Management of isolated coronal shear fractures of the humeral capitellum with Herbert screw fixation through anterolateral approach

Clinical Outcomes and Management Strategies for Capitellum and Trochlea Fractures: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Capitellum and trochlea fractures, also referred to as coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus, are infrequent yet challenging intra-articular fractures of the elbow. There are a variety of surgical approaches and fixation methods with often variable outcomes. This systematic review investigates interventions, outcomes and complications of capitellum and trochlea fractures.

Methods

A systematic review of studies published in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health literature (CINAHL) was conducted to assess the clinical outcomes of capitellum and trochlea fractures managed surgically. Data on patient demographics, surgical approach, implant usage, postoperative outcomes and complications were compiled.

Results

Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 700 patients. Surgical interventions primarily utilized either the lateral (79%) or antero-lateral (15%) approaches with headless compression screws as the most common fixation method (68%). Clinical outcomes were measured using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index (MEPI) with a mean score of 89.9 (±2.6) and the DASH score with a mean of 16.9 (±7.3). Elbow range of motion showed a mean flexion of 126.3° (±19.4), extension of 5.71° (±11.8), pronation of 75.23° (±12.2), and supination of 76.6° (±9.8). The mean flexion-extension arc was 113.7° (±16.9), and the mean pronation-supination arc was 165.31° (±9.41). Complications occurred in 19.8% of cases, with re-interventions required in 8.3% of cases, mainly due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness requiring surgical release. Other complications included implant removal (10.4%), overall reported stiff elbows (6%), nerve palsies (2%), non-union (1.5%), and infection (1.2%).

Conclusion

The treatment of capitellum and trochlea fractures yields satisfactory outcomes but has a considerable rate of complications and reoperations primarily due to symptomatic implants and elbow stiffness. There is noteworthy variability in the achieved range of motion, suggesting unpredictable outcomes. Deficits in functionality and range of motion are common after surgery, especially with more complex injury patterns.

Coronal Plane Articular Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Coronal plane articular shear fractures of the distal humerus are a rare injury, comprising 6% of distal humerus fractures. The fracture can be easily missed on initial radiographs; therefore, a high index of suspicion is warranted. Radiographically obvious fractures are often more complex than initially appreciated, with plain radiographs often underestimating the extent of posterior comminution and trochlear involvement. Associated bony and ligamentous injuries are common. Anatomic reduction and internal fixation of displaced fractures is the standard of care because poor results have been described with nonsurgical treatment. However, the regional anatomy and the often-limited bone stock can make open reduction and internal fixation challenging. The lateral approach, with headless compression screws placed from anterior to posterior, is commonly used for simpler fracture patterns, but exposure and fixation of trochlea extension can be difficult. In the absence of posterior comminution, the anterolateral approach can enhance trochlea exposure and allow for a better trajectory for screw placement. Posterior comminution often requires locking plate fixation. Better results and lower complication rates have been reported for fractures with less fragmentation of the articular surface and those without posterior comminution. Contracture and symptomatic implants are the most common reasons for revision surgery.

Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are rare, frequently comminuted, and are without consensus for treatment. The aim of this paper is to review the current concepts on the diagnosis, classification, treatment options, surgical approaches, and complications of capitellar and trochlear fractures. Computed Tomography (CT) scans, along with the Dubberley classification, are extremely helpful in the decision-making process. Most of the fractures necessitate open reduction and internal fixation, although elbow arthroplasty is an option for comminuted fractures in the elderly low-demand patient. Stiffness is the most common complication after fixation, although reoperation is infrequent.

Biomechanical stability of complex coronal plane fracture fixation of the capitellum

INTRODUCTION

Coronal plane fractures of the distal humerus are relatively rare and can be challenging to treat due to their complexity and intra-articular nature. There is no gold standard for surgical management of these complex fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and strength of two different internal fixation techniques for complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum with posterior comminution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen fresh frozen, age- and gender-matched cadaveric elbows were 3D-navigated osteotomized simulating a Dubberley type IIB fracture. Specimens were randomized into one of two treatment groups and stabilized with an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (group antiGP + HCS) or a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate with lateral extension (group PLP). Cyclic testing was performed with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in displacement during 2000 cycles (p = 0.291), stiffness (310 vs. 347 N/mm; p = 0.612) or ultimate load to failure (649 ± 351 vs. 887 ± 187 N; p = 0.140) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterolateral distal humerus locking plate achieves equal biomechanical fixation strength as an anterior antiglide plate with additional anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws for fracture fixation of complex coronal plane fractures of the capitellum. These results support the use of a posterolateral distal humerus locking plate considering the clinical advantages of less invasive surgery and extraarticular metalware.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Biomechanical study.

Coronal Shear Fractures of the Distal Humerus: A Review of Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcomes

Fractures of the capitellum and trochlea are uncommon fractures of the elbow and can be challenging to treat due to their size, location, and articular nature. Because of their intra-articular nature and predilection toward displacement, these fractures are typically treated operatively. Furthermore, capitellum fractures have high rates of associated injuries, including radial head fractures or lateral collateral ligament injury in ~30% to 60% of patients. In addition to open reduction internal fixation, operative options include fragment excision, arthroscopic assisted reduction and fixation, and elbow arthroplasty. In this article, we undertake a comprehensive literature review of capitellum fractures of the distal humerus, in an attempt to summarize the existing body of evidence and propose areas of future study.

Biomechanical stability of simple coronal shear fracture fixation of the capitellum

BACKGROUND

Coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are rare, and their surgical management is challenging, without a defined gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different internal fixation techniques for simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum without posterior comminution.

METHODS

Dubberley type IA fractures of the capitellum were created in 18 cadaveric elbows, which were age and sex matched to the following 3 internal fixation groups: (1) two anteroposterior cannulated headless compression screws (HCSs), (2) two anteroposterior HCSs with an additional anterior antiglide plate (antiGP), and (3) a posterolateral distal humeral locking plate (LP). All fixation techniques were cyclically loaded with 75 N over 2000 cycles and ultimately until construct failure. Data were analyzed for displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure.

RESULTS

Fragment displacement under cyclic loading with 2000 cycles did not show a significant difference (P = .886) between the 3 groups. The HCS group showed the highest stiffness compared with the HCS-antiGP and LP groups (602 N/mm vs. 540 N/mm vs. 462 N/mm, P = .417), without reaching a statistically significant difference. Ultimate load to failure was also not significantly different on comparison of all 3 groups (P = .297).

CONCLUSIONS

Simple coronal shear fractures of the capitellum are biomechanically equally stabilized by HCSs compared with HCSs with an additional antiGP or a posterolateral distal humeral LP. In view of the advantages of less (invasive) metalware, the clinical use of 2 isolated anteroposterior HCSs appears reasonable.

An Unusual Bryan and Morrey Type IV Capitellum Fracture with Posterolateral Rotational Instability: A Case Report

Introduction:

Better understanding of disruption of bony and ligamentous constraints of the radiocapitellar joint in complex capitellum fracture is essential for optimizing the surgical care and outcome. This report highlights the need for modification in surgical fixation technique to address an unusual variant of this rare injury.

Case Report:

We report a three-part capitellum fracture pattern with a Y-shaped split of distal humerus with a sheared anterior fragment and a single, large, non-articular posterolateral fragment in a young male patient. Articular fragment was fixed with two countersunk anterior-distal to posterior-proximal oblique screws. Additional screw was used to fix the posterolateral fragment to prevent posterolateral rotational instability. Mayo elbow performance score was 95 with no rotational instability at 2 years follow-up.

Conclusion:

Additional fixation of posterolateral fragment in this three-part variant of Bryan and Morrey Type IV capitellum fracture ensured rotational stability and good function.

Surgical tips and tricks for coronal shear fractures of the elbow

INTRODUCTION

Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus represent an uncommon lesion and could be burdened by high complications. This complex lesion requires an accurate reduction and surgical fixation for a better outcome. Different techniques have been described, however no standard protocol have been proposed. Purpose of this retrospective study, is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcome with posterior cannulated self-tapping headless screws followed by an early-active-motion protocol and to outline the surgical tips and tricks for different fracture patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2013 to 2019, a consecutive series of 24 patients with coronal shear fracture undergoing ORIF were included in the study. Fractures were classified according to Dubberley's classification. Cannulated self-tapping headless screws were used to fix the fragments. When necessary, additional cannulated half-threaded screws on the lateral edge of the humerus were used, as well as bone chips and fibrin sealant on severe comminution. All patients underwent an assisted early-active-motion rehabilitation protocol. Mean follow-up was 30 months; patients underwent standard X-rays and clinical outcome assessment with range of motion, Broberg and Morrey score and MEPI score.

RESULTS

Surgical fixation with headless screw guaranteed complete healing of all shear fractures examined, no loss of reduction were reported. ROM assessment showed good results with an average arc of 113.1°. Excellent to good Broberg-Morrey and MEPI score were reported. No cases of avascular necrosis nor post-traumatic osteoarthritis resulted in our series. Complications occurred in 16.6% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Coronal shear fracture represents a challenging injury to treat. Anatomical reduction and the use of cannulated self-tapping headless screws from posterior provide a stable fixation, high union rates and good elbow function, with a low cartilage damage and risks of necrosis over 2 years of follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Functional Outcomes of Capitellum Fractures Treated by Open Reduction and Internal Fixation with Herbert Screw: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Introduction:

Based on the complex intra-articular nature of capitellum fractures, it has been sometimes difficult to formulate a universally accepted method of surgical treatment. The purpose of this study is to present the functional outcomes of capitellum fractures after fixation with Herbert screw including the safety and tips of the surgical approach.

Methods:

This descriptive cross-sectional study was done from December 2014 to November 2019. Ethical approval was taken. The study included 22 capitellum fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation with Herbert screws either lateral or anterolateral approach. Functional outcomes were assessed with Mayo elbow performance index scores at the latest follow-up visit. Convenient sampling was done. Data entry was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (version16.0).

Results:

Out of 22 surgeries, the average time to unite the fracture was 11.13±1.20 weeks (range 9 to 15). The mean range of movement for flexion and extension was 138.41±8.22 degree while the mean supination and pronation range was 161.59±6.79 degree. The average time of follow-up in this series was 37.45±9.43 weeks (range 22 to 58 weeks). Similarly, the mean Mayo elbow performance index score at the latest follow-up was 90.22±8.65 (range 70 to 100).

Conclusions:

Careful assessment and radiological evaluation, anatomical reduction, and stable fixation with Herbert screws maintaining the minimal damage to the articular cartilage can maximize the functional outcomes and minimize the incidence of complications.

Capitellum fractures: Treatment with headless screws and outcomes

Objectives

This study aims to present the results of 21 patients with capitellum fractures treated with open reduction and headless screws by a single experienced surgeon.

Patients and methods

Twenty-one patients (13 males, 8 females; mean age 39 years; range, 18 to 63 years) who were admitted to our clinic between June 2011 and January 2018 with the diagnosis of capitellum fracture and followed-up for a mean period of 45 months (range, 12 to 90 months) were included in this retrospective study. The fractures were fixed with headless cannulated screws by a single surgeon.

Results

The mean range of motion was 102° (range, 65° to 140°) during flexion-extension and 165° (range, 130° to 180°) during supination-pronation. The mean preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score was 8.5 (range, 6 to 10), whereas the mean postoperative VAS score was 2.2 (range, 0 to 6). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance score, nine patients were evaluated as excellent, six patients as good, four patients as fair, and two as poor. The mean Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 25.1 (range, 4 to 57). Avascular necrosis developed in three patients (14%) and heterotopic ossification was detected in one patient (4%).

Conclusion

Capitellum fractures are difficult to diagnose and treat, and good results can only be achieved by an accurate diagnosis, careful surgical technique, and stable fixation. Larger and more comprehensive studies are required to establish a generalization and more accurate inferences on this limitedly studied subject.

Functional Outcome of a Coronal Shear Fracture of the Capitellum Managed by Herbert Screw Fixation Using the Anterolateral Surgical Approach

Fractures of the capitellum, particularly coronal shear fractures, are difficult to manage. The challenges are adequate surgical exposure, proper anatomic reduction, and stable fixation of these fractures. Our study included 10 patients with a coronal shear fracture of the capitellum without any involvement of the posterior condyle. All patients underwent open reduction and Herbert screw fixation using the anterolateral approach, with good functional outcome. In our opinion, this is a good option for the treatment of coronal shear fractures of the capitellum.

Comparison of lateral approach versus anterolateral approach with Herbert screw fixation for isolated coronal shear fractures of humeral capitellum

Background

For coronal shear fractures of humeral capitellum, the lateral approach is the most commonly used surgical approach. However, exposure range of the anterior aspect of the distal humerus is inadequate. The anterolateral approach has also been adopted to overcome this disadvantage. However, this approach seems anatomically complex due to the risk of iatrogenic injury to the radial nerve. So far, the optimal approach for the treatment of capitellar shear fractures remains inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to prospectively review and compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of treated with open reduction and Herbert screw internal fixation through the lateral approach or the anterolateral approach.

Methods

Twenty-six patients with isolated capitellar shear fractures were enrolled from January 2013 to December 2017, and randomly assigned to lateral approach group or anterolateral approach group. All the fractures were treated with open reduction and Herbert screw internal fixation through lateral approach or anterolateral approach. Operation time, wound healing complication, elbow joint function, and radiographic evidence were evaluated and compared between two groups.

Results

The operation via the anterolateral approach took significantly shorter time than via lateral approach (p < 0.05). There were no wound healing problems and infection for both groups. One patient from anterolateral approach group sustained incomplete posterior interosseous nerve palsy, which recovered completely in 4 weeks without residual compromise. All fractures healed well in their normal anatomic position as seen on radiographs. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found between two groups with respect to the ROM in supination-pronation, ROM in pronation-supination, loss of flexion-extension motion, or loss of pronation-supination motion (p > 0.05). There is no significant difference with respect to MEPI score of elbow joint between two groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Based on our findings, both lateral approach and anterolateral approach with Herbert screw internal fixation are suitable for coronal shear fractures of capitellum with satisfactory early outcomes. Compared with the lateral approach, the anterolateral approach made the surgical procedure easier and time saving in current series. When the medial aspect of the trochlea is involved for capitellar coronal fractures, the anterolateral lateral approach should be preferred.