Factors influencing inconsistent leg length discrepancy in dysplastic hip osteoarthritis: a retrospective study

Characteristics of pelvic obliquity in dysplastic hip osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Factors affecting direction of pelvic obliquity (PO) in dysplastic hip osteoarthritis (DHOA) remains unclear. This retrospective cohort study evaluates morphological characteristics, spinal alignment, and hip function in patients with unilateral DHOA.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2022, 104 patients with unilateral DHA were enrolled. Patients were categorized into flat PO (F-PO group; PO < 2°), affected side PO (A-PO group; PO downward by ≥ 2°), and unaffected side PO (U-PO group; PO upward by ≥ 2°). Demographics, radiographic hip and lower limb parameters, spinal parameters, and functional scores were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

There were 39, 44, and 21 patients in the F-PO, A-PO, and U-PO group, respectively. The subluxation percentage of Crowe classification showed a significant difference among the three groups. The femoral head lateralization distance was significantly greater in the U-PO group than in the F-PO and A-PO groups. Furthermore, the hip adduction angle was significantly lower in the A-PO group than in the F-PO and U-PO groups. The lumbar scoliosis angle was significantly different between the groups. In multivariate analysis, hip adduction angle was extracted as an independent factor associated with the A-PO. Age, subluxation percentage, and hip adduction angle were identified as independent factors associated with the U-PO. Harris hip score was significantly poorer in U-PO group than in F-PO group.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip adduction angle influenced A-PO, while age, subluxation percentage, and hip adduction angle influenced U-PO; lumbar scoliosis angle was associated with PO direction. U-PO patients had poorer functional scores, indicating the impact of hip contracture and subluxation on PO direction in DHOA.

Risk factors for residual pelvic obliquity one year after total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

It is not uncommon for patients with hip disorders to present with pelvic obliquity (PO), and residual PO after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may not only affect hip joint function but also cause adjacent intervertebral joint disorders. This study aimed to investigate the postoperative PO impact on clinical outcomes and risk factors by comparing patients who had PO after THA to those who did not.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. A total of 103 patients who underwent THA were included in this study from 2018 to 2020. Demographics, functional outcomes, and spinopelvic parameters were compared between post-THA PO of less than 2° (NT group, 55 patients) and PO of 2° or more (O group, 48 patients). Multivariate analysis was performed using factors with significant differences in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Postoperative Harris Hip Score Activity was significantly lower in the T group than in the NT group (p = 0.031). Preoperative PO was smaller in the NT group than in the T group (p = 0.001). Preoperative lumbar bending range (LBR) was significantly more flexible in the NT group than in the T group. In the logistic regression analysis, Age (odds ratio 0.957, 95% CI 0.923-0.993, p = 0.020), preoperative PO (odds ratio 1.490, 95% CI 1.100-2.020, p = 0.001), and LBR (odds ratio 0.848, 95% CI 0.756-0.951, p = 0.005) were found to be significant factors.

CONCLUSION

Younger age and large preoperative PO, and poor lumbar spine mobility were identified as risk factors for residual postoperative PO.

Impact of the hip-spine relationship and patient-perceived leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Patient-perceived leg length discrepancy (PLLD) is one of the major postoperative complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA). This study aimed to identify factors that cause PLLD following THA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included a series of consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA between 2015 and 2020. Ninety-five patients who underwent unilateral THA with postoperative radiographic leg length discrepancy (RLLD) ≤1 cm were classified into two groups according to the direction of preoperative pelvic obliquity (PO). Standing radiographs of the hip joint and whole spine were obtained before and one year after THA. The clinical outcomes and the presence or absence of PLLD was confirmed one year after THA.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients were classified as having type 1 PO (rising toward the unaffected side) and 26 were classified as having type 2 PO (rising toward the affected side). Eight patients with type 1 PO and seven with type 2 PO had PLLD postoperatively. In the type 1 group, patients with PLLD had larger preoperative and postoperative PO values and larger preoperative and postoperative RLLD than those without PLLD (p = 0.01, p < 0.001, p = 0.01, and p = 0.007, respectively). In the type 2 group, patients with PLLD had larger preoperative RLLD, larger amount of leg correction, and a larger preoperative L1-L5 angle than those without PLLD (p = 0.03, p = 0.03, and p = 0.03, respectively). In type 1, postoperative PO was significantly associated with postoperative PLLD (p = 0.005), but spinal alignment was not an indicator of postoperative PLLD. The area under the curve (AUC) for postoperative PO was 0.883 (good accuracy) with a cut-off value was 1.90° CONCLUSION: Rigidity of the lumbar spine might lead to postoperative PO as a compensatory movement, resulting in PLLD after THA in type 1. Further research on the relationship between flexibility of the lumbar spine and PLLD is needed.

A large preoperative pelvic oblique angle affects perception of leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In some cases, patients feel a perceived leg length discrepancy (P-LLD) despite no radiographic leg length discrepancy (R-LLD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We aimed to investigate the rate of postoperative P-LLD and the factors that cause postoperative P-LLD.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 100 patients with R-LLD ≤5 mm after THA. Patients were classified into two groups based on P-LLD post-THA: group P (with P-LLD) and group E (without P-LLD). Relevant data on the general characteristics and radiological findings between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

We observed that 25 & 75% of patients belonged to group P and group E, respectively, with no significant difference in patient background. Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) classification of pain and activities of daily living scores were significantly lower in group P than in group E (37.2 ± 3.9 vs. 39.1 ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.013, and 16.2 ± 4.2 vs. 18.2 ± 2.2, respectively; P = 0.011). The preoperative pelvic oblique angle (POA) was significantly larger in group P than in group E (3.3 ± 2.3° vs. -0.2 ± 2.1°; respectively; P < 0.01). The pelvis tilted toward the surgical side was significantly higher in group P than in group E(88% vs 57%; respectively; P = 0.013). The preoperative C7 coronal vertical axis (C7 CVA) was significantly larger in group P than in group E (6.7 ± 14.7 mm vs. -0.2 ± 10.3 mm; respectively; P = 0.028). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that preoperative POA (OR, 3.71; 95% CI: 1.86-8.12; P < 0.01) and the pelvis tilted toward the surgical side (OR, 4.14; 95% CI: 2.07-9.71; P = 0.022) were independent risk factors for P-LLD after THA.

CONCLUSION

Even though there was no postoperative R-LLD, 25% of patients had P-LLD. A large preoperative POA and the pelvis tilted toward the surgical side were independent risk factors for P-LLD after THA.

Fall risk in patient with dysplastic hip osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Patients with dysplastic hip osteo arthritis (DHOA) often have a spinopelvic imbalance, and they are more likely to experience falls. This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for falls in patients with DHOA, including spinopelvic parameters.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 103 patients with DHOA were included from 2019 to 2021. Fall risk was evaluated using the Fall Risk Index 5 items version (FRI-5). Demographics, functional outcomes, and spinopelvic parameters were compared between the high-risk group (FRI-5 ≥ 6) and the low-risk group (FRI-5 < 6). Multivariate analysis was performed using factors with significant differences in univariate analysis.

RESULTS

High-risk and low-risk groups comprised 54 and 49 patients, respectively. Females were significantly more common in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group. The Harris Hip Score was significantly lower in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p = 0.02). Pelvic incidence, tilt, and obliquity were significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-12.64, p = 0.03), pelvic obliquity (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.09-1.71, p < 0.01), and Harris hip score (OR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99, p = 0.02) were identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Female sex, pelvic obliquity, and low Harris hip score were associated with an increased risk of falls among patients with DHOA.

Differences in peri-hip articular pain after total hip arthroplasty between taper wedge stem and fit-and-fill stem

Background

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip disorders helps to alleviate pain and improve active daily life. When determining the effects of medical therapy and the subsequent clinical results, patient quality of life (QOL) also needs to be assessed. Recently, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have become important as evaluation criteria. This study aimed to evaluate patient QOL and various PRO between different types of cementless stems and to clarify the relationship between PRO and stem-cortical bone contact.

Methods

The study comprised 138 consecutive patients undergoing cementless THA for hip osteoarthritis. We assessed three different types of PRO: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Hip-Disease Evaluation Questionnaire (JHEQ), patient's joint perception, and peri-hip articular joint pain (PHAP). We measured the state of contact between femur and implant by density mapping.

Results

No significant difference was noted in PRO between stem types based on the JHEQ and patient's joint perception. PHAP occurred more frequently in the patients with a taper wedge stem versus a fit-and-fill stem. In both groups, distal contact was associated with PHAP but not with JHEQ results and patient's joint perception.

Conclusion

The difference in PHAP between the two stem types groups was significant, with postoperative PHAP being higher with the taper wedge stem because of the more distal contact between the taper wedge stem and femur cortical bone.