Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study

Lateral to medial fluoroscopic view improves the accuracy of identifying the MPFL femoral footprint using Schottle's technique

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of different fluoroscopy settings on the accuracy of locating Schottle's point during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

The centre of the MPFL femoral footprint was identified and marked on 44 dry femurs. Two standard true lateral knee fluoroscopic images were obtained: (1) medial to lateral (ML) and (2) lateral to medial (LM). The deviation between the anatomically determined MPFL femoral footprint and the fluoroscopically identified point was measured on both fluoroscopic images. An 'acceptable tunnel location' was defined as within a 5- or 7-mm margin of error from the anatomic MPFL footprint. Distal femoral morphometric dimensions were also measured using digital calipers. Statistical analysis determined discrepancies between techniques and their relation to femoral morphometry.

RESULTS

The LM view yielded a significantly smaller distance between the anatomical MPFL footprint and Schottle's point compared to the ML view (3.2 ± 1.5 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 mm, p < 0.001). The LM view achieved acceptable tunnel locations, meeting the 5-mm error criterion in 90.9% of cases, while the ML view achieved 65.9% (p < 0.001). Both views yielded acceptable tunnel locations at similar rates using the 7-mm error criterion (n.s.). The anatomic MPFL footprint was displaced towards the anterior and proximal location in the ML view in reference to the Schottle point. No correlation was observed between any of the morphometric measurements and the deviations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that using the LM fluoroscopic view improves the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement when identifying the MPFL footprint via the Schottle technique. Adopting the LM view in surgical practice will help surgeons locate the anatomical femoral footprint accurately, replicating the native MPFL and enhancing clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, cadaveric study.

Palpation and fluoroscopy are valid but unreliable for the assessment of femoral tunnel position after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of two techniques, palpation and fluoroscopy, for assessing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction femoral tunnel position accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty-one fresh frozen cadaveric knees had an MPFL femoral tunnel drilled and filled with a metal screw. Tunnels were created in a nonstandard fashion to ensure the sample included a range of tunnel positions from poor to ideal. Six experienced sport medicine and arthroscopy surgeons evaluated the placement of the femoral tunnel by palpating the screw in relation to anatomic landmarks and by fluoroscopy related to Schöttle's Point. They evaluated 1) the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, 2) the direction of tunnel error, and 3) the clinical acceptability of the tunnel position. Validity measures included sensitivity, specificity, and correlation to clinical acceptability, which were calculated for the palpation and fluoroscopic assessments. Reliability measures included interrater reliability (ICC 2,k) for femoral tunnel accuracy and percent agreement of the raters' tunnel direction assessment.

RESULTS

The palpation method demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.84 for assessing the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, while the fluoroscopic method showed a sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients for clinical acceptability of tunnel position were high, with both techniques ranging from .589 to .854. Interrater reliability for the palpation and fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of tunnel accuracy were 0.31 and 0.55 (ICC 2,k), respectively. Assessment of the direction of tunnel error was good with the fluoroscopic technique slightly more accurate than palpation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that both palpation and fluoroscopy are valid techniques for assessing femoral tunnel position after MPFL reconstruction. Despite demonstrating good validity, the accuracy of assessing tunnel position was unreliable in a group of six experienced knee surgeons. Further research into MPFL reconstruction femoral tunnel assessment techniques, including patient-specific reference standards, is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Comparison of five different fluoroscopic methods for identifying the MPFL femoral footprint

PURPOSE

The success of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is closely linked to the precise positioning of the femoral tunnel. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly utilized to identify the MPFL footprint. This study aimed to ascertain the most accurate fluoroscopic method among the five previously described methods used to determine the MPFL femoral footprint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 44 well-preserved dry femur bones, the MPFL femoral insertion site was demarcated using anatomical bony landmarks, namely the center of the saddle sulcus between the medial epicondyle, adductor tubercle and gastrocnemius tubercle. Fluoroscopic true lateral knee images were acquired and measurements taken, referencing established methods by Schottle et al., Redfern et al., Wijdicks et al., Barnett et al., and Kaipel et al. The distance between anatomic and fluoroscopic MPFL footprints was then measured on digital fluoroscopic images. The accuracy of the locations was compared using a margin of error of 5 and 7 mm.

RESULTS

The Schottle method consistently emerged superior, showcasing the smallest mean distance (3.2 ± 1.2 mm) between the anatomic and radiographic MPFL footprints and a high in-point detection rate of 90.9% under 5 mm criteria. While the Redfern method displayed perfect accuracy (100%) within the 7 mm criteria, the Schottle method also performed 97.7% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

For intraoperative identification of the MPFL footprint using fluoroscopy, the Schottle method is the most consistent and accurate among the assessed methods. Thus, its accuracy in detecting the MPFL footprint makes it recommended for MPFLR to ensure optimal outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cadaveric study.

MPFL reconstruction with proximal rather than distal femoral tunnel position leads to less favorable short-term results

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) between anatomic femoral tunnel positions: proximal (near adductor tubercle [AT]) and distal (near medial epicondyle [ME]).

HYPOTHESIS

MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position has worse clinical and radiological outcomes than those with the distal femoral tunnel position.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients who underwent isolated MPFLR with proximal or distal femoral tunnels with at least 2 years of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Based on postoperative CT images, 28 patients were classified as group AT and the remaining 27 patients were classified as group ME. The International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, Tegner, Kujala scores, and complications were evaluated. Radiologically, the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI), patellar tilt angle, patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA), patellofemoral cartilage status by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, bone contusion, and MPFL graft signal intensity were evaluated.

RESULTS

All clinical scores significantly improved in both groups (p<0.01). No statistically significant difference was noted between the two groups in regards to their preoperative demographic data, postoperative clinical scores, complications, or radiological findings (CDI, patellar tilt angle, PFOA, bone contusion, and graft signal intensity). The group AT had worse cartilage status on the medial facet of the patella (p=0.02). The ICRS grade for the medial facet of the patella statistically progressed in group AT compared to group ME (p=0.04) as well.

DISCUSSION

Both groups showed significantly improved clinical outcomes. However, for the medial facet of the patella, MPFLR with the proximal femoral tunnel position had worse cartilage status and ICRS grade progression than those with the distal femoral tunnel position.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; retrospective comparative study.

Effect of Lower Extremity Torsion on Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer for Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability

BACKGROUND

Increased femoral torsion (FT) or tibial torsion (TT) has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for recurrent patellofemoral instability. However, the influence of increased FT or TT on the postoperative clinical outcomes of recurrent patellofemoral instability has rarely been investigated.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of increased FT or TT on postoperative results in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability after combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer, along with the influence of other risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Out of 91 patients, the study's analyses included 86 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who were treated with MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer and enrolled between April 2020 and January 2021. FT and TT were assessed using preoperative computed tomography images. According to the torsion value of FT or TT, patients were categorized into 3 groups for each of FT and TT: group A (<20°), group B (20°-30°), and group C (>30°). Patellar height, femoral trochlear dysplasia, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were also assessed. Patient-reported outcome scores (Tegner, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Clinical failure of MPFLR was recorded. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of increased FT or TT on the postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 25 months. At the final follow-up, all functional scores improved significantly. Patella alta, high-grade trochlear dysplasia, and increased TT-TG distance did not have any significant effect on the postoperative functional scores. Regarding FT, subgroup analysis indicated that all functional scores of group C were lower than those of groups A and B except the KOOS knee-related Quality of Life score. For TT, group C had lower scores than group A for all functional outcomes except Tegner and KOOS Quality of Life and lower scores than group B for Kujala, IKDC, KOOS (Symptoms and Sport and Recreation subscales), Tegner, and Lysholm scores. The comparison between group A and group B, whether for FT or TT, revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, increased lower extremity torsion (FT or TT >30°) was associated with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes after combined MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer.

Double-Tunnel Technique Was Similar to Single-Tunnel Technique in Clinical, Imaging and Functional Outcomes for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes of single-tunnel (ST) and double-tunnel (DT) techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients with recurrent patellar instability were randomly divided into 2 groups, receiving either ST or DT MPFL reconstruction. Lateral reticulum release (LRR) and tibial tuberosity (TT) transfer were performed as combined procedures when necessary. Preoperative and postoperative clinical characteristics (symptoms and episodes of redislocation), functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, and KOOS score), and radiological measurements (congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar angle, and lateral patellar translation) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The analysis included data from 90 patients with 48 patients in the ST group and 42 patients in the DT group. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 37.8 (range: 27-50) months in the ST group and 38.6 (range: 25-53) months in the DT group. Forty-three patients in the ST group and 40 patients in the DT group received combined TT transfer, and all patients underwent LRR. At the latest follow-up, 1 patient in ST group experienced redislocation, while no patient in the DT group sustained clinical failure (P = .347). Imaging measurements decreased significantly to the normal range postoperatively. No significant difference was noted between the postoperative radiological results of the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved postoperatively, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups except for the higher Lysholm score (P = .031), KOOS symptoms score (P = .021) and KOOS knee-related quality of life score (P = .043) in the DT group.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques could equally mitigate the patellar lateral translation or redislocation. Our results demonstrate several significant differences in functional outcomes that favored DT MPFL reconstruction but no difference in clinical failure rates and radiological results between ST and DT MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized clinical trial.

Influence of the Fluoroscopy Setting towards the Patient When Identifying the MPFL Insertion Point

(1) The malposition of the femoral tunnel in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction can lead to length changes in the MPFL graft, and an increase in medial peak pressure in the patellofemoral joint. It is the cause of 36% of all MPFL revisions. According to Schöttle et al., the creation of the drill canal should be performed in a strictly lateral radiograph. In this study, it was hypothesized that positioning the image receptor to the knee during intraoperative fluoroscopy would lead to a relevant mispositioning of the femoral tunnel, despite an always adjusted true-lateral view. (2) A total of 10 distal femurs were created from 10 knee CT scans using a 3D printer. First, true-lateral fluoroscopies were taken from lateral to medial at a 25 cm (LM25) distance from the image receptor, then from medial to lateral at a 5 cm (ML5) distance. Using the method from Schöttle, the femoral origin of the MPFL was determined when the femur was positioned distally, proximally, superiorly, and inferiorly to the image receptor. (3) The comparison of the selected MPFL insertion points according to Schöttle et al. revealed that the initial determination of the point in the ML5 view resulted in a distal and posterior shift of the point by 5.3 mm ± 1.2 mm when the point was checked in the LM25 view. In the opposite case, when the MPFL insertion was initially determined in the LM25 view and then redetermined in the ML5 view, there was a shift of 4.8 mm ± 2.2 mm anteriorly and proximally. The further positioning of the femur (distal, proximal, superior, and inferior) showed no relevant influence. (4) For fluoroscopic identification of the femoral MPFL, according to Schöttle et al., attention should be paid to the position of the fluoroscopy in addition to a true-lateral view.

Computed Tomography Imaging Analysis of the MPFL Femoral Footprint Morphology and the Saddle Sulcus: Evaluation of 1094 Knees

Background:

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been reported to be anatomically attached from an osseous saddle region (saddle sulcus) between neighboring landmarks on the femur, including the adductor tubercle (AT), medial epicondyle (ME), and medial gastrocnemius tubercle (MGT). However, the position and prevalence of the saddle sulcus remain unknown.

Purpose:

To study the femoral footprint of MPFL and the prevalence of the saddle sulcus with computed tomography (CT) imaging; quantify the position of the saddle sulcus; and determine the relevant factors of the identified position and measuring distances.

Study Design:

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 1094 knees in 753 patients were studied. Knees were organized into an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) group (controls) and a recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) group. Using 3-dimensionally reconstructed CT images, the authors determined the prevalence of the saddle sulcus and its position relative to the AT, the ME, the Schöttle point (1.3 mm anterior to the distal posterior cortex and 2.5 mm distal to the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle), and the Fujino point (approximately 10 mm distal to the AT). Analysis of covariance was used to adjust for age, sex, side, and body mass index on the measurements.

Results:

There were 555 knees in the control group and 539 knees in the RPD group. The MPFL femoral footprint presented as an oblique, oblong, osseous region (saddle sulcus) in 75.7% of knees (75.0%, ACLR group vs 76.4%, RPD group; P < .001). The saddle sulcus was located a mean of 12.2 mm (95% CI, 12.0-12.4 mm) from a line connecting the apex of the AT to the ME (AT-ME) and a mean of 7.6 mm (95% CI, 7.5-7.8 mm) posteriorly perpendicular to that line. The location as a proportion of the AT-ME distance was 63.1% (95% CI, 62.6%-63.7%) in the X direction and 39.8% (95% CI, 39.1%-40.5%) in the Y direction. The Schöttle and Fujino points lay anterior and proximal to the saddle sulcus more than 5 mm away from the center of the saddle sulcus. Women had a higher prevalence of saddle sulcus (odds ratio [OR], 1.33 [95% CI, 1.00-1.75]; P = .046) compared with men.

Conclusion:

The saddle sulcus was identified in 75.7% of knees from the medial femoral aspect, with its center located consistently between the AT and ME.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Radiographic Reference Points Do Not Ensure Anatomic Femoral Fixation Sites in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Quantified Anatomic Localization Method Based on the Saddle Sulcus

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is one of the main treatments for lateral patellar translation. Based on intraoperative true lateral radiographs, the accepted methods for femoral MPFL tunnel location are potentially inaccurate. Direct assessment of anatomic characteristics during surgery through palpation of the anatomic landmarks involving the saddle sulcus might help eliminate tunnel malposition.

HYPOTHESIS

The saddle sulcus is a reliable osseous landmark where the MPFL attaches for tunnel placement.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 9 fresh-frozen unpaired human cadaveric knees were dissected; MPFL insertion point and relative osseous structures were marked. Three-dimensional images and transformed true lateral radiographs were obtained for analysis; 3 previously reported radiographic reference points for MPFL femoral tunnel placement were determined on all images and compared with the anatomic insertion.

RESULTS

A saddle sulcus consistently existed where the MPFL was attached, located at 11.7 ± 5.9 mm from the apex of the adductor tubercle (AT) to the medial epicondyle (ME), 62.8% of the average distance between the apexes of the AT and ME, and 5.6 ± 2.8 mm perpendicular-posterior to the border connecting the AT and ME. The reported radiographic reference points were located at average distances of 6.2 ± 3.2 mm (Schöttle method), 5.9 ± 2.3 mm (Redfern method), and 7.3 ± 6.6 mm (Fujino method) from the saddle sulcus center on the true lateral radiographs.

CONCLUSION

The saddle sulcus was a reliable landmark where the MPFL was anatomically attached, located approximately 12 mm from the AT to the ME (approximately 60% along a line from the AT to the ME) and 6 mm perpendicular-posterior to the border connecting the apexes of the AT and ME. Additionally, the saddle sulcus position presented variability on the femoral aspect of different knees. All of the average direct distances from the sulcus to the reference radiographic points exceeded 5 mm, and tunnel localizations on a true lateral radiograph were inaccurate.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates the potential precise position of the saddle sulcus, according to the ME and AT, as a reliable anatomic landmark for MPFL femoral tunnel location. Radiographic reference points were not accurate during MPFL reconstruction. Direct palpation of the landmarks might be effective for femoral MPFL tunnel placement.