Is the contralateral lesser trochanter a reliable reference for planning of total hip arthroplasty - a 3-dimensional analysis

Restoration of hip anatomy using computer modelling prior to total hip arthroplasty and its potential consequences in terms of lower limb-length difference

BACKGROUND

Restoring hip anatomy during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the gold standard. The general goal is for hips to be symmetrical in terms of height. This study aimed to analyse the effect of simulating hip length (HL) equalisation on leg-length difference (LLD) before and after THA with a computerised plan.

METHODS

141 consecutive patients were enrolled following THA. Outcomes of interest were preoperative hip-length difference (HLD) and LLD as determined on CT and final LLD as determined by simulating HL equalisation. We divided patients into 3 groups: no LLD, LLD >5 mm and LLD ⩾10 mm.

RESULTS

The rate of preoperative LLD >5 mm and LLD ⩾10 mm was 37.5% and 14.8%, respectively. HL equalisation did not change LLD distribution in the overall cohort. Among patients with smaller preoperative HLs and LLDs, HL equalisation changed the rate of LLD >5 mm from 100% (n = 24) to 41.7% (n = 10) (p < 0.0001) and of LLD ⩾10 mm from 100% (n = 12) to 16.7% (n = 2) (p < 0.0001). Among patients with no preoperative LLD, HL equalisation changed the rate of LLD ⩽5 mm from 100% (n = 64) to 59.3% (n = 38) (p < 0.0001) and of LLD<10 mm from 100% (n = 76) to 89.5% (n = 68) (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoring biomechanical hip anatomy by HL equalisation may not be the correct goal for all patients. In patients with no LLD and shorter HLs, equalisation could result in LLD >5 mm in 40% of patients and LLD >10 mm in 10%, demonstrating the necessity to further analyse individuals and propose a personalised stem position.

No relevant mechanical leg axis deviation in the frontal and sagittal planes is to be expected after subtrochanteric or supracondylar femoral rotational or derotational osteotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if one level of corrective femoral osteotomy (subtrochanteric or supracondylar) bears an increased risk of unintentional implications on frontal and sagittal plane alignment in a simulated clinical setting.

METHODS

Out of 100 cadaveric femora, 23 three-dimensional (3-D) surface models with femoral antetorsion (femAT) deformities (> 22° or < 2°) were investigated, and femAT normalized to 12° with single plane rotational osteotomies, perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Change of the frontal and sagittal plane alignment was expressed by the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and the posterior distal femoral angle (PDFA), respectively. The influence of morphologic factors of the femur [centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) angle and antecurvatum radius (ACR)] were assessed. Furthermore, position changes of the lesser (LT) and greater trochanters (GT) in the frontal and sagittal plane compared to the hip centre were investigated.

RESULTS

Mean femoral derotation of the high-antetorsion group (n = 6) was 12.3° (range 10-17°). In the frontal plane, mLDFA changed a mean of 0.1° (- 0.06 to 0.3°) (n.s.) and - 0.3° (- 0.5 to - 0.1) (p = 0.03) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. In the sagittal plane, PDFA changed a mean of 1° (0.7 to 1.1) (p = 0.03) and 0.3° (0.1 to 0.7) (p = 0.03), respectively. The low-antetorsion group (n = 17) was rotated by a mean of 13.8° (10°-23°). mLDFA changed a mean of - 0.2° (- 0.5° to 0.2°) (p < 0.006) and 0.2° (0-0.5°) (p < 0.001) after subtrochanteric and supracondylar osteotomy, respectively. PDFA changed a mean of 1° (- 2.3 to 1.3) (p < 0.01) and 0.5° (- 1.9 to 0.3) (p < 0.01), respectively. The amount of femAT correction was associated with increased postoperative deviation of the mechanical leg axis (p < 0.01). Using multiple regression analysis, no other morphological factors were found to influence mLDFA or PDFA. Internal rotational osteotomies decreased the ischial-lesser trochanteric space by < 5 mm in both the frontal and sagittal plane (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In case of femAT correction of ≤ 20°, neither subtrochanteric nor supracondylar femoral derotational or rotational osteotomies have a clinically relevant impact on frontal or sagittal leg alignment. A relevant deviation in the sagittal (but not frontal plane) might occur in case of a > 25° subtrochanteric femAT correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

A simple method for restoring the femoral head center in hip arthroplasty: a 3-dimensional analysis in the Chinese population

Background

Various authors have successfully demonstrated that the distance from the greater trochanter to the femoral head center (GTFHC) and the distance from the lesser trochanter to the femoral head center (LTFHC) can be used as parameters to determine the recovery of the femoral head center (FHC) during hip arthroplasty. It is necessary to undertake an anatomical study concerning the correlations between the greater trochanter (GT), the lesser trochanter (LT), and the FHC using data obtained from the 3D-CT reconstruction method.

Methods

The study comprised 293 patients (151 males and 142 females), with an average age of 65.06 years. The femoral head diameter(FHD), the linear distance from FHC to GT (GTFHC), and the linear distance from FHC to LT(LTFHC) were all measured and recorded data. The correlation between FHD with LTFHC and GTFHC was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients, and the ratio of LTFHC and GTFHC to FHD was calculated from this ratio. All measured parameters were compared between the left and right sides and the sexes of the participants.

Results

The average ratios of GTFHC/FHD and LTFHC/FHD were 0.99 and 0.95, respectively .96% of the LTFHC had absolute lateral differences of < 4 mm . 92% of the GTFHC had absolute lateral differences of < 4 mm.

Conclusion

LTFHC and GTFHC are reliable reference parameters for preoperative planning and reconstruction of FHC of hip arthroplasty. The ratio displayed in this research may yield insight into a practical and straightforward method for orthopedic surgeons to perform hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fractures. Ratios from studies based on the same race may be desirable for future work.

Emergency Department Stress Radiographs of Lateral Compression Type-1 Pelvic Ring Injuries Are Safe, Effective, and Reliable

BACKGROUND

Occult instability of lateral compression type-1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries may be determined with a fluoroscopic stress examination under anesthesia (EUA) performed in the operating room. We hypothesized that LC1 injuries, similar to some fractures of the extremities, could be radiographically stressed for stability in the emergency department (ED). Our primary objective was to determine if stress examination of LC1 fractures could be safely and accurately performed in the ED and could be tolerated by patients.

METHODS

A prospective, consecutive series of 70 patients with minimally displaced LC1 pelvic injuries (<10-mm displacement on presentation) underwent stress examinations performed by the on-call orthopaedic resident in the ED radiology suite. The stress examination series included static 40° inlet, internal rotation stress inlet, and external rotation stress inlet views. Pelvic fractures that had positive stress results (≥10 mm of overlap of the rami) were indicated for a surgical procedure. These fractures also underwent EUA in order for the 2 techniques to be compared.

RESULTS

All patients tolerated the ED stress examination without general anesthetic or hemodynamic instability. Fifty-seven patients (81%) had negative stress results and were allowed to bear weight. All patients with negative stress results who had 3-month follow-up went on to radiographic union without substantial displacement. For the patients with a positive stress result in the ED, the mean displacement was 15.15 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.8 to 19.4 mm) for the ED stress test and 15.60 mm (95% CI, 11.7 to 19.4 mm) for the EUA (p = 0.86). Two patients with a negative ED stress test did not mobilize during their hospitalization and underwent EUA and conversion to a surgical procedure. Thus, a total of 11 patients underwent both stress testing in the ED and EUA; no patient had a positive result on one test but a negative result on the other.

CONCLUSIONS

ED stress examination of LC1 injuries is a safe and reliable method to determine pelvic ring stability. The displacement measured in the ED stress examination is similar to the displacement measured under general anesthesia. Furthermore, a negative ED stress examination predicts successful nonoperative treatment. Given the results of this study, we encourage the use of stress examination in the ED for LC1-type injuries involving complete sacral fractures only. Widescale adoption of this streamlined protocol may substantially diminish cost, anesthetic risk, and potential operations for patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.