Patient-reported outcome after patient-specific unicondylar knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis

New technology: Custom made implants, patient-specific alignment, and navigation - How to convince my hospital it's worth it: Current concepts

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) faces significant challenges, including lower survival rates and higher revision rates than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To address these issues, technological advancements like custom-made implants (CMI), patient-specific alignment (PSA), and computer-assisted systems (CAS) are being explored. These innovations aim to tailor procedures to individual joint morphology, soft tissue balance, and limb alignment, moving away from the traditional "one size fits all" approach. Early studies suggest that CMI may improve survival rates and patient-reported outcomes, though conclusive evidence is lacking. PSA shows potential for restoring pre-surgical alignment; however, its long-term benefits are uncertain. CAS improves implant placement precision and ligament balance; nevertheless, long-term survival data remain inconclusive. Moreover, economic and implementation challenges, such as cost and the need for specialized training, remain underexplored. While promising, further research is needed to fully understand the long-term efficacy and practical application of these technologies in UKA.

The effect of femoral component valgus/varus angle on the mid-term efficacy of unicondylar knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of femoral component valgus/varus angle (FCVA) on the mid-term outcome after unicondylar knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients who underwent unicompartmental knee replacement in the Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the postoperative femoral prosthesis internal and external rotation angle, patients were divided into six groups the postoperative femoral prosthesis internal and external rotation angle: standard group, mildly abnormal group. The patients were followed up for 12 months, and complications were recorded during the follow-up period. The Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), and Knee society score (KSS) were compared between the six groups.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four patients with 124 knees were included in this study. There were no statistical differences in age, gender, body mass index, preoperative ROM, or preoperative VAS, KSS-C, and KSS-F scores among the six groups. Comparison of postoperative outcomes and efficacy grades showed that: (1) the differences in ROM grades, as well as VAS, KSS-C, and KSS-F efficacy at 12 months postoperatively were statistically significant in all six groups by rank sum test; and patients in the normal group had better ROM grades and KSS-F grades than those in the mild and severe abnormality groups; (2) During the follow-up, no patient records had other serious complications such as periprosthetic infection, prosthetic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and spacer dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Controlling the femoral prosthetic internal rotation angle between 6° and 0° in unicompartmental knee replacements can lead to better mid-term outcomes for patients.

Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simplified Chinese version of the knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score in patients after total knee arthroplasty

Objectives

The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) has been utilized to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes in individuals following knee injuries, such as those with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee osteoarthritis, but has not yet been applied to individuals undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in China. The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Simplified Chinese version of the KOOS in Chinese individuals undergoing TKA.

Methods

This study distributed 170 questionnaires, and assessed the KOOS of the participants, along with requiring them to complete the Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey. There were 35 participants completed a test-retest reliability survey with a 24-h interval, 129 participants completed a pre - surgery survey, and 119 individuals completed a post - surgery survey 6 weeks after the surgery. The following tests were conducted: Cronbach's alpha (α) to assess internal consistency, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to evaluate test-retest reliability, Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) to examine construct validity, effect size (ES) to detect measure responsiveness, minimal detectable change (MDC) to assess measurement errors. Floor and ceiling effects (<15%) were also asses evaluated.

Results

The simplified Chinese version of the KOOS showed good test-retest reliability in participants after TKA, with an ICC of 0.82-0.97 (95% CI). The internal consistency of the five subscales of the KOOS was good (Cronbach's α = 0.70-0.96). No floor or ceiling effects were found. Regarding construct validity, a strong positive correlation was found between each of the three KOOS subscales (activities of daily living, knee-related Quality of Life, and sport and recreation subscales) and the general health and bodily pain subscales of the SF-36 (0.53 < ρ < 0.61). The subscales of the simplified Chinese version of the KOOS showed responsiveness (ES: 0.68 to 0.86) before and after 6 weeks of physical treatment. The MDC ranged from 10.28 to 23.24.

Conclusions

The Chinese version of the KOOS showed good psychometric properties and was found to be valid, reliable, and simple as an assessment tool for symptoms, pain, activity of daily living, sports and recreational activity and quality of life for the Chinese population suffering from TKA.

Trends in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty among 138 international experienced arthroplasty knee surgeons

Purpose

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established option for treating isolated unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA), but controversies still exist about patient selection, indications, perioperative management and alignment goals. This survey was designed to understand the current trends of experienced arthroplasty knee surgeons performing UKA.

Methods

An online questionnaire was created with SurveyMonkey® to assess global tendencies in the utilization of UKA. A link to the survey was shared with all ESSKA (European Society for Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy) members. The questionnaire consisted of free and multiple-choice questions and was divided into four sections: demographic information, the surgical activity of the respondents, indications for surgery and postoperative alignment goals.

Results

A total of 138 ESSKA members from 34 different countries completed the survey. A total of 81 % of the responders performed fewer than 50 UKAs per year; 53 % of UKAs represented less than 20 % of their knee replacements; 71 % used mainly or only fixed-bearing implants; 81 % performed UKA in a shorter time compared to TKA; and 61 % and 72 % were interested in custom-made UKA and robotics, respectively. Thirty-six percent considered a minimum postoperative alignment of 0° for medial UKA, and 32 % considered 10° as the maximum valgus deformity for lateral UKA. Fifty-five percent had no minimum age cut-off, 47 % had no BMI cut-off, and 57 % believed TKA was better than UKA in knees with concomitant high-grade patellofemoral OA. Approximately 50 % of the surgeons desired a coronal alignment that was the same as the predegeneration alignment.

Conclusion

A high level of agreement was reached regarding the following: preference for fixed-bearing UKAs, lower surgical time for UKA compared to TKA, interest in custom-made and robotic UKAs, no age and weight cut-off, TKA preferred in the presence of patellofemoral OA, and a final alignment goal of the predegenerative state both for medial and lateral. There was no agreement regarding length of stay, rehabilitation protocol, preoperative varus and valgus cut-off values, and treatment in cases of absence of anterior cruciate ligament or previous osteotomy.

The efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Evidence from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) and conventional instrumentation (CI) for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Our hypothesis was that the PSI would be superior to CI in improving implant positioning and clinical function.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane) to identify relevant studies published before July 1, 2023 that met our inclusion criteria. The identified reports at least included one of the following outcome variables: coronal component alignment, sagittal component alignment, number of outliers, hip-knee-ankle angle, postoperative complications, operative time and knee joint functional evaluation. For dichotomous variables, we calculated the risk ratio and its 95% confidence interval (CI). For continuous variables, we calculated the mean difference (MD) and its 95% CI. Heterogeneity of the included studies was assessed using the standard chi-square test. Meta-analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4. software. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (No. CRD42023454160).

RESULTS

A total of 9 articles were included in the analysis, consisting of 4 randomized controlled trials and 5 cohort studies. The study population comprised 494 patients, with 262 in the PSI group and 232 in the CI group. Our findings demonstrate that the PSI group exhibits superior tibial component coronal alignment compared to the CI group (MD = -0.66, 95% CI: -1.21 to -0.12, P = .02). Conversely, the CI group demonstrates better femoral component coronal alignment than the PSI group (MD = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.17-1.60, P = .01). No significant between 2 groups differences were observed in tibial component sagittal alignment, femoral component sagittal alignment, tibial coronal axis outliers, tibial sagittal axis outliers, femoral coronal axis outliers, femoral sagittal axis outliers, postoperative complications, operative time, hip-knee-ankle angle, and postoperative knee joint function score.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study findings suggest that the PSI confer an advantage in achieving superior tibial component coronal alignment, whereas the CI associated with better femoral component coronal alignment. However, no significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of other parameters. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings.

Survival of Patient-Specific Unicondylar Knee Replacement

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in isolated medial or lateral osteoarthritis leads to good clinical results. However, revision rates are higher in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason is suboptimal fitting of conventional off-the-shelf prostheses, and major overhang of the tibial component over the bone has been reported in up to 20% of cases. In this retrospective study, a total of 537 patient-specific UKAs (507 medial prostheses and 30 lateral prostheses) that had been implanted in 3 centers over a period of 10 years were analyzed for survival, with a minimal follow-up of 1 year (range 12 to 129 months). Furthermore, fitting of the UKAs was analyzed on postoperative X-rays, and tibial overhang was quantified. A total of 512 prostheses were available for follow-up (95.3%). Overall survival rate (medial and lateral) of the prostheses after 5 years was 96%. The 30 lateral UKAs showed a survival rate of 100% at 5 years. The tibial overhang of the prosthesis was smaller than 1 mm in 99% of cases. In comparison to the reported results in the literature, our data suggest that the patient-specific implant design used in this study is associated with an excellent midterm survival rate, particularly in the lateral knee compartment, and confirms excellent fitting.

Insufficient evidence to confirm benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesise the available literature and critically appraise current evidence on the functional and radiographic outcomes as well as reoperation and revision rates of custom partial knee arthroplasty, i.e., unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), bicompartmental knee arthroplasty (BKA), and patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), and a protocol was registered with Prospero. On 25 May 2021, two authors independently searched and screened Level I-IV studies that reported on outcomes of custom partial knee arthroplasty using the databases of MEDLINE^®, EMBASE^®, and the Cochrane Library without restriction on date of publication. Findings from eligible articles were synthesised and tabulated, and quality assessments were done according to the guidelines of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Checklists.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were eligible for data extraction, of which two comparative and four case series were on custom UKA (follow-up, 0-9 months), one comparative and five case series on custom BKA (follow-up, 0.25-72 months), and three case series on custom PFA (follow-up, 2-119 months). Three studies on custom UKA reported mean Knee Society Score (KSS) Knee of 86-94 and mean KSS Function of 94-95, and two studies on custom BKA reported mean KSS Knee of 90-94 and KSS function of 81, whereas one study on custom PFA reported KSS Knee of 91 and KSS Function of 89. Custom implants tended to have less bone-implant mismatch compared to off the shelf (OTS) implants. Revision rates were 3-25% for custom UKA (at 0-109 months), 3-5% for custom BKA (at 12-72 months), and 0-14% for custom PFA (at 2-119 months).

CONCLUSION

Due to the small number of comparative studies and lack of consistency in reported outcomes, it remains difficult to ascertain the benefits of custom partial knee arthroplasty. Anecdotal evidence suggests that, compared to OTS implants, custom implants result in less bone-implant mismatch and that 78-91% of patients are either satisfied or very satisfied after custom partial knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.