Tourniquet use in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Minimal differences in acute postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps versus hamstring autograft

Studies are lacking that evaluate early postoperative pain after all-soft-tissue quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), particularly in young patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in early postoperative pain between adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring autograft. A retrospective review was performed of 60 patients (mean age, 15.6 ± 1.3 years) who underwent ACLR using either quadriceps tendon ( n  = 31) or hamstring ( n  = 29) autografts between January 2017 and February 2020. Intraoperative and postoperative milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs), postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay and PACU pain scores were recorded. Pain scores and supplemental oxycodone use were recorded on postoperative days (POD) 1-3. Differences were compared between the two groups. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, body mass index or concomitant meniscus repairs between the two groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in intraoperative MMEs, PACU MMEs or PACU length of stay between groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in maximum PACU pain scores (3.7 ± 3.0 vs. 3.8 ± 3.2; P  = 0.89). Maximum pain scores on POD 1-3 were similar between groups ( P  > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in supplemental oxycodone doses between groups on POD 1-3 ( P  > 0.05). Adolescent patients undergoing ACLR with quadriceps tendon and hamstring autografts have similar pain levels and opioid use in the early postoperative period.

The past and future of peri-operative interventions to reduce arthrogenic quadriceps muscle inhibition after total knee arthroplasty: A narrative review

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patient-reported function by alleviating joint pain, however the surgical trauma exacerbates already impaired muscle function, which leads to further muscle weakness and disability after surgery. This early postoperative strength loss indicates a massive neural inhibition and is primarily driven by a deficit in quadriceps muscle activation, a process known as arthrogenic muscle inhibition (AMI). To enhance acute recovery of quadriceps muscle function and long-term rehabilitation of individuals after TKA, AMI must be significantly reduced in the early post-operative period. The aim of this narrative review is to review and discuss previous efforts to mitigate AMI after TKA and to suggest new approaches and interventions for future efficacy evaluation. Several strategies have been explored to reduce the degree of post-operative quadriceps AMI and improve strength recovery after TKA by targeting post-operative swelling and inflammation or changing neural discharge. A challenge of this work is the ability to directly measure AMI and relevant contributing factors. For this review we focused on interventions that aimed to reduce post-operative swelling or improve knee extension strength or quadriceps muscle activation measured by twitch interpolation. For individuals undergoing TKA, the use of anti-inflammatory medications, tranexamic acid, cryotherapy, intra-articular drains, torniquets, and minimally invasive surgical techniques for TKA have limited benefit in attenuating quadriceps AMI early after surgery. However, interventions such as inelastic compression garments, voluntary muscle contractions, and neuro-muscular electrical stimulation show promise in mitigating or circumventing AMI and should continue to be refined and explored.

Management after acute injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Part 3: Recommendation on surgical treatment

PURPOSE

The aim of this consensus project was to give recommendations regarding surgical treatment of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured patient.

METHODS

For this consensus process, an expert, steering and rating group was formed. In an initial online meeting, the steering group, together with the expert group, formed various key topic complexes for which multiple questions were formulated. For each key topic, a structured literature search was performed by the steering group. The results of the literature review were sent to the rating group with the option to give anonymous comments until a final consensus voting was performed. Sufficient consensus was defined as 80% agreement.

RESULTS

During this consensus process, 30 topics regarding the surgical management and technique of ACL reconstruction were identified. The literature search for each key question resulted in 30 final statements. Of these 30 final statements, all achieved consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

This consensus process has shown that surgical treatment of ACL injury is a complex process. Various surgical factors influence patient outcomes. The proposed treatment algorithm can be used as a decision aid for the surgeon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Tranexamic acid use in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is an effective and safe adjunct to improve visualization: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Although tranexamic acid (TXA) is being increasingly used in orthopedic arthroplasty and lower-extremity arthroscopic procedures, its use in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is less widely reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of TXA administration in ARCR.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed to compare clinical outcomes in patients who underwent ARCR with or without TXA. Literature was retrieved using the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Embase electronic databases. The primary outcome of this study was visual clarity. Secondary outcomes contained total operative time, postoperative pain score, amount of blood loss, shoulder swelling (change in shoulder circumference), volume of irrigation fluid, number of adjustments of the pump pressure for irrigation, and adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Seven studies (3 and 4 with level I and II evidence, respectively), which included 272 and 265 patients who underwent arthroscopy with and without TXA, respectively, met the eligibility criteria. Pooled analysis showed significant improvements in visual clarity (mean difference, 9.10%; 95% CI, 4.05-14.15; P = .0004) and total operative time (mean difference, -11.24 minute; 95% CI, -19.90 to -2.57) associated with perioperative TXA application. None of the trials reported adverse events and complications associated with TXA.

CONCLUSION

The best available evidence indicates that TXA administration could significantly improve arthroscopic visual clarity and effectively save operative time in ARCR without increasing the incidence of adverse events. Furthermore, the optimal dose, route, and timing of TXA application in ARCR surgery remains to be validated by future high-level evidence studies.

The use of tourniquet is useful in terms of blood loss and soft tissue damage in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective study

Whether a tourniquet should be used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) when the operative field is secured remains controversial. Little is known about the influence of not using a tourniquet on total perioperative blood loss and soft tissue damage. The aim of this study was to compare total perioperative blood loss and soft tissue damage with and without tourniquet use during ACLR. Seventy-seven consecutive ACLRs in 76 patients were performed without tourniquet use at our hospital and enrolled in this study (T- group) between November 2018 and September 2021. The control group (T + group) comprised 55 historical ACLRs in 55 patients performed with tourniquet use at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2018. Total perioperative blood loss, calculated from the change in hemoglobin between that preoperatively and on postoperative day (POD) 1, and indicators of soft tissue damage including serum white blood cell (WBC) counts, creatine phosphokinase (CPK), and C-reactive protein (CRP) values measured on POD 1 and POD 7 were compared between groups. Total blood loss was significantly higher in the T- group (339 ± 216 mL) than in the T + group (258 ± 199 mL; P = 0.030). On POD 1, WBC counts were significantly higher in the T- group (9.7 ± 2.4 × 103 cells/µL) than in the T + group (9.1 ± 2.5 × 103 cells/µL; P = 0.043), CPK levels were significantly higher in the T- group (294 ± 417 U/L) than in the T + group (255 ± 88 U/L; P = 0.046), and CRP levels were also significantly higher in the T- group (1.40 ± 1.12 mg/dL) than in the T + group (0.91 ± 0.76 mg/dL; P = 0.016). No significant differences in WBC counts or CPK or CRP levels were seen between groups on POD 7. Total blood loss and soft tissue damage were significantly increased without tourniquet use during ACLR. No advantage was found for not using a tourniquet in terms of blood loss or soft tissue damage.

Tourniquet-less arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a technical guide & narrative review of the evidence

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often performed with the use of a thigh tourniquet. Surgeons believe this helps improve visualisation and reduce operative time. However, tourniquet use has been associated with many complications including increased pain, neurovascular injury, venous thromboembolism, haematoma formation, and others. In this article, we describe a method allowing comparable arthroscopic visualisation to be achieved without the aid of a tourniquet for ACLR procedures. The literature evidence relating to this technique as well as tourniquet use for ACLR is also reviewed. Tourniquet-less ACLR can be achieved through the combined application of hypotensive anaesthesia, intravenous tranexamic acid, and use of adrenaline-supplemented irrigation fluid and local anaesthetic. Performing ACLR without a tourniquet avoids the risks associated with its use and reduces the severity of post-operative haemarthrosis which may contribute to the patient's pain and limit their ability to perform their rehabilitation exercises.

Tourniquet Use Improves Intraoperative Parameters, Leading to Similar Postoperative Outcomes Compared With No Tourniquet Use in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of tourniquet use in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in terms of: (1) intraoperative visualization with operative time and consumption of sterile saline, and (2) intra- and postoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, swelling, serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, clinical outcomes, and graft healing.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized clinical trial, patients were assigned to tourniquet inflation (tourniquet-up) or tourniquet deflation (tourniquet-down) groups. Primary outcomes were intraoperative visualization with operative time and sterile saline consumption. Secondary outcomes were intra- and postoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, opioid consumption, swelling, serum CPK, Hb concentration, subjective and objective functional scores, and graft healing.

RESULTS

Intraoperative visualization was satisfactory in 100 of 100 cases in the tourniquet-up group and 64 of 100 cases in the tourniquet-down group (P < .05). The mean operative time was 58.4 ± 5.7 minutes in the tourniquet-up group and 72.5 ± 8.6 minutes in the tourniquet-down group (P < .05). The mean sterile saline consumption was 6.4 ± 2.5 L in the tourniquet-up group and 8.7 ± 4.6 L in the tourniquet-down group (P < .05). The respective amounts of estimated intraoperative and postoperative blood loss were 95.3 ± 25.1 mL and 240.3 ± 44.5 mL in the tourniquet-up group and 230.2 ± 22.3 mL and 75.6 ± 15.3 mL in the tourniquet-down group (P < .05). Our results showed no significant difference in postoperative pain, opioid consumption, percentage of patients using opioids, swelling, mean serum CPK and Hb levels, subjective and objective functional scores, or graft healing (P > .05) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Tourniquet use during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction significantly improves intraoperative visualization, shortens operative time, and decreases intraoperative sterile saline consumption and blood loss without serious adverse events or greater complication rates based on early postoperative outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Tourniquet Use During Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The intra-operative use of tourniquet in open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures remains a topic of debate. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing clinical outcomes of patients undergoing ankle ORIF with tourniquet use versus a control group where no tourniquet was used. A systematic review was performed with reference to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines of the Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies were included if they were an RCT comparing tourniquet and no-tourniquet in ankle ORIF. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan, and p-value <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. On completion of the literature search, a total of 4 RCTs including 350 ankles (52.6% males), with a mean age of 47.1 ± 5.7 years were included. There were 173 patients in the tourniquet group (T), versus 177 patients in the no tourniquet control group (NT), with nonsignificant differences between the groups for age, gender and body mass index demographics (all p > .05). There were significantly shorter duration of surgery, with significantly higher patient-reported rates of pain levels at day 2 postoperatively (both p < .001) in the T group. Additionally, there were significantly greater ranges of ankle motion at 6 weeks postoperatively (p = .03), with nonsignificant differences reported incidence of wound infections and deep vein thrombosis (p = .056 and p = .130 respectively) between the groups. In conclusion, current evidence suggests that although intraoperative tourniquet usage in cases of ankle ORIF results in significant reductions in duration of surgery, this may be at the expense of higher patient-reported pain scores and reduced range of motion postoperatively.

The Duration of Thigh Tourniquet Use Associated With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Does Not Produce Cellular-Level Contractile Dysfunction of the Quadriceps Muscle at 3 Weeks After Surgery

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) trauma and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are associated with the loss of strength and function of the muscles that span the knee joint. The underlying mechanism associated with this is not completely understood.

PURPOSE

To determine whether the duration of tourniquet use during ACLR has an effect on knee extensor muscle contractile function and size at the cellular (ie, fiber) level 3 weeks after surgery and at the whole-muscle level at 6 months after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study and case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Study participants sustained an acute, first-time ACL injury. All participants underwent ACLR with the use of a tourniquet placed in a standardized location on the thigh; the tourniquet was inflated (pressure range, 250-275 mm Hg), and the time of tourniquet use during surgery was documented. Participants were evaluated 1 week before surgery (to measure patient function, strength, and subjective outcome with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] and International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score), at 3 weeks after ACLR surgery (to obtain muscle biopsy specimens of the vastus lateralis and assess muscle fiber cross-sectional area, contractile function, and mitochondrial content and morphometry), and at 6 months after ACLR (to evaluate patient function, strength, and subjective outcomes via KOOS and IKDC scores). Data were acquired on both the injured/surgical limb and the contralateral, normal side to facilitate the use of a within-subjects study design. Results are based on additional analysis of data acquired from previous research that had common entry criteria, treatments, and follow-up protocols.

RESULTS

At 3 weeks after ACLR, the duration of tourniquet use at the time of surgery did not explain the variation in single-muscle fiber contractile function or cross-sectional area (myosin heavy chain [MHC] I and II fibers) or subsarcolemmal and intermyofibrillar mitochondrial content or morphometry. At 6 months after ACLR, the duration of tourniquet use was not associated with the peak isometric and isokinetic torque measurements, patient function, or patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The duration of tourniquet use at the time of ACLR surgery did not explain variation in muscle fiber size, contractile function, or mitochondrial content at 3 weeks after surgery or strength of the quadriceps musculature or patient-reported function or quality of life at 6-month follow-up.

Does meniscal repair impact muscle strength following ACL reconstruction?

Purpose: Meniscal lesions are commonly associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Meniscal repair, when possible, is widely accepted as the standard of care. Despite advancements in surgical and rehabilitation techniques, meniscal repair may impact muscle recovery when performed in conjunction with ACL reconstruction. The objective of this study was to explore if meniscal repairs in the context of ACL reconstruction affected muscle recovery compared to isolated ACL reconstruction. Methods: Fifty-nine patients with isolated ACL reconstruction were compared to 35 patients with ACL reconstruction with an associated meniscal repair. All ACL reconstructions were performed using hamstring grafts with screw-interference graft fixation. Isokinetic muscle testing was performed between six and eight months of follow-up. Muscle recovery between both groups was compared. A further subgroup analysis was performed to compare muscle recovery function of gender and meniscal tear location. Tegner scores were assessed at six months’ follow-up. Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding muscle recovery. No difference in muscle recovery was found concerning gender. Lesion of both menisci significantly increased the deficit of hamstrings muscular strength at 60°/s compared to a lesion of one meniscus (26.7% ± 15.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.018) and in eccentric test (32.4% ± 26.2 vs. 18.1% ± 13.5, p = 0.040). No significant differences were found concerning the Tegner score. Conclusion: Meniscal repairs performed during an ACL reconstruction do not impact muscle recovery at 6–8 months post-operatively compared to an isolated ACL reconstruction. However, reparations of both menisci appear to impact hamstring muscle recovery negatively.

Level of evidence: III, Retrospective cohort study

Preoperative Optimization and Tips to Avoiding Surgical Complications Before the Incision

In preparation for surgery, it is important for surgeons to have a detailed discussion with patients about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to surgery. Patient optimization, ensuring the patient is in the best medical condition before surgery, is also an important aspect of patient care that the surgeon must consider. Although complications cannot be eliminated, there are often opportunities to optimize patients, so these risks can be minimized based on current evidence-based medicine. To minimize the risk of complications, the surgeon should take an active role in each step of the patient's care beginning with the history and physical examination, obtaining the correct preoperative labs, and continuing through positioning, draping, and prepping before making an incision.

Knee strength symmetry at 4 months is associated with criteria and rates of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Strength limb symmetry index (LSI) is a useful criterion to help in return-to-sport performance (RTP) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess whether knee extensor and flexor LSI values at 4 months after ACLR are associated with those recommended at 8 months after ACLR for RTP (80%, 85% and 90%) and with successful RTP after 2 years.

METHODS

This was prospective cohort study of 113 participants who underwent primary ACLR. Personal factors such as demographic and sport information, injury and surgery characteristics were collected at 6 weeks after surgery. Isokinetic strength LSI (60°/s) was calculated at 4 months (LSI[4m]) and 8 months (LSI[8m]) for knee extensors (Q-LSI) and flexors (H-LSI). Participants were followed at 2 years after ACLR to determine their self-reported RTP. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine associations between personal factors and LSI at 4 and 8 months. Associations between passing the optimal cut-off thresholds and RTP were tested with chi-square tests and odds ratios (ORs) with effect sizes (ES).

RESULTS

Among the 113 participants (mean age 25.2 [SD 9.7] years; 42% females), extended tourniquet time and lower level of pre-injury sport were associated with lower Q-LSI[4m] and H-LSI[4m]. Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft was associated with lower Q-LSI[4m] and Q-LSI[8m], and older age was associated with lower Q-LSI[4m]. For knee extensors, Q-LSI[4m] >59% was associated with Q-LSI[8m] >80% (OR= 31.50, p <0.001, large ES) and increased odds of successful RTP (60% vs 31%, OR= 3.45, p= 0.003, medium ES). For knee flexors, H-LSI[4m] >72% was associated with H-LSI[8m] >90% (OR= 6.03, p <0.001, large ES) and increased odds of successful RTP (53% vs 23%, OR= 3.76, p= 0.013, small-to-medium ES).

CONCLUSIONS

After primary ACLR, 4-month post-operative strength symmetry was negatively associated with age, pre-injury sport and tourniquet time and bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Four-month post-operative LSI was associated with 8-month post-operative LSI, and Q-LSI[4m] >59% or H-LSI[4m] >72% was associated with increased RTP rates after 2 years. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: : NCT04071912.

Not Using a Tourniquet May Reduce the Incidence of Asymptomatic Deep Venous Thrombosis After ACL Reconstruction: An Observational Study

Background

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism are serious potential complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Little is known about the influence of tourniquet use on the incidence of DVT after ACLR.

Purpose

To compare the incidence of DVT after ACLR with and without the use of a tourniquet.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Between November 2018 and May 2020, a total of 60 consecutive ACLRs in 60 patients, including 7 revision surgeries, were performed without tourniquet use at our hospital and were enrolled in this study (T- group). In addition, 55 consecutive ACLRs in 55 patients, including 10 revision surgeries, were performed with tourniquet use between April 2017 and September 2018 and were enrolled as the control group (T+ group). DVT was diagnosed using ultrasonography of both legs performed preoperatively and at postoperative week 1. The incidence of postoperative DVT was compared between the T- and T+ groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of older age (≥40 vs <40 years) and tourniquet use on the occurrence of DVT.

Results

No DVTs were detected preoperatively. The incidence of postoperative DVT was significantly lower in the T- group compared with the T+ group (1 patient [1.7%] vs 9 patients [16.4%]; P = .005). All patients with DVT were asymptomatic. Although the mean operative time was not significantly different (80.8 minutes in the T+ group vs 78.5 minutes in the T- group; P = .461), the mean blood loss from the drain was significantly lower in the T- group than in the T+ group (149.9 vs 201.9 mL; P < .001). Age ≥40 years and tourniquet use were significantly related to the occurrence of DVT (odds ratio, 8.3 [95% CI, 1.9-36.8]; P = .005; and odds ratio, 8.8 [95% CI, 1.0-75.3]; P = .047, respectively).

Conclusion

ACLRs performed without tourniquet resulted in a significantly lower incidence of DVT after ACLR and significantly less bleeding from drains. If adequate visibility of the surgical field is obtained, ACLR without tourniquet use may reduce the incidence of DVT.

Pain Following Single-bundle versus Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been known to result in better functional outcomes, joint stability, and lower revision rates compared to single-bundle (SB) ACLR. However, given the increased invasiveness and damage to the surrounding tissue area, it is proposed that it may be associated with increased pain. AIM: This review aims to gather all studies and literature that reported pain as an outcome when comparing SB versus DB ACLR. METHODS: Literature searching was conducted across seven search engines for studies reporting pain as an outcome and comparing SB versus DB ACLR. RESULTS: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Overall, the studies show variable findings regarding pain in DB compared to SB ACLR, with the only statistically significant results from two studies indicating that DB ACLR is associated with more pain than SB ACLR. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited evidence available, no conclusions can be made regarding the pain experienced between people receiving either procedure. This constitutes a need for additional studies with increased follow-up time periods, larger sample size, and better study design.

Tips for Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction without the Tourniquet

The arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is a common surgery performed by the orthopedic surgeons willing to restore the knee stability of physically active patients. Despite the fact that it is usually an uneventful procedure, surgeons must always look for better post-operative results; in this scenario, the arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament without a tourniquet is a promising alternative. The aim of the present paper is to share with other orthopedic surgeons around the world our experience with this procedure and some technical tips that may be helpful.

Is a tourniquet necessary in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?: A randomized controlled study protocol

BACKGROUND

In the past few decades, the number of surgery of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) implemented in the outpatient centers has dramatically enhanced. There is still a lack of effective randomized controlled trials in the literature to demonstrate the effectiveness of tourniquets. As a kind of prospective clinical trial, this research protocol is conducted to compare the results of ACLR with and without the use of a tourniquet.

METHODS

All the patients aged 18 or over who underwent the selective primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in our hospital from November 2020 to January 2022 are eligible to take part in our experiment. Exclusion criteria are history of peripheral neuropathy, pregnancy, lumbar radiculopathy, or surgery to the injured or contralateral knee. After the written informed consent is given, the patients participating in the study are randomly assigned to the tourniquet group (group 1) and the tourniquet free group (group 2) on the day of operation, through utilizing the computer-generated random table with 10 members in each group. And the assignments were kept in an opaque and sealed envelope. Any comments on visual difficulties in the process of operative time, arthroscopy, complications, and total bleeding from suction and drainage, as well as the reduction of postoperative hemoglobin are assessed as the parameters. The software of SPSS v. 24 is applied for all the statistical analyses.

RESULTS

This protocol will provide a reliable theoretical basis for the following research.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry6240).

Perioperative and Postoperative Factors Influence Quadriceps Atrophy and Strength After ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background:

Quadriceps dysfunction after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is common and may affect return to sport due to resulting muscle atrophy and muscle weakness.

Purpose:

To systematically review the available literature regarding the impact of perioperative and postoperative interventions on quadriceps atrophy and loss of strength after ACL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed in accordance with the 2009 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Embase. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score to determine consensus scores. Eligible level 1 or level 2 studies included interventions of perioperative nerve block, intraoperative tourniquet use, postoperative nutritional supplementation, and postoperative blood flow restriction training. Additionally, the included studies quantified postoperative quadriceps measurements such as thigh circumference, quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA), isokinetic quadriceps strength, and/or quadriceps electromyographic (EMG) testing.

Results:

In total, 15 studies met stated inclusion and exclusion criteria with the following intervention types: perioperative nerve block (n = 4), intraoperative tourniquet use (n = 5), postoperative nutritional supplementation (n = 3), and postoperative blood flow restriction (n = 3). Intraoperative tourniquet use resulted in decreased thigh circumference and detrimental EMG changes in quadriceps function in 3 of the 5 included studies. Perioperative femoral nerve blocks were associated with transient decreases in postoperative quadriceps strength, persisting up to 6 weeks after surgery, in 2 of the 4 studies. Postoperative blood flow restriction training augmented quadriceps size and function after ACL reconstruction in 2 of 3 studies. Postoperative nutritional supplementation was associated with increased quadriceps volume and strength in 1 of the 3 studies examined.

Conclusion:

The peri- and postoperative factors reviewed here may influence quadriceps atrophy and strength after ACL reconstruction. Our results tentatively indicated that blood flow restriction training may be beneficial to the quadriceps after ACL reconstruction and that intraoperative tourniquet use and nerve block administration may be detrimental; however, the strongest finding was that all of these interventions would benefit from further level 1 and 2 evidence studies, including multicenter, randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up, to definitively determine their impact on return to activity.

Epinephrine in irrigation fluid for visual clarity in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate whether epinephrine in irrigation fluid improves visual clarity in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the surgical outcomes of patients who did and did not receive epinephrine during arthroscopic shoulder surgery. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and Embase for relevant RCTs. We used the Cochrane Collaboration's tool to assess the risk of bias and adopted random-effects model meta-analysis to combine data. We used the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology to evaluate the overall quality of the body of the retrieved evidence. The primary outcome was visual clarity. The secondary outcomes were operative time, amount of irrigation fluid, the need for increased pump pressure, and adverse cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

This study included three RCTs with a total of 238 participants (124 in the epinephrine group and 114 in the non-epinephrine group). The use of epinephrine in irrigation fluid for shoulder arthroscopy achieved better visual clarity (standardized mean difference, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 1.39; p < 0.0001) and less need for increased pump pressure (risk ratio, 0.40; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.64; p = 0.0001) compared to the non-epinephrine group. No significant differences were noted in operative time (mean difference - 5.08; 95% CI - 14.46 to 4.31; p = 0.29) and amount of irrigation fluid (mean difference - 1.04; 95% CI - 2.38 to 0.39; p = 0.12) between the two groups. No adverse events were recorded in any of the included trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence shows that the use of epinephrine in arthroscopic shoulder surgery may improve visualization and does not appear to have any major disadvantages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.