cervical joint kinematics, and deep muscle pain showed local effects on individual joints while superficial muscle pain showed global effects spread to all joints.

Motion analysis of the cervical spine during extension and flexion: Reliability of the vertebral marking procedure

Cervical spine motion analysis using videofluoroscopy is currently a technique without a gold standard. We demonstrate the reliability of a rigid and reliable analysis methodology for cervical motion using videofluoroscopic images, representing the entire range of motion during flexion and extension, from the neutral position to the end-range in the sagittal plane. Two researchers with radiography and vertebral marking expertise, and two inexperienced researchers with 10 hours of training manually marked anatomical structures on fluoroscopic images in a procedure designed to control for vertebral rotation around the mid-plane axis. The average marking error across examiners and images was -0.12^∘ (standard deviation: 0.88°), and the intraexaminer error ranged from -1.00^∘ to 1.61° (standard deviation range: 0.27°-1.19°). Our method demonstrated lower errors compared to the higher resolution X-ray studies, and proved that vertebral marking can be performed by persons with no experience in radiographic image analysis.

Disturbance of neck proprioception and feed-forward motor control following static neck flexion in healthy young adults

The highly complex proprioceptive system provides neuromuscular control of the mobile cervical spine. Static neck flexion can induce the elongation of posterior tissues and altered afferent input from the mechanoreceptors. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of prolonged static neck flexion on neck proprioception and anticipatory postural adjustments. Thirty-eight healthy participants (20 females and 18 males) between the ages of 20-35 years with no history of neck, low back, and shoulder pain enrolled in this study. Neck proprioception and anticipatory muscle activity were tested before and after 10-min static neck flexion. For assessment of neck proprioception, each participant was asked to perform 10 trials of the cervicocephalic relocation test to the neutral head position after active neck rotation to the left and right sides. Anticipatory postural adjustments were evaluated during a rapid arm flexion test. Following the flexion, the absolute and variable errors in head repositioning significantly increased (p < 0.05). The results also showed that there was a significant delay in the onset of myoelectric activity of the cervical erector spinae muscles after flexion (p = 0.001). The results of this study suggested that a 10-min static flexion can lead to changes in the neck proprioception and feed-forward control due to mechanical and neuromuscular changes in the viscoelastic cervical spine structures. These changes in sensory-motor control may be a risk factor for neck pain and injury.

Cervical flexion and extension includes anti-directional cervical joint motion in healthy adults

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anti-directional cervical joint motion has previously been demonstrated. However, quantitative studies of anti-directional and pro-directional cervical flexion and extension motions have not been published.

PURPOSE

This study aimed for a quantitative assessment of directional and anti-directional cervical joint motion in healthy subjects.

STUDY DESIGN

An observational study was carried out.

PATIENTS SAMPLE

Eighteen healthy subjects comprised the study sample.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Anti-directional and pro-directional cervical flexion and extension motion from each cervical joint in degrees were the outcome measures.

METHODS

Fluoroscopy videos of cervical flexion and extension motions (from neutral to end-range) were acquired from 18 healthy subjects. The videos were divided into 10% epochs of C0/C7 range of motion (ROM). The pro-directional and anti-directional motions in each 10% epoch were extracted, and the ratios of anti-directional motions with respect to the pro-directional motions (0%=no anti-directional movement) were calculated for joints and 10% epochs.

RESULTS

The flexion and extension ROM for C0/C7 were 51.9°±9.3° and 57.2°±12.2°. The anti-directional motions of flexion and extension ROM constituted 42.8%±9.7% and 41.2%±8.2% of the respective pro-directional movements. For flexion, the first three joints (C0/C1, C1/C2, C2/C3) demonstrated larger ratios compared with the last three joints (C4/C5, C5/C6, C6/C7) (p<.03). For extension, C1/C2 and C2/C3 ratios were larger compared with C0/C1, C4/C5, and C5/C6 (p<.03). Comparisons between flexion and extension motions showed larger C0/C1 ratio but smaller C5/C6 and C6/C7 ratios in extension (p<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of quantified anti-directional cervical flexion and extension motion. The anti-directional motion is approximately 40% of the pro-directional motion. The results document that large proportions of anti-directional cervical flexion and extension motions were normal.