Femoral neck fracture: the reliability of radiologic classifications

Enhancing Clinical Insights: New Radiographic Grading for Lumbar Facet Joint Degeneration, A Reliability Study

Background

Lumbar facet joint diseases can often lead to reduced work efficiency and increased medical costs. As a primary imaging tool in orthopedics, X-rays offer numerous advantages. However, there is no consensus on the classification of lumbar facet joints based on X-ray imaging.

Methods

This study was conducted for 356 patients between November 2017 and September 2023. A senior radiologist and a senior orthopedic surgeon discussed and established a grading system for lumbar facet joints based on both X-ray and MRI findings. Two double-blind attending spinal surgeons were asked to evaluate and grade the included cases. The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability were evaluated by assessing the weighted kappa (κw) coefficient.

Results

The level of inter-rater reliability of MRI for complete agreement was good for Doctor A (κw = 0.792) and Doctor B (κw = 0.869). The inter-rater reliability coefficient for grading lumbar facet joint degeneration based on the radiograph was as follows: for Doctor A (κw = 0.702, session 1; κw = 0.847, session 2) and Doctor B (κw = 0.714, session 1; κw = 0.828, session 2). Moreover, the level of intra-rater reliability based on X-ray for complete agreement was excellent for Doctor A (κw = 0.843) and Doctor B (κw = 0.836).

Conclusion

We propose a new grading system for lumbar facet joint degeneration based on X-rays, which serves as a supplement to the Weishaupt and Pathria classifications. This grading system aims to provide clinicians with a more comprehensive understanding of lumbar facet joint degeneration, allowing for the use of a broader range of diagnostic tools to evaluate facet joint degeneration from multiple perspectives. We believe that this grading system can be valuable in assessing potential anatomical changes related to the facet joint, thereby informing modifications to surgical techniques and procedural steps.

Clinical application of modified hip joint lateral position in femoral neck fracture

BACKGROUND

To show the femoral neck better in hip lateral view of X-ray, we design a modified hip lateral view and then investigate the value in femoral neck fractures.

METHODS

CT images of 10 normal hip joints for 3D reconstruction were selected, the Mimics Medical 21.0 was used, and rotating the proximal femur was to find the most suitable angle for showing the femoral neck well, designed the modified lateral view according to this angle. We collected 35 healthy cases and 35 femoral neck fractures as the normal and fracture group. And two groups were all taken hip anteroposterior view, cross-table lateral view and modified lateral view, which were analyzed by two radiologists to score the anatomical structures of the articular surface, femoral head, head neck junction, femoral neck, basal region and intertrochanteric region. Friedman test was used to analyze the score of femoral neck at different angles. T test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were to compare inter-groups.

RESULTS

The modified lateral view was designed as follows: The subjects were supine, with the sagittal axis biased toward the healthy side at an angle of approximately 20° to the long axis of the examination table, the hip joint flexed at 45°, the lower extremity abducted at 40°, the centerline inclined 45° toward the head and the centerline aligned with the center of the groin. The modified lateral view showed the femoral head, head neck junction and femoral neck more clearly than the cross-table lateral view, but the cross-table lateral view showed the femoral neck basal and intertrochanteric region better. In addition, the time of taking the modified lateral view was significantly less than the cross-table lateral view (normal group: 0.789 min ± 0.223 vs 0.623 min ± 0.207, P < 0.001; fracture group: 1.131 min ± 0.362 vs 0.946 min ± 0.390, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified lateral view can obtain a standard sagittal image of femoral neck, which can show the dislocation and angulation of the sagittal femoral neck fracture clearly, and improve the accuracy of diagnosis. And it is more convenient and easier for patients to cooperate, which is worthy promoting and applying in clinical work.

Conversion to Arthroplasty After Internal Fixation of Nondisplaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Results from a Swedish Register Cohort of 5,428 Individuals 60 Years of Age or Older

BACKGROUND

Although most nondisplaced or minimally displaced femoral neck fractures are routinely treated with internal fixation, high rates of secondary surgical procedures are common, especially in the elderly population. Primary arthroplasty in elderly patients has been proposed as an alternative treatment to reduce the need for a secondary surgical procedure. The objective of this study was to describe the rate of conversion to arthroplasty within 5 years after internal fixation of nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients ≥60 years of age.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR) between 2012 and 2018, cross-matched with the Swedish Arthroplasty Register (SAR), 5,428 nondisplaced femoral neck fractures in patients ≥60 years of age were included. Competing risk analysis was used to estimate conversion rates to arthroplasty and mortality in various age groups at 1, 2, and 5 years.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence function (CIF) for conversion to arthroplasty was 6.3% at 1 year, 8.1% at 2 years, and 10.1% at 5 years. The conversion rates within 2 years were 6.5% in 60 to 69-year-olds, 9.6% in 70 to 79-year-olds, and 7.8% in ≥80-year-olds. Women had a higher risk of conversion; the hazard ratio (HR) was 1.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.87). The cumulative mortality was 21.3% (95% CI, 20.3% to 22.5%) at 1 year, 31.3% (95% CI, 30.0% to 32.6%) at 2 years, and 54.9% (95% CI, 53.1% to 56.7%) at 5 years. Mortality was higher in men at all time points, and the adjusted 1-year HR was 1.79 (95% CI, 1.61 to 2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

One in 10 patients ≥60 years of age treated with internal fixation for a nondisplaced femoral neck fracture underwent conversion to arthroplasty within 5 years, and more than one-half of the conversions occurred within the first year. The risk of conversion was highest in women and in patients 70 to 79 years of age. These data warrant further studies in this frail patient group to identify subgroups of patients who would benefit from primary arthroplasty for nondisplaced femoral neck fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Does Garden type I incomplete femoral neck fracture really exist in older adults? To evaluate the stability and consistency of Garden classification

Background

Accurate classification of femoral neck fracture (FNF) is crucial for treatment plan and therapeutic outcomes. Garden classification is commonly used in the clinic, but its stability and consistency remain controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability and consistency of Garden classification based on X and CT images, and to analyze whether it is valid for Garden I in the elderly.

Methods

X-ray and CT images from 886 elderly patients with FNF were collected, four orthopaedic surgeons and four radiologists evaluated these images independently, and determined the fracture type based on Garden classification. Three months later, The exercise was repeated and the results were compared based on 4 types Garden classification (I, II, III and IV) and 3 types Garden classification (I + II, III and IV). Kappa was used to measure inter- and intraobserver agreement. The patients with Garden I incomplete FNF confirmed by 8 observers together based on images combined with medical history were compared with the intraoperative results.

Results

Four types Garden classification, there was little consistency inter- and intraobservers (Kappa from 0.18 to 0.43) based on X-ray images, while professors consistency (0.56 to 0.76) was higher than residents (0.28 to 0.35) based on CT. 3 types Garden classification showed almost perfect agreement inter- and intraobservers, which ranged from 0.76 to 0.90. Totally 52 patients were diagnosed as Garden I, 38 of whom underwent arthroplasty. All surgical cases showed complete fracture during operation.

Conclusions

There was low consistency and repeatability in 4 types Garden classification (I, II, III and IV), while 3 types Garden classification (I + II, III and IV) had high consistency among observers. In the elderly, all undisplaced femoral neck fracture may be Garden II, no Garden I.