1
|
Dickson SA, Mazza DP, Waddell ML, Dodge PA, Kopkau HE, Nadolski KN, Forrestal KM, Zablocki V, Bailey BA. In utero effects of opioids on fetal growth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2023; 36:2238239. [PMID: 37487761 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2238239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies indicate antenatal opioid use is associated with birth size deficits, as evidenced by reductions in birth weight and head circumference. However, there remains a limited understanding of how early this growth restriction occurs, and what specific parameters are affected. This novel study evaluated global and specific growth deficits associated with prenatal opioid exposure between 18-22 weeks' gestation as assessed during anatomy ultrasounds. METHODS Pregnant women who completed an anatomy ultrasound were identified via electronic medical records from a large academic obstetric practice. The study group used opioids, with tobacco and/or marijuana use permitted (n = 41). The control group could have used tobacco and/or marijuana, but not opioids (n = 308). Neither group had alcohol or other drug exposure. Records were reviewed for medical history and ultrasound size parameters, coded as percentiles for gestational age. RESULTS Demographics and medical histories were compared with several significant differences noted. After controlling for these differences, significant (p < 0.05) growth deficits were identified in opioid-exposed fetuses. Specifically, reductions >10 percentile points were observed in head circumference, biparietal diameter, and humerus length for opioid-exposed fetuses compared to controls. Additionally, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was diagnosed five times more often. Femur length was significantly reduced in opioid-exposed fetuses prior to adjustment for confounding (p = .016), but this reduction was not significant (p = .072) after controlling for background differences. Estimated fetal weight (p = .274) and abdominal circumference (p = .633) were not significantly different between exposure groups. CONCLUSION Fetal opioid exposure predicted various bone growth deficits during routine anatomy ultrasound, indicating the effects of opioid exposure on size deficits may be evident as early as 18-22 weeks' gestation. These findings may also suggest that in utero opioid exposure negatively impacts bone growth specifically rather than weight or fat/muscle mass. Additional studies with larger sample sizes may also reveal significantly reduced femur length, further supporting a negative impact on bone growth. Future studies evaluating bone health and immune function in children after antenatal opioid exposure may help clarify this specific effect of opioids on bone development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha A Dickson
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - David P Mazza
- The Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Madison L Waddell
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Phoebe A Dodge
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Haley E Kopkau
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | | | - Kaya M Forrestal
- The Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow College of Health Professions, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Victoria Zablocki
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Beth A Bailey
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu B, Chen H, Li C, Guan Y, Jiang W, Wang H, Guo W, Wen W, Cen X, Wang H, Tian J. Reproductive and developmental toxicity assessments of LPM3480392, a novel mu opioid receptor biased agonist in rats. Reprod Toxicol 2023; 119:108403. [PMID: 37196679 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Opioids remain the most powerful analgesics for moderate to severe pain but their clinical use, misuse and abuse has been an alarming medical problem, especially for those users at child-bearing age. Mu-opioid receptor (MOR) biased agonists have been suggested as superior alternatives with better therapeutic ratios. We recently discovered and characterized a novel MOR biased agonist, LPM3480392, which demonstrates robust analgesic effect, favorable pharmacokinetic performance, and mild respiratory suppression in vivo. To understand the safety profile of LPM3480392 on the reproductive system and embryonic development, this study evaluated the effects of LPM3480392 on the fertility and early embryonic development, embryo-fetal development, and pre- and postnatal development in rats. Results showed that LPM3480392 had mild effects on parental male and female animals, accompanied by subtle early embryonic loss and delayed ossification of fetal development during organogenesis period. In addition, although minor effects were found on normal developmental milestones and behaviors in the pups, there was no evidence of malformed effect. In conclusion, these results suggest that LPM3480392 has a favorable safety profile with only minor effects on the reproductive and developmental outcomes in animals, which support the development of LPM3480392 as a novel analgesic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bin Liu
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Hongyu Chen
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Chunmei Li
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China; Bohai Rim Advanced Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Yantai 264005, China
| | - Yana Guan
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Wanglin Jiang
- Bohai Rim Advanced Research Institute for Drug Discovery, Yantai 264005, China; Department of Clinical Medicine, Binzhou Medical College, Yantai 256603, China
| | - Hanrong Wang
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Wei Guo
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Wen Wen
- National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xiaobo Cen
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China; National Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs, State Key Lab of Biotherapy/Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
| | - Jingwei Tian
- School of Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology and Drug Evaluation (Yantai University), Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Drug Delivery System and Biotech Drugs in Universities of Shandong, Yantai University, Yantai 264005, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bodnar RJ. Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2021. Peptides 2023; 164:171004. [PMID: 36990387 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2023.171004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
This paper is the forty-fourth consecutive installment of the annual anthological review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, summarizing articles published during 2021 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides and receptors as well as effects of opioid/opiate agonizts and antagonists. The review is subdivided into the following specific topics: molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors (1), the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia in animals (2) and humans (3), opioid-sensitive and opioid-insensitive effects of nonopioid analgesics (4), opioid peptide and receptor involvement in tolerance and dependence (5), stress and social status (6), learning and memory (7), eating and drinking (8), drug abuse and alcohol (9), sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (10), mental illness and mood (11), seizures and neurologic disorders (12), electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (13), general activity and locomotion (14), gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (15), cardiovascular responses (16), respiration and thermoregulation (17), and immunological responses (18).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Bodnar
- Department of Psychology and Neuropsychology Doctoral Sub-Program, Queens College, City University of New York, CUNY, 65-30 Kissena Blvd., Flushing, NY 11367, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
How Do Drugs Affect the Skeleton? Implications for Forensic Anthropology. BIOLOGY 2022; 11:biology11040524. [PMID: 35453723 PMCID: PMC9030599 DOI: 10.3390/biology11040524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Simple Summary Forensic anthropologists analyze human remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly by assessing age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry and any unique identifying features. Whilst methods have been established to create this biological profile of the skeleton, these may be influenced by a number of factors. This paper, for the first time, provides an overview from a reading of the clinical and pharmacological literature to explore whether the intake of drugs can affect the skeleton and whether these may have implications for forensic anthropology casework. In effect, drugs such as tobacco, heroin, and prescription medications can alter bone mineral density, can increase the risk of fractures, destroy bone and changes to the dentition. By considering how drugs can affect the skeleton, forensic anthropologists can be aware of this when attempting to identify the deceased. Abstract Forensic anthropologists rely on a number of parameters when analyzing human skeletal remains to assist in the identification of the deceased, predominantly age-at-death, sex, stature, ancestry or population affinity, and any unique identifying features. During the examination of human remains, it is important to be aware that the skeletal features considered when applying anthropological methods may be influenced and modified by a number of factors, and particular to this article, prescription drugs (including medical and non-medical use) and other commonly used drugs. In view of this, this paper aims to review the medical, clinical and pharmacological literature to enable an assessment of those drug groups that as side effects have the potential to have an adverse effect on the skeleton, and explore whether or not they can influence the estimation of age-at-death, sex and other indicators of the biological profile. Moreover, it may be that the observation of certain alterations or inconsistencies in the skeleton may relate to the use of drugs or medication, and this in turn may help narrow down the list of missing persons to which a set of human remains could belong. The information gathered from the clinical and medical literature has been extracted with a forensic anthropological perspective and provides an awareness on how several drugs, such as opioids, cocaine, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, tobacco and others have notable effects on bone. Through different mechanisms, drugs can alter bone mineral density, causing osteopenia, osteoporosis, increase the risk of fractures, osteonecrosis, and oral changes. Not much has been written on the influence of drugs on the skeleton from the forensic anthropological practitioner perspective; and this review, in spite of its limitations and the requirement of further research, aims to investigate the current knowledge of the possible effects of both prescription and recreational drugs on bones, contributing to providing a better awareness in forensic anthropological practice and assisting in the identification process of the deceased.
Collapse
|