ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation - a matched pair analysis after one year follow up

Postoperative Strength Differences at Short-Term Follow-Up Vary Based on Autograft Harvest Site After Adolescent Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of adolescent patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with quadriceps tendon (QT) versus hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adolescent patients aged 18 years or younger treated at a single tertiary care children's hospital who underwent primary transphyseal ACLR using QT or HT between January 2018 and December 2019. All patients had minimum 6-month follow-up. Outcomes included isokinetic strength testing, postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, and complications; these were compared between the QT and HT cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 84 patients (44 HT and 40 QT patients) were included. The QT cohort had a higher proportion of male patients (62.5% vs 34.1%, P = .01). At 3 months, HT patients had a lower hamstring-quadriceps (H/Q) strength ratio (60.7 ± 11.0 vs 79.5 ± 18.6, P < .01) and lower Limb Symmetry Index in flexion (85.6 ± 16.1 vs 95.5 ± 15.7, P = .01) whereas QT patients had a lower Limb Symmetry Index in extension (67.3 ± 9.5 vs 77.4 ± 10.7, P < .01). The H/Q ratio at 6 months was lower in HT patients (59.4 ± 11.5 vs 66.2 ± 7.5, P < .01). Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were not different at 3 months or latest follow-up. QT patients had more wound issues (20.0% vs 2.3%, P = .01). Patients receiving HT autograft had more ipsilateral knee injuries (18.2% vs 2.5%, P = .03), but there was no difference in graft failure for ACLR using HT versus QT (9.1% vs 2.5%, P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in patient-reported outcome measures between patients receiving QT autografts and those receiving HT autografts. Patients with QT grafts had more postoperative wound issues but a lower rate of ipsilateral knee complications (graft failure or meniscal tear). Differences in quadriceps and hamstring strength postoperatively compared with the contralateral limb were observed for adolescent ACLR patients receiving QT and HT autografts, respectively. This contributed to higher H/Q ratios seen at 3 and 6 months postoperatively for patients receiving QT autografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic study.

Tape-Reinforced Graft Suturing and Retensioning of Adjustable-Loop Cortical Buttons Improve Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Biomechanics in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical effects of tape-reinforced graft suturing and graft retensioning for all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in a full-construct human cadaveric model.

METHODS

Harvested cadaveric ASTQT grafts were assigned to either (1) double-suspensory adjustable-loop cortical button device (ALD) fixation in which both graft ends were fixed with a suspensory fixation device with (n = 5) or without (n = 5) tape-reinforced suturing or (2) single-suspensory distal tendon fixation in which only the patellar end was fixed with an ALD (n = 5) or fixed-loop cortical button device (FLD) (n = 5). All specimens were prepared using a No. 2 whipstitch technique, and tape-reinforced specimens had an integrated braided tape implant. Graft preparation time was recorded for double-suspensory constructs. Samples were tested on an electromechanical testing machine using a previously published protocol simulating rehabilitative kinematics and loading.

RESULTS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing resulted in greater graft load retention after cycling (11.9% difference, P = .021), less total elongation (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)], 5.57 mm [3.50-7.65 mm] vs 32.14 mm [25.38-38.90 mm]; P < .001), greater ultimate failure stiffness (mean [95% CI], 171.9 N/mm [158.8-185.0 N/mm] vs 119.4 N/mm [108.7-130.0 N/mm]; P < .001), and less graft preparation time (36.4% difference, P < .001) when compared with unreinforced specimens. Retensioned ALD constructs had less cyclic elongation compared with FLD constructs (mean total elongation [95% CI], 7.04 mm [5.47-8.61 mm] vs 12.96 mm [8.67-17.26 mm]; P = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

Tape-reinforced graft suturing improves time-zero ASTQT ACLR construct biomechanics in a cadaveric model with 83% less total elongation, 44% greater stiffness, and reduced preparation time compared with a whipstitched graft without tape reinforcement. ALD fixation improves construct mechanics when compared with FLD fixation as evidenced by 46% less total elongation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tape-reinforced implants and graft retensioning using ALDs improve time-zero ACLR graft construct biomechanics in a time-zero biomechanical model. Clinical studies will be necessary to determine whether these implants improve clinical outcomes including knee laxity and the incidence of graft rupture.

Adverse Events and Complications After Primary ACL Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery with quadriceps tendon (QT) grafts, both with and without a patellar bone plug, have gained popularity in recent years in the primary and revision settings. Postoperative complications occur with the use of QT autografts.

Purpose

To systematically review the incidence of postoperative complications after primary ACLR QT autograft and compare complication rates in patients undergoing all-soft tissue QT grafts versus QT grafts with a patellar bone plug (QTPB).

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A literature search using the 2020 PRISMA guidelines was performed by querying PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from database inception through August 2022. Included were evidence level 1 to 4 human clinical studies in English that reported complications after primary ACLR with QT autograft. The incidence of complications within the included studies was extracted. Differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between ACLR with QT with and without a patellar bone plug were calculated.

Results

A total of 20 studies from 2004 to 2022, comprised of 2381 patients (2389 knees; 68.3% male) with a mean age of 27 years (range, 12-58 years), were identified. The mean follow-up was 28.5 months (range, 6-47 months). The total incidence of complications was 10.3%, with persistent postoperative knee pain being the most common (10.8%). Patients who underwent ACLR with all-soft tissue QT grafts had a 2.7-times increased incidence of anterior knee pain (23.3% vs 8.6%) and reoperations (5.9% vs 3.2%) when compared with QTPB grafts (P < .01 for both). There was no appreciable difference in total complications, graft failures, ACLR revisions, cyclops lesions, or range of motion deficit (P > .05 for all). Patellar fractures occurred exclusively after QTPB (2.2%).

Conclusion

Complications after primary ACLR using QT autograft were recorded in 10.5% of knees, with anterior knee pain being the most common. No difference was reported in the overall incidence of complications with the use of the QT versus QTPB grafts; however, anterior knee pain was 2.7 times greater with use of a soft tissue quadriceps graft.

One-stage anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery after primary failed double-bundle reconstruction: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery after failed double-bundle (DB) reconstruction is a challenging procedure. This study aimed to systematically review the research on ACL revision surgery following failed DB reconstruction, providing an overview on indications, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes and potential pitfalls occurring while performing this therapeutic approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature published from exception to February 2023 was searched in the Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases. Studies in English reporting on patients who underwent ACL revision surgery after prior failed DB reconstruction were considered. Review articles and expert opinion or editorial pieces were excluded. Outcomes of interest included indications and pre-operative planning, surgical technique and associated procedures, type of revision surgery (either one- or two-stage), graft choice, clinical and functional outcomes, rate of complications, failure rate.

RESULTS

Overall, 4 studies met all the inclusion criteria for this review. All were published between 2007 and 2020. The search resulted in two retrospective comparative studies, one case series, and one case report. Average follow-up periods ranged from 24 to 45 months. From these studies, 66 patients (66 knees) were identified. One-stage revision surgery was performed in 64 on 66 patients (97%) with pathologic laxity following DB ACL reconstruction. Most frequently reported outcome was Lysholm score in five studies: average postoperative Lysholm score ranged from 90.5 to 91.0 while Tegner activity level ranged from 5.6 to 7.0. In 4 patients (6%) re-revision surgery was performed due to graft re-rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

One-stage ACL revision surgery following DB ACL reconstruction appears feasible providing satisfying outcomes and limited complications. The literature on this subject is limited and further comparative studies reporting long-term outcomes are needed, as high-level studies on this topic are still lacking.

Various Definitions of Failure Are Used in Studies of Patients Who Underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Purpose

To conduct a literature review to assess the definitions of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure used throughout the orthopaedic literature.

Methods

A systematic search of Embase, Ovid Medline, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science was conducted by a university librarian to identity level I-IV clinical studies on ACLR failure. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients who underwent ACLR and included a definition of failure of ACLR. Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repairs, animal/cadaver studies, review studies, non-English language articles, and non-full text articles were excluded. Failure data were extracted from each study and categorized. Other data that were extracted included follow-up time after ACLR, failure reoperation rate, and failure reoperation procedure. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data.

Results

Out of 2,775 studies, 104 (3.75%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed in this review. The most common definition of ACLR failure included the use of a physical examination, specifically Lachman's test (21/104 [20.2%]), anterior laxity assessment, or a Pivot-Shift test (24/104 [35.2%]) or undergoing or requiring revision ACLR (39/104 [37.5%]). Although some studies used quantitative tests or imaging to help define "failure," others simply defined it as graft rerupture that was otherwise not defined (22/104 [22.5%]). Other common definitions included: the use of imaging (magnetic resonance imaging/radiographs) to confirm graft re-rupture (37/104 [35.6%]), patient-reported outcomes (recurrent instability)/patient reported outcomes measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], Tegner) (18/104 [17.3%]), and the use of an arthrometer (KT-1000/2000, Rollimeter, or Kneelax) (17/104 [16.3%]). The least common definitions included graft failure or rerupture confirmed by arthroscopy (13/104 [12.5%]) and nonrevision surgery (2/104 [1.0%]). The failure rate of this procedure ranged from 0% to 100% depending on the definition of "failure."

Conclusion

In this study, we found that a variety of definitions of failure are used among studies published in the orthopaedic literature. The most common criteria for failure of ACLR were the results of physical examination tests (35%), the need for undergoing a revision ACLR (36%), and the use of imaging to diagnose the failure (34%). About 17% of studies included in this review used patient-reported outcomes, specifically recurrent instability, or PROMs (IKDC, KOOS, Tegner) in their assessment of failure of ACLR. The least used definitions of "failure" of ACLR included nonrevision ACLR surgery (2%). Although some studies used similar tests or categories in their definition of failure, there were a variety of score and grade cutoff points between them.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of Level II-IV studies.

ACL reconstruction provides superior stability than ACL repair in patients with Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations: first results of a 12 month follow-up study

PURPOSE

Acute knee dislocation is a rare but devastating multi-ligamentous knee injury with only limited evidence-based surgical technique recommendations. The aim of this study was a comparison of two different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) restoration techniques as part of an early total surgical care concept: (1) repair of ACL with additional internal bracing (ACLIB) compared to; (2) ACL reconstruction with autograft (ACLR).

METHODS

Retrospective, clinical-study of patients with an acute type III or IV knee dislocation (according to Schenck classification), in which the ACL was treated with ACLIB or ACLR within 12 days. The PCL was sutured and internally braced in all cases. Medial and lateral complex injuries were repaired and additionally laterally augmented by an Arciero reconstruction. After a minimum 12 months follow-up different patient-reported outcome measurements (IKDC, Lysholm, VAS, Tegner Score) and instrumental stability assessment by Rolimeter -test and stress radiographs (Telos™) were analyzed. Groups were compared by t test with p < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 20 patients (5 IIIM, 5 IIIL and 10 IV) were included in this study with an average follow-up of 13.7 ± 2.6 months. There were significant differences in instrumental stability testing (side-to-side difference (SSD) of anterior tibial translation: ACLIB 2.7 ± 1.5 mm vs. ACLR 1.3 ± 1.3; p = 0.0339) and stress radiography (SSD ACL: ACLIB 3.4 ± 2.2 mm vs. ACLR 0.4 ± 2.7; p = 0.0249) between groups. ACLIB group showed greater ROM in terms of flexion (SSD Flexion: ACLIB 7.8 ± 9.9° vs. ACLR 16 ± 7.0°; p = 0.0466; Total Flexion overall 125.5 ± 11.8°). No clinically relevant differences in patient-reported outcome scores (Lysholm Score: ACLIB 82 ± 16.4 vs. ACLR 85 ± 10.4; IKDC subjective score: ACLIB 70.4 ± 17 vs. ACLR 76.6 ± 8.3) were determined.

CONCLUSION

ACLR provides superior translational stability than ACLIB in terms of instrumental testing and stress radiography. Both techniques were equivalent with respect to PROMS and led to good and excellent clinical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study, III.

Older Age, Poor Preoperative Quadriceps Muscle Strength, and Residual Pain as Risk Factors for Poor Quadriceps Muscle Strength Recovery at 1 Year After ACL Reconstruction: A TMDU MAKS Study of 402 Patients

Background

Poor postoperative quadriceps muscle strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) leads to delayed return to sports and lower patient satisfaction.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to examine factors that affect quadriceps muscle strength 1 year after ACLR. It was hypothesized that older age, poor preoperative quadriceps muscle strength, and residual pain would be risk factors for poor quadriceps muscle strength recovery.

Study Design

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were patients from multiple institutions who underwent primary ACLR using autologous hamstring tendon grafts between August 1, 2013, and March 31, 2018, and who had at least 1 year of follow-up data. Patients with past ligamentous injuries in the affected knee, previous injuries or operations in the contralateral knee, accompanying ligament injuries of grade 2 or 3, or inflammatory or other types of osteoarthritis were excluded. Patients were categorized as having muscle strength ≥80% (good strength recovery) or <80% (poor strength recovery) compared with the contralateral leg at 1 year postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the factors influencing postoperative quadriceps muscle strength. In addition, a categorical analysis was conducted based on factors extracted by the multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 402 patients were included. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age at surgery (P = .020), preoperative quadriceps muscle strength (P = .006), and postoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-Pain score (P = .002) were significantly associated with quadriceps muscle strength at 1 year postoperatively. The odds of poor muscle strength recovery according to categorical analysis were 5.0-fold higher for patients aged >40 versus ≤20 years, 4.2-fold higher for those with preoperative quadriceps muscle index <60% versus ≥80%, and 7.7-fold higher for those with a postoperative KOOS-Pain score of <85 versus 100.

Conclusion

Older age, poor preoperative quadriceps muscle strength, and low postoperative KOOS-Pain score were risk factors for poor quadriceps muscle strength 1 year after primary ACLR. Surgical indications, including age, preoperative active rehabilitation, and pain control, should be considered for optimization of postoperative quadriceps muscle strength recovery.

Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications

Postoperative patient satisfaction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) is influenced mainly by the degree of pain, the need for reoperation, and functional performance in daily activities and sports. Graft choice has shown to have an influence on postoperative outcomes after ACL-R. While patient reported outcomes measurements do not differ between graft options, evidence shows that normal knee kinematics is not fully restored after ACL-R with an increase in postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT). Postoperative graft rupture rates seem to favor bone-patella-tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts over HT or allografts. While return to sports rates seem comparable between different graft types, postoperative extensor strength is reduced in patients with BPTB and QT whereas flexion strength is weakened in patients with HT. Postoperative donor site morbidity is highest in BPTB but comparable between HT and QT. With all graft options having advantages and drawbacks, graft choice must be individualized and chosen in accordance with the patient.

Less than 1% risk of donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture post-ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to develop a comprehensive complications profile for quadriceps tendon-autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT ACL-R).

METHODS

A traditional and grey literature search was conducted in accordance with PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and many grey literature sources were searched from inception to May 29, 2022. All studies were searched and screened in duplicate with included studies being of all levels of evidence, reporting complications, and with patients of all ages undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft in the last 15 years. Studies were excluded if they had cadaveric or animal subjects or were reviews. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using MINORS criteria for non-randomised studies and Cochrane's RoB 2.0 for randomised studies. Data were summarised with weighted event rates generated under a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies (5315 reconstructions) were included: 32 used quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT), 19 used all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT), and four did not report the QT graft subtype used. Included patients had an age range of 6.2-58 years and an average reported follow-up time of 28.1 months (range, 6-90 months) for non-randomised studies and 34.3 months (range, 0.233-120 months) for randomised studies. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant major complications included contralateral ACL injury at 6.0%, postoperative meniscal issues at 5.4%, cyclops lesions at 4.8%, graft failure at 4.1%, patellar fracture at 2.2%, hardware removal at 1.7%, infection at 1.5%, and donor-site quadriceps tendon rupture at 0.7%. Pooled incidence rates for clinically relevant minor complications included anterior knee pain at 9.7%, kneeling pain at 9.5%, sensation deficits at 4.4%, loss of extension at 4.2%, donor-site tendinopathy at 3.9%, cosmetic issues at 1.8%, and hematoma at 1.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

QT ACL-R resembles other graft types in its rates and types of postoperative complications. In this exploratory systematic review, no complications of QT ACL-R were found to be disproportionately represented in the literature. This graft type should remain an option with comparable complication rates to other graft choices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

REGISTRATION

This study was preregistered under PROSPERO with preregistration code CRD42022302078.

Re-rupture rate and the post-surgical meniscal injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique in comparison to the interference screw technique: a retrospective analysis of 200 patients with at least 3 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus regarding the preferred surgical procedure for the reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The interference screw technique is widely used, but has been associated with a risk of graft damage. The Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique is one of the alternatives for biological ACL-reconstruction with minimal implant requirements. The hypothesis of this retrospective analysis is, that the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique leads to better results with respect to re-rupture rate and secondary meniscal lesion than the interference-screw-technique.

METHODS

To compare the re-rupture rate of the interference-screw-technique (IF) used until 2015 with the currently used Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique (PFH), the last 100 patients of the IF-group and the first 100 patients of the PFH-group were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcomes were re-rupture rate, complications and secondary meniscal injury. Additionally, laxity, Lachman and Pivot-shift and range of motion were evaluated.

RESULTS

A mean follow-up of 4.2 and 5.3 years revealed 4% and 9% re-rupture rates and 1% and 2% complication rates in the PFH- and IF-group, respectively. In the PFH-group there were no re-ruptures in patients older than 23 years. Secondary meniscal injury post-surgery was 6% and 9% for the PFH and IF-group, respectively. Knee stability was similar in both groups. Range of motion was significantly better in the PFH-group, with 136° of flexion, 6 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

For ACL-reconstruction the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique is an alternative new method. Low level of secondary meniscal lesions after surgery and high stability, is known to prevent later arthrosis of the knee. The encouraging observed trend of the reduction of the re-rupture rate in revision surgery and in young patients using the Press-Fit-Hybrid®-technique in comparison to the interference-screw-technique must be confirmed with further studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III, retrospective cohort study.

GRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

Objective

This study proposes to systematically review the literature and compare data on (1) function, (2) pain, (3) return to sport, and (4) complications after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft (QT) and hamstring tendon autograft (HT).

Methods

In June 2021, a systematic review of the EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS databases was performed, based on PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy included the keywords: "Previous Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction," "ACL reconstruction," "quadriceps tendon autograft," "quadriceps graft," "Hamstring-Tendon Autografts." Meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager software (RevMan Web).

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding function according to Lysholm score (MD 3.01; CI-0.30, 6.33, p = 0.08), the presence of pain (RR 0.89; CI-0.57, 1.39, p = 0.60), and re-rupture (RR 0.60; IC-0.19, 1.88, p = 0.38).

Conclusion

QT and HT autografts show comparatively good results in ACL reconstruction without significant differences regarding function, pain, and rupture after surgical intervention. Level of Evidence II, Systematic Review of Level II Studies.

Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Autograft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains controversial, with increasing interest in the usage of quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft versus traditional hamstring tendon (HT) use. The current study undertakes an in-depth review and comparison of the clinical and functional outcomes of QT and HT autografts in ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

The QT autograft is equivalent to the HT autograft and there will be little or no significant difference in the outcomes between these 2 autografts.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were systematically searched from their inception until November 2020. All observational studies comparing ACLR QT and HT autografts were assessed for their methodological quality. Patient outcomes were compared according to patient-reported outcome measures (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Cincinnati, Lysholm, Tegner, and visual analog scale [VAS] measures), knee extensor and flexor torque limb symmetry indices (LSIs), hamstring to quadriceps (H/Q) ratios, functional hop capacity, knee laxity, ipsilateral graft failure, and contralateral injury.

RESULTS

A total of 20 observational studies comprising 28,621 patients (QT = 2550; HT = 26,071) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. In comparison with patients who received an HT autograft, those who received a QT autograft had similar postoperative Lysholm (mean difference [MD], 0.67; P = .630), IKDC (MD, 0.48; P = .480), VAS pain (MD, 0.04; P = .710), and Cincinnati (MD, -0.85; P = .660) scores; LSI for knee flexor strength (MD, 6.06; P = .120); H/Q ratio (MD, 3.22; P = .160); hop test LSI (MD, -1.62; P = .230); pivot-shift test grade 0 (odds ratio [OR], 0.80; P = .180); Lachman test grade 0 (OR, 2.38; P = .320), side-to-side laxity (MD, 0.09; P = .650); incidence of graft failure (OR, 1.07; P = .830) or contralateral knee injury (OR, 1.22; P = .610); and Tegner scores (MD, 0.11; P = .060). HT autografts were associated with a higher (better) side-to-side LSI for knee extensor strength (MD, -6.31; P = .0002).

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis, the use of the QT autograft was equivalent to the HT autograft in ACLR, with comparable graft failure and clinical and functional outcomes observed. However, HT autografts were associated with better LSI knee extensor strength.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction show comparable clinical, functional, and patient-reported outcome measures, but lower donor-site morbidity compared with hamstring tendon autograft: A matched-pairs study with a mean follow-up of 6.5 ​years

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and functional outcomes of patients after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using quadriceps tendon- (QT-A) and hamstring tendon (HT-A) autograft with a minimum follow-up (FU) of 5 years.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2014, all patients undergoing ACLR were recorded in a prospectively administered database. All patients with primary, isolated QT-A ACLR and without any concomitant injuries or high grade of osteoarthritis were extracted from the database and matched to patients treated with HT-A. Re-rupture rates, anterior-posterior (ap) knee laxity, single-leg hop test (SLHT) performance, distal thigh circumference (DTC) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were recorded. Between group comparisons were performed using chi-square-, independent-samples T- or Mann-Whitney-U tests.

RESULTS

45 QT-A patients were matched to 45 HT-A patients (n ​= ​90). The mean FU was 78.9 ​± ​13.6 months. 18 patients (20.0%/QT-A: N ​= ​8, 17.8%; HT-A: n ​= ​10, 22.2%; p ​= ​.60) sustained a graft rupture and 17 subjects (18.9%/QT-A: n ​= ​9, 20.0%; HT-A: n ​= ​8, 17.8%; p ​= ​.79) suffered a contralateral ACL injury. In high active patients (Tegner activity level ≥ 7) rerupture rates increased to 37.5% (HT-A) and 22.2% (QT-A; p ​= ​.32), respectively. Patients with graft failure did not differ between both groups in terms of mean age at surgery (QT-A: 26.5 ​± ​11.6 years, HT-A: 23.3 ​± ​9.5 years, p ​= ​.63) or graft thickness (mean graft square area: QT-A: 43.6 ​± ​4.7 mm², HT-A: 48.1 ​± ​7.9 mm², p ​= ​.27). No statistical between-group differences were found in ap knee laxity side-to-side (SSD) measurements (QT-A: 1.9 ​± ​1.2 ​mm, HT-A: 2.1 ​± ​1.5 ​mm; p ​= ​.60), subjective IKDC- (QT-A: 93.8 ​± ​6.8, HT-A: 91.2 ​± ​7.8, p ​= ​.17), Lysholm- (QT-A 91.9 ​± ​7.2, HT-A: 91.5 ​± ​9.7, p ​= ​.75) or any of the five subscales of the KOOS score (all p ​> ​.05). Furthermore, Tegner activity level (QT-A: 6(1.5), HT-A: 6(2), p ​= ​.62), VAS for pain (QT-A: 0.5 ​± ​0.9, HT-A: 0.6 ​± ​1.0, p ​= ​.64), Shelbourne-Trumper score (QT-A: 96.5 ​± ​5.6, HT-A: 95.2 ​± ​8.2, p ​= ​.50), Patient and Observer Scar -Assessment scale (POSAS) (QT-A: 9.4 ​± ​3.2, HT-A: 10.7 ​± ​4.9, p ​= ​.24), SSD-DTC (QT-A: 0.5 ​± ​0.5, HT.- A: 0.5 ​± ​0.6, p ​= ​.97), return to sports rates (QT-A: 82.1%, HT-A: 86.7%) and SLHT (QT -A: 95.9 ​± ​3.8%, HT-A: 93.7 ​± ​7.0%) did not differ between groups. Donor-site morbidity (HT-A n ​= ​14, 46.7%; QT-A n ​= ​3, 11.5%; p ​= ​.008) was statistically significantly lower in the QT-A group. Five patients (11.1%) of the HT-group and three patients (6.7%) in the QT-group required revision surgery (p ​= ​.29).

CONCLUSION

Patient-reported outcome measures, knee laxity, functional testing results and re-rupture rates are similar between patients treated with QT- and HT- autografts. However, patients with QT-autograft have a smaller tibial postoperative scar length and lower postoperative donor-site morbidity. There is a tendency towards higher graft rupture rates in highly active patients treated with HT autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable.

HYPOTHESIS

Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies.

CONCLUSION

The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.

Novel press-fit technique of patellar bone plug in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is comparable to interference screw fixation

PURPOSE

Conventional press-fit technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is performed with extraction drilling of the femoral bone tunnel and manual shaping of the patellar bone plug. However, the disadvantages of this technique include variation in bone plug size and, thus, the strength of the press-fit fixation, bone loss with debris distribution within the knee joint, potential heat necrosis, and metal wear debris due to abrasion of the guide wire. To overcome these disadvantages, a novel technique involving punching of the femoral bone tunnel and standardized compression of the bone plug was introduced. In this study, the fixation strength and apparent stiffness were tested and compared to that of the gold-standard interference screw fixation technique in three flexion angle configurations (0°/45°/90°) in a porcine model. We hypothesized that the newly developed standardized press fit fixation would not be inferior to the gold standard method.

METHODS

Sixty skeletally mature porcine knees (30 pairs) were used. Full-thickness central third patellar tendon strips were harvested, including a patellar bone cylinder of 9.5 mm in diameter. The specimens were randomly assigned to 10 pairs per loading angle (0°, 45°, 90°). One side of each pair was prepared with the press-fit technique, and the contra-lateral side was prepared with interference screw fixation. Equivalent numbers of left- and right-sided samples were used for both fixation systems. A three-way multifactor ANOVA was carried out to check for the influence of (a) fixation type, (b) flexion angle, and (c) side of the bone pair.

RESULTS

The primary fixation strength of femoral press-fit graft fixation with punched tunnels and standardized bone plug compression did not differ significantly from that of interference screw fixation (p = 0.51), which had mean loads to failure of 422.4 ± 134.6 N and 445.4 ± 135.8 N, respectively. The flexion angle had a significant influence on the maximal load to failure (p = 0.01). Load values were highest in 45° flexion for both fixations. The anatomical side R/L was not a statistically significant factor (p = 0.79).

CONCLUSION

The primary fixation strength of femoral press-fit graft fixation with punched femoral tunnels and standardized bone plug compression is equivalent to that of interference screw fixation in a porcine model. Therefore, the procedure represents an effective method for ACL reconstruction with patellar or quadriceps tendon autografts including a patellar bone plug.

Quadriceps Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Postoperative Rehabilitation and Complication Profiles

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study are to explore current elements for postoperative rehabilitation protocol after quadriceps tendon-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (QT-ACLR), outline general timelines for progression of those elements, and explore their associated complication rates and profiles.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, 5 online databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and PubMed) were searched and screened in duplicate using predetermined criteria for studies on the aforementioned patient population. Descriptive statistics are presented.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies were included, with 31 studies using quadriceps tendon with bone block (B-QT) and 26 studies using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (S-QT). The majority of studies permitted full weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) within the first 12 postoperative weeks, and motion-controlled braces within 6 weeks. Isometric exercises were initiated within 1 week after surgery, closed-chain exercises within 12 weeks, and open-chain and sports-specific exercises within 36 weeks. Complication profiles were similar between graft types and included graft failure (1.2%-1.6%), cyclops syndrome (0.4%-0.7%), and persistent stiffness (0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current postoperative rehabilitation strategies in ACLR with QT offer a complication profile comparable to those reported with other graft types. Based on the included rehabilitation regimen, these protocols should focus on early ROM, specifically on achieving full extension, alongside isometric quadriceps strengthening. Progression to closed- and open-chain exercises should follow in a progressive manner, similar to existing protocols in ACLR. Adjuncts such as motion-controlled bracing and continuous passive motion machines may be used if graft protection is prioritized. This review highlights the need for comparison of defined protocols against one another in the setting of QT-ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation

PURPOSE

To contribute to future quadriceps tendon harvest and fixation guidelines in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by comparing 2-year patient-reported subjective knee outcome scores and incidence of graft-related complications between the shorter harvest all-inside tibial-femoral suspensory fixation (TFSF) approach versus the longer harvest standard tibial interference screw fixation technique.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft from January 2017 to May 2019 were identified for inclusion. Patients were matched into 2 cohorts of 62 based on reconstruction technique. All patients completed baseline and minimum 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner Activity Level, and Lysholm questionnaires and were queried regarding subsequent procedures and complications to the operative knee.

RESULTS

Average graft length for the all-inside TFSF was 69.55 (95% confidence interval 68.99-70.19) mm versus 79.27 (95% confidence interval 77.21-81.34) mm in the tibial screw fixation cohort (P = .00001). Two-year Lysholm scores were greater in the TFSF cohort (P = .04) but were not clinically significant. There was no difference in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .09) or Tegner (P = .69) scores between cohorts, but more patients in the TFSF cohort returned to or exceeded their baseline activity level compared with the tibial screw fixation cohort (73% vs 61%, P = .25). Seven patients in the TFSF cohort versus 13 in the tibial screw fixation cohort reported anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty (P = .22). There were no differences in reported complications.

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside soft-tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with TFSF resulted in clinically comparable subjective outcome scores at 2 years to tibial screw fixation. There were also no differences in complications or reports of anterior knee pain or kneeling difficulty. All-inside TFSF can be a viable alternative to tibial screw fixation for all-soft tissue quadriceps autograft.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, comparative therapeutic trial.

Comparing the Stiffness of Peroneus Longus Tendon Versus Hamstrings in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

Background: The use of autografts originating from either hamstring tendons or peroneus longus tendons is a surgical option in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Objectives: This research aimed to compare the tensile strength between the hamstring tendon and the peroneus longus tendon in ACL reconstruction. The hypothesis of this study was: Peroneus longus grafts have tensile strength equal to hamstring grafts based on living donor patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study was a biomechanical study examining means and standard deviations (SD) by comparing the tensile strength of peroneus longus tendons and hamstring tendons when used as autograft donors in ACL reconstruction. Results: In this study, 51 patients with reconstructive ACL were enrolled. The mean diameter of the hamstring tendon was 7.86 with SD ± 0.69, while the mean diameter of peroneus longus tendon was 7.67 with SD ± 0.63. The mean diameter of the peroneus longus graft was not significantly different. The mean displacement on the hamstring tendon was 2.44 with SD ± 0.42, while the peroneus longus tendon was 2.06 with SD ± 0.14. The peroneus longus tendon had significantly more tensile strength compared to the hamstring tendon. Conclusions: Diameter of the peroneus longus graft was not significantly different from the hamstring graft. However, the peroneus longus graft had more tensile strength than the hamstring graft based on living donor patients.

Quadricep ACL Reconstruction Techniques and Outcomes: an Updated Scoping Review of the Quadricep Tendon

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the most recent literature examining techniques and outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) which will enable surgeons to make well informed evidence-based decisions when choosing a particular graft option and technique in ACL reconstruction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several RCTs and systematic reviews have been published recently on this topic, and overall, there were no differences found between the QT, HT, and BPTB groups in patient-reported outcomes, stability testing, or graft re-rupture rates. In terms of strength testing, the QT group did have inferior knee extensor strength on isokinetic testing when compared to the HT group, whereas the HT group had inferior knee flexor strength compared to the QT group. No differences were found on strength testing between the QT and BPTB groups. Currently, two large RCTs, the Stability2 and SQuASH trials, are ongoing examining the effectiveness of the QT vs BPTB with or without LET and QT vs HT in the pediatric population which will help shed further light on the effectiveness of the QT as a graft choice in ACL reconstruction. The findings of this scoping review demonstrate that the QT is an excellent graft option in ACL reconstruction both in the primary and revision settings, among adult and pediatric populations. This review provides surgeons with further assurance when selecting QT autograft in ACL reconstruction.

Graft Failure, Revision ACLR, and Reoperation Rates After ACLR With Quadriceps Tendon Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts: A Registry Study With Review of 475 Patients

BACKGROUND

It has been indicated that anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft has a higher risk of revision compared with ACLR performed with a hamstring tendon (HT) graft.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

To investigate whether ACLR with QT graft had a higher risk of graft failure, revision ACLR, or reoperation compared with HT graft in a high-volume center. We hypothesized that there would be no between-group differences.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This was a registry study with review of medical records. Our study cohort consisted of patients who underwent primary ACLR with either QT or HT graft performed at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre between January 2015 and December 2018. The cohort was identified from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry and linked to the Danish National Patient Registry to identify all hospital contacts after ACLR. The outcome variables were graft failure (rerupture or >3-mm side-to-side difference in anteroposterior [AP] laxity), revision ACLR, reoperation due to cyclops lesion, reoperation due to meniscal injury, and reoperation due to any reason. AP laxity and pivot shift were assessed at 1 year. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to evaluate the rates of events at 2 years, and comparison was performed with Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 475 patients (252 HT, 223 QT) were included. The rate of graft failure at 2 years was 9.4% for the QT group and 11.1% for the HT group (P = .46). For the QT and HT groups, respectively, the rate of revision ACLR was 2.3% and 1.6% (P = .60), the rate of reoperation due to cyclops lesion was 5.0% and 2.4% (P = .13), and the rate of reoperation due to meniscal injury was 4.3% and 7.1% (P = .16). The rate of reoperation due to any reason was 20.5% and 23.6% (P = .37). At 1-year follow-up, AP laxity was 1.4 mm for QT and 1.5 mm for HT (P = .51), and the proportion of patients with a positive pivot shift was 29-30% for both groups.

CONCLUSION

QT and HT grafts yielded similar rates of graft failure, revision ACLR, and reoperation at 2 years of follow-up after ACLR. Graft failure was found in 9% to 11% of patients. Patients with QT ACLR showed a non-statistically significant trend of higher risk for reoperation due to cyclops lesion, and those with HT showed a non-statistically significant trend of higher risk for reoperation due to meniscal injury.

Press-fit fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yields low graft failure and revision rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Press-fit fixation is a hardware-free technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose of this review was to quantitatively assess the risk profile and outcomes of press-fit fixation and provide an update on its effectiveness compared to more standard fixation techniques of ACLR.

METHODS

The electronic databases PUBMED, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched on March 26, 2020 for therapeutic randomized controlled trials (RCT) addressing press-fit fixation for primary ACLR. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation tool was used to assess the quality for randomized studies. A meta-analysis with a random-effects model was used to pool applicable outcomes data.

RESULTS

A total of six eligible RCTs were included in this review. There were 292 patients (72.9% male) with a mean age of 28.8 ± 3.8 years and a mean follow-up of 81.3 ± 88.3 months that underwent press-fit ACLR on the femoral, tibial or both tunnels. Femoral fixation techniques included press-fit fixation (96.6%) and cross-pin fixation (3.4%). Tibial fixation techniques included press-fit (37.0%), staples (28.1%), interference screws (21.2%) and abarticular post-screws (13.7%). Graft options included bone-patellar tend--bone autografts (73.6%) and semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autograft (26.4%). Significant improvements (p < 0.05) from baseline to follow-up were found for clinical outcomes. Significantly less postoperative bone tunnel enlargement (p < 0.05) was found with tibial press-fit fixation when compared to biodegradable screws. The overall complication rate was 13.3%. There were no significant differences in complication rates [odds ratio = 0.84 (95%CI 0.43-1.66); p = n.s.] (I² = 0%) between patients undergoing femoral press-fit fixation and femoral metal interference screw fixation.

CONCLUSION

The overall graft failure and revision rates with press-fit ACLR were low. There were no significant differences in complication rates between patients undergoing femoral press-fit and femoral metal interference screw fixation. Included studies found that patients undergoing press-fit fixation for ACLR had significant improvements in functional outcome scores postoperatively and had significantly reduced postoperative bone tunnel enlargement compared to patients undergoing bioabsorbable fixation. Thus, early evidence suggests that press-fit fixation appears to be a good option for patients undergoing ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Minimally invasive harvesting of the quadriceps tendon: Technical note

The quadriceps tendon is gaining preference as an autograft over conventional grafts for the primary reconstruction of the anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments and of the medial patello-femoral ligament. In the past, the use of the quadriceps tendon was associated with considerable morbidity and less favourable outcomes compared to other grafts, specifically due to post-operative weakness of the quadriceps and other complications such as patellar fracture and rupture of the extensor apparatus. These problems are partially ascribable to the graft harvesting method used (large incision, bone block>2cm, and full-thickness tendon harvesting). Recent technical advancements have made reproducible harvesting of quadriceps grafts possible, thereby largely preventing the complications. In this study we describe an original quadriceps tendon harvesting technique in which a minimally invasive approach allows the collection of a sufficiently long graft, while sparing the deep layer of the quadriceps tendon. This technique decreases intra-operative morbidity and improves the post-operative outcomes.

Lower incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon compared to hamstring tendons

PURPOSE

To determine and compare the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis following revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) with autologous quadriceps tendon (with patellar bone block) compared to autologous hamstring tendons (semitendinosus and gracilis).

METHODS

A total of 1638 isolated R-ACLR with either autologous hamstring tendons (n = 1004, 61.3%) or quadriceps tendon (n = 634; 38.7%) were performed between 2004 and 2017 and were retrospectively analysed with regard to the occurrence of post-operative septic arthritis. The technique of R-ACLR did not significantly change during the years of the study. All patients received pre-op i.v.antibiotics, but no presoaking of the grafts in vancomycin was performed in the years of the study. The individual decision of graft choice was based on graft availability, tunnel position and the presence of tunnel widening. Generally, hamstring tendons were preferred. There were no clinically relevant differences between the groups regarding gender or age. Routine follow-up examination was performed 6 weeks after the index operation (follow-up rate 96.5%), and patients unsuspicious for septic arthritis at that time were classified as non-infected.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with septic arthritis were identified, resulting in an overall incidence of 0.85%. There was one patient with septic arthritis in the quadriceps tendon group (incidence: 0.16%) and 13 patients in the hamstring tendons group (incidence: 1.29%), respectively. The difference was significant (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this series, the incidence of post-operative septic arthritis after R-ACLR was lower when quadriceps tendon graft was used compared to hamstring tendon grafts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Anatomical study of quadriceps tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Background

The quadriceps tendon is a promising alternative graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Morphology of the graft directly affects the biomechanical properties. However, a few studies are evaluating the anatomical structures of quadriceps tendon as a graft in Asian population.

Objective

To define the anatomical structures of quadriceps tendon as a graft for ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Forty-nine quadriceps tendons were dissected and analyzed. Measurements were also done including length, width, and thickness.

Results

The maximum length of superficial quadriceps tendon was 63.2 ± 12.5 mm (range 37.6–83.4). The maximum length of tendon at the deepest part was 57.2 ± 11.5 (range 30.9–83.4). The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located at 61.4% ± 13% (range 31.8–83.6) from medial edge of the patella insertion (approximately 5 mm lateral from the center of quadriceps tendon insertion). The width of quadriceps tendon at patella insertion was 42.4 ± 3.8 mm (range 33.8–50.5). The thickness of quadriceps tendon at its maximum length on patella insertion was 6.9 ± 2.0 mm (range 1.5–9.5). Positive correlation between the height of cadaver and the maximum length of quadriceps tendon was noted.

Conclusions

The maximum length of quadriceps tendon was located 5 mm lateral from the center of quadriceps tendon insertion. Thus, we recommend marking midline of the quadriceps tendon insertion as a medial border of the harvested graft to get maximum length of the graft. Graft length measurement using superficial anatomy should be cautioned because graft shortening might occur.

Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary ACL reconstruction: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of the current study was to clarify the role of the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for primary ACL reconstruction. Thus, a Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing patients undergoing a primary ACL reconstruction with QT versus patellar tendon (PT) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts was conducted.

Material and methods

This Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. In January 2020, the main databases were accessed. Articles comparing the outcomes of the QT autograft versus HT autograft and/or PT autograft for primary ACL reconstruction were included in the present study. The statistical analysis was performed with STATA Software/MP, through a Bayesian hierarchical random-effect model analysis.

Results

Data from a total of 2603 knees were analysed. The overall mean follow-up was 35.0 months. Among the different grafts were evidenced comparable values of IKDC, Tegner and Lysholm score. The QT autograft detected comparable rate of Lachman test > 3 mm, Pivot shift test > 3 m and instrumental laxity > 3 mm. The QT autograft showed a lower rate of autograft failure above all. The QT autograft detected the reduced rate of AKP than the PT.

Conclusion

Quadriceps tendon autograft may represent a feasible option for primary ACL reconstruction. These results must be interpret within the limitations of the present network meta-anlaysis.