Different diagnostic performance of plasma fibrinogen and D-dimer in periprosthetic joint infection: a propensity score matched study

Limited value of platelet-related markers in diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic values of serum platelet count (PC), mean platelet volume ratio (MPV), platelet count to mean platelet volume ratio (PVR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), platelet to neutrophil ratio (PNR), PC/Albumin-globulin ratio (PC/AGR), and PC/C-reactive protein (PC/ CRP) in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).

METHODS

The medical records were retrospectively analyzed of the 158 patients who had undergone hip or knee revisions from January 2018 to May 2022. Of them, 79 cases were diagnosed with PJI and 79 with aseptic loosening (AL). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. The plasma levels of CRP, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), PC, MPV, PVR, PLR, PNR, PC/AGR, and PC/CRP in the 2 groups were recorded and analyzed. In addition, tests were performed according to different joint types. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of each indicator. The diagnostic value for each indicator was calculated according to the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The PC, PVR, PLR and PC/AGR levels in the PJI group were significantly higher than those in the AL group, while PC/CRP levels were significantly lower (P < 0.001). The AUC for PC/CRP, and PC/AGR was 0.804 and 0.802, respectively, which were slightly lower than that of CRP (0.826) and ESR (0.846). ROC analysis for PC/CRP, and PC/AGR revealed a cut-off value of 37.80 and 160.63, respectively, which provided a sensitivity of 73.42% and 84.81% and a specificity of 75.95% and 65.82% for PJI. The area under the curve of PLR and PC was 0.738 and 0.702. The area under the curve values for PVR, PNR, and MPV were 0.672, 0.553, and 0.544, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that PC, PLR, PC/CRP, and PC/AGR values do not offer significant advantages over ESR or CRP values when employed for the diagnosis of PJI. PVR, PNR, and MPV were not reliable in the diagnosis of PJI.

What is the Accuracy of a Rapid Strip Test That Detects D-lactic Acid in Synovial Fluid for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections?

BACKGROUND

D-lactic acid is a specific marker produced almost exclusively by bacterial species; thus, the appearance of this marker in synovial fluid may indicate periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Recently, studies have investigated the accuracy of enzyme-linked laboratory tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid to diagnose PJI. However, to our knowledge, no studies have determined the usefulness of rapid strip tests that detect D-lactic acid in synovial fluid in the diagnosis of PJI.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid strip test for diagnosing PJI? (2) What are the diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV], and negative predictive value [NPV]) of the rapid D-lactic acid strip test and two different rapid leukocyte esterase (LE) strip tests?

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 157 patients who underwent revision THA or TKA from May 2021 to February 2022 at a single orthopaedic center. Seventy percent (110 of 157) were eligible for analysis; 10% of these patients (15 of 157) were excluded based on the exclusion criteria (causes of revisions and additional comorbidities that may interfere with the results), and 20% (32 of 157) of the synovial fluid samples could not be tested (dry taps and blood-contaminated samples that could not be centrifuged). We performed the following off-label diagnostic tests on synovial fluid samples collected from all patients: the D-lactic acid strip test (QuantiQuick TM , BioAssay System), two different LE strip tests (10 EA from ARKRAY and BM 10 from BioMaxima). Differently colored strips were marked with symbols (from [-] to [++++] for D-lactic acid and from [-] to [+++] for LE tests) according to the manufacturers' instructions. For the LE tests, results were different for (++), which corresponds to a minimal value of 250 leu/mL for 10 EA and 125 leu/mL for BM 10 tests. The diagnostic standard for the presence or absence of PJI in this study was the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria; based on these criteria (without the application of an LE test as a minor criterion), all patients were assessed and divided into two groups. Patients who did not meet the criteria for PJI and underwent revision for aseptic loosening, implant malposition, instability, or implant damage were included in the aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty group (68 patients). Patients with a fistula penetrating the joint, those with two positive culture results of the same pathogen, or those with ≥ 6 points according to ICM 2018 minor criteria were enrolled in the PJI group (42 patients). To ascertain the best cutoff value for the rapid D-lactic acid and both LE strip tests for diagnosing PJI, we used collected results, generated a receiver operating characteristic curve, and calculated the Youden index. To determine the accuracies of the diagnostic tests, we calculated their sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs against the diagnostic standard (the ICM 2018 criteria).

RESULTS

The best cutoff value for D-lactic acid was 22.5 mg/L, which corresponded to a reading of (+) on the test strip. For D-lactic acid, in the diagnosis of PJI, the sensitivity was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68% to 92%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). For both LE strip tests, the best cutoff value was the same as that proposed in the ICM 2018 criteria. For LE (10 EA), the sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 66% to 91%) and specificity was 99% (95% CI 91% to 100%); for LE (BM 10), sensitivity was 81% (95% CI 65% to 91%) and specificity was 97% (95% CI 89% to 100%).

CONCLUSION

A rapid off-label D-lactic acid strip test is valuable for diagnosing PJI. The results of this study indicate very good accuracy with comparable sensitivity and specificity for both LE strip tests. The usefulness of the test in a group of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and the reproducibility of the reading by different researchers were not analyzed in this study and require further investigations. Before a rapid D-lactic strip test is routinely used for diagnosing PJI, multicenter studies on a larger group of patients should be conducted.Level of Evidence Level II, diagnostic study.

Is Fibrinogen a Reliable Biomarker in the Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: In recent years, several studies have identified closed correlations between the coagulation cascade and inflammatory mechanisms in infective diseases. Fibrinogen (PF) is emerging as promising biomarker for the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI). This study aims to investigate the diagnostic value of PF in diagnosing PJI and to explore potential causes influencing the diagnostic value of PF. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched regarding the role of fibrinogen as a biomarker in the diagnosis of PJI. Studies in English were included in the meta-analysis if they determined the diagnostic value of fibrinogen for PJI detection after hip or knee arthroplasty, applying the recognized diagnostic criteria for PJI. A quality evaluation of the studies included was performed. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were obtained using the statistical software STATA, version 17 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results: Ten studies (9 retrospective) were included in the study. Low publication bias was detected, but with high heterogeneity among them. Plasma fibrinogen showed a good diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility in PJI (sensitivity, 0.81 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.75-0.86]; specificity, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.76-0.86]; AUROC, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.85-0.91]; DOR, 19 [95% CI, 14-26]). Conclusions: The attempt to find an "ideal" biomarker is crucial to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the current diagnostic algorithms for PJI. The analysis performed in the current study indicates that plasma fibrinogen test is a valid biomarker for PJI diagnosis.

The poor accuracy of D-dimer for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection but its potential usefulness in early postoperative infections following revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening

BACKGROUND

D-dimer was introduced in 2018 as an alternative biomarker for C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnostic of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) criteria of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. We assessed the accuracy of plasma D-dimer for the diagnosis of early, delayed, and late PJI according to Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) criteria, and whether persistently high levels of D-dimer in cases of aseptic loosening (AL) may be predictive of subsequent implant-related infection.

METHODS

A prospective study of a consecutive series of 187 revision arthroplasties was performed at a single institution. Septic (n = 39) and aseptic revisions (n = 141) were classified based on IDSA criteria. Preoperative assessment of CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer was performed. Receiver operating curves were used to determine maximum sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. The natural progress of D-dimer for AL cases was followed up either until the date of implant-related infection at any time during the first year or 1 year after revision in patients without failure. Clinical outcomes for those AL cases included infection-related failure that required a new surgery or need for antibiotic suppression.

RESULTS

Preoperative D-dimer level was significantly higher in PJI cases than in AL cases (p = 0.000). The optimal threshold of D-dimer for the diagnosis of PJI was 1167 ng/mL. For overall diagnosis of PJI, C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved the highest sensitivity (84.6%), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and D-dimer (82% and 71.8%, respectively). Plasma D-dimer sensitivity was lower for all PJI types. When combinations of 2 tests were studied, the combined use of ESR and CRP achieved the best accuracy for all types of PJI (76.9%). 4.25% of AL cases had implant failure due to implant-related infection during the first year after the index revision arthroplasty, only the cases with early failure maintained high D-dimer levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma D-dimer did not offer an improvement over the individual or combined diagnosis for any type of PJI according to IDSA criteria. Persistently raised levels of D-dimer after revision arthroplasty in AL cases might be used to effectively diagnose early postoperative infection.