Assessing lateral femoral condyle cartilage prior to medial UKA: MRI vs. Valgus stress radiograph

Anteromedial knee osteoarthritis (AMOA) evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): a cohort study of 100 patients

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are increasingly used for knee osteoarthritis evaluation and preoperative planning before unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and often patients already have MRI scans before their initial surgeon consultation. This highlights the need for surgeons to understand anteromedial osteoarthritis (AMOA) patterns on MRI. Hence, we aim to describe MRI findings in patients with AMOA meeting current indications for medial UKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analysed MRI scans from 100 knees evaluated for UKA between 2006 and 2013. Inclusion criteria comprised full-thickness medial compartment loss and intact lateral compartment joint space on preoperative radiographs. Assessment included cartilage lesions, osteophytes, meniscal damage, and anterior-cruciate ligament (ACL) status on tibial and femoral surfaces. Final decision to proceed with UKA relied on intraoperative findings, independent of MRI.

RESULTS

Complete anteromedial tibial and femoral cartilage loss preserved posterior cartilage rims was evident in all cases. Cartilage thinning occurred in the lateral compartment in 34% of cases. While 62% displayed lateral osteophytes, only 6 exhibited small areas of full-thickness cartilage loss. ACL abnormalities varied: 27% normal, 3% ruptured, and 70% had intrasubstance high signal. Larger osteophytes in the medial (p = 0.012) and lateral (p = 0.002) intercondylar notch correlated significantly with ACL damage. All underwent medial UKA, with no evidence of areas with full lateral compartment cartilage loss intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The MRI findings confirmed the radiographic diagnosis of bone-on-bone medial disease but highlights a range of findings in the ACL, lateral compartment, and patellofemoral joint compartment for patients who met the current x-ray and intraoperative indication for UKA. Further research is required to understand if these MRI changes will affect long-term outcomes.

Small medial proximal tibial angle is a radiographic finding strongly associated with less coronal alignment correction under valgus stress in medial knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The degree to which varus knees can be corrected manually is important when considering total versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The primary aim was to clarify the relationship between the degree of coronal alignment correction and radiographic parameters involved in UKA prognosis using preoperative full-length lower extremity valgus stress radiography. The secondary aim was to identify the factors affecting alignment correction.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 115 knees with medial osteoarthritis that underwent knee osteotomy or arthroplasty. Percent mechanical axis without valgus stress (%MA: neutral, 50%; varus, <50% and valgus, >50%), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, lateral bowing femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle, medial and lateral joint space width (LJSW) and medial femoral and tibial joint osteophyte size were measured using preoperative full-length weight-bearing radiographs. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess associations between parameters and %MA with valgus stress or amount of %MA change (%MA with valgus stress minus %MA without valgus stress).

RESULTS

%MA with valgus stress was correlated with all radiographic parameters. %MA change was correlated with parameters except for MPTA and LJSW. Multiple regression analyses showed that %MA without valgus stress and MPTA were associated with both %MA with valgus stress and %MA change. When %MA with valgus stress was set at 30%, 40% and 50%, MPTA cutoff values were 81.6°, 83.5° and 84.9°, and cutoffs for %MA without valgus stress were 10.7%, 17.1% and 25.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Small MPTA is strongly associated with less alignment correction under valgus stress in varus knees. The finding is useful in surgical planning, especially to avoid undercorrection with UKA when valgus stress radiographs are unavailable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.