Giant ventral hernia-relationship between abdominal wall muscle strength and hernia area

Quality of life and abdominal wall functionality after abdominal wall reconstruction: A prospective single center follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Fascial breakdown with the occurrence of an incisional hernia (IH) is an important and challenging complication of any laparotomy. For a long time, the success of the abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) was measured only from the surgeon's perspective by defining outcome measures such as wound morbidity and recurrence. The understanding that complete recovery is difficult to assess without considering patients has shifted the paradigm of optimal outcomes to Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) and Quality of Life (QoL), which are pivotal to evaluate the success and efficacy of AWR.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective follow-up study of 91 patients undergoing mesh-augmented abdominal wall reconstruction for primary or recurrent incisional hernia between January 2021 and December 2023. Demographic data, comorbidities, and hernia characteristics were recorded. All patients were evaluated preoperatively by a native abdomino-pelvic CT scan to assess the characteristics of hernia (length, width, surface, and volume of the incisional hernia sac and of peritoneal cavity), the presence of mesh (if previously inserted), and abdominal wall muscles status. All intervention were performed by the same surgical team according to the techniques described by Rives - Stoppa (RS), Ramirez (ACS), and Novitsky (PCS). Abdominal wall function was assessed using trunk raising (TR) and double leg lowering (DLL) measurements performed preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. At the same time, pre- and post-operative quality of life was analysed using the EQ-5D score.

RESULTS

Mean age of 59.42 ± 12.28 years and a male/female ratio of 35/56 were recorded, most of them being obese. There were 36 (42%) patients with defects larger than 10 cm. The distribution of the type of surgical intervention was: RS 35 patients, ACS 13 patients, and PCS 43 patients. The mean value of combined score for the preoperative abdominal wall functionality was 4.41 ± 1.67 (2-8) while the mean value of preoperative EQ-5D index was 0.652 ± 0.026 (-0.32-1.00). QoL was poor and very poor for 48% (44) of the patients who recorded index values less than 0.56 (50% percentile). Preoperative EQ-5D index was highly correlated with Combined AWF score (r = 0.620; p < 0.0001) and the correlation was specific (AUC = 0.799; p < 0.0001; asymptotic 95%CI = 0.711-0.923). At 12 months, the AWF score increased to 8.13 ± 2.58 (1-10) and the QoL total score to 0.979 ± 0.007 (0.71-1). Good and very good total scores for QoL were recorded for 47 patients (84%) compared to 33 (36%) in the preoperative evaluation (χ2 with Yates continuity correction for two degrees of liberty = 46.04; p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that patients can expect to see a significant overall improvement in all five components of QoL measured with the help of Eq. 5D questionnaire. This improvement is dependent by hernia size, and some individual patient's factors (diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and age over 60 years).

The causal association between body fat distribution and risk of abdominal wall hernia: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study

PURPOSE

Obesity and a high body mass index (BMI) are considered as risk factors for abdominal wall hernia (AWH). However, anthropometric measures of body fat distribution (BFD) seem to be better indicators in the hernia field. This Mendelian randomization analysis aimed to generate more robust evidence for the impact of waist circumstance (WC), body, trunk, arm, and leg fat percentages (BFP, TFP, AFP, LFP) on AWH.

METHODS

A univariable MR design was employed and the summary statistics allowing for assessment were obtained from the genome-wide association studies (GWASs). An inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was applied as the primary analysis, and the odds ratio value was used to evaluate the causal relationship between BFD and AWH.

RESULTS

None of the MR-Egger regression intercepts deviated from null, indicating no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy (p > 0.05). The Cochran Q test showed heterogeneity between the genetic IVs for WC (p = 0.005; p = 0.005), TFP (p < 0.001; p < 0.001), AFP-L (p = 0.016; p = 0.015), LFP-R (p = 0.012; p = 0.009), and LFP-L (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Taking the IVW random-effects model as gold standard, each standard deviation increment in genetically determined WC, BFP, TFP, AFP-R, AFP-L, LFP-R, and LFP-L raised the risk of AWH by 70.9%, 70.7%, 56.5%, 69.7%, 78.3%, 87.7%, and 72.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study proves the causal relationship between AWH and BFD, attracting more attention from BMI to BFD. It provides evidence-based medical evidence that healthy figure management can prevent AWH.

A Scoping Review of Quality-of-Life Assessments Employed in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Surgeons use several quality-of-life instruments to track outcomes following abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR); however, there is no universally agreed upon instrument. We review the instruments used in AWR and report their utilization trends within the literature.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines using the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases. All published articles in the English language that employed a quality-of-life assessment for abdominal wall hernia repair were included. Studies which focused solely on aesthetic abdominoplasty, autologous breast reconstruction, rectus diastasis, pediatric patients, inguinal hernia, or femoral hernias were excluded.

RESULTS

Six hernia-specific tools and six generic health tools were identified. The Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey and Carolinas Comfort Scale are the most common hernia-specific tools, while the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is the most common generic health tool. Notably, the SF-36 is also the most widely used tool for AWR outcomes overall. Each tool captures a unique set of patient outcomes which ranges from abdominal wall functionality to mental health.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of AWR have been widely studied with several different assessments proposed and used over the past few decades. These instruments allow for patient assessment of pain, quality of life, functional status, and mental health. Commonly used tools include the Hernia-Related Quality-of-Life Survey, Carolinas Comfort Scale, and SF-36. Due to the large heterogeneity of available instruments, future work may seek to determine or develop a standardized instrument for characterizing AWR outcomes.

A comparative study to evaluate abdominal wall dynamics in patients with incisional hernia compared to healthy controls

BACKGROUND

Incisional hernia is a common complication following abdominal surgery. It causes change in function of core abdominal muscles leading to change in abdominal wall dynamics. This study aims to objectively measure and compare preoperative abdominal wall dynamics with surface electromyography (sEMG) in incisional hernia patients with healthy individuals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this prospective comparative study, two groups of participants as cases and controls were evaluated for their abdominal wall dynamics by using sEMG. Both cases and controls were evenly matched in terms of age and gender. Statistical analysis was done with STATA 14.1 and p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Demographic profile was comparable between the two groups. Mean BMI of cases was higher than controls. The most common index procedure was lower segment cesarean section. The strength and power of all three abdominal wall muscles (rectus abdominis, external oblique, internal oblique) were significantly diminished among cases compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal wall dynamics can be objectively and correctly interpreted from sEMG of abdominal wall core muscles in patients with incisional hernia. This study shows that there is a decrease in abdominal wall strength and power in patients suffering from incisional hernia in comparison with healthy controls.

Evaluation of rectus abdominis muscle strength and width of hernia defect in patients undergoing incisional hernia surgery

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze the strength status of the rectus abdominis muscle in patients with incisional hernia and the relationship between the width of the hernia defect and the strength of the rectus abdominis muscle.

METHODS

This is a observational cohort study of patients with medial line incisional hernia (July-October 2022), classified as W2 according to the European Hernia Society (EHS). The data collected were demographic and clinical characteristics related to hernia, and measure of the rectus abdominis muscle strength using an isokinetic dynamometer and a strain gauge. We analyzed the relationship between hernia width and rectus abdominis muscle strength with correlation tests to adjustment by age, sex, BMI, and body composition.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients (64% female) with a mean age of 57.62 years (SD 11) were enrolled in the study. The mean BMI was 29.18 (SD 5.06), with a mean percentage of fat mass of 37.8% (SD 8.47) and a mean percentage of muscle mass of 60.33% (SD 6.43). The maximum width of the hernia defect was 6.59 cm (SD 1.54). In the male group, the mean bending force moment (ISOK_PT) was 94.01 Nw m (SD 34.58), bending force moment relative to body weight (ISOK_PT_Weight) was 103.32 Nw m (SD 37.48), and peak force (PK_90) was 184.71 N (SD 47.01). In the female group, these values were 58.11 Nw m (SD 29.41), 66.48 Nw m (SD 32.44), and 152.50 N (SD 48.49), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed in the relationship between the data obtained with the isokinetic dynamometer and sex (p = 0.002), as well as between the data obtained with the isokinetic dynamometer and age (p = 0.006). Patients in the 90th percentile (P90) of rectus abdominis muscle strength also had smaller hernia defect widths (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, age and sex were identified as the most statistically significant predictor variables for rectus abdominis muscle strength. The width of the hernia defect exhibited a trend towards statistical significance.

Physical activity recommendations pre and post abdominal wall reconstruction: a scoping review of the evidence

PURPOSE

There are no universally agreed guidelines regarding which types of physical activity are safe and/or recommended in the perioperative period for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair or abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). This study is intended to identify and summarise the literature on this topic.

METHODS

Database searches of PubMed, CINAHL, Allied & Complementary medicine database, PEDro and Web of Science were performed followed by a snowballing search using two papers identified by the database search and four hand-selected papers of the authors' choosing. Inclusion-cohort studies, randomized controlled trials, prospective or retrospective. Studies concerning complex incisional hernia repairs and AWRs including a "prehabilitation" and/or "rehabilitation" program targeting the abdominal wall muscles in which the interventions were of a physical exercise nature. RoB2 and Robins-I were used to assess risk of bias. Prospero CRD42021236745. No external funding. Data from the included studies were extracted using a table based on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's data extraction template.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 5423 records. After screening two titles were selected for inclusion in our study. The snowballing search identified 49 records. After screening one title was selected for inclusion in our study. Three total papers were included-two randomised studies and one cohort study (combined 423 patients). All three studies subjected their patients to varying types of physical activity preoperatively, one study also prescribed these activities postoperatively. The outcomes differed between the studies therefore meta-analysis was impossible-two studies measured hernia recurrence, one measured peak torque. All three studies showed improved outcomes in their study groups compared to controls however significant methodological flaws and confounding factors existed in all three studies. No adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature supporting the advice given to patients regarding recommended physical activity levels in the perioperative period for AWR patients is sparse. Further research is urgently required on this subject.

Truncal function after abdominal wall reconstruction via transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR) for large incisional hernias: a prospective case-control study

BACKGROUND

Data about abdominal wall function in patients with incisional hernias (IH) are limited. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (AWR) could be beneficial for the improvement of this function. The goal of the study was to evaluate if the abdominal wall function was restored after transversus abdominis muscle release (TAR).

METHODS

We performed a prospective case-control study of 59 patients with IH equal or larger than 10 cm in their width undergoing AWR via TAR with mesh reinforcement and complete linea alba restoration. With two simple physical tests-Trunk Raising (TR) and Double Leg Lowering (DLL), we clinically assessed, preoperatively, 1 month and 1 year postoperatively the functionality of the abdominal wall (flexion). Patients were compared with a control group (n = 57) with an intact abdominal wall undergoing visceral surgery through a midline laparotomy.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups in terms of sex and mean age. In the study group, TR demonstrated an increase from 1.93 preoperatively to 2.44 at 1 month and 4.27, respectively, at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001). DLL was improved from 2.067 to 4.37 at 1 year postoperatively (p = 0.016). In the control group, surgery resulted in a decrease of truncal flexion. At 1 year postoperatively, the abdominal wall function for study group patients was almost identical with that the functionality of the control group featuring an intact abdominal wall (TR 4.26 vs 4.33 p = 0.532; DLL 4.42 vs 4.21 p = 0.193).

CONCLUSION

AWR via TAR for large IH specifically improved long-term abdominal wall muscular function.

Use of Shear Wave Elastography to Quantify Abdominal Wall Muscular Properties in Patients With Incisional Hernia

Shear wave elastography (SWE) is a potential modality that quantitatively measures the elasticity (shear wave speed [SWS]) of musculoskeletal structure. This SWS was bilaterally measured in the rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO) muscle, internal oblique (IO) muscle and transversus abdominis (TrA) using SWE in 28 patients with incisional hernia and 14 healthy controls. The differences in muscle thickness for IO and TrA were significant between the two groups (p < 0.05). The SWS of RA, EO, IO and TrA was significantly higher in the incisional hernia patient group than in the healthy controls (p < 0.05). Significant differences were also observed between the upper and lower points in both groups (p < 0.05). The measurements of SWS help in evaluating the elastic properties of abdominal wall muscles, which could further aid in preparing treatment plans to improve muscle strength.

Histology and Function of the Rectus Abdominis Muscle in Patients With Incisional Hernia

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to examine different features of the rectus abdominis muscle (RA) in patients with and without a midline incisional hernia to characterize the effects of a hernia on abdominal wall skeletal muscle.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RA tissue from patients undergoing surgical repair of a large midline incisional hernia (n = 18) was compared with that from an intact abdominal wall in patients undergoing colorectal resection for benign or low-grade malignant disease (n = 18). In addition, needle biopsies were obtained from the vastus lateralis muscle (VL) of all subjects. Outcome measures were muscle fiber type and size, preoperative truncal flexion strength and leg extension power measured in strength-measure equipment, and RA cross-sectional area measured by computed tomography.

RESULTS

In both the RA and VL, the fiber cross-sectional area was greater in the patients with a hernia. The RA cross-sectional area correlated significantly with the truncal flexion strength (r = 0.44, P = 0.015). Patients in the hernia group had a significantly reduced ratio between truncal flexion strength and RA cross-sectional area compared with the control group (41.3 ± 11.5 N/cm²versus 51.2 ± 16.3 N/cm², P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical displacement of the RA and lack of medial insertion in the linea alba rather than dysfunction secondary to alteration of muscle fiber structure may contribute to impairment of abdominal wall function in patients with midline incisional hernias. The study was registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/(NCT02011048).

One-year outcome after repair of giant incisional hernia using synthetic mesh or full-thickness skin graft: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

Repair of giant incisional hernia often requires complex surgery and the results of conventional methods using synthetic mesh as reinforcement are unsatisfactory, with high recurrence and complication rates. Our hypothesis was that full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) provides an alternative reinforcement material for giant incisional hernia repair and that outcome is improved. The aim of this study was to compare FTSG with conventional materials currently used as reinforcement in the repair of giant incisional hernia.

METHODS

A prospective randomised controlled trial was conducted, comparing FTSG with synthetic mesh as reinforcement in the repair of giant (> 10 cm minimum width) incisional hernia. One-year follow-up included a blinded clinical examination by a surgeon and objective measurements of abdominal muscle strength using the Biodex-4 system.

RESULTS

52 patients were enrolled in the study: 24 received FTSG and 28 synthetic mesh. Four recurrences (7.7%) were found at 1-year follow-up, two in each group. There were no significant differences regarding pain, patient satisfaction or aesthetic outcome between the groups. Strength in the abdominal wall was not generally improved in the study population and there was no significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION

The outcome of repair of giant incisional hernia using FTSG as reinforcement is comparable with repair using synthetic mesh. This suggests that FTSG may have a future place in giant incisional hernia repair.