1
|
Li J, Rothrauff B, Chen S, Zhao S, Wu Z, Chen Q, He J. Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221132564. [PMID: 36338352 PMCID: PMC9629579 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221132564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Bibliometrics is a methodology that measures the scientific output of an author, institution, or country. Visualized analysis is the transformation of data into visible form by software, highlighting important features, including commonalities and anomalies, allowing users to easily and quickly perceive significant aspects of their data. Purpose: To conduct a bibliometric analysis of the literature on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair, with visualization of trends, in order to identify the areas of interest and the primary researchers involved in ACL repair. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: The PubMed database was queried on April 14, 2022, for publications that reported on ACL repair from 1960 onward. The initial search resulted in 1392 publications. Filter settings were applied to remove publications with weak correlation, such as those on meniscal repair and ACL reconstruction. Publication information, citations, authors, commonly used terms, and affiliated institutions and countries were analyzed by VOSviewer and Python. Results: A total of 553 articles were included for analysis. Three techniques were visualized: bridge-enhanced ACL repair, internal brace, and dynamic intraligamentary stabilization. The most published authors were Martha Murray (51 articles), Gregory Difelice (35 articles), and Braden Fleming (31 articles). The most cited article was “Collagen–Platelet Rich Plasma Hydrogel Enhances Primary Repair of the Porcine Anterior Cruciate Ligament” by Murray et al. The journals with the most publications on ACL repair were the American Journal of Sports Medicine (n = 49); Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (n = 49); and Arthroscopy (n = 48). The top 3 institutions by publication number were the Hospital for Special Surgery (n = 51), Boston Children’s Hospital (n = 49), and Brown University (n = 31), with the most publications coming from the United States (n = 242), Germany (n = 83), and the United Kingdom (n = 47). Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the research on ACL repair comes from a small number of authors and corresponding institutions; the top sports medicine journals and the developed countries have an interest in this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinfei Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Benjamin Rothrauff
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shuyi Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Shuying Zhao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Zhaoxi Wu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Jinshen He
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.,Jinshen He, MD, Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 138 Tongzipo Road, Changsha, Hunan 410013, China ()
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
ACL repair for athletes? J Orthop 2022; 31:61-66. [PMID: 35464814 PMCID: PMC9018522 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current gold standard treatment for an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear in an athlete is an arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with autografts. This restores the knee stability but is associated with unique complications like graft re-tear, kinesiophobia and graft donor site morbidity. ACL suture repair (ACLSR) is an attractive alternative method of surgical management of this injury. Current science of ACLSR The potential advantages of performing a repair are the preservation of native biology and proprioceptive function of ACL, elimination of a graft and preservation of bone stock. The purported benefits are better stability, reduction of kinesiophobia and faster rehabilitation. ACLSR is now performed only for proximal (femoral-sided) tears in the acute phase, when the tissue quality is good and using high-strength nonabsorbable sutures. There are several techniques for performing ACLSR but broadly speaking are either non-augmented, static augmented with suture tape, dynamic augmented or using bio-scaffolds. Clinical outcome of ACLSR There is a lot of literature on ACLSRs including case series, cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. The results from these studies are encouraging but mostly pertain to patient reported outcome measures, are in small numbers and in the short-term. The results are also inconsistent across different studies and not specifically performed for the athletic population. Moreover, most of these studies are from the innovator or designer surgeons and groups and have not been independently validated. Conclusion Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend ACLSR as a preferred method of managing even acute proximal tears in athletes. Improved rates of return to sports, lower retear rate and lesser kinesiophobia needs to be proven in athletes.
Collapse
|
3
|
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction Algorithm-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Biomechanical Changes in Articular Cartilage in Patients after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE 2022; 2022:8256450. [PMID: 35330602 PMCID: PMC8940546 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8256450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the evaluation of biomechanical changes in articular cartilage in patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on a three-dimensional (3D) finite element model. The data of 90 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction in the hospital were collected and divided into the stable group (54 cases) and the unstable group (36 cases). A load of up to 134N was applied to the 3D finite element model, and the kinematics of knee flexion at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° were examined. The tibial anteversion, tibial rotation, and ACL/graft tension were recorded in the 3D finite element model, which was randomly divided into the normal group (intact group, n = 30), the ACL rupture group (deficient group, n = 30), and the anatomical reconstruction group (anatomical group, n = 30). When the graft was fixed at 0°, the anterior tibial translation at 30°, 60°, and 90° in the anatomic group was 8-19% higher than the normal value under 134 N anterior load. The tibial internal rotation in the anatomic group was 18% and 28% higher than the normal value at 30° and 90°. When the graft was fixed at 30°, the anterior tibial translation at 60° and 90° of the anatomic group was 15% higher than the normal value. The tibial internal rotation at 90° of the anatomic group was 16% higher than the normal value, and the above differences had statistical significance (P < 0.05). MRI images were used to assess the bone tunnel angle, and the statistical analysis by the independent-samples t-test showed that there were significant differences in the bone tunnel angle between the stable group and the unstable group (P < 0.05). Currently, based on the 3D finite element model, MRI can accurately evaluate the postoperative effect of anatomical ACL reconstruction in the position, diameter, and angle of tibial and femoral bone tunnels, which can be applied to clinical promotion.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wilson WT, Hopper GP, Banger MS, Blyth MJG, Riches PE, MacKay GM. Anterior cruciate ligament repair with internal brace augmentation: A systematic review. Knee 2022; 35:192-200. [PMID: 35366618 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary repair of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures has re-emerged as a treatment option for proximal tears, with internal brace augmentation often utilised. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current evidence presenting outcomes of ACL repair with internal bracing to assess the safety and efficacy of this technique. METHODS All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears, augmented with internal bracing from 2014-2021 were included. Primary outcome was failure rate and secondary outcomes were subjective patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and objective assessment of anteroposterior knee laxity. RESULTS Nine studies were included, consisting of 347 patients, mean age 32.5 years, mean minimum follow up 2 years. There were 36 failures (10.4%, CI 7.4% - 14.1%). PROMs reporting was variable across studies. KOOS, Lysholm and IKDC scores were most frequently used with mean scores > 87%. The mean Tegner and Marx scores at follow-up were 6.1 and 7.8 respectively. The mean side to side difference measured for anteroposterior knee laxity was 1.2mm. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review with meta-analysis shows that ACL repair with internal bracing is a safe technique for treatment of proximal ruptures, with a failure rate of 10.4%. Subjective scores and clinical laxity testing also revealed satisfactory results. This suggests that ACL repair with internal bracing should be considered as an alternative to ACL reconstruction for acute proximal tears, with the potential benefits of retained native tissue and proprioception, as well as negating the need for graft harvest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W T Wilson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK; NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - G P Hopper
- NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | - M S Banger
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | | | - P E Riches
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29:3706-3714. [PMID: 33386882 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06399-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to investigate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using the suture tape augmentation (STA) technique. METHODS This prospective interventional case series included 35 patients who underwent STA ACL repair and were all followed up for 2 years. The ACL rupture was between 4 and 12 weeks old and per-operatively confirmed repairable. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm and Tegner scores were collected together with return to work (RTW), return to sport (RTS), re-rupture, and re-intervention rate. Lachman testing was performed and ACL healing was evaluated on MRI using a grading scale based on the ACL's morphology and signal intensity with grade 1 representing good ACL healing and grade 3 representing poor ACL healing. RESULTS The number of patients who returned to their pre-rupture level for IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores at 2 years of follow-up are 17/26 (65.4%), 13/25 (52.0%), and 18/27 (66.7%) patients, respectively. Median RTW and RTS periods were 5.5 weeks (range 0-32 weeks) and 6 months (range 2-22 months), respectively. The Lachman side-to-side difference decreased significantly (P < 0.001) to less than 3 mm after surgery and remained stable. Four patients [11.4%, 95% CI (3.2, 26.7)] suffered from a re-rupture and three other patients [8.6%, 95% CI (1.8, 23.1)] needed a re-intervention for another reason than re-rupture. MRI follow-up of 31 patients showed overall grade 1 ACL healing in 14 (45.2%) patients, grade 2 ACL healing in 11 (35.5%) patients, and grade 3 ACL healing in 6 (19.4%) patients. A higher risk of re-rupture was associated with grade 3 ACL healing at 6 months post-operatively and a pre-operative Tegner score of ≥ 7. CONCLUSION This study shows that treatment of the acute, repairable ACL with the STA technique leads to a stable knee and favorable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the re-rupture rate of 11.4% within the 2-year follow-up is a concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kobayashi EF, Tang K, Grant JA. Is ACL Repair Really Back? A Review of Modern Techniques. OPER TECHN SPORT MED 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otsm.2021.150828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
|
7
|
Vermeijden HD, van der List JP, O'Brien RJ, DiFelice GS. Primary Repair of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: Current Level of Evidence of Available Techniques. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202105000-00001. [PMID: 33956672 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
» Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair that has the potential to preserve native tissue using a more minimally invasive approach. Multiple repair techniques for different tear types have been reported over the last decade. » From a healing perspective, proximal tears can be reapproximated directly to the femoral wall because they have better intrinsic healing capacity than midsubstance tears. These procedures can be classified further as direct suture repair with or without static or dynamic augmentation. Current evidence does not support direct repair of midsubstance tears because of their limited healing capacity. In many instances, biological augmentation is needed to enhance the healing potential of the ACL. » While ACL repair is certainly not an effective surgical approach for all tears or in all patients, this procedure can be an effective and less morbid alternative to ACL reconstruction in carefully selected patients. » The overall current reported level of evidence of published studies has ranged from low to moderate, and thus there is a need for higher-quality, comparative studies in which outcomes of larger patient groups are compared with the current gold standard of ACL reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harmen D Vermeijden
- Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Jelle P van der List
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Robert J O'Brien
- Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| | - Gregory S DiFelice
- Orthopaedic Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York-Presbyterian, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
ACL Repair: A Game Changer or Will History Repeat Itself? A Critical Appraisal. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10050912. [PMID: 33652689 PMCID: PMC7956607 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Until the past decade the common thought was that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was not able to heal and restore knee stability. In this manuscript a brief review of studies of the developers and the early adaptors of four different modern ACL repair techniques are presented. The present status and considerations for the future of ACL repair and its research are shared. After promising short- to midterm ACL healing results by the developers, the results of the early adaptors show more variety in terms of rerupture and reintervention for other reasons. Risk factors for failure are a young age, high preinjury sports activity level, midsubstance ruptures and impaired integrity of the ACL bundles and the synovial sheath. There is a call for more clinical data and randomized clinical trials. Conclusion: an important finding of the past decade is that the ACL is able to heal and subsequently restabilize the knee. Patient selection is emphasized: the ideal patient is a non-high athlete older than 25 and has an acute proximal one bundle ACL rupture. Further research will have to show if ACL repair could be a game changer or if history will repeat itself.
Collapse
|
9
|
Anterior cruciate ligament tear patterns in young patients: An arthroscopic multicenter study. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2021; 16:168-175. [PMID: 33717953 PMCID: PMC7920093 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the last decade, there has been a renewed interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation surgeries in the younger patients. Several ACL preservation techniques such as primary repair, augmented repair, and scaffold repair have been described based on the particular tear type and pattern. The purpose of this study was to determine the distribution of tear patterns in young patients presenting with an acute ACL injury. METHODS A prospective observational study was performed at two tertiary children's hospitals. Patients under 18 years undergoing ACL reconstruction within 8 weeks of initial injury were included from 2017 to 2019. Tear patterns were classified by two orthopedic surgeons from each of the two centers during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction into 4 types: I. Avulsion off the femur, II. <10% of total ACL length tear from femoral end, III. Mid-substance tear and IV. Single bundle tear. For reliability, the four surgeons classified ACL injury (2 rounds each) based on de-identified intraoperative videos of 33 randomly selected surgical ACL cases. Inter and intra-rater reliability studies were calculated using Kappa statistics. RESULTS 224 patients (123 males, 101 females) with mean age of 16 (range: 9-18) years were enrolled in this study. Fifty-seven (25%) patients reported contact injury while 167 (75%) reported non-contact. Isolated ACL injury was recorded in 70 (31%) patients, while concomitant injuries were recorded in 154 patients (69%). The most common associated injury was lateral meniscus tear (35%), followed by lateral and medial meniscus tears (20%). According to our classification, 31 (14%) patients were Type I, 30 (13%) were Type II, 139 (62%) were Type III, 18 (8%) were Type IV. The intra-rater reliability was excellent for 2 reviewers, good for 1 and marginal for another. The overall inter-rater reliability for all 4 reviewers was marginal for both readings. There was no statistical difference in the occurrence of type of tear based on the mechanism of injury (contact vs non-contact) or age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS This is the first multicenter study using an arthroscopic assessment to classify the location of ACL tear in the young population. It gives us further insight on the possible application for surgeries to preserve the ACL in this group. Larger studies incorporating these findings with MRI evaluation and ACL repair techniques are needed to confirm the utility of this information to decide the eligibility for repair in pediatric patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Rocchi JE, Labanca L, Luongo V, Rum L. Innovative rehabilitative bracing with applied resistance improves walking pattern recovery in the early stages of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction: a preliminary investigation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:644. [PMID: 33008346 PMCID: PMC7532107 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03661-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of knee braces early after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a controversial issue. The study preliminarily compares the effect of a traditional brace blocked in knee extension and a new functional brace equipped with a spring resistance on walking and strength performance early after ACL reconstruction performed in the acute/subacute stage. METHODS 14 ACL-reconstructed patients wore either a traditional (Control group: CG, 7 subjects) or a new functional brace (Experimental group: EG 7 subjects) until the 30th post-operative day. All patients were tested before surgery (T0), 15, 30, and 60 days after surgery (T1, T2, and T3, respectively). Knee angular displacement and ground reaction forces (GRF) during the stance phase of the gait cycle were analyzed at each session and, at T3, maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) for knee flexor/extensor muscles was performed. Limb symmetry indexes (LSI) of GRF and MVIC parameters were calculated. RESULTS At T3, EG showed greater peak knee flexion angle of injured limb compared to CG (41 ± 2° vs 32 ± 1°, p < 0.001). During weight acceptance, a significant increase of anteroposterior GRF peak and vertical impulse from T1 to T3 was observed in the injured limb in EG (p < 0.05) but not in CG (p > 0.05). EG showed a greater side-to-side LSI of weight acceptance peak of anteroposterior GRF at T2 (113 ± 23% vs 69 ± 11%, p < 0.05) and T3 (112 ± 23% vs 84 ± 10%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The preliminary findings from this study indicate that the new functional brace did help in improving gait biomechanical pattern in the first two months after ACL reconstruction compared to a traditional brace locked in knee extension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacopo Emanuele Rocchi
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy.
- Villa Stuart Sport Clinic, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Via Trionfale 5952, 00135, Rome, Italy.
| | - Luciana Labanca
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy
| | - Valeria Luongo
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Rum
- Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome "Foro Italico", Piazza Lauro De Bosis 6, 00135, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|