The impact of limb loading and the measurement modality (2D versus 3D) on the measurement of the limb loading dependent lower extremity parameters

Influence of different standing positions on anatomical parameters of coronal whole-leg weight-bearing radiographs in preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in lower limb global alignment and anatomical parameters of coronal whole-leg radiographs, which were generally used in preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomy (HTO), according to different weight-bearing standing positions.

Methods

Between April 2021 and December 2022, 176 patients (60 males and 116 females) were investigated. Full-weight-bearing coronal whole-leg radiographs were obtained with the patella centred on the femoral condyle. Patients were divided by Kellgren-Lawrence grade (KL-0, KL-I, KL-II and KL-III) and assessed in two standing positions: legs closed and legs spread. Patients with flexion contractures or those unable to stand with full weight bearing were excluded. The mechanical distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femorotibial angle, joint line convergence angle, percentage weight-bearing line (%WBL) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) were measured. The Student's t test was used to compare the two standing positions. A p value < 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.

Results

The MPTAs of legs closed standing and legs spread standing were 84.9 ± 2.6° and 85.1 ± 2.4° in KL-0, 84.7 ± 2.0° and 84.9 ± 2.1° in KL-I and 85.0 ± 2.43° and 85.4 ± 2.4° in KL-II, respectively. There were statistically significant differences in the MPTA between the two standing positions in KL-0, KL-I and KL-II. In contrast, the %WBL and HKAA did not change regardless of the standing position. In the KL-III group, no statistical significance was observed for any of the anatomical parameters.

Conclusion

Several anatomical parameters were changed between the legs closed standing and the legs spread standing positions. It was suggested that the standing position should be taken into consideration in the planning for HTO.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, Case series with no comparison group.

Increased tibial tuberosity torsion has the greatest predictive value in patients with patellofemoral instability compared to other commonly assessed parameters

PURPOSE

The multifactorial nature of patellofemoral instability requires a comprehensive assessment of the affected patients. While an association between tibial tuberosity (TT) torsion and patellofemoral instability is known, its specific effect has not yet been investigated. This study investigated the effect of TT torsion on patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent surgical intervention for patellofemoral instability and asymptomatic controls. TT torsion was measured in addition to other commonly assessed risk factors for patellofemoral instability using standardised computed tomography (CT) data of the lower extremities. The diagnostic performances of the assessed parameters were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

RESULTS

The patellofemoral instability group consisted of 79 knees, compared to 72 knees in the asymptomatic control group. Both groups differed significantly in all assessed parameters (p < 0.001), except for tibial torsion (n.s.). Among all parameters, TT torsion presented the best diagnostic performance for predicting patellar instability with an area under the curve of 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.98; p < 0.001). A cut-off value of 17.7° yielded a 0.87 sensitivity and 0.89 specificity to predict patellar instability (OR, 55.2; 95% CI, 20.5-148.6; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Among the evaluated risk factors, TT torsion had the highest predictive value for patellofemoral instability. Patients with TT torsions ≥ 17.7° showed a 55-fold increased probability of patellofemoral instability. Therefore, TT torsion should be included in the assessment of patients with patellofemoral instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The influence of the weight-bearing state on three-dimensional (3D) planning in lower extremity realignment - analysis of novel vs. state-of-the-art planning approaches

BACKGROUND

The use of 3D planning to guide corrective osteotomies of the lower extremity is increasing in clinical practice. The use of computer-tomography (CT) data acquired in supine position neglects the weight-bearing (WB) state and the gold standard in 3D planning involves the manual adaption of the surgical plan after considering the WB state in long-leg radiographs (LLR). However, this process is subjective and dependent on the surgeons experience. A more standardized and automated method could reduce variability and decrease costs.

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was (1) to compare three different three-dimensional (3D) planning modalities for medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and (2) to describe the current practice of adapting NWB CT data after considering the WB state in LLR. The purpose of this study is to validate a new, standardized approach to include the WB state into the 3D planning and to compare this method against the current gold standard of 3D planning. Our hypothesis is that the correction is comparable to the gold standard, but shows less variability due compared to the more subjective hybrid approach.

METHODS

Three surgical planning modalities were retrospectively analyzed in 43 legs scheduled for MOWHTO between 2015 and 2019. The planning modalities included: (1) 3D hybrid (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB) CT models after manual adaption of the opening angle considering the WB state in LLR, (2) 3D NWB (3D NWB CT models) and (3) 3D WB (2D/3D registration of 3D NWB CT models onto LLR to simulate the WB state). The pre- and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the planned opening angle (°) were assessed and differences among modalities reported. The relationship between the reported differences and BMI, preoperative HKA (LLR), medial meniscus extrusion, Outerbridge osteoarthritis grade and joint line convergence angle (JLCA) was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean (std) planned opening angle of 3D hybrid did not differ between 3D hybrid and 3D WB (0.4 ± 2.1°) (n.s.) but was higher in 3D hybrid compared to 3D NWB (1.1° ± 1.1°) (p = 0.039). 3D WB demonstrated increased preoperative varus deformity compared to 3D NWB: 6.7 ± 3.8° vs. 5.6 ± 2.7° (p = 0.029). Patients with an increased varus deformity in 3D WB compared to 3D NWB (> 2 °) demonstrated more extensive varus alignment in LLR (p = 0.009) and a higher JLCA (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Small intermodal differences between the current practice of the reported 3D hybrid planning modality and a 3D WB approach using a 2D/3D registration algorithm were reported. In contrast, neglecting the WB state underestimates preoperative varus deformity and results in a smaller planned opening angle. This leads to potential under correction in MOWHTO, especially in patients with extensive varus deformities or JLCA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Incorporating the WB state in 3D planning modalities has the potential to increase accuracy and lead to a more consistent and reliable planning in MOWHTO. The inclusion of the WB state in automatized surgical planning algorithms has the potential to reduce costs and time in the future.

Deep-learning based 3D reconstruction of lower limb bones from biplanar radiographs for preoperative osteotomy planning

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional (3D) preoperative planning has become the gold standard for orthopedic surgeries, primarily relying on CT-reconstructed 3D models. However, in contrast to standing radiographs, a CT scan is not part of the standard protocol but is usually acquired for preoperative planning purposes only. Additionally, it is costly, exposes the patients to high doses of radiation and is acquired in a non-weight-bearing position.

METHODS

In this study, we develop a deep-learning based pipeline to facilitate 3D preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies, based on 3D models reconstructed from low-dose biplanar standing EOS radiographs. Using digitally reconstructed radiographs, we train networks to localize the clinically required landmarks, separate the two legs in the sagittal radiograph and finally reconstruct the 3D bone model. Finally, we evaluate the accuracy of the reconstructed 3D models for the particular application case of preoperative planning, with the aim of eliminating the need for a CT scan in specific cases, such as high tibial osteotomies.

RESULTS

The mean Dice coefficients for the tibial reconstructions were 0.92 and 0.89 for the right and left tibia, respectively. The reconstructed models were successfully used for clinical-grade preoperative planning in a real patient series of 52 cases. The mean differences to ground truth values for mechanical axis and tibial slope were 0.52° and 4.33°, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We contribute a novel framework for the 2D-3D reconstruction of bone models from biplanar standing EOS radiographs and successfully use them in automated clinical-grade preoperative planning of high tibial osteotomies. However, achieving precise reconstruction and automated measurement of tibial slope remains a significant challenge.

Magnetic resonance imaging-based bone imaging of the lower limb: Strategies for generating high-resolution synthetic computed tomography

This study aims at assessing approaches for generating high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging- (MRI-) based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images suitable for orthopedic care using a deep learning model trained on low-resolution computed tomography (CT) data. To that end, paired MRI and CT data of three anatomical regions were used: high-resolution knee and ankle data, and low-resolution hip data. Four experiments were conducted to investigate the impact of low-resolution training CT data on sCT generation and to find ways to train models on low-resolution data while providing high-resolution sCT images. Experiments included resampling of the training data or augmentation of the low-resolution data with high-resolution data. Training sCT generation models using low-resolution CT data resulted in blurry sCT images. By resampling the MRI/CT pairs before the training, models generated sharper images, presumably through an increase in the MRI/CT mutual information. Alternatively, augmenting the low-resolution with high-resolution data improved sCT in terms of mean absolute error proportionally to the amount of high-resolution data. Overall, the morphological accuracy was satisfactory as assessed by an average intermodal distance between joint centers ranging from 0.7 to 1.2 mm and by an average intermodal root-mean-squared distances between bone surfaces under 0.7 mm. Average dice scores ranged from 79.8% to 87.3% for bony structures. To conclude, this paper proposed approaches to generate high-resolution sCT suitable for orthopedic care using low-resolution data. This can generalize the use of sCT for imaging the musculoskeletal system, paving the way for an MR-only imaging with simplified logistics and no ionizing radiation.

Validation of a Three-Dimensional Weight-Bearing Measurement Protocol for Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

Three-dimensional (3D) deformity assessment and leg realignment planning is emerging. The aim of this study was to (1) validate a novel 3D planning modality that incorporates the weight-bearing (WB) state (3D WB) by comparing it to existing modalities (3D non-weight-bearing (NWB), 2D WB) and (2) evaluate the influence of the modality (2D vs. 3D) and the WB condition on the measurements. Three different planning and deformity measurement protocols were analyzed in 19 legs that underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO): (1) a 3D WB protocol, after 2D/3D registration of 3D CT models onto the long-leg radiograph (LLR) (3D WB), (2) a 3D NWB protocol based on the 3D surface models obtained in the supine position (3D NWB), and (3) a 2D WB protocol based on the LLR (2D WB). The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and the achieved surgical correction were measured for each modality and patient. All the measurement protocols demonstrated excellent intermodal agreement for the achieved surgical correction, with an ICC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.76-0.96)) (p < 0.001). Surgical correction had a higher mean absolute difference compared to the 3D opening angle (OA) when measured with the WB protocols (3D WB: 2.7 ± 1.8°, 3D NWB: 1.9 ± 1.3°, 2D WB: 2.2 ± 1.3°), but it did not show statistical significance. The novel planning modality (3D WB) demonstrated excellent agreement when measuring the surgical correction after HTO compared to existing modalities.

The coronal alignment differs between two-dimensional weight-bearing and three-dimensional nonweight bearing planning in total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

The goal of this study is (1) to assess differences between two-dimensional (2D) weight-bearing (WB) and three-dimensional (3D) nonweight-bearing (NWB) planning in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and (2) to identify factors that influence intermodal differences.

Methods

Retrospective single-centre analysis of patients planned for a TKA with patient-specific instruments (PSI). Preoperative WB long-leg radiographs and NWB computed tomography were analysed and following radiographic parameters included: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) (+varus/-valgus), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), femorotibial subluxation and bony defect classified according to Anderson. Preoperative range of motion was also considered as possible covariate. Demographic factors included age, sex, and body mass index.

Results

A total of 352 knees of 323 patients (66% females) with a mean age of 66 ± 9.7 years were analysed. The HKA differed significantly between 2D and 3D planning modalities; varus knees (n = 231): 9.9° ± 5.1° vs. 6.7° ± 4°, p < 0.001; valgus knees (n = 121): -8.2° ± 6° vs. -5.5° ± 4.4°, p < 0.001. In varus knees, HKA (β = 0.38; p < 0.0001) and JLCA (β = 0.14; p = 0.03) were associated with increasing difference between 2D/3D HKA. For valgus knees, HKA (β = -0.6; p < 0.0001), JLCA (β = -0.3; p = 0.0001) and lateral distal femoral angle (β = -0.28; p = 0.03) showed a significant influence on the mean absolute difference.

Conclusion

The coronal alignment in preoperative 3D model for PSI-TKA significantly differed from 2D WB state and the difference between modalities correlated with the extent of varus/valgus deformity. In the vast majority of cases, the 3D NWB approach significantly underestimated the preoperative deformity, which needs to be considered to achieve the planned correction when using PSI in TKA.

Level of Evidence

Level III.

An automated optimization pipeline for clinical-grade computer-assisted planning of high tibial osteotomies under consideration of weight-bearing

3D preoperative planning for high tibial osteotomies (HTO) has increasingly replaced 2D planning but is complex, time-consuming and therefore expensive. Several interdependent clinical objectives and constraints have to be considered, which often requires multiple rounds of revisions between surgeons and biomedical engineers. We therefore developed an automated preoperative planning pipeline, which takes imaging data as an input to generate a ready-to-use, patient-specific planning solution. Deep-learning based segmentation and landmark localization was used to enable the fully automated 3D lower limb deformity assessment. A 2D-3D registration algorithm allowed the transformation of the 3D bone models into the weight-bearing state. Finally, an optimization framework was implemented to generate ready-to use preoperative plannings in a fully automated fashion, using a genetic algorithm to solve the multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem based on several clinical requirements and constraints. The entire pipeline was evaluated on a large clinical dataset of 53 patient cases who previously underwent a medial opening-wedge HTO. The pipeline was used to automatically generate preoperative solutions for these patients. Five experts blindly compared the automatically generated solutions to the previously generated manual plannings. The overall mean rating for the algorithm-generated solutions was better than for the manual solutions. In 90% of all comparisons, they were considered to be equally good or better than the manual solution. The combined use of deep learning approaches, registration methods and MOO can reliably produce ready-to-use preoperative solutions that significantly reduce human workload and related health costs.

[Osteotomies around the knee: preoperative planning using CT-based three-dimensional analysis, patient-specific cutting and reduction guides]

OBJECTIVE

The goal of osteotomy is either to restore pretraumatic anatomic conditions or to shift the load to less affected compartments.

INDICATIONS

Indications for computer-assisted 3D analysis and the use of patient-specific osteotomy and reduction guides include "simple" deformities and, in particular, multidimensional complex (especially posttraumatic) deformities.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

General contraindications for performing a computed tomography (CT) scan or for an open approach for performing the surgery.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Based on CT examinations of the affected and, if necessary, the contralateral healthy extremity as a healthy template (including hip, knee, and ankle joints), 3D computer models are generated, which are used for 3D analysis of the deformity as well as for calculation of the correction parameters. For the exact and simplified intraoperative implementation of the preoperative plan, individualized guides for the osteotomy and the reduction are produced by 3D printing.

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Partial weight-bearing from the first postoperative day. Increasing load after the first x‑ray control 6 weeks postoperatively. No limitation of the range of motion.

RESULTS

There are several studies that have analyzed the accuracy of the implementation of the planned correction for corrective osteotomies around the knee joint with the use of patient-specific instruments with promising results.

Automatic Assessment of Lower-Limb Alignment from Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning of lower-limb realignment surgical procedures necessitates the quantification of alignment parameters by using landmarks placed on medical scans. Conventionally, alignment measurements are performed on 2-dimensional (2D) standing radiographs. To enable fast and accurate 3-dimensional (3D) planning of orthopaedic surgery, automatic calculation of the lower-limb alignment from 3D bone models is required. The goal of this study was to develop, validate, and apply a method that automatically quantifies the parameters defining lower-limb alignment from computed tomographic (CT) scans.

METHODS

CT scans of the lower extremities of 50 subjects were both manually and automatically segmented. Thirty-two manual landmarks were positioned twice on the bone segmentations to assess intraobserver reliability in a subset of 20 subjects. The landmarks were also positioned automatically using a shape-fitting algorithm. The landmarks were then used to calculate 25 angles describing the lower-limb alignment for all 50 subjects.

RESULTS

The mean absolute difference (and standard deviation) between repeat measurements using the manual method was 2.01 ± 1.64 mm for the landmark positions and 1.05° ± 1.48° for the landmark angles, whereas the mean absolute difference between the manual and fully automatic methods was 2.17 ± 1.37 mm for the landmark positions and 1.10° ± 1.16° for the landmark angles. The manual method required approximately 60 minutes of manual interaction, compared with 12 minutes of computation time for the fully automatic method. The intraclass correlation coefficient showed good to excellent reliability between the manual and automatic assessments for 23 of 25 angles, and the same was true for the intraobserver reliability in the manual method. The mean for the 50 subjects was within the expected range for 18 of the 25 automatically calculated angles.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a method that automatically calculated a comprehensive range of 25 measurements that defined lower-limb alignment in considerably less time, and with differences relative to the manual method that were comparable to the differences between repeated manual assessments. This method could thus be used as an efficient alternative to manual assessment of alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factor affecting the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between the standing and supine radiographs

BACKGROUND

Conflicting results have been reported regarding the factors that can predict the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between radiographs taken in the standing and supine positions. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate factors that can predict discrepancies in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between radiographs taken in the standing and supine positions.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the medical records of patients who underwent full-length anteroposterior radiographs of the lower limb in both standing and supine positions between January 2019 and September 2021. The discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between the standing and supine radiographs was defined as the absolute value of the difference in the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle between the two radiographs, which is presented as the ΔHKA angle. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to analyse the relationship among ΔHKA angle, demographic data, and several radiographic parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 147 limbs (94 patients) were included in this study. The mean ΔHKA angle was 1.3 ± 1.1° (range, 0-6.5°). The ΔHKA angle was significantly correlated with body mass index and several radiographic parameters, including the HKA angle, joint line convergence angle, and osteoarthritis grade. Subsequent multiple linear regression analysis was performed using the radiographic parameters measured on the supine radiographs with the two separate models from the two observers, which revealed that body mass index and advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 and 4) had a positive correlation with the ΔHKA angle.

CONCLUSIONS

Body mass index and advanced osteoarthritis affected the discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb between standing and supine radiographs. A discrepancy in the coronal alignment of the lower limb could be more prominent in patients with an increased body mass index and advanced osteoarthritis, corresponding to Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 and 4.

Efficient cascaded V-net optimization for lower extremity CT segmentation validated using bone morphology assessment

Semantic segmentation of bone from lower extremity computerized tomography (CT) scans can improve and accelerate the visualization, diagnosis, and surgical planning in orthopaedics. However, the large field of view of these scans makes automatic segmentation using deep learning based methods challenging, slow and graphical processing unit (GPU) memory intensive. We investigated methods to more efficiently represent anatomical context for accurate and fast segmentation and compared these with state-of-the-art methodology. Six lower extremity bones from patients of two different datasets were manually segmented from CT scans, and used to train and optimize a cascaded deep learning approach. We varied the number of resolution levels, receptive fields, patch sizes, and number of V-net blocks. The best performing network used a multi-stage, cascaded V-net approach with 128³ -64³ -32³ voxel patches as input. The average Dice coefficient over all bones was 0.98 ± 0.01, the mean surface distance was 0.26 ± 0.12 mm and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance 0.65 ± 0.28 mm. This was a significant improvement over the results of the state-of-the-art nnU-net, with only approximately 1/12th of training time, 1/3th of inference time and 1/4th of GPU memory required. Comparison of the morphometric measurements performed on automatic and manual segmentations showed good correlation (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] >0.8) for the alpha angle and excellent correlation (ICC >0.95) for the hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral inclination, femoral version, acetabular version, Lateral Centre-Edge angle, acetabular coverage. The segmentations were generally of sufficient quality for the tested clinical applications and were performed accurately and quickly compared to state-of-the-art methodology from the literature.

Weight-bearing cone-beam CT: the need for standardised acquisition protocols and measurements to fulfill high expectations-a review of the literature

Weight bearing CT (WBCT) of the lower extremity is gaining momentum in evaluation of the foot/ankle and knee. A growing number of international studies use WBCT, which is promising for improving our understanding of anatomy and biomechanics during natural loading of the lower extremity. However, we believe there is risk of excessive enthusiasm for WBCT leading to premature application of the technique, before sufficiently robust protocols are in place e.g. standardised limb positioning and imaging planes, choice of anatomical landmarks and image slices used for individual measurements. Lack of standardisation could limit benefits from introducing WBCT in research and clinical practice because useful imaging information could become obscured. Measurements of bones and joints on WBCT are influenced by joint positioning and magnitude of loading, factors that need to be considered within a 3-D coordinate system. A proportion of WBCT studies examine inter- and intraobserver reproducibility for different radiological measurements in the knee or foot with reproducibility generally reported to be high. However, investigations of test-retest reproducibility are still lacking. Thus, the current ability to evaluate, e.g. the effects of surgery or structural disease progression, is questionable. This paper presents an overview of the relevant literature on WBCT in the lower extremity with an emphasis on factors that may affect measurement reproducibility in the foot/ankle and knee. We discuss the caveats of performing WBCT without consensus on imaging procedures and measurements.

Increased femoral curvature and trochlea flexion in high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees

PURPOSE

High-grade patellofemoral dysplasia is often associated with concomitant axial and frontal leg malalignment. However, curvature of the femur and sagittal flexion of the trochlea has not yet been studied in patellofemoral dysplastic knees. The aim of the study was to quantify the femoral curvature and sagittal flexion of the trochlea in both high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic and healthy knees.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study matched 19 high-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees (Dejour types C and D) with 19 healthy knees according to sex and body mass index. Three-dimensional (3D) femoral curvature and sagittal trochlea flexion were analysed. To analyse femoral curvature, the specific 3D radius of curvature (ROC) was calculated. Trochlear flexion was quantified through the development of the trochlea flexion angle (TFA), which is a novel 3D measurement in relation to the anatomical and mechanical femur axis and is referred to as 3D TFA_anatomic and 3D TFA_mech. The influence of age, gender, height, weight and frontal and axial alignment on ROC and TFA was analysed in a multiple regression model.

RESULTS

Overall ROC was significantly smaller in dysplastic knees, compared with the control group [898.4 ± 210.8 mm (range 452.9-1275.1 mm) vs 1308.4 ± 380.5 mm (range 878.3-2315.8 mm), p < 0.001]. TFA was significantly higher in dysplastic knees, compared with the control group, for 3D TFA_mech [13.8 ± 7.2° (range 4.4-33.4°) vs 6.5 ± 2.3° (range 0.8-10.2°), p < 0.001] and 3D TFA_anatomic [12.5 ± 7.2° (range 3.1-32.2°) vs 6.4 ± 1.9° (range 2.1-9.1°), p = 0.001]. A smaller ROC was associated with smaller height, female gender and higher femoral ante torsion. An increased TFA was associated with valgus malalignment.

CONCLUSION

High-grade patellofemoral dysplastic knees demonstrated increased femoral curvature and sagittal flexion of the trochlea, compared with healthy knees. The ROC and newly described TFA allowed the quantification of the sagittal femoral deformity. TFA and ROC should be incorporated in future deformity analysis to investigate their potential as a target for surgical correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Effect of Position on Radiographic Angle Measurements of the Lower Extremities

Purpose

Accurately measuring an angle on a lower extremity X-ray is essential for the diagnosis and treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, the angle is often affected by position, especially with flexion contracture and rotation. To date, there have been no quantitative analyses examining the relationship between lower extremity angle and patient position and no studies targeting patients with deformities. The aim of this study is to quantify the effect of position on angle measurements in lower extremity X-rays and to compare the effect in patients with different deformities.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) data of 131 patients with knee pain were retrospectively analyzed. The subjects were categorized into the following groups: neutral (hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) between 175 and 185°), varus (HKAA less than 175°), valgus (HKAA more than 185°), and flexion (flexion contracture more than 10°). CT images were digitally reconstructed to anterior-posterior X-ray images using an average intensity projection algorithm. The process was then repeated while rotating the reconstruction plane from internal 9° to external 9°. In this manner, X-ray images were reconstructed in different rotational states. The following angles were measured from reconstructed X-ray images: HKAA, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and femoral valgus angle (FVA). The measurements were then compared according to the degree of rotation.

Results

FVA significantly differed according to rotation in all groups (P < 0.001), with a difference of 1.3° (±0.4°). HKAA significantly changed only in the flexion contracture group (P < 0.001), which showed a difference of 1.0° (±0.7°). However, HKAA in the other groups, LDFA, and MPTA did not significantly differ depending on rotation.

Conclusions

Radiographic measurement of FVA is subject to change according to rotation. HKAA significantly changed only in the flexion contracture group, so more care should be taken while obtaining X-rays of patients with flexion contracture.

O papel da estereorradiografia na avaliação das deformidades dos membros inferiores

Deformities of the lower limbs are a common condition and can lead to changes in gait, as well as affecting the function and longevity of the hips, knees, and spine. A systematic approach is essential to achieve the desired therapeutic result with the lowest rate of complications. Panoramic radiography is a widely available, low-cost method that is commonly used in order to assess the length and angular deformities of the lower limbs, by measuring the length and angular deviations of the axes. However, because the combination of lower limb deformities in two or three orthogonal planes is common, conventional radiography lacks accuracy because it is a two-dimensional imaging method. Therefore, the measurements of valgus/varus deformities on X-rays restricted to the coronal plane will present increasing variations in measurements depending on the degree of flexion/recurvatum alignment, anomalous bone torsions, or, last but not least, inappropriate patient positioning. Low-dose biplanar stereoradiography using three-dimensional models increases the accuracy of the measurement of several parameters used in the evaluation of lower limb alignment, including lengths, axes, and tibial/femoral torsions, parameters that could previously be evaluated only by computed tomography. Stereoradiography also makes it possible to perform a head-to-toe evaluation, as well as to evaluate the interactions among the lower limbs, pelvis, and spine.

Global varus malalignment increase from double-leg to single-leg stance due to intra-articular changes

PURPOSE

Preoperatively planned correction for tibial osteotomy surgery is usually based on weightbearing long-leg Xrays, while the surgery is performed in a supine non-weightbearing position. The purpose of this study was to assess the differences in lower limb alignment in three different weightbearing conditions: supine position, double-leg (DL) stance and single-sleg (SL) stance prior to performing a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) for varus malalignment. The hypothesis of this study was that progressive limb-loading would lead to an increased preoperative varus deformity.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 89 patients (96 knees) with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis (Ahlbäck grade I or II) and significant metaphyseal tibial vara (> 6°). The differences between supine position, DL stance and SL stance were analysed for the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBL) and joint line convergence angle (JLCA).

RESULTS

From a supine position to DL stance, the HKA angle slightly increased from 175.5° ± 1.1° to 176.3° ± 1.1° and JLCA changed from 2.0° ± 0.3° to 1.8° ± 0.3° without a statistically significant difference. From DL to SL stances, the HKA angle decreased from 176.3° ± 1.1° to 174.4° ± 1.1° (p < 0.05) and the JLCA increased from 1.8° ± 0.3° to 2.6° ± 0.3° (p < 0.05). A significant correlation was found between ΔHKA and ΔJLCA between the DL and the SL stances (R² = 0.46; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Varus malalignment increases with weight-bearing loading from double-leg to single-leg stances with an associated JLCA increase. Thus, single-leg stance radiographs may be useful to correct preoperative planning considering patient-specific changes in JLCA.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative study.

Influence of axial limb rotation on radiographic lower limb alignment: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The influence of limb malrotation on long-leg radiographs (LLR) is frequently discussed in literature. This systematic review aimed to describe the influence of limb rotation on alignment measurements alone and in combination with knee flexion, and determine its clinical impact.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in June 2021 using the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics), and Embase. The search term ((radiograph OR X-ray) AND (position OR rotation) AND limb alignment) was used. Database query, record screening, and study inclusion and exclusion were performed by two reviewers independently. Experimental studies (using either specimens or synthetic bones) or clinical studies (prospective or retrospective using radiographs of patients) analyzing the influence of limb rotation on anatomic and mechanical limb alignment measurements were included. Characteristics and results of the included studies were summarized, simplified, and grouped for comparison to answer the research question. Studies were compared descriptively, and no meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies were included showing large heterogeneity, comprising studies with cadavers, patients, and synthetic bones. Most studies (7 out of 8) reported that external rotation (ER) causes less apparent valgus and leads to more varus and internal rotation (IR) causes more valgus and leads to less varus. However, there is no consensus on the extent of rotation influencing alignment measures. Studies reported about an average change of > 2° (n = 4) and < 2° (n = 4) hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) between 15°IR and 15°ER. There is a consensus that the impact of rotation on mechanical alignment is higher if additional sagittal knee angulation, such as knee flexion, is present. All five studies analyzing the influence of rotation combined with knee flexion (5°-15°) showed an HKA change of > 2° between 15°IR and 15°ER.

CONCLUSION

Malrotation is frequently present on LLR, possibly influencing the measured alignment especially in knees with extension deficit. Surgeons must consider this when measuring and treating deformities (high tibial osteotomy or total knee arthroplasties), and analyzing surgical outcomes. Especially in patients with osteoarthritis with knee extension deficits or postoperative swelling, the effect of malrotation is significantly greater.

Does postoperative quantitative bone scintigraphy reflect outcomes following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy?

Purpose

The present study evaluated changes in bone tracer uptake (BTU) after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) and determined whether postoperative BTU correlates with clinical symptoms, radiologic parameters, or cartilage regeneration following MOWHTO.

Methods

A total of 210 knees underwent MOWHTO for medial compartmental osteoarthritis (OA) were enrolled in this study. Mean follow-up period was 42.7 months. We assessed BTU for the medial compartment of the knee before MOWHTO and at the time of plate removal. Radiologic parameters included Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade and Hip-Knee-Ankle angle (HKAA). Clinical evaluation included American Knee Society (AKS) score and cartilage status was graded at the time of MOWHTO and second-look arthroscopy according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grading system and articular cartilage regeneration stage. Statistical analysis performed to assess the relationships among postoperative BTU of the medial compartment, radiologic parameters, arthroscopic changes and clinical outcomes.

Results

BTU of medial femoral condyle and tibial plateau were significantly decreased at 2 years after MOWHTO (p<0.001). AKS scores and arthroscopic cartilage status were also significantly improved following MOWHTO. BMI and postoperative HKAA showed significant correlations with postoperative changes of BTU in uni- and multi-variable analysis. Meanwhile, postoperative changes of BTU did not show significant correlation with clinical outcomes or cartilage regeneration following MOWHTO.

Conclusion

Lower BMI and postoperative valgus alignment were significant predictor for postoperative BTU decrease of the medial compartment following MOWHTO. However, postoperative changes of BTU did not reflect cartilage regeneration or clinical outcomes until the midterm follow-up.

The EOS 3D imaging system reliably measures posterior tibial slope

Background

One of the values determined during the assessment of knee issues is the posterior tibial slope (PTS). A new option for measuring the PTS is the EOS 3D imaging system, which provides anteroposterior (AP) and lateral long leg radiographs (LLRs) using less radiation than a conventional LLR. We investigated the reliability of the EOS 3D imaging system with respect to PTS measurements.

Methods

We retrospectively searched our radiological database for patients who underwent an EOS scan and a computed tomography (CT) scan of their lower extremities between January and December 2019. Fifty-six knees were included in the study. Medial and lateral PTSs were determined using both modalities. A radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon each performed all measurements twice and the intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated to assess inter- and intrarater reliability. The Student t test and Pearson correlation were used to compare the results of both imaging modalities.

Results

The mean medial PTS was 8.5° (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1–8.9°) for the EOS system and 7.7° (95% CI, 7.3–8.1°) for CT, and the lateral PTS was 7.4° (95% CI, 6.9–7.9°) for the EOS system, and 7.0° (95% CI, 6.5–7.4°) for CT. Interrater reliability (ICC) with respect to medial and lateral PTSs measured on the EOS (0.880, 0.765) and CT (0.884, 0.887) images was excellent. The intrarater reliability of reader 1 (ICC range, 0.889–0.986) and reader 2 (ICC range, 0.868–0.980) with respect to the same measurements was excellent.

Conclusion

The PTS measurements from the EOS 3D imaging system are as reliable and reproducible as those from CT, the current gold standard method. We recommend using this system if possible, because it acquires more information (sagittal plane) in a scan than a conventional LLR, while exposing the patient to less radiation.

Level of evidence

Level III, Retrospective cohort study

Three-dimensional preoperative planning in the weight-bearing state: validation and clinical evaluation

Objectives

3D preoperative planning of lower limb osteotomies has become increasingly important in light of modern surgical technologies. However, 3D models are usually reconstructed from Computed Tomography data acquired in a non-weight-bearing posture and thus neglecting the positional variations introduced by weight-bearing. We developed a registration and planning pipeline that allows for 3D preoperative planning and subsequent 3D assessment of anatomical deformities in weight-bearing conditions.

Methods

An intensity-based algorithm was used to register CT scans with long-leg standing radiographs and subsequently transform patient-specific 3D models into a weight-bearing state. 3D measurement methods for the mechanical axis as well as the joint line convergence angle were developed. The pipeline was validated using a leg phantom. Furthermore, we evaluated our methods clinically by applying it to the radiological data from 59 patients.

Results

The registration accuracy was evaluated in 3D and showed a maximum translational and rotational error of 1.1 mm (mediolateral direction) and 1.2° (superior-inferior axis). Clinical evaluation proved feasibility on real patient data and resulted in significant differences for 3D measurements when the effects of weight-bearing were considered. Mean differences were 2.1 ± 1.7° and 2.0 ± 1.6° for the mechanical axis and the joint line convergence angle, respectively. 37.3 and 40.7% of the patients had differences of 2° or more in the mechanical axis or joint line convergence angle between weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing states.

Conclusions

Our presented approach provides a clinically feasible approach to preoperatively fuse 2D weight-bearing and 3D non-weight-bearing data in order to optimize the surgical correction.

A real 3D measurement technique for the tibial slope: differentiation between different articular surfaces and comparison to radiographic slope measurement

Background

The tibial slope plays an important role in knee surgery. However, standard radiographic measurement techniques have a low reproducibility and do not allow differentiation between medial and lateral articular surfaces. Despite availability of three-dimensional imaging, so far, no real 3D measurement technique was introduced and compared to radiographic measurement, which were the purposes of this study.

Methods

Computed tomography scans of 54 knees in 51 patients (41 males and 10 females) with a mean age of 46 years (range 22–67 years) were included. A novel 3D measurement technique was applied by two readers to measure the tibial slope of medial and lateral tibial plateau and rim. A statistical analysis was conducted to determine the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the new technique and compare it to a standard radiographic measurement.

Results

The mean 3D tibial slope for the medial plateau and rim was 7.4° and 7.6°, for the lateral plateau and rim 7.5° and 8.1°, respectively. The mean radiographic slope was 6.0°. Statistical analysis showed an ICC between both readers of 0.909, 0.987, 0.918, 0.893, for the 3D measurement of medial plateau, medial rim, lateral plateau and lateral rim, respectively, whereas the radiographic technique showed an ICC of 0.733.

Conclusions

The proposed novel measurement technique shows a high intraclass agreement and offers an applicable opportunity to assess the tibial slope three-dimensionally. Furthermore, the medial and lateral articular surfaces can be measured separately and one can differentiate the slope from the plateau and from the rim. As three-dimensional planning becomes successively more important, our measurement technique might deliver a useful supplement to the standard radiographic assessment in slope related knee surgery.

Level of evidence

Level III, diagnostic study.