Management of subdural effusion and hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy for posttraumatic cerebral infarction in a patient with traumatic brain injury: a case report

Is cranioplasty the optimal treatment for contralateral subdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy?: a case report

Introduction and importance

Contralateral subdural effusion (CSDE) is a rare complication secondary to decompressive craniectomy (DC), which can lead to encephalocele and neurologic deterioration. The authors report a case that confirm the existence of unidirectional membrane valve, and cranioplasty is an effective treatment for CSDE.

Case presentation

The authors reported a case of 43-year-old female was diagnosed with ruptured intracranial aneurysm and treated with interventional embolization. She underwent DC because of postoperative cerebral infarction subsequently. Her conscious state deteriorated accompanied by encephalocele in postoperative 2 week. A craniocerebral computed tomography (CT) confirmed the diagnosis of CSDE with cerebral hernia. A compression bandaging of the skull defect was applicated, whereas, her conscious state progressive deteriorated. She was transferred to the author's hospital where she underwent burr-hole drainage and clinical symptom has been improved. However, a relapse of CSDE was observed after the removal of drainage tube. Continuous lumbar drainage was employed, and which was ineffective for CSDE in this case. Finally, she underwent cranioplasty, with the help of drainage of subdural effusion, CSDE was completely resolved.

Clinical discussion

CSDE is occasionally observed in patients after DC. Intracranial pressure (ICP) gradient and unidirectional membrane valve are the possible mechanisms of CSDE. At present, there is no optimal therapy for CSDE. For symptomatic CSDE patients, one or more treatment measures should be applicated.

Conclusion

Cranioplasty is one of the curative and optimal method to treat symptomatic CSDE patients, early cranioplasty combined with burr-hole drainage should be performed for conservative treatment failed and intractable cases.

Subdural Lesions Linking Additional Intracranial Spaces and Chronic Subdural Hematomas: A Narrative Review with Mutual Correlation and Possible Mechanisms behind High Recurrence

The purpose of this study was two-fold. The first was to investigate the pathologic mechanisms underlying the formation of subdural fluid collection, an umbrella term referring to a condition commonly seen in the clinical setting. Accumulation of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the subdural space can be referred to in this disease category, disregarding the underlying source of the subdural fluid. However, in these two clinical situations, especially after trauma or brain surgery, fluid collection from the subarachnoid space (subdural hygroma) or from the ventricle to the subarachnoid space and infusion into the subdural space (external hydrocephalus), surgical management of critical patients may adopt the strategies of burr-hole, subduroperitoneal shunt, or ventriculoperitoneal shunt, which present distinctly different thoughts. Crucially, the former can be further transformed into chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). The second significant theme was the pathogenesis of CSDH. Once the potential dural border cell (DBC) layer is separated such as if a wound is formed, the physiological mechanisms that seem to promote wound healing will resume in the subdural space as follows: coagulation, inflammation, fibroblast proliferation, neovascularization, and fibrinolysis. These aptly correspond to several key characteristics of CSDH formation such as the presence of both coagulation and fibrinolysis signals within the clot, neomembrane formation, angiogenesis, and recurrent bleeding, which contribute to CSDH failing to coagulate and absorb easily. Such a complexity of genesis and the possibility of arising from multiple pathological patterns provide a reasonable explanation for the high recurrence rate, even after surgery. Among the various complex and clinically challenging subdural lesions, namely, CSDH (confined to the subdural space alone), subdural hygroma (linked in two spaces), and external hydrocephalus (linked in three spaces), the ability to fully understand the different pathological mechanisms of each, differentiate them clinically, and devote more interventional strategies (including anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, and anti-fibrinolysis) will be important themes in the future.

Predictive role of shock index in the early formation of cerebral infarction in patients with TBI and cerebral herniation

Background and purpose

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) with brain herniation predisposes to posttraumatic cerebral infarction (PTCI), which in turn seriously affects the prognosis of patients. At present, there is a lack of effective indicators that can accurately predict the occurrence of PTCI. We aimed to find possible risk factors for the development of PTCI by comparing the preoperative and postoperative clinical data of TBI patients with brain herniation.

Methods

The clinical data of 120 patients with craniocerebral trauma and brain herniation were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 54 patients had cerebral infarction within 3–7 days after injury. The two groups of patients were compared through univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a classification tree model and a nomogram model were constructed. Finally, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and decision curve analysis were conducted to analyze the clinical utility of the prediction model.

Results

Logistic regression analysis showed that factors like the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score (P = 0.002), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) (P = 0.005), aspiration pneumonia (P < 0.001), decompressive craniectomy (P < 0.05), intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring (P = 0.006), the shock index (SI) (P < 0.001), the mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P = 0.005), and blood glucose (GLU) (P < 0.011) appeared to show a significant statistical correlation with the occurrence of infarction (P < 0.05), while age, sex, body temperature (T), D-dimer levels, and coagulation tests were not significantly correlated with PTCI after cerebral herniation. Combined with the above factors, Classification and Regression Tree was established, and the recognition accuracy rate reached 76.67%.

Conclusions

GCS score at admission, no decompressive craniectomy, no ICP monitoring, combined SAH, combined aspiration pneumonia, SI, MAP, and high GLU were risk factors for infarction, of which SI was the primary predictor of PTCI in TBI with an area under the curve of 0.775 (95% CI = 0.689–0.861). Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these results.

Effects of Cranioplasty on Contralateral Subdural Effusion After Decompressive Craniectomy: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Contralateral subdural effusion(CSE) after decompressive craniectomy (CSEDC) is occasionally observed. Cranioplasty is routinely performed for reconstruction and has recently been associated with improving contralateral subdural effusion .

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review all available literature and evaluate the effectiveness of cranioplasty for CSE.

METHODS

A PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar search was conducted for preferred reporting items following the guidelines of systematic review and meta-analysis, including studies reporting patients who underwent cranioplasty because of CSEDC.

RESULTS

The search yielded eight articles. A total of 56 patients ranging in age from 21 to 71 years, developed CSEDC. Of them, 32 patients underwent cranioplasty. Eighteen cases with symptomatic CSE underwent cranioplasty alone, two cases received Ommaya drainage later because of a a recurrence of CDC, and one case underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt because the CSE did not resolve completely and the ventricle was dilated again. The symptoms of 14 cases lessened without recurrence after simultaneous cranioplasty and drainage or a shunt. The total success rate(CSE disappeared without recurrence) was 90.6% for patients who underwent cranioplasty; however, the total incidence of hydrocephalus was 40.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests that cranioplasty is effective for the treatment of CSEDC, particularly intractable cases, but early cranioplasty may be more effective. In addition, hydrocephalus is fairly common after cranioplasty and requires further treatment.

Failure of crizotinib based systemic treatment in ALK positive histiocytosis involving the central nervous system: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Among the histiocytic disorders, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive histiocytosis emerged in 2008. As more and more cases of the novel entity are reported, our understanding of it is deepened. However, only a few cases with central nervous system (CNS) involvement have been reported. Furthermore, the lesion in the suprasellar region has not been documented.  CASE PRESENTATION: We presented a case of ALK-positive histiocytosis involving the suprasellar region of a one-year-and-four-month-old boy. Through clinical, neuropathological, and genomic analyses, the patient was diagnosed with ALK-positive histiocytosis. After lesions were resected he started treatment with a combination of the three compounds vincristine, prednisolone, and crizotinib, but they did not work. Cytarabine was then added as an additional chemotherapy drug for him, and the lesions in the brain and lungs were shrunk by combining treatment of crizotinib, dexamethasone, vincristine, and cytarabine according to the RECIST (esponse Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours).

CONCLUSIONS

Additional adjuvant chemotherapy drugs are needed when ALK-inhibitor treatment is ineffective.

Contralateral subdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy: What is the optimal treatment?

OBJECTIVE

Contralateral subdural effusion after decompressive craniectomy (CSEDC) is rare, and the optimal treatment is not determined. We present 11 cases of CSEDC and give an overview of the English literature pertaining to this disease.

METHODS

We searched the database at our institution and performed a search of English literature in PubMed and Google Scholar. Keywords used were as follows (single word or combination): "subdural hygroma"; "subdural effusion"; "decompressive craniectomy". Only patients with CSEDC and contained adequate clinical information pertinent to the analysis were included.

RESULTS

11 cases of CSEDC were recorded at our institution. They comprised ten men and one woman with an average age of 41.9 years. All the 8 symptomatic patients underwent surgery and the CSEDC resolved gradually. 68 cases of CSEDC were found in the literature. Including ours, a total of 79 patients were analyzed. Conservative treatment was effective in the asymptomatic patients. 41.7% of the symptomatic CSEDC underwent burr hole drainage and successfully drained the CSEDC. However, 76% of them received subsequent surgery to manage the reaccumulation of CSEDC. 25% of the symptomatic patients underwent cranioplasty, while 13.3% of them received Ommaya drainage later because of CSEDC recurrence. 18.3% of the symptomatic patients underwent cranioplasty plus subduroperitoneal shunting, and all CSEDC resolved completely.

CONCLUSIONS

Burr hole drainage appears to be only a temporary measure. Early cranioplasty should be performed for patients with CSEDC. CSF shunting procedures may be required for patients in whom CSEDC have not been solved or hydrocephalus manifest after cranioplasty.

Scenario for the use of effusion-peritoneal shunt necessary against subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to summarize the surgical strategies for subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy (SESDC) and discuss the applicable scenarios of effusion-peritoneal shunt (EP shunt).

METHODS

A total of 53 consecutive patients with SESDC were screened out of 7569 cases. The SESDC was divided into five types, and the treatment methods of each type were analyzed and compared. According to the implementation strategy of cranioplasty (CP), patients were divided into CP-first and delayed-CP groups. The differences in surgical methods were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All patients with SESDC in this cohort had undergone cranioplasty. Subcutaneous puncture and aspiration (SPAA) proved ineffective. Only 2/30 patients in the CP-first group used EP shunt, while 6/19 patients in the delayed-CP group used EP shunt; the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.03). A significant difference was found in the use of EP shunt among type 1, type 2, and type 5 SESDC (χ² = 6.778, P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

CP combined with other treatments could cure most SESDC. EP shunt should be used preferentially in some specific scenarios in which CP cannot be performed first, rather than as a backup measure that can only be used when other preceding treatments fail.

Subdural fluid accumulation caused by ventriculoperitoneal shunt underdrainage: A rare and paradoxical complication

Background:

Subdural fluid collection in patients with internal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts has generally been linked to overdrainage and more rarely to pus accumulation. The authors present a previously unrecognized condition leading to extra-axial CSF accumulation: shunt underdrainage. Treatment of coexisting subdural fluid collection and hydrocephalus, disorders that have previously only been reported concurrently following head trauma or subarachnoid hemorrhage, is controversial. In addition, we intend to provide insight into the physiopathology of abnormal CSF accumulation within both the subdural space and ventricles simultaneously.

Case Description:

A 42-year-old female with a history of hypothalamic glioma and obstructive hydrocephalus during childhood presented with headache, vomiting, and gait disturbance. Following the insertion of her first ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) by the age of 8, she underwent several surgeries due to shunt failure, all of them associating ventriculomegaly. Ventricles remained notably enlarged following insertion of her most recent VPS, and the computed tomography scan performed 2 months later at her admission showed a large subdural collection. Afterward, a malpositioned distal catheter causing shunt blockage was confirmed. Both, the subdural accumulation and hydrocephalus, were resolved following adequate placement of the peritoneal catheter.

Conclusion:

This case demonstrates that subdural fluid accumulations may occur following VPS underdrainage with hydrocephalus. Development of such extra-axial collection was probably caused by pressure related to CSF spillage from the ventricles into the subdural space. Our case also supports that a mass-effect subdural accumulation with hydrocephalus can be satisfactorily treated with adequate VPS alone, without directly treating the subdural collection.