The EPIPHA-KNEE trial: Explaining Pain to target unhelpful pain beliefs to Increase PHysical Activity in KNEE osteoarthritis - a protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial with clinical- and cost-effectiveness analysis

Real-world implementation of pain science education and barriers to use in private practice physiotherapy settings: an Australia-wide cross-sectional survey

ABSTRACT

Physiotherapists are critically positioned to integrate education into patient care, including pain science education (PSE) to enhance management and outcomes. Anecdotally, many physiotherapists report difficulty providing PSE in private practice settings. Here, we aimed to explore current PSE use, knowledge, and barriers to implementation. A nationwide online (Qualtrics) survey of PSE-trained Australian private practice physiotherapists assessed use, knowledge (revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire [rNPQ]), concept application, implementation barriers, and resource awareness/use/preferences, exploring associations with individual/clinic-level factors (clinical experience, PSE training, work location). A total of 278 physiotherapists (62.9% female, 39.4 [11.8] years, 15.2 [11.6] years of experience, 37.2% rural/remote) completed the survey. Pain science knowledge (rNPQ: mean 10.4 [2.2]/13) and perceived PSE competence was high, although 30% supported inaccurate PSE concepts. Pain science education training via professional development course was associated with higher knowledge relative to university training (multivariable; β = 1.337, P < 0.001). Physiotherapists reported providing PSE to 61% of patients, with patient-related barriers (expecting other treatments: 94%; previous negative/contradictory PSE experiences: 89%), clinic-level barriers (time constraints: 77%; insufficient billing schedules: 57%), and clinician-specific barriers (difficulties identifying/addressing patient maladaptive beliefs/behaviours: 53%; cultural/demographic translation challenges: 46%) reported. Fewer years of clinical experience was associated with heightened worry that providing PSE might go wrong (multivariable; β = -0.034, P = 0.010) and/or damage therapeutic relationships (multivariable; β = -0.049, P < 0.001). Physiotherapists were aware of over 100 PSE resources, with varying levels of perceived use/effectiveness, yet were largely unaware of educational strategies. Physiotherapists called for reduced complexity and greater ability to individualise PSE resources. Findings will guide improvements in PSE training/resources, to maximise physiotherapists' confidence and preparedness to effectively implement PSE.

Painful distortions: people with painful knee osteoarthritis have biased visuospatial perception of the environment

ABSTRACT

Visuospatial perception is thought to be adaptive-ie, hills are perceived as steeper when capacity is low, or threat is high-guiding appropriate interaction with the environment. Pain (bodily threat) may similarly modulate visuospatial perception, with the extent of modulation influenced by threat magnitude (pain intensity, fear) and associated with behaviour (physical activity). We compared visuospatial perception of the environment between 50 people with painful knee osteoarthritis and 50 age-/sex-matched pain-free control participants using 3 virtual reality tasks (uphill steepness estimation, downhill steepness estimation, and a distance-on-hill measure), exploring associations between visuospatial perception, clinical characteristics (pain intensity, state and trait fear), and behaviour (wrist-worn accelerometry) within a larger knee osteoarthritis group (n = 85). People with knee osteoarthritis overestimated uphill (F 1,485 = 19.4, P < 0.001) and downhill (F 1,480 = 32.3, P < 0.001) steepness more so than pain-free controls, but the groups did not differ for distance-on-hill measures (U = 1273, P = 0.61). There was also a significant group x steepness interaction for the downhill steepness task (F 4,480 = 3.11, P = 0.02). Heightened overestimation in people with knee osteoarthritis relative to pain-free controls increased as downhill slopes became steeper. Results were unchanged in a replication analysis using all knee osteoarthritis participants (n = 85), except the downhill steepness interaction was no longer significant. In people with knee osteoarthritis, higher state fear was associated with greater over-estimation of downhill slope steepness (rho = 0.69, P < 0.001), and greater visuospatial overestimation (distance-on-hill) was associated with lower physical activity levels (rho = -0.22, P = 0.045). These findings suggest that chronic pain may shift perception of the environment in line with protection, with overestimation heightened when threat is greater (steeper hills, more fearful), although impact on real-world behaviour is uncertain.

Item development and pre-testing of an Osteoarthritis Conceptualisation Questionnaire to assess knowledge and beliefs in people with knee pain

Many people with osteoarthritis hold beliefs that physical activity is unhelpful or dangerous for their joints, despite high-level evidence suggesting otherwise. Recent advances in scientific understanding of osteoarthritis have led to new treatments that target an individual's understanding both of their condition and the importance of best-practice management strategies, such as physical activity. Conceptual change has been proposed as an important mechanism by which cognitive interventions, such as pain science education, may reduce pain and improve function. There are currently no specific assessments of osteoarthritis conceptualisation to determine the effectiveness of cognitive interventions in effecting conceptual change in people with knee osteoarthritis. Therefore, we aimed to develop an item bank, as the first phase of developing a questionnaire to assess people's conceptualisations about their knee osteoarthritis and the role of physical activity in managing their osteoarthritis. Using a guideline-informed mixed method design, a panel of experts identified domains relevant to conceptualisation about knee osteoarthritis and physical activity (knowledge, beliefs, understanding) based upon available evidence. The panel created 33 provisional items. Qualitative and quantitative pretesting were used to explore how people with knee osteoarthritis understood the provisional items. Eighteen people with knee osteoarthritis completed cognitive interviews about their comprehension of the wording/grammar of each provisional item. The provisional item bank was field tested with 100 people with knee osteoarthritis. Readability was adequate with a Flesch reading ease score of 57.7. Although 14.7% used the 'Strongly agree' response option, only 3.4% of responses used the 'Strongly disagree' option, suggesting possible response bias. Predictive quality testing identified relevant modifications to the questionnaire instructions. The panel of experts appraised the qualitative data to assess whether and how items should be modified to address the problems identified, resulting in a final item bank of 45 items that can be evaluated for psychometric properties in future research.