The influence of previous arthroscopic treatment on subsequent primary total knee arthroplasty: the comparison between bilateral knees of the same patient

Simultaneous bilateral and staged total knee arthroplasty combined with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of bilateral knee osteoarthritis: comparison of early clinical outcomes, complications, and prosthesis survival

OBJECTIVE

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is usually bilateral. In many patients, the degree of bilateral knee degeneration varies, with one side involving multiple compartments and the other a single compartment degeneration. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the early clinical efficacy of simultaneous bilateral and staged total knee arthroplasty (TKA) combined with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of bilateral KOA with different degrees.

METHODS

We compared clinical data from 71 simultaneous bilateral TKA/UKA (SB-TKA/UKA) patients with 52 Staged TKA/UKA (Staged-TKA/UKA) patients. Staged-TKA/UKA is defined as TKA on one knee followed by UKA on the other knee. The comparison included Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, range of motion(ROM), complication rate and prosthetic survival rate at the last follow-up between the two groups.

RESULTS

The follow-up time of SB-TKA/UKA group was (69.08 ± 14.35) months, and that of Staged-TKA/UKA group was (73.25 ± 18.39) months. Staged-KA/UKA group had a shorter hospital stays, less hospitalization costs and shorter operating time (p < 0.001 for hospital stay, p < 0.001 for hospitalization costs and p < 0.001 for operating time). There were no significant differences in HSS and ROM between the two groups at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (χ2 = 0.56, p = 0.454). For the TKA-side knee joint, there was no significant difference in the prosthetic survival rate (χ2 = 0.05, p = 0.824) and the prosthetic survival curve (χ2 = 0.052, p = 0.82) between the two groups. For UKA-side knee joint, there was no significant difference in prosthetic survival rate (χ2 = 0.08, p = 0.777) and prosthetic survival curve (χ2 = 0.074, p = 0.786) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to Staged-TKA/UKA, SB-TKA/UKA has the same early clinical efficacy, shorter operating time and hospital stays, less hospitalization costs, and no increased postoperative complications and prosthesis revision rates. Therefore, SB-TKA/UKA may be recommended for patients who can tolerate simultaneous bilateral surgery as assessed before surgery.

Simultaneous bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy versus simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the treatment of bilateral medial knee osteoarthritis: a retrospective study of an average three-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE

There is growing evidence that simultaneous bilateral open wedge high tibial osteotomy(SBOWHTO) and simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty(SBUKA) is an effective surgical treatment for bilateral medial knee osteoarthritis (MKOA). However, which intervention is more beneficial for bilateral MKOA patients remains unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these two strategies through early clinical outcomes, complication rates, and prosthetic survival.

METHODS

The clinical data of 60 patients with bilateral MKOA admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from January 2018 to December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, and they were divided into SBOWHTO group (n = 28) and SBUKA group (n = 32) according to different treatment methods. Clinical relevant indexes, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, Knee Society Knee (KSS) score, range of motion(ROM), postoperative complications and prosthetic survival rate were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Patients in the SBOWHTO group were followed up for 27 to 50 months, with an average of (37.18 ± 6.84) months. Patients in the SBUKA group were followed up for 24 to 59 months, with an average of (39.38 ± 9.74) months. There were no significant differences in postoperative KSS, HSS and ROM between SBOWHTO group and SBUKA group (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in complication rate between the two groups (p = 0.721). There was no significant difference in prosthetic survival rate (p = 0.622) and prosthetic survival curve (χ2 = 0.546, p = 0.46) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study compared early clinical outcomes, complication rates, and prosthesis retention rates after SBOWHTO and SBUKA, and found that the early clinical benefits of SBOWHTO and SBUKA were comparable in patients with bilateral MKOA.

Arthroscopic Management of Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the procedure of choice for osteoarthritis of the knee (OAK) when conservative treatment fails; however, high rates of dissatisfaction and poor implant longevity dissuade younger patients from TKA. There is a paucity of evidence that report outcomes and clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic knee procedures in patients with end-stage (grade 3-4) OAK. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of arthroscopic treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe (grade 3-4) OAK.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed with the terms "Knee," "Osteoarthritis," and/or "Arthroscopic debridement," "Arthroscopic lavage," "Arthroscopic microfracture," "Arthroscopic chondroplasty," "debridement," "lavage," "chondroplasty," "microfracture," and/or "arthroscopy" in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases in November 2023 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Databases were searched for studies that evaluated outcomes (e.g., pain, function, and conversion to TKA) for patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 to 4 OAK after knee arthroscopy (including debridement, lavage, microfracture, or chondroplasty) at a minimum 6-month follow-up. Percent improvement from preoperative score was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included achievement of minimal clinically importance difference and conversion to TKA.

RESULTS

Nine studies (410 knees with grades 3-4 OAK) were included. Arthroscopic debridement and lavage resulted in a 18.8% to 53.1% improvement at short-term follow-up (e.g., 6 months to 3 years) and a 50.0% improvement at long-term follow-up (e.g., 10 years) in knees with grade 3 OAK and a 15.0% to 41.3% improvement at short-term follow-up and a 46.9% improvement at long-term follow-up in knees with grade 4 OAK. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture resulted in 1.6% to 50.8% improvement at short-term follow-up in knees with grade 3 OAK. No studies included long-term outcomes or evaluated knees with grade 4 OAK after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and lavage occurred in 21.9% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 35.0% of patients with grade 4 OAK at short-term follow-up and in 47.4% of patients with grade 3 OAK and in 76.5% of patients with grade 4 OAK at long-term follow-up. Conversion to TKA after arthroscopic debridement and microfracture occurred in 10.9% of patients with grade 3 and 4 OAK at long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic debridement, lavage, and microfracture can provide short- and long-term symptomatic relief and improvement in function by up to 50.0% in patients with grade 3 to 4 OAK. These procedures may result in fewer patients with grade 3 OAK undergoing TKA compared with patients with grade 4 OAK.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; systematic review of Level II-IV studies. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Blocks Before Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Improved Postoperative Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This study compares the use of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) versus ropivacaine in adductor canal blocks (ACB) before total knee arthroplasties (TKAs).

METHODS

From the months of April 2020 to September 2021, 147 patients undergoing unilateral primary TKA were asked to participate in this prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Each patient received an iPACK block utilizing ropivacaine and was additionally randomized to receive an ACB with Exparel or Ropivacaine. For each patient, demographic information, inpatient hospital information, postoperative opioid use, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire scores were collected.

RESULTS

Overall, 100 patients were included (50 in each cohort). The Exparel group had a lower hospital length of stay compared to the Control group (36.3 vs 49.7 hours, P < .01). Patients in the Exparel group reported an increased amount of Numerical Rating Scale pain score improvement at all postoperative timepoints. These patients also used a lower amount of inpatient opioids (40.9 vs 47.3 MME/d, P = .04) but a similar amount of outpatient opioids (33.4 vs 32.1 MME/d, P = .351). Finally, the Exparel group had increased improvements in all WOMAC subscores and total scores at most timepoints compared to the Control group (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Exparel peripheral regional nerve blocks lead to decreases in pain levels, shorter hospital lengths of stay, inpatient opioid usage, and improved WOMAC scores. Exparel can be safely used in ACB blocks before TKA to help in controlling postoperative pain and decrease length of stay.

The influence of prior arthroscopy on outcomes of primary total lower extremity arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The primary purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of prior arthroscopy on postoperative revisions, complications, and other clinical outcomes after conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty.

METHODS

Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar electronic databases from inception to June 02, 2021. We identified cohort trials that compared the outcomes of patients who underwent primary THA or TKA in the prior arthroscopy or control groups. The primary outcome was revision, and secondary outcomes included reoperation, patient-reported outcomes, and postoperative complications. A modified version of the Downs and Black tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the non-randomized cohort studies.

RESULTS

Of the 23 included studies with 319946 cases, 18 were matched retrospectively and five were non-matched retrospectively. Methodological quality was high in ten studies and moderate in thirteen studies. Our analysis demonstrated that TKA or THA patients with prior arthroscopy were associated with an increased risk of revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Furthermore, there were no significant intergroup differences in periprosthetic fracture, range of motion, Harris Hip Score, or Knee Society Score.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopy performed before total lower extremity arthroplasty substantially increased the revision, reoperation, infection, and aseptic loosening rates. THA patients with prior arthroscopy were also associated with an increased risk of dislocation. Patients should be counseled on the potential increased risks associated with conversion total lower extremity arthroplasty after prior arthroscopy. Further research is needed to better characterize these findings.