The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study

The influence of lumbar vertebra and cage related factors on cage-endplate contact after lumbar interbody fusion: An in-vitro experimental study

Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) using interbody cages is an established treatment for lumbar degenerative disc disease, but fusion results are known to be affected by risk factors such as bone mineral density (BMD), endplate geometry and cage position. At present, direct measurement of endplate-cage contact variables that affect LIF have not been fully identified. The aim of this study was to use cadaveric experiments to investigate the dependency between BMD, endplate geometry, cage parameters like type, orientation, position, and contact variables like stress and area. One vertebral body specimen from each of the five lumbar positions was harvested from five male donors. The lower half of each vertebra was potted and placed in a material testing machine (Instron 8874). A spinal cage was clamped to the machine then lowered to bring it into contact against the superior endplate. A lockable ball-joint was used to rotate the cage such that its inferior surface was congruent with the local endplate surface. A pressure sensor (Tekscan) was placed between the cage and endplate to record contact area and the peak and average contact pressures. Axial compression of 400 N was performed for five positions using a straight cage, and in one anterior position using a curved cage. The linear mixed model was utilised to perform data analyses for experimental results with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. The results indicated two trends toward significance for contact area, one for volumetric BMD (vBMD) of the vertebra (p = 0.081), and another for predicted contact area (p = 0.057). Peak contact pressure correlated significantly with vBMD (p = 0.041), and there was a trend between average contact pressure and lateral position of cage (p = 0.051). In addition, predicted contact area correlated significantly with cage orientation (p < 0.001). These results indicated that high vBMD of vertebra and a medially positioned cage led to higher contact pressures. Logically, low vBMD of vertebra and transverse cage orientation increased the contact area between the cage and endplate. In conclusion, the study identified significant influence of vBMD of vertebra, cage position and orientation on cage-endplate contact which may help to inform cage selection and design for LIF.

Fabrication and characterization of sodium alginate-silicon nitride-PVA composite biomaterials with damping properties

Silicon nitride is utilized clinically as a bioceramic for spinal fusion cages, owing to its high strength, osteoconductivity, and antibacterial effects. Nevertheless, silicon nitride exhibits suboptimal damping properties, a critical factor in mitigating traumatic bone injuries and fractures. In fact, there is a scarcity of spinal implants that simultaneously demonstrate proficient damping performance and support osteogenesis. In our study, we fabricated a novel sodium alginate-silicon nitride/poly(vinyl alcohol) (SA-SiN/PVA) composite scaffold, enabling enhanced energy absorption and rapid elastic recovery under quasi-static and impact loading scenarios. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that the incorporation of physical and chemical cross-linking significantly improved stiffness and recoverable energy dissipation. Concerning the interaction between cells and materials, our findings suggest that the addition of silicon nitride stimulated osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting Staphylococcus aureus growth. Collectively, the amalgamation of ceramics and tough hydrogels facilitates the development of advanced composites for spinal implants, manifesting superior damping, osteogenic potential, and antibacterial properties. This approach holds broader implications for applications in bone tissue engineering.

Load distribution on intervertebral cages with and without posterior instrumentation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF, TLIF) are well-established procedures for spinal fusion. However, little is known about load sharing between cage, dorsal construct, and biological tissue within the instrumented lumbar spine.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify the forces acting on cages under axial compression force with and without posterior instrumentation.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical cadaveric study.

METHODS

Ten lumbar spinal segments were tested under uniaxial compression using load cell instrumented intervertebral cages. The force was increased in 100N increments to 1000N or a force greater than 500N on one load cell. Each specimen was tested after unilateral PLIF (uPLIF), bilateral PLIF (bPLIF) and TLIF each with/without posterior instrumentation. Dorsal instrumentation was performed with 55N of compression per side.

RESULTS

Cage insertion resulted in median cage preloads of 16N, 29N and 35N for uPLIF, bPLIF, and TLIF. The addition of compressed dorsal instrumentation increased the median preload to 224N, 328N, and 317N, respectively. With posterior instrumentation, the percentage of the external load acting on the intervertebral cage was less than 25% at 100N (uPLIF: 14.2%; bPLIF: 16%; TLIF: 11%), less than 45% at 500N (uPLIF: 31.8%; bPLIF: 41.1%; TLIF: 37.9%) and less than 50% at 1000N (uPLIF: 40.3%; bPLIF: 49.7%; TLIF: 43.4%). Without posterior instrumentation, the percentage of external load on the cages was significantly higher with values above 50% at 100N (uPLIF: 55.6%; bPLIF: 75.5%; TLIF: 66.8%), 500N (uPLIF: 71.7%; bPLIF: 79.2%; TLIF: 65.4%), and 1000N external load (uPLIF: 73%; bPLIF: 80.5%; TLIF: 66.1%). For absolute loads, preloads and external loads must be added together.

CONCLUSIONS

Without posterior instrumentation, the intervertebral cages absorb more than 50% of the axial load and the load distribution is largely independent of the loading amplitude. With posterior instrumentation, the external load acting on the cages is significantly lower and the load distribution becomes load amplitude dependent, with a higher proportion of the load transferred by the cages at high loads. The bPLIF cages tend to absorb more force than the other two cage configurations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Cage instrumentation allows some of the compression force to be transmitted through the cage to the screws below, better distributing and reducing the overall force on the pedicle screws at the end of the construct and on the rods.

Lateral-PLIF for spinal arthrodesis: concept, technique, results, complications, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery represents an effective option to treat degenerative conditions in the lumbar spine. To reduce the drawbacks of the classical technique, we developed a variant, so-called Lateral-PLIF, which we then evaluated through a prospective consecutive series of patients.

METHODS

All adult patients treated at our institute with single or double level Lateral-PLIF for lumbar degenerative disease from January to December 2017 were prospectively collected. Exclusion criteria were patients < 18 years of age, traumatic patients, active infection, or malignancy, as well as unavailability of clinical and/or radiological follow-up data. The technique consists of insert the cages bilaterally through the transition zone between the central canal and the intervertebral foramen, just above the lateral recess. Pre- and postoperative (2 years) questionnaires and phone interviews (4 years) assessed pain and functional outcomes. Data related to the surgical procedure, postoperative complications, and radiological findings (1 year) were collected.

RESULTS

One hundred four patients were selected for the final analysis. The median age was 58 years and primary symptoms were mechanical back pain (100, 96.1%) and/or radicular pain (73, 70.2%). We found a high fusion rate (95%). A statistically significant improvement in functional outcome was also noted (ODI p < 0.001, Roland-Morris score p < 0.001). Walking distance increased from 812 m ± 543 m to 3443 m ± 712 m (p < 0.001). Complications included dural tear (6.7%), infection/wound dehiscence (4.8%), and instrument failure (1.9%) but no neurological deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral-PLIF is a safe and effective technique for lumbar interbody fusion and may be considered for further comparative study validation with other techniques before extensive use to treat lumbar degenerative disease.

The porous cantilever beam as a model for spinal implants: Experimental, analytical and finite element analysis of dynamic properties

Investigation of the dynamic properties of implants is essential to ensure safety and compatibility with the host's natural spinal tissue. This paper presents a simplified model of a cantilever beam to investigate the effects of holes/pores on the structures. Free vibration test is one of the most effective methods to measure the dynamic response of a cantilever beam, such as natural frequency and damping ratio. In this study, the natural frequencies of cantilever beams made of polycarbonate (PC) containing various circular open holes were investigated numerically, analytically, and experimentally. The experimental data confirmed the accuracy of the natural frequencies of the cantilever beam with open holes calculated by finite element and analytical models. In addition, two finite element simulation methods, the dynamic explicit and modal dynamic methods, were applied to determine the damping ratios of cantilever beams with open holes. Finite element analysis accurately simulated the damped vibration behavior of cantilever beams with open holes when known material damping properties were applied. The damping behavior of cantilever beams with random pores was simulated, highlighting a completely different relationship between porosity, natural frequency and damping response. The latter highlights the potential of finite element methods to analyze the dynamic response of arbitrary and complex structures, towards improved implant design.

Safety and efficacy of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of unilateral vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) for lumbar degenerative diseases.

Methods

Electronic databases including PubMed, Web of science, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBSCO were searched by computer. The deadline was set for June 1, 2022. This study included all high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective clinical controlled studies (PRO), and retrospective studies (Retro) that compared unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Revman5.3 software was used for meta-analysis after two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the study.

Results

Fourteen studies with a total of 1,086 patients were included. Compared with BPSF, unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) has shorter operation time and hospital time, and less blood loss and operation cost, operation time [SMD = −1.75, 95% CI (−2.46 to −1.03), P < 0.00001], hospital time [SMD = −1.10, 95% CI (−1.97 to −0.22), P = 0.01], Blood loss [SMD = −1.62, 95% CI (−2.42 to −0.82), P < 0.0001], operation cost [SMD = −14.03, 95% CI (−20.08 to −7.98), P < 0.00001], the ODI after bilateral pedicle screw fixation was lower, and the degree of lumbar dysfunction was lighter, [SMD = 0.19, 95% CI (0.05–0.33), P = 0.007], better fusion effect, fusion rate [RR=0.95, 95% CI (0.91–1.00), P = 0.04]. VAS-Low back pain [SMD = 0.07, 95% CI (−0.07–0.20), P = 0.35], VAS-Leg pain [SMD = 0.18, 95% CI (−0.00–0.36), P = 0.05], SF-36 [SMD = 0.00, 95% CI (−0.30–0.30), P = 1.00], complications rate [RR = 0.94, 95% CI (0.9154–1.63), P = 0.82], the overall difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Currently limited evidence suggests that UPSF significantly reduces blood loss, significantly shortens the operative time and hospital stay, and reduces blood loss and costs. After BPSF, the ODI was lower, the degree of lumbar spine dysfunction was lower, and the fusion rate was significantly higher. The VAS, SF-36, and complications scores of the two groups were comparable, and there was no significant clinical difference.

Finite element modeling of temporal bone graft changes in XLIF: Quantifying biomechanical effects at adjacent levels

Extreme lateral interbody fusion allows for the insertion of a large-footprint interbody cage while maintaining the presence of natural stabilizing ligaments and the facets. It is unclear how the load-distribution mechanisms through these structures alter with temporal changes in the bone graft. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of temporal bone graft changes on load distribution among the cage, graft, and surrounding spinal structures using finite element analysis. Thoracolumbosacral spine computed tomography data from an asymptomatic male subject were segmented into anatomical regions of interest and digitally stitched to generate a surface mesh of the lumbar spine (L1-S1). The interbody cage was inserted into the L4-L5 region during surface meshing. A volumetric mesh was generated and imported into finite element software for pre-processing, running nonlinear static solves, and post-processing. Temporal stiffening was simulated in the graft region with unbonded (Soft Callus, Temporal Stages 1-3, Solid Graft) and bonded (Partial Fusion, Full Fusion) contact. In flexion and extension, cage stress reduced by 20% from the soft callus to solid graft state. Force on the graft was directly related to its stiffness, and load-share between the cage and graft improved with increasing graft stiffness, regardless of whether contact was fused with the endplates. Fused contact between the cage-graft complex and the adjacent endplates shifted load-distribution pathways from the ligaments and facets to the implant, however, these changes did not extend to adjacent levels. These results suggest that once complete fusion is achieved, the existing load paths are seemingly diminished.

TCP/PLGA composite scaffold loaded rapamycin in situ enhances lumbar fusion by regulating osteoblast and osteoclast activity

The purpose of this study was to develop a novel β-tricalcium phosphate (TCP)/poly (D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) composite scaffold loaded with rapamycin that can regulate the activity of osteoblasts and osteoclasts for lumbar fusion. The TCP/PLGA composite scaffold was fabricated by cryogenic three-dimensional printing techniques and then loaded with rapamycin in situ. The structural surface morphology of the composite scaffold was tested with scanning electron microscope. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the composite scaffold in vitro, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were cultured on the TCP/PLGA composite scaffold slide and tested with Live/Dead Viability Kit. The effect of rapamycin on osteoclast and osteoblast was studied with staining and Western blotting. The in vitro results showed that the rapamycin-loaded TCP/PLGA composite scaffold showed good biocompatibility with BMSC and released rapamycin obviously promoted the osteoblast differentiation and mineralization. In vivo study, the TCP/PLGA composite scaffold loaded with rapamycin were implanted in lumbar fusion model and study with micro-computed tomography scanning, hematoxylin-eosin, Masson, and immune-histological staining, to evaluate the effect of rapamycin on bone fusion. The in vivo results demonstrated that rapamycin-loaded TCP/PLGA composite scaffold could enhance bone formation by regulating osteoblast and osteoclast activity, respectively. In this study, the TCP/PLGA composite scaffold loaded with rapamycin was confirmed to provide great compatibility and improved performance in lumbar fusion by regulating osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity and would be a promising composite biomaterial for bone tissue engineering.

Do the positioning variables of the cage contribute to adjacent facet joint degeneration? Radiological and clinical analysis following intervertebral fusion

Background

Compared to other risk factors, adjacent facet joint degeneration (AFD) is the main contributor to adjacent segment disease (ASD). The interbody cage may be a potential indirect risk of AFD. This study investigated the correlations among the lumbar sagittal balance parameters, the inter-body cage's intraoperative positioning variables, and adjacent facet joint degeneration following the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) technique.

Methods

Patients who accepted single-level TLIF for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease and were followed up for at least six months were enrolled in this study. According to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, 93 patients were included (44 males and 49 females). X-ray and computed tomography (CT) images were obtained before and six months after surgery. The vertebral contour and the center of the marker mass in the cage were calculated using a geometric algorithm. Orthopedic surgeons measured the disc height, lordosis angle, and facet joint degeneration. Patient-reported outcomes, including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS), were used to assess the clinical outcomes. The Student’s t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and Chi-square test were used for the statistical analyses.

Results

The average age was 53.7 years old (range, 27–84 years). The average functional disability outcome assessed by the ODI was 61.2, and the average back and leg pain assessed by the VAS was 6.2 and 6.9, respectively. The patients were categorized into a normal group and an abnormal (AFD) group according to whether the facet joint degeneration was aggravated. The abnormal group had a higher back pain VAS score (P=0.031) and lower sagittal vertical position (P=0.027). The other parameters were similar at baseline (P>0.05). The cage’s sagittal vertical position decreased significantly with AFD aggravation (OR, 0.737; 95% CI, 0.561–0.969).

Conclusions

In patients with AFD aggravation, the preoperative VAS and postoperative ODI scores were significantly higher. The cage position parameters were related to AFD. A lower cage center was associated with a greater incidence of AFD.

Is there any advantage of using stand-alone cages? A numerical approach

Background

Segment fusion using interbody cages supplemented with pedicle screw fixation is the most common surgery for the treatment of low back pain. However, there is still much controversy regarding the use of cages in a stand-alone fashion. The goal of this work is to numerically compare the influence that each surgery has on lumbar biomechanics.

Methods

A non-linear FE model of the whole lumbar spine was developed to compare between two types of cages (OLYS and NEOLIF) with and without supplementary fixation. The motion of the whole spine was analysed and the biomechanical environment of the adjacent segments to the operated one was studied. Moreover, the risk of subsidence of the cages was qualitatively evaluated.

Results

A great ROM reduction occurred when supplementary fixation was used. This stiffening increased the stresses at the adjacent levels. It might be hypothesised that the overloading of these segments could be related with the clinically observed adjacent disc degeneration. Meanwhile, the stand-alone cages allowed for a wider movement, and therefore, the influence of the surgery on adjacent discs was much lower. Regarding the risk of subsidence, the contact pressure magnitude was similar for both intervertebral cage designs and near the value of the maximum tolerable pressure of the endplates.

Conclusions

A minimally invasive posterior insertion of an intervertebral cage (OLYS or NEOLIF) was compared using a stand-alone design or adding supplementary fixation. The outcomes of these two techniques were compared, and although stand-alone cage may diminish the risk of disease progression to the adjacent discs, the spinal movement in this case could compromise the vertebral fusion and might present a higher risk of cage subsidence.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12938-019-0684-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

How Does Cage Lordosis Influence Postoperative Segmental Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion

BACKGROUND

Consideration of sagittal alignment is an integral part of spinal fusion surgery correlating with superior outcomes. Segmental lordosis is an important contributor to sagittal alignment. This study assessed surgical factors influencing segmental lordosis in a 360° fusion model, including cage dimensions, anterior longitudinal ligament resection, facetectomy, and posterior compression.

METHODS

Six L3-4 synthetic spinal motion segments were used in a repeated measures design. Each sample was sequentially instrumented with lateral cages of increasing height and angle. Lordosis was assessed from lateral radiographs of intact and each instrumented condition. The effect of anterior longitudinal ligament resection, posterior compression with pedicle screws, and bilateral facetectomy was additionally examined.

RESULTS

A linear relationship between segmental lordosis and cage height was found. This effect was greater with the anterior longitudinal ligament divided. In cages of the same anterior height, increased intrinsic cage lordosis did not result in increased segmental lordosis; cages with no intrinsic lordosis resulted in the highest segmental lordosis. In examining this finding, it was shown that posterior cage height had a larger influence on segmental lordosis. Posterior compression with pedicle screws and bilateral facetectomy increased the segmental lordosis by a further 3.4° and 2.6°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cage height was a key factor, with posterior compression further increasing lordosis. The finding that 0° cages results in the most segmental lordosis was an unexpected finding and highlights the importance of appropriate sizing on resulting lordosis. These findings are relevant to cage selection but require further study prior to applying to clinical practice and may influence future cage design.

Adequate Restoration of Disc Height and Segmental Lordosis by Lumbar Interbody Fusion Decreases Adjacent Segment Degeneration

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effects of lumbar interbody fusion-induced biomechanical changes on the adjacent segments, especially disc height and segmental lordosis restoration, and to provide more information for proper surgical strategy selection.

METHODS

The medical records of 528 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion were retrospectively reviewed, and a total of 89 patients were included. Surgical indications included degenerative spondylolisthesis (nonspondylolytic), marked disc herniation, or lumbar spinal stenosis requiring extensive decompression at L4/5. Postoperative adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) was assessed based on X-rays and functional status. Disc height, foraminal height, segmental lordosis, lumbar lordosis, and cage geometry were compared between the ASD and non-ASD patients. To identify the possible risk factors for radiographic ASD, univariate analysis was performed first, followed by multivariate logistic regression using variables with P < 0.20.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis revealed that the postoperative disc height in the non-ASD group were significantly greater than in the ASD group. The postoperative segmental lordosis in the non-ASD group was significantly greater than that in the ASD group, and the lumbar lordosis in the non-ASD group was also significantly greater than that in the ASD group at the final follow-up visit. Four variables were identified as independent risk factors for ASD by subsequent multivariate logistic regression: postoperative relative disc height of L4/5 (P = 0.011), postoperative segmental lordosis (P = 0.046), lumbar lordosis at the final follow-up visit (P = 0.007), and cage height (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Improved lumbar lordosis is correlated with a lower incidence of ASD, and adequate disc height and segmental lordosis restoration are essential for ASD prevention.

Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, significant progress has been made in the research related to regenerative medicine. At the same time, biomedical implants in orthopedics and dentistry are facing many challenges and posing clinical concerns. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an overview of the clinical applications of current regenerative strategies to the fields of dentistry and orthopedic surgery. The main research question in this review is: What are the major advancement strategies in regenerative medicine that can be used for implant research?

RECENT FINDINGS

The implant surfaces can be modified through patient-specific stem cells and plasma coatings, which may provide methods to improve osseointegration and sustainability of the implant. Overall understanding from the review suggesting that the outcome from the studies could lead to identify optimum solutions for many concerns in biomedical implants and even in drug developments as a long-term solution to orthopedic and dental patients.

Correlation between lumbar intervertebral disc height and lumbar spine sagittal alignment among asymptomatic Asian young adults

BACKGROUND

To investigate the distribution and characteristics of the lumbar intervertebral disc height (IDH) in asymptomatic Asian population and to determine whether the lumbar IDH is related to the lumbar spine sagittal alignment.

METHODS

A cohort of 169 cases of asymptomatic volunteers was enrolled from January 2014 to July 2016. All participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine and panoramic radiography of the spine. Panoramic radiographs of the spine were taken to evaluate pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT) using Surgimap® software. Roussouly classification was utilized to categorize all subjects according to the four subtypes of sagittal alignment. The IDH was measured on the MRI mid-saggital section of the vertebral body. The relationships between lumbar IDH and spine-pelvic parameters were also assessed using the Spearman correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The reference value ranges of IDH in asymptomatic Asian volunteers between L1/2, L2/3, L3/4, L4/5, and L5/S1 were (6.25, 10.99), (6.97, 12.08), (7.42, 13.3), (7.76, 14.57),and (7.11, 13.12) mm, respectively. Based on the above reference value, the high lumbar intervertebral space is defined as more than 14 mm. According to the Roussouly Classification, there are 33 cases in type I, 48 in type II, 66 in type III, and 22 in type IV. According to the definition of the high IDH, there are two cases in type I, three in type II, nine in type III, and eight in type IV. The results indicated that people in the Roussouly III and IV subtypes had greater values for IDH compared to those of Roussouly I and II subtypes, and the spinopelvic parameters were partly correlated with IDH in different subtypes. In addition, levels L4-L5 showed the highest IDH for all four groups followed by the L3-L4 and L5-S1 levels, and the value of L3-L4 is equivalent to that of L5-S1. All type groups showed moderate and positive correlations between the PI and IDH except the level of L1-L2 in type IV.

CONCLUSIONS

The IDH may influence the lumbar spine sagittal alignment in asymptomatic Asian adults. Moreover, pre-operative evaluation of IDH is useful for selection of optimal cage size and reconstruction of spinal alignment.