Comparison of temporary external and percutaneous k-wire fixations for treatment of ankle fracture-dislocations

A Novel Uni- and Biplanar External Fixator for Initial and Definitive Complex Foot Trauma

Background

Evidence concerning the complex foot trauma, especially its definitive management, is scarce. Soft tissue envelope sequalae are the primary parameters that delay or make internal fixation implausible. Stability conferred by external fixators makes them a reasonable initial treatment choice. Although AO or circular fixators can be applied around the foot, this can involve a learning curve and substantial costs, especially for the circular fixator. There is little evidence as to how well external fixators work as a definite method of fixation in patients where progression to internal fixation cannot be made.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated 10 adult patients with severe and complex foot trauma who were consecutively treated at our clinic. Initial reduction and stabilization were performed with an external fixator that was initially conceived for distal radius fractures, applied during the initial procedure and mantained throughout the treatment.

Results

Fracture healing was obtained in all 10 cases, and both internal and external column length was restored. One of the patients developed chronic osteomyelitis. At the 1-year follow-up visit, these patients averaged 45.6 points in the physical and 44.8 points on the mental status sections of the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). The Foot Function Index findings for pain, disability, and daily activities limitations were 33.3, 39, and 41.5, respectively, which suggest moderate residual impairment.

Conclusion

In this relatively small case series of complex foot trauma, we found that the use of simple external fixation as definitive treatment worked reasonably well.

Level of Evidence

Level III, prospective cohort study.

Lower limb preservation in pediatric trauma: a case study of Gustilo grade IIIC fracture in a 7-year-old

This case report describes the intricate aspects of managing pediatric lower limb trauma. A 7-year-old patient had a severe compound fracture and significant soft tissue damage in the left lower limb, classified as Gustilo Grade IIIC. This necessitated the use of scoring systems such as the Mangled Extremity Severity Score and limb salvage index to assess the likelihood of limb preservation. Despite these high amputation risk indicators, a multidisciplinary approach has led to limb salvage surgery with internal fixation. Detailed postoperative monitoring revealed progressive recovery culminating in restored sensation, bone healing, and functional recovery. The discussion emphasizes the difficulties in deciding between limb salvage and amputation, stressing the importance of tailored care and cautious scoring system interpretation in pediatric cases. This conclusion advocates the prioritization of limb salvage in children owing to their unique healing capabilities while highlighting the need for further research to refine treatment protocols for pediatric lower limb trauma.