Using arthroscopy combined with fluoroscopic technique for accurate location of the bone tunnel entrance in chronic ankle instability treatment

Tourniquet use in ankle arthroscopy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Ankle arthroscopy is commonly performed using a thigh tourniquet and is thought to improve visibility and reduce operative time. However, the current evidence is unclear as to whether the use of a tourniquet provides these benefits. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is any clinical benefit of using a tourniquet in ankle arthroscopy.

METHODS

A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines was undertaken. All clinical studies published in Medline, Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Library Database from inception until January 2023 reporting on the use of a tourniquet in ankle arthroscopy were included.

RESULTS

180 studies were identified of which 3 (164 patients) met the inclusion criteria. All studies showed no statistically significant difference in mean surgical time and complication rate between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups. Overall, the quality of the evidence was moderate to poor without data in favour or against the routine use of tourniquets in ankle arthroscopy.

CONCLUSION

The current literature suggests that there are no significant differences in mean surgical time and complication rate between the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups.

Modified classifications and surgical decision-making process for chronic anterior talofibular ligament injuries based on the correlation of imaging studies and arthroscopic findings

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of chronic ankle instability (CAI) typically includes ligament repair or reconstruction. Using preoperative ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to choose an appropriate arthroscopic procedure is still difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of imaging studies with arthroscopic findings and support the arthroscopic surgical decision-making process.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with chronic anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) injuries were treated using the arthroscopic surgical decision-making process from November 2018 to August 2020. Preoperative imaging assessments using dynamic ultrasonography, MRI, and combined methods were applied to categorize the ATFL remnants into three quality grades ("good," "fair," and "poor"). Arthroscopic findings were classified into 6 major types (7 subtypes) and used to select an appropriate surgical procedure. Correlations between imaging studies, arthroscopic findings, and surgical methods were evaluated. Diagnostic parameters, clinical outcomes, and complications were also assessed.

RESULTS

There was a significant interobserver agreement in the evaluation of dynamic ultrasonography (0.954, P < 0.001), MRI (0.958, P < 0.001), and arthroscopy diagnosis (0.978, P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between the modified imaging classifications, arthroscopic diagnostic types, and surgical procedures. The mean follow-up period was 33.58 ± 8.85 months. Significant improvements were documented in postoperative ankle functions when assessed with Karlson-Peterson scores and Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool scores. The risk of complications is also very low.

CONCLUSION

The modified classifications and surgical decision-making process based on dynamic ultrasonography, MRI, and arthroscopic findings, as proposed in this study, might help in selecting an appropriate arthroscopic surgical procedure for chronic ATFL injuries.

Safe Talar Tunnel Placement During Reconstruction of the Deep Layer of the Deltoid Ligament: A Comparison of 4 Different Anatomic Landmarks on the Lateral Malleolus

Background

Deltoid ligament reconstruction of the ankle can be considered when the ruptured ligament is insufficient for direct repair.

Purpose

To compare the safety of talar tunnels oriented toward 4 different anatomic landmarks on the lateral malleolus during reconstruction of the deep layer of the deltoid ligament (DDL).

Study Design

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods

A total of 30 computed tomography scans of the ankle joint in healthy adults were collected to generate 3-dimensional models. Virtual talar tunnels with a diameter of 5 mm and with different lengths (20.0, 25.0, and 30.0 mm) were created from the talar insertion of the DDL and were oriented toward the talar neck as well as the most anterior, the most distal, and the most posterior points of the distal fibula. The minimal safe distance (MSD) of a drilling route was calculated for the tunnels, and the safe distance from the end of the tunnel to the bone surface was measured for each tunnel. The nonpaired Student t test was used to detect differences among the safe distances of the 4 different bone tunnels.

Results

For the 20.0-mm tunnels, the safe distance of the tunnel oriented toward the talar neck (5.90 ± 1.16 mm) did not meet the MSD (6.0 mm). For the 25.0-mm tunnels, the safe distances of the tunnels oriented toward the talar neck (4.53 ± 1.13 mm) and the anterior point of the fibula (5.91 ± 1.52 mm) did not meet the MSD (6.9 mm).

Conclusion

Tunnels that were 5 mm in diameter and 20.0 and 25.0 mm in length, oriented toward the most distal or most posterior point of the distal fibula, were safe for DDL reconstruction.

Clinical Relevance

Knowledge of safe talar tunnel placement is important, especially to avoid bone surface penetration during DDL reconstruction.

Arthro-Broström with endoscopic retinaculum augmentation using all-inside lasso-loop stitch techniques

Background

There is still some controversy about the augmentation of the inferior extensor retinaculum after arthroscopic anterior talofibular ligament repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the novel arthro-Broström procedure with endoscopic retinaculum augmentation using all-inside lasso-loop stitch techniques for chronic lateral ankle instability.

Methods

Thirty-four cases with grade-2 or grade-3 chronic anterior talofibular ligament lesions who underwent the novel arthro-Broström procedure with endoscopic retinaculum augmentation using all-inside lasso-loop stitch techniques were assessed retrospectively. A total of 30 cases (30 ankles) were followed up for a mean of 26.67 ± 4.19 months (range, 24—36 months). four cases were excluded due to insufficient medical records or loss of follow-up reports. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool scores, The Karlsson-Peterson scores and Visual Analogue Scale scores were evaluated before surgery and at the final follow-up time. Also, the results of stress fluoroscopic tests and complications were recorded.

Results

At the final follow-up, the average of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool scores, The Karlsson-Peterson scores and Visual Analogue Scale scores were 86.63 ± 6.69 (range, 77—100), 90.17 ± 4.64 (range, 85—100) and 0.53 ± 0.63 (range, 0—2), respectively. Moreover, the results of stress fluoroscopic tests were improved significantly after surgery. Mild keloid formation and/or knot irritation were observed in four cases. No wound infections, nerve injuries and recurrent instability were recorded. Also, no stiffness or arthritis of the subtalar joint was encountered.

Conclusions

The arthro-Broström procedure combined with endoscopic retinaculum augmentation using all-inside lasso-loop techniques is reliable and safe due to the advantage of direct endoscopic visualization.

Anatomic reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments: is there an optimal graft option?

PURPOSE

Different graft options are available for the reconstruction of lateral ankle ligaments to treat chronic ankle instability (CAI), which fall in two categories: allografts and autografts. This study aims to provide an updated comparison of the clinical outcomes after stabilisation procedures using allografts and autografts, to correctly advise the clinician during the choice of the best material to be used for the reconstruction of the lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to analyse the use of autografts and allografts for anatomic reconstruction of the lateral ligamentous complex of the ankle in CAI patients. The presence of a postoperative assessment through outcome measures with proofs of validation in the CAI population or patient's subjective evaluation on the treatment were necessary for inclusion. The quality of the included studies was assessed through the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). Relevant clinical outcome data were pooled to provide a synthetic description of the results in different groups or after different procedures.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies (autograft: 19; allograft: 9; both procedures: 1) accounting for 930 procedures (autograft: 616; allograft: 314) were included. The average mCMS was 55.9 ± 10.5 points. The Karlsson-Peterson scale was the most frequently reported outcome scale, showing a cumulative average post- to preoperative difference of 31.9 points in the autograft group (n = 379, 33.8 months follow-up) and of 35.7 points in the allograft group (n = 227, 25.8 months follow-up). Patient satisfaction was good or excellent in 92.8% of autograft (n = 333, 65.2 months follow-up) and in 92.3% of allograft procedures (n = 153, 25.0 months follow-up). Return to activity after surgery and recurrence of instability were variably reported across the studies with no clear differences between allograft and autograft highlighted by these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic analysis of validated CAI outcome measures and the patient's subjective satisfaction does not support a specific choice between autograft and allograft for the reconstruction of the ankle lateral ligamentous complex in CAI patients. Both types of grafts were associated to a postoperative Karlsson-Peterson score superior to 80 points and to a similar rate of patient's subjective satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.