Arthroscopy-controlled medial reefing and lateral release for recurrent patellar dislocation: clinical, radiologic outcomes and complications

Three different patellar fixation techniques yield similar clinical and radiological outcomes in recurrent patellar dislocation undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of three different patellar fixation techniques on medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the treatment of patellar dislocation (PD).

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2020, 130 patients with recurrent PD who underwent surgical reconstruction were eligible for this retrospective study: 48 patients were treated with the semi-tunnel bone bridge fixation technique (Group A), 42 patients were treated with the suture anchor fixation technique (Group B) and 40 patients were treated with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique (Group C). Clinical outcomes included functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores), activity levels (Tegner activity score and return to sports), physical examinations, patellar re-dislocation rate and complications. Radiological outcomes included patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, lateral patellar translation and lateral patellar angle.

RESULTS

All clinical and radiological outcomes improved significantly in all groups, without any significant difference among these three groups. At the final follow-up, no re-dislocation occurred, and all groups achieved a successful return to sports. However, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques showed statistically higher Tegner activity scores (p = 0.004) and shorter time from surgery to return to sports (p = 0.007) than the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique.

CONCLUSION

The three MPFLR patellar fixation techniques achieved favourable and comparable clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of PD. Compared with the transpatellar tunnel fixation technique, the semi-tunnel bone bridge and suture anchor fixation techniques may be more effective with higher activity levels.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Efficacy of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment for Pain Reduction in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is among the most common causes of musculoskeletal pain in the United States. It is defined as retropatellar or peripatellar pain that is reproduced with functional activities that load the patellofemoral joint in a flexed position, such as stair climbing or squatting. While it presents in both adolescents and adults, it is commonly found in physically active individuals, such as athletes and military recruits. Exploring the role of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in PFPS is of particular interest given the absence of a definitive treatment and the poor long-term prognosis associated with PFPS. This meta-analysis includes three studies exploring the use of OMT to reduce pain in patients suffering from PFPS and exploring the efficacy of OMT as a primary intervention. In these studies, pain assessments, pre-treatment, and post-treatment follow-up of at least 30 days were performed using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The mean difference in pain between OMT and no treatment (NT) groups using the random effects model was -3.95 (-6.39; -1.50) with a p<0.01, suggesting OMT resulted in significant knee pain reduction in those with PFPS. A measure of heterogeneity, known as I2, was found to be high at 97%, which suggests caution should be taken when interpreting the overall results. Given the lack of definitive treatment and the poor long-term prognosis for PFPS, the authors suggest OMT provides an effective option for pain relief in patients with PFPS. Further research is needed to provide results that may be more clinically applicable or valuably interpreted.

Indications of Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Patellar Instability in Children

Purpose Understanding the relevant risk factors for patellar instability and the clinical and radiographic tests necessary to determine optimal treatment. This case series intends to evaluate arthroscopic indications in the treatment of patellar instability in children. Methods From 2013 to 2021, 33 patients (seven to 16 years of age) with 35 knees sustaining first-time dislocation with loose bodies, recurrent dislocation or subluxation, and habitual dislocation were arthroscopically operated on according to the flow chart. Periods of follow-up were two to 10 years (avg. 5.5 years). Follow-up assessment included the recurrence, complications (joint stiffness and excessive reduction), and the final function outcomes by using the Kujala score. Results Among 35 knees, there were two (5.7%) first dislocations, 30 (85.7%) recurrent dislocations, and three (8.6%) habitual dislocations, lateral release 27/35 (77.1%), medial reefing 23/35 (65.7%), reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) 12/35 (34.3%). The major complication was a knee of extensive stiffness after medial reefing and lateral release. Recurrence was in 4/35 (11.4%) of knees, not correlated to lateral release (p=0.21), medial reefing, or reconstruction of MPFL (p=0.07); in about 23 knees of medial reefing, recurrence was significantly correlated to number of knots (p=0.045). The final functional results according to Kujala were 88-100 (avg. 95.5). Conclusions This study showed the role of arthroscopy in both medial reefing and reconstruction of MPFL in children by low recurrence rate and high Kujala score at final follow-up. There was no significant correlation between recurrence and the procedures as arthroscopic indications counted on the flow chart.

Revision Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Instability After Patellofemoral Arthroplasty

Recurrent patellar instability is a rare complication after patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and usually involves a traumatic injury. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after arthroplasty is a complicated and technically challenging surgical procedure because the lack of patellar bone stock due to resurfacing significantly increases the risk of patellar fracture. We present our surgical technique for revision MPFL reconstruction for recurrent instability after PFA. This technical note describes the use of 1.8-mm all-suture anchors for revision MPFL reconstruction in patients with decreased patellar bone stock after PFA. This technique reduces the risk of patellar fracture without compromising the integrity of the MPFL graft.