An evaluation of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery

Clinical Effectiveness of Arthroscopy-Assisted Fixation in the Treatment of Avulsed Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Avulsed posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries are complex orthopedic challenges that require careful consideration and optimal management. Arthroscopy offers advantages, including smaller incisions, reduced soft tissue disruption, reduced postoperative pain, and improved visualization of intraarticular anatomy. Arthroscopy-assisted fixation results in superior clinical outcomes. Patient-specific factors, graft choice, and timing of surgery significantly impact outcomes. Rehabilitation is vital and requires a tailored approach to restore knee function. Biomechanically, arthroscopy-assisted fixation enhances joint stability and range of motion, reducing the risk of secondary injuries. Advancements in technology and surgical techniques further improve outcomes. Concomitant injuries and incorporation are essential considerations. Arthroscopy-assisted fixation is a recommended approach, but personalized care is crucial for successful recovery. Its precision in reattaching the PCL enhances joint stability and clinical results, aligning with outcomes seen in conventional procedures. Using biocompatible materials in fixation devices has significantly reduced the risk of allergic reactions or complications. This has allowed a faster and smoother recovery process for patients undergoing arthroscopy-assisted fixation. The incorporation of physical therapy and rehabilitation programs after surgery plays a vital role in restoring joint function and preventing muscle atrophy. The combination of advanced technology, surgical techniques, and personalized care has greatly improved the success rate of arthroscopy-assisted fixation procedures. Advancements in technology further improve patient outcomes, but each case should be individually assessed to determine the most appropriate treatment approach.

Outcome Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Narrative Review

The primary posterior stabilizer of the knee is the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), the largest intra-articular ligament in the human knee. One of the four primary ligaments of the knee joint, the PCL, serves to support the tibia on the femur. An extreme force applied anteriorly to the proximal tibia of the flexed knee results in trauma to the PCL. Dashboard injuries, which occur when the knee is driven into the dashboard after a collision with a motor vehicle, are frequent causes. Grade 1 and 2 acute injuries are often addressed conservatively due to the PCL's natural capacity for mending. If a grade 3 injury occurs, a cautious trial can be conducted on elderly or low-demand patients. When standard treatment for isolated grade 3 injuries has failed, surgery is advised. Single-bundle or double-bundle techniques using either transtibial tunnel or tibial inlay techniques are among the reconstruction approaches. Restoring the natural kinematics of the knee and forestalling persistent posterior and mixed rotatory knee laxity are the ultimate goals of treating PCL injuries through a personalized strategy. These injuries may become more common in the future as more people participate in sports. As a result of ongoing instability, discomfort, diminished function, and the emergence of inflammatory and degenerative disorders of joints, PCL rips are becoming more well-acknowledged as a cause of morbidity and decreased function.

Outcome of Arthroscopic All-Inside Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Posterior Trans-Septal Approach

Introduction

Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) reconstruction is a complex surgical procedure and often challenging. The newer posterior trans-septal portal technique is thought to make tibial tunnel preparation easier with better visualization of the tibial attachment site. It is also thought to lower the risk of neurovascular injuries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and clinical outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic all-inside PCL reconstruction using the posterior trans-septal portal at our institute.

Methods

This was a retrospective study with prospectively collected data between 2016 and 2020. Data collected were age, gender, types of graft used, range of movement, posterior drawer test grade, KOOS score, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and post-operative complications. All patients underwent pre- and post-operative PCL rehabilitation.

Results

A total of 36 patients (26 males and 10 females) were identified from our database. The mean age was 35.2 years. Mean time from injury to surgery was 20 months. Mean follow-up was 41.2 months (range, 13-72 months). Twenty cases involved multi-ligament injuries and another 16 patients had isolated PCL injury. Post-operative mean posterior drawer test grade improved from 2.7 to 0.7 (p < 0.001). Knee range of movement was 116.3 degrees pre-operatively and 115.6 degrees postoperatively (p = 0.814). Lysholm knee scoring scale improved from 50.9 to 91.0 (p < 0.001). KOOS score improved from 65.1 to 77.2 (p = 0.196). One patient required manipulation under anesthesia for stiffness. No patients needed any additional surgical procedures. All PCLs were clinically intact at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

Greater visualization of the PCL tibial attachment minimizes the 'killer turn' giving a huge advantage to this technique. Arthroscopic all-inside PCL reconstruction using the posterior trans-septal portal technique is a safe, reliable and reproducible procedure. From our study, it shows that post-operative clinical and functional outcomes improved significantly.

Safe femoral tunnel drilling angles avoid injury to the medial and posteromedial femoral anatomic structures during single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the inside-out technique

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the medial and posteromedial femoral anatomic structures and the femoral tunnel exit produced by different tunnel orientations when creating the femoral tunnel for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) using the inside-out (IO) technique and to estimate safe tunnel orientations to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury to these structures.

METHODS

Eleven cadaveric knees were used. The medial and posteromedial aspects of each knee joint were dissected to reveal the "safe zone," which is a bony area that avoids the distribution or attachment of at-risk structures (MCL, PMC structures, and articular cartilage), while remaining 10 mm away from the articular cartilage. The hypothesis of this study was that by creating the femoral tunnel at specific angles using the IO technique, the tunnel outlet would be as close to the safe zone as possible, protecting the at-risk structures from damage. Femoral tunnels were drilled at 20 different angle combinations on each specimen: 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to a line parallel to the transepicondylar axis in the axial plane, as well as 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to a line parallel to the femoral axis in the coronal plane. The positional relationship between each tunnel exit and the safe zone was recorded, and the shortest distance between the exit center and the safe zone boundary was measured.

RESULTS

The risk of iatrogenic injury differed depending on the drilling orientation (χ² = 168.880, P < 0.001). Femoral drilling angle combinations of 45/45°, 45/60°, 60/30°, 60/45°, and 60/60° (axial/coronal) were considered relatively safer than other orientations (P < 0.05). The shortest distance between the tunnel exit and the safe zone boundary was negatively correlated with the angle in the axial plane (P < 0.001, r = - 0.810).

CONCLUSIONS

When creating the IO femoral tunnel for single-bundle PCL reconstruction, angle combinations of 45/45°, 45/60°, 60/30°, 60/45°, and 60/60° (axial/oblique coronal) could be utilized to prevent at-risk structures from being damaged. The drilling angles and the safe zone can be employed to optimize the femoral tunnel in PCLR.

Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the "critical corner" that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee.

METHODS

CT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0°, 30°, 60° and 90°, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia.

RESULTS

Among the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60° and 90°). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13.

CONCLUSION

In summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint.

[Correlation analysis of femoral tunnel angle and medial collateral ligament injury in posterior cruciate ligament single-bundle reconstruction]

Objective

To investigate whether the outlet of the femoral tunnel will cause iatrogenic injury to the medial collateral ligament (MCL) during posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) and estimate the safe angle of femoral tunnel placement.

Methods

Thirteen formaldehyde-soaked human knee joint specimens were used, 8 from men and 5 from women; the donors' age ranged from 49 to 71 years, with an average of 61 years. First, the medial part of the femur was carefully dissected to clearly expose the region of the MCL course and attachment on the femoral medial aspect and to outline the anterior margin of the region with a marked line. The marked line divided the medial femoral condyle into an area with an MCL course and a bare bone area which is regarded relatively safe for no MCL course. Then, the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was cut to identify the femoral attachment of the PCL. After the knee joint was fixed at a 120° flexion angle, the process of femoral tunnel preparation for the PCL single-bundle reconstruction was simulated. The inside-out technique was used to drill the femoral tunnel from the PCL femoral footprint inside the knee joint with an orientation to exit the medial condyle of the femur, and the combination angle of the two planes, the axial plane and the coronal plane, was adapted to the process of drilling femoral tunnels at different orientations. The following 15 angle combinations were used in the study: 0°/30°, 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/30°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, 30°/30°, 30°/45°, 30°/60°, 45°/30°, 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, 60°/60° (axial/coronal). The positional relationship between the femoral tunnel outlet on the femoral medial condyle and the marked line was used to verify whether the tunnel drilling angle was a risk factor for MCL injury or not, and whether the shortest distance between the femoral exit center and the marked line was affected by the various angle combinations. Furthermore, the safe orientation of the femoral tunnel placement would estimated.

Results

When creating the femoral tunnel for PCLR, there was a risk of damage to the MCL caused by the tunnel outlet, and the incidence was from 0 to 100%; when the drilling angle of the axial plane was 0° and 15°, the incidence of MCL damage was from 69.23% to 100%. There was a significant difference in the incidence of MCL damage among femoral tunnels of 15 angle combinations ( χ ²=148.195, P<0.001). By comparison between groups, it was found that when drilling femoral tunnels at 5 combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal), the shortest distances between the tunnel exit and the marked line were significantly different than 0°/45°, 0°/60°, 15°/45°, 15°/60°, and 30°/30° (axial/coronal) ( P<0.05). Additionally, after comparing the median of the shortest distance with other groups, the outlets generated by these 5 angles were farther from the marked line and the posterior MCL.

Conclusion

The creation of the femoral tunnel in PCLR can cause iatrogenic MCL injury, and the risk is affected by the tunnel angle. To reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury, angle combinations of 45°/45°, 45°/60°, 60°/30°, 60°/45°, and 60°/60° (axial/coronal) are recommended for preparing the femoral tunnel in PCLR.

Allografts as alternative to autografts in primary posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Following posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture, autografts and allografts are routinely used for its reconstruction. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of allografts for primary PCL reconstruction, comparing them to autografts in terms of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), functional tests, and complications.

METHODS

This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus were accessed in October 2022. All the clinical studies investigating the outcomes of primary PCL reconstruction using allografts, or comparing the outcomes of allografts versus autografts, were accessed. The outcomes of interests were: instrumental laxity, range of motion (ROM), Telos stress radiography, drawer test, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner Activity Scale, and the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale. Data on complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients were included. The mean follow-up was 45.2 ± 23.8 months. The mean age of the patients was 30.6 ± 2.2 years. The time span between the injury and surgical intervention was 12.9 ± 10 months. Overall, 28% (125 of 445 patients) were women. Good baseline comparability was found between the two cohorts. No difference was found in terms of Lysholm Score, ROM, Tegner Scale, IKDC, arthrometer laxity, drawer test, and Telos stress radiography. No difference was found in the rates of anterior knee pain and revision.

CONCLUSION

Allografts can be considered a suitable alternative to autografts for PCL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Return to Play after Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Posterior cruciate ligament injuries can be treated conservatively with a structured rehabilitation program or with surgical reconstruction. Treatment algorithms are based on a variety of factors including the patient's presentation, physical exam, and desired level of activity. The goal is to return the patient to their athletic pursuits with a stable and pain-free knee. Return to play and activities should be individualized based on the patient's injury and progression through rehabilitation. This article provides a review of the current treatments for posterior cruciate ligament injuries and the respective rehabilitation protocols, outcomes after each treatment option, and specific return to play criteria.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows excellent outcomes and return to play with conservative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Return to play algorithms stress the importance of quadriceps strengthening throughout the recovery process and emphasize inclusion of plyometrics and sport-specific training. Rehabilitation plays a critical role in the outcome after posterior cruciate ligament injury and the ability to return to athletics. The primary focus of post-injury or post-operative rehabilitation is to restore function, as it relates to range of motion, strength, and proprioception, while mitigating swelling and pain. The patients' desired sport and level of play dictate return to play timelines. The literature supports the use of non-operative management of isolated PCL injuries in athletes and non-athletes with excellent functional and patient-reported outcomes.

The effect of obesity on complications following isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the risk of 30-day complications for obese patients compared to non-obese patients undergoing isolated posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2019, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing isolated PCL reconstruction. Two patient cohorts were defined: patients with obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m²) and patients without obesity (BMI < 30 kg/m²). Patients' baseline demographics and medical comorbidities were collected and compared between the cohorts. Postoperative outcomes were assessed using bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

414 patients underwent PCL reconstruction. 258 patients (62.3%) were non-obese and 156 patients (37.7%) were obese. Obese patients were more likely to be older, have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and have hypertension compared to non-obese patients (p < 0.05 for all). The rates of superficial surgical site infections, wound dehiscence, transfusion necessity, deep vein thrombosis, and re-operation were not significant between obese and non-obese patients. Following adjustment on multivariate analyses, relative to patients without obesity, those with obesity had an increased risk of admission to the hospital overnight (OR 1.66; p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate obesity on complications in isolated PCL reconstruction. Our results and the heterogeneity in the literature indicate that obesity significantly impacts the rates of hospital readmission for PCL reconstruction. Therefore, surgeons should carefully weigh the risks and benefits of operating on obese patients and plan accordingly as obese patients may require postoperative hospital admission after PCL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Hamstring, bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps and peroneus longus tendon autografts for primary isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Several autografts are available to reconstruct the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

SOURCE OF DATA

Current scientific literature published in PubMed, Google scholar, Embase and Scopus.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

Hamstring, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), quadriceps and peroneus longus (PLT) are the most common tendon autografts used for primary isolated PCL reconstruction.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

The optimal tendon source for PCL reconstruction remains nevertheless debated. Identifying the most suitable tendon autograft could assist the surgeon during primary PCL reconstruction.

GROWING POINTS

The present study compared the outcome of PCL reconstruction using hamstring, BPTB, quadriceps and PLT autografts. The focus was on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), joint laxity, range of motion and complications.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

All autografts are viable options for PCL reconstruction, with BTB and hamstring autografts demonstrating superior PROMs. However, further clinical investigations are required to determine the ideal autograft construct.

Single versus double bundle in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: a meta-analysis

Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction can be performed using single bundle (SB) and double bundle (DB) techniques. The present study investigated whether DB PCL reconstruction is superior to SB reconstruction in terms of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and joint stability. In December 2021 Embase, Google Scholar, Pubmed, Scopus databases were accessed. All clinical trials comparing SB versus DB reconstruction to address PCL insufficiency in skeletally mature patients were considered. Data from 483 procedures were retrieved. The mean follow-up was 31.0 (28.0 to 107.6) months, and the mean timespan between injury and surgery was 11.3 (6 to 37) months. The mean age of the patients was 29.3 ± 3.8 years. 85 of 483 patients (18%) were women. At a mean of 31.0 months post reconstruction, ROM (P = 0.03) was slightly greater in the SB group, while the Tegner score (P = 0.03) and the Telos stress (P = 0.04) were more favorable in the DB cohort. Similarity was found in instrumental laxity (P = 0.4) and Lysholm score (P = 0.3). The current evidence does not support the use of DB techniques for PCL reconstruction. Both methods could restore knee stability and motion with satisfactory short term patient reported outcome measures. Further high quality clinical trials are required to validate these results on a larger scale.

Graft position at the femoral condyle affects knee mobility after posterior cruciate ligament replacement

BACKGROUND

In some cases posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tears require surgical reconstruction. As the femoral footprint of the ligament is quite large, an ideal graft fixation position on the medial notch wall has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to compare three different graft fixation positions within the anatomical footprint of the PCL and test it for posterior tibial translation at different knee flexion angles.

METHODS

In six human knee specimens a drawer test was simulated on a material testing machine by applying load on the tibia. At three different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°) knee mobility was examined with respect to tibial posterior translation and stiffness for the following conditions: intact ligaments, detached PCL, three different graft fixation positions on the femoral condyle.

RESULTS

Replacement of the PCL within its femoral footprint restored knee stability in terms of tibial posterior translation. Low graft position showed comparable drawer displacements to the intact condition for all knee flexion angles (p > 0.344). A higher graft position excessively reduced the posterior translation (p < 0.047) and resulted in a restricted knee mobility and a stiffer joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft fixation positions on the femoral condyle play a crucial role in post-operative knee mobility and joint functionality after PCL replacement. Even though all graft fixation positions were placed within the femoral footprint of a native PCL, only the lower position on the medial notch wall showed comparable posterior tibial translation to an intact PCL.