The effect of a single consecutive volume aspiration on concentrated bone marrow from the proximal humerus for clinical application

Trends of regenerative tissue engineering for oral and maxillofacial reconstruction in veterinary medicine

Oral and maxillofacial (OMF) defects are not limited to humans and are often encountered in other species. Reconstructing significant tissue defects requires an excellent strategy for efficient and cost-effective treatment. In this regard, tissue engineering comprising stem cells, scaffolds, and signaling molecules is emerging as an innovative approach to treating OMF defects in veterinary patients. This review presents a comprehensive overview of OMF defects and tissue engineering principles to establish proper treatment and achieve both hard and soft tissue regeneration in veterinary practice. Moreover, bench-to-bedside future opportunities and challenges of tissue engineering usage are also addressed in this literature review.

High Variability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Obtained via Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Compared With Traditional Bone Marrow Aspiration Technique

Background:

Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) is a common source for harvesting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), other progenitor cells, and associated cytokines and growth factors to be used in the biologic treatment of various orthopaedic pathologies. The aspirate is commonly centrifuged into a concentrated volume that can be immediately administered to a patient using commercially available kits. However, the handling and efficacy of BMA concentrate (BMAC) are still controversial.

Purpose:

To characterize BMA versus BMAC for MSC quantity, potency, and cytokine profile.

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

From 8 participants (age, 17-68 years), 30 mL of bone marrow was aspirated by a single surgeon from either the proximal humerus or distal femur and was separated into 2 equal samples. One sample was kept as BMA, and the other half was centrifuged into BMAC. The 2 samples then underwent flow cytometry for detection of MSCs, cell analysis for colony-forming units (CFUs), and cytokine profiling. A 2-tailed t test was used to detect differences between MSCs, CFUs, and cytokine density concentrations between BMA and BMAC.

Results:

The average concentration of MSCs in both BMA and BMAC was 0.001%. Average MSC events detected by flow cytometry were significantly higher in BMA versus BMAC (15.1 and 8.1, respectively; P < .045). Expanded MSCs demonstrated similar phenotypes, but CFUs were significantly increased in BMA compared with BMAC (104 vs 68 CFUs, respectively; P < .001). Total protein concentration and cytokine profiling demonstrated great variability between BMA and BMAC and between patients. Most importantly, BMAC failed to concentrate MSCs in 6 of 8 samples.

Conclusion:

There is great variability in MSC concentration, total protein concentration, and cytokine profile between BMA and BMAC.

Clinical Relevance:

When studying the clinical efficacy of BMAC, one must also evaluate the sample itself to determine the presence, concentration, and potency of MSCs if this is to be considered a cell-based therapy. Further standard operating procedures need to be investigated to ensure reproducible results and appropriate treatments.

Acetabular Bone Marrow Aspiration During Total Hip Arthroplasty

Biologically augmented surgical treatments of orthopaedic conditions are increasingly popular. Bone marrow aspirate concentrate is a key orthobiologic tissue source, and the field is moving from the standard iliac crest marrow aspiration toward local aspirations of marrow depots that are accessible during the standard-of-care procedures in an attempt to reduce morbidity, surgery time, and cost. Here, we present the aspiration of the standard iliac marrow depot, but through a novel acetabular approach during total hip arthroplasty. This procedure markedly simplifies biologic augmentation with bone marrow aspirate concentrate in this large patient cohort.

Nucleated Cell Count Has Negligible Predictive Value for the Number of Colony-Forming Units for Connective Tissue Progenitor Cells (Stem Cells) in Bone Marrow Aspirate Harvested From the Proximal Humerus During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether nucleated cell count (NCC) could serve as an approximation for the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) in concentrated bone marrow aspirate (cBMA) obtained from the proximal humerus.

METHODS

Bone marrow aspirate (BMA) was harvested from the proximal humerus in 96 patients (mean age 56.2 ± 7.0 years) during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Following concentration of the aspirate, nucleated cells of each sample were counted. The total number of CFUs was evaluated under the microscope at their first appearance, usually after 5 to 10 days in culture. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and assays for osteogenic, adipogenic, and chondrogenic differentiation were performed. Linear regression was assessed to predict the number of CFUs by using NCC. Age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated as independent variables.

RESULTS

The average volume of the obtained BMA was 86.7 ± 35.2 mL. The cBMA contained a mean of 26.3 ± 6.8 × 10⁶ nucleated cells per mL, which yielded a mean of 1421.7 ± 802.7 CFUs in cell culture. There were no significant differences in NCC or number of CFUs when sex, volume of BMA, age, or BMI was examined independently (P >.05, respectively). Linear regression found that NCC was of limited predictive value for the total number of CFUs being yielded after cell culture (r² = 0.28 with a root mean square error of 679.4).

CONCLUSION

NCC was of negligible predictive value for the total number of CFUs for connective tissue progenitor cells in BMA harvested from the proximal humerus during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

NCC is often used to assess the quality of cBMA samples for biological augmentation during surgery. The limited predictive value of this measurement tool is of clinical importance, because effectiveness of BMA applications has been suggested to depend on the concentration of progenitor cells within the sample.

Evaluation of Autologously Derived Biomaterials and Stem Cells for Bone Tissue Engineering

Despite progress, clinical translation of tissue engineering (TE) products/technologies is limited. A significant effort is underway to develop biomaterials and cells through a minimally modified process for clinical translation of TE products. Recently, bone marrow aspirate (BMA) was identified as an autologous source of cells for TE applications and is currently being tested in clinical therapies, but the isolation methods need improvement to avoid potential for contamination and increase progenitor cell yield. To address these issues, we reproducibly processed human peripheral blood (PB) and BMA to develop autologously derived biomaterials and cells. We demonstrated PB-derived biomaterial/gel cross-linking and fibrin gel formation with varied gelation times as well as biocompatibility through support of human bone marrow-derived stem cell survival and growth in vitro. Next, we established a plastic culture-free process that concentrates and increases the yield of CD146+/CD271+ early mesenchymal progenitor cells in BMA (concentrated BMA [cBMA]). cBMA exhibited increased colony formation and multipotency (including chondrogenic differentiation) in vitro compared with standard BMA. PB-derived gels encapsulated with cBMA also demonstrated increased cell proliferation and enhanced mineralization when assessed for bone TE in vitro. This strategy can potentially be developed for use in any tissue regeneration application; however, bone regeneration was used as a test bed for this study.