Simultaneous multi-slice MR imaging of the hip at 3 T to reduce acquisition times and maintain image quality

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Accelerated Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

With a substantial growth in the use of musculoskeletal MRI, there has been a growing need to improve MRI workflow, and faster imaging has been suggested as one of the solutions for a more efficient examination process. Consequently, there have been considerable advances in accelerated MRI scanning methods. This article aims to review the basic principles and applications of accelerated musculoskeletal MRI techniques including widely used conventional acceleration methods, more advanced deep learning-based techniques, and new approaches to reduce scan time. Specifically, conventional accelerated MRI techniques, including parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and simultaneous multislice imaging, and deep learning-based accelerated MRI techniques, including undersampled MR image reconstruction, super-resolution imaging, artifact correction, and generation of unacquired contrast images, are discussed. Finally, new approaches to reduce scan time, including synthetic MRI, novel sequences, and new coil setups and designs, are also reviewed. We believe that a deep understanding of these fast MRI techniques and proper use of combined acceleration methods will synergistically improve scan time and MRI workflow in daily practice. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction for Accelerating Turbo Spin Echo Hand and Wrist Imaging: A Comparison of Image Quality, Visualization of Anatomy, and Detection of Common Pathologies with Standard Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hand and wrist is a routine MRI examination and takes about 15-20 minutes, which can lead to problems resulting from the relatively long scan time, such as decreased image quality due to motion artifacts and lower patient throughput. The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the hand and wrist regarding image quality, visualization of anatomy, and diagnostic performance concerning common pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients (mean age: 43 ± 19 [19-85] years, 10 men, 11 female) were prospectively enrolled in this study between October 2020 and June 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI protocols: first, standard fully sampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a standard GRAPPA reconstruction (TSES) and second, prospectively undersampled TSE sequences using a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Both protocols were acquired consecutively in one examination. Two experienced MSK-imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence, as well as the delineation of anatomical structures (triangular fibrocartilage complex, tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle, extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, median nerve, cartilage) using a five-point Likert scale and assessed common pathologies. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the sequences.

RESULTS

Overall image quality, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, and diagnostic confidence of TSEDL were rated to be comparable to TSES (p > 0.05). Additionally, TSEDL showed decreased image noise (4.90, median 5, IQR 5-5) compared to TSES (4.52, median 5, IQR 4-5, p < 0.05) and improved edge sharpness (TSEDL: 4.10, median 4, IQR 3.5-5; TSES: 3.57, median 4, IQR 3-4; p < 0.05). Inter- and intrareader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.632-1.000) for the detection of common pathologies. Time of acquisition could be reduced by more than 60% with the protocol using TSEDL.

CONCLUSION

Compared to TSES, TSEDL provided decreased noise and increased edge sharpness, equal image quality, delineation of anatomical structures, detection of pathologies, and diagnostic confidence. Therefore, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for hand and wrist imaging, as it reduces examination time by more than 60%, thus increasing patient comfort and patient throughput.

Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Accelerated 2D Hip MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction Based on a Deep Iterative Hierarchical Network

OBJECTIVES

Hip MRI using standard multiplanar sequences requires long scan times. Accelerating MRI is accompanied by reduced image quality. This study aimed to compare standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with accelerated 2D TSE sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (TSEDL) for routine clinical hip MRI at 1.5 and 3 T in terms of feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective, monocentric study, TSEDL was implemented clinically and evaluated in 14 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing a clinically indicated hip MRI at 1.5 and 3T between October 2020 and May 2021. Each patient underwent two examinations: For the first exam, we used standard sequences with generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSES). For the second exam, we implemented prospectively undersampled TSE sequences with DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists assessed the TSEDL and TSES regarding image quality, artifacts, noise, edge sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using an ordinal five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = moderate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). Both sequences were compared regarding the detection of common pathologies of the hip. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between TSEDL and TSES.

RESULTS

Compared with TSES, TSEDL was rated to be significantly superior in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.020) with significantly reduced noise (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly improved edge sharpness (p = 0.003). No difference was found between TSES and TSEDL concerning the extent of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, or the delineation of anatomical structures (p > 0.05). Example acquisition time reductions for the TSE sequences of 52% at 3 Tesla and 70% at 1.5 Tesla were achieved.

CONCLUSION

TSEDL of the hip is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared with TSES, reducing the acquisition time significantly.

Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated TSE for Improved Spatiotemporal Resolution and Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the utility of simultaneous multislice (SMS) acceleration for routine magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with multiple sclerosis underwent MRN of the sciatic nerve consisting of a standard fat-saturated T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence using integrated parallel acquisition technique (PAT2) acceleration and 2 T2 TSE sequences using a combination of PAT-SMS acceleration (1) to reduce scan time (PAT2-SMS2; SMS-TSE FAST ) and (2) for time neutral increase of in-plane resolution (PAT1-SMS2; SMS-TSE HR ). Acquisition times were 5:29 minutes for the standard T2 TSE, 3:12 minutes for the SMS-TSE FAST , and 5:24 minutes for the SMS-TSE HR . Six qualitative imaging parameters were analyzed by 2 blinded readers using a 5-point Likert scale and T2 nerve lesions were quantified, respectively. Qualitative and quantitative image parameters were compared, and both interrater and intrarater reproducibility were statistically assessed. In addition, signal-to-noise ratio/contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was obtained in healthy controls using the exact same imaging protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients with MS (mean age ± standard deviation, 38.1 ± 11 years) and 10 healthy controls (mean age, 29.1 ± 7 years) were enrolled in this study. CNR analysis was highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.755-0.948) and revealed a significant CNR decrease for the sciatic nerve for both SMS protocols compared with standard T2 TSE (SMS-TSE FAST /SMS-TSE HR , -39%/-55%; P ≤ 0.01). Intrarater and interrater reliability of qualitative image review was good to excellent (κ: 0.672-0.971/0.617-0.883). Compared with the standard T2 TSE sequence, both SMS methods were shown to be superior in reducing pulsatile flow artifacts ( P < 0.01). Ratings for muscle border sharpness, detailed muscle structures, nerve border sharpness, and nerve fascicular structure did not differ significantly between the standard T2 TSE and the SMS-TSE FAST ( P > 0.05) and were significantly better for the SMS-TSE HR than for standard T2 TSE ( P < 0.001). Muscle signal homogeneity was mildly inferior for both SMS-TSE FAST ( P > 0.05) and SMS-TSE HR ( P < 0.001). A significantly higher number of T2 nerve lesions were detected by SMS-TSE HR ( P ≤ 0.01) compared with the standard T2 TSE and SMS-TSE FAST , whereas no significant difference was observed between the standard T2 TSE and SMS-TSE FAST .

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of SMS offers either to substantially reduce acquisition time by over 40% without significantly impeding image quality compared with the standard T2 TSE or to increase in-plane resolution for a high-resolution approach and improved depiction of T2 nerve lesions while keeping acquisition times constant. This addresses the specific needs of MRN by providing different imaging approaches for 2D clinical MRN.

Emerging Technology in Musculoskeletal MRI and CT

This article provides a focused overview of emerging technology in musculoskeletal MRI and CT. These technological advances have primarily focused on decreasing examination times, obtaining higher quality images, providing more convenient and economical imaging alternatives, and improving patient safety through lower radiation doses. New MRI acceleration methods using deep learning and novel reconstruction algorithms can reduce scanning times while maintaining high image quality. New synthetic techniques are now available that provide multiple tissue contrasts from a limited amount of MRI and CT data. Modern low-field-strength MRI scanners can provide a more convenient and economical imaging alternative in clinical practice, while clinical 7.0-T scanners have the potential to maximize image quality. Three-dimensional MRI curved planar reformation and cinematic rendering can provide improved methods for image representation. Photon-counting detector CT can provide lower radiation doses, higher spatial resolution, greater tissue contrast, and reduced noise in comparison with currently used energy-integrating detector CT scanners. Technological advances have also been made in challenging areas of musculoskeletal imaging, including MR neurography, imaging around metal, and dual-energy CT. While the preliminary results of these emerging technologies have been encouraging, whether they result in higher diagnostic performance requires further investigation.

High-Resolution Simultaneous Multi-Slice Accelerated Turbo Spin-Echo Musculoskeletal Imaging: A Head-to-Head Comparison With Routine Turbo Spin-Echo Imaging

Background/Aim: The turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence is widely used for musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging; however, its acquisition speed is limited and can be easily affected by motion artifacts. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of a simultaneous multi-slice TSE (SMS-TSE) sequence can accelerate MSK imaging while maintaining image quality when compared with the routine TSE sequence.

Methods: We prospectively enrolled 71 patients [mean age, 37.43 ± 12.56 (range, 20–67) years], including 37 men and 34 women, to undergo TSE and SMS sequences. The total scanning times for the wrist, ankle and knee joint with routine sequence were 14.92, 13.97, and 13.48 min, respectively. For the SMS-TSE sequence, they were 7.52, 7.20, and 6.87 min. Quantitative parameters, including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were measured. Three experienced MSK imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the image quality of bone texture, cartilage, tendons, ligament, meniscus, and artifact using a 5-point evaluation system, and the diagnostic performance of the SMS-TSE sequences was evaluated.

Results: Compared with the routine TSE sequences, the scanning time was lower by 49.60, 48.46, and 49.04% using SMS-TSE sequences for the wrist, ankle, and knee joints, respectively. For the SNR comparison, the SMS-TSE sequences were significantly higher than the routine TSE sequence for wrist (except for Axial-T2WI-FS), ankle, and knee joint MR imaging (all p < 0.05), but no statistical significance was obtained for the CNR measurement (all p > 0.05, except for Sag-PDWI-FS in ankle joint). For the wrist joint, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 88.24, 100, and 92%. For the ankle joint, they were 100, 75, and 93.33%. For the knee joint, they were 87.50, 85.71, and 87.10%.

Conclusion: The use of the SMS-TSE sequence in the wrist, ankle, and knee joints can significantly reduce the scanning time and show similar image quality when compared with the routine TSE sequence.

Accelerated Breast Diffusion-weighted Imaging Using Multiband Sensitivity Encoding with the CAIPIRINHA Method: Clinical Experience at 3 T

Purpose To examine the clinical value of multiband (MB) sensitivity encoding (SENSE)-accelerated diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for breast imaging by performing quantitative and qualitative comparisons with conventional diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging, or conventional DWI (cDWI). Materials and Methods In this prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03607552), women with breast cancer were recruited from July 2018 to July 2019 to undergo additional MB SENSE DWI during clinical 3-T breast MRI examinations. The cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions were assessed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Regions of interest were defined for tumorous and normal tissue, and the tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal index (SI) were calculated for both DWI methods. Three readers independently reviewed the two acquisitions side by side and provided relative image quality scores. Tumor ADC, CNR, and SI measures were compared between cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions by using a paired t test, and reader preferences were evaluated by using the sign test. Results The study included 38 women (median age, 48 years; range, 28-83 years). Overall agreement was good between cDWI and MB SENSE DWI tumor ADC measures (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.75, 0.94]), and no differences were evident in the ADC (median, 0.93 × 10^-3 mm²/sec vs 0.87 ×10^-3 mm²/sec; P = .50), CNR (2.2 vs 2.3; P = .17), or SI (9.2 vs 9.2; P = .23) measurements. The image quality of cDWI and MB SENSE DWI acquisitions were considered equal for 51% of images (58 of 114), whereas MB SENSE DWI was preferred more often than cDWI (37% [42 of 114] vs 12% [14 of 114]; P < .001). The preference for MB SENSE DWI was most often attributed to better fat suppression. Conclusion MB SENSE can be used to accelerate breast DWI acquisition times without compromising the image quality or the fidelity of quantitative ADC measurements. Keywords: MR-Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Breast, Comparative Studies, Technology Assessment Clinical trial registration no. NCT03607552 © RSNA, 2022.

Feasibility study of using simultaneous multi-slice RESOLVE diffusion weighted imaging to assess parotid gland tumors: comparison with conventional RESOLVE diffusion weighted imaging

Background

To evaluate the feasibility of using simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains (RESOLVE) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess parotid gland tumors, compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI.

Methods

From September 2018 to December 2018, 20 consecutive patients with parotid tumors who underwent MRI scan for pre-surgery evaluation were enrolled. SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI were scanned with matched imaging parameters, respectively. The scan time of two DWI sequences was recorded. Qualitative (anatomical structure differentiation, lesion display, artifact, and overall image quality) and quantitative (apparent diffusion coefficient, ADC; ratio of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR ratio; ratio of contrast-to-noise ratio, CNR ratio) assessments of image quality were performed, and compared between SMS-RESOLVE DWI and conventional RESOLVE DWI by using Paired t-test. Two-sided P value less than 0.05 indicated significant difference.

Results

The scan time was 3 min and 41 s for SMS-RESOLVE DWI, and 5 min and 46 s for conventional RESOLVE DWI. SMS-RESOLVE DWI produced similar qualitative image quality with RESOLVE DWI (anatomical structure differentiation, P = 0.164; lesion display, P = 0.193; artifact, P = 0.330; overall image quality, P = 0.083). Meanwhile, there were no significant difference on ADC_Lesion (P = 0.298), ADC_Masseter (P = 0.122), SNR ratio (P = 0.584) and CNR ratio (P = 0.217) between two DWI sequences.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional RESOLVE DWI, SMS-RESOLVE DWI could provide comparable image quality using markedly reduced scan time. SMS could increase the clinical usability of RESOLVE technique for DWI of parotid gland.