Dynamic soft tissue mobilization versus proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation in reducing hamstring muscle tightness in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized control trial

Comparing the effects of neck stabilization exercises versus dynamic exercises among patients having nonspecific neck pain with forward head posture: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific neck pain (NSNP) is a well-established global burden affecting. It is also a common problem in Pakistan. The burden of neck pain is also increasing day by day due to poor work ergonomics, and increased use of computers and mobiles after the pandemic. An individual's poor posture is often associated with forward head posture (FHP). Limited evidence is available about the effects of neck stabilization (NSE) and dynamic exercises (NDE) for nonspecific neck pain particularly in patients with FHP. This aimed to compare the effects of NSE versus NDE among patients having NSNP with FHP in reducing pain, disability, forward head posture and improving neck range of motion.

METHODS

It is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial with 60 patients aged 18-40 years, with moderate intensity NSNP for > 3 weeks and < 6 months along with FHP with a moderate disability on neck disability index (NDI) randomly assigned to the treatment groups. Group 1 was doing NSE and group 2 was doing NDE. Transcutaneous Electical Nerve Stimulation, cold packs, and stretching exercises were given to both groups. A total of 9 sessions (3 sessions/ week) were given to participants. NDI questionnaire, Visual analogue scale (VAS), goniometry, and plumb line measurement tool were used as baseline and assessment at the end of 3rd week. The data was analyzed on SPSS version 21. Descriptive analysis was performed. Independent t-test was used for between group comparison and paired t-test used for within group comparison. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

After treatment within-group analysis of both NSE and NDE showed significant (p < 0.001) improvement in pain on VAS, all ROMs of the neck including flexion, extension, left and right lateral flexion and left rotation, plumb line and NDI score with very large effect size. However, between-group analysis showed non-significant differences (p > 0.05) for post-treatment mean VAS, neck ROM, NDI and plumb line measurement.

CONCLUSION

Between NSE and NDE, no one is more beneficial than another. Both are equally effective in alleviating pain, increasing ROM, decreasing functional disability, and improving forward head posture in patients with NSNP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered trial at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05298631, 28/03/2022, prospectively registered.

Comparison of muscle tightness between knees in individuals with unilateral osteoarthritis and its relationship with pain and function

BACKGROUND

Unilateral osteoarthritis (OA) affects single knees and presents a unique scenario where individuals experience varying degrees of symptoms between their affected and unaffected knees.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate differences in muscle tightness between symptomatic and asymptomatic knees in individuals with unilateral knee OA while exploring the interplay among pain, functionality, and muscle tightness.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, thirty knee OA patients underwent assessments for hamstring (Active Knee Extension, Straight Leg Raise), iliotibial band (Ober Test), and quadriceps tightness (Modified Thomas Test). Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional limitations were evaluated via the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC).

RESULTS

A negative correlation was observed between participants' pain and AKE (p= 0.004, r=-0.515), ASLR (p= 0.27, r=-0.403), Ober (p= 0.010, r=-0.461) values. However, no significant correlation was found with the Modified Thomas value (p= 0.204, r=-0.239). There was also a negative correlation between participants' WOMAC scores and AKE (p= 0.019, r=-0.427), OBER (p= 0.004, r=-0.510), and Modified Thomas (p= 0.022, r=-0.416) values, while ASLR (p= 0.286, r=-0.202) values showed no significant correlation. Comparisons between AKE, Ober, and Modified Thomas values showed higher values in asymptomatic extremities (AKE: p= 0.025, Ober: p= 0.021, Modified Thomas: p= 0.030).

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the significance of muscle tightness in the symptomatic extremities of individuals with unilateral knee OA. The results indicate that increased muscle tightness makes pain worse and limits movement. It's crucial for healthcare providers treating OA to focus on improving muscle flexibility, reducing pain, and enhancing overall function.