Limb salvage surgery with joint preservation for malignant humeral bone tumors: operative procedures and clinical application

Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts a Long-lasting Reconstruction After Intercalary Resection of the Humerus for Primary Bone Tumors?

BACKGROUND

A vascularized fibula graft (VFG) is the vascular autograft most frequently used to restore large segmental long bone defects, particularly in the upper limb. Because the use of a vascularized fibula involves an operation in an uninvolved extremity with potential morbidity, it is important to document that this type of reconstruction is successful in restoring function to the humerus. However, the long-term results of VFG after intercalary resection of the humeral diaphysis for bone tumors are still unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What was the complication rate of reconstruction? (2) What was the functional result after surgical treatment, as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, and Constant score? (3) What was the survivorship of these grafts free from revision and graft removal at 5, 10, and 15 years?

METHODS

Between 1987 and 2021, 127 patients were treated at our institution with en bloc resection for a primary malignant or an aggressive benign bone tumor of the humerus; we excluded patients treated with extra-articular resection or amputation. Of those, 14% (18 of 127) were treated with intercalary resection of the humeral diaphysis for primary bone tumors and reconstruction with VFG, with or without a bulk allograft, and were analyzed in this retrospective study. Generally, our indications for reconstruction with VFG are intercalary resection of the humerus for primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors in patients with long life expectancy and high functional demands, in whom adequate bone stock of the proximal and distal epiphysis can be preserved. In 13 patients, VFG was used alone, whereas in five patients, a massive allograft was used. Our policy was to use VFG combined with a massive allograft in patients undergoing juxta-articular joint-sparing resections in which proximal osteotomy was performed close to the anatomic neck of the humerus to obtain more stable fixation and better tendinous reattachment of the rotator cuff and deltoid. All 18 patients who were treated with a VFG were available for follow-up at a minimum of 2 years (median follow-up 176 months, range 26 to 275 months), and although three have not been seen in the past 5 years and are not known to have died, they had 172, 163, and 236 months of follow-up, and were included. The median age at surgery was 25 years (range 2 to 63 years), the median humeral resection length was 15 cm (range 8 to 21 cm), and the median fibular length was 16 cm (range 12 to 23 cm). Complications and functional scores were ascertained by chart review that was performed by an individual not involved in patient care. Functional results were assessed with the MSTS score (range 0 to 30), the ASES score (range 0 to 100), and the Constant score (range 0% to 100%). Survivorship was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator, which was suitable because there were few deaths in this series.

RESULTS

Seven patients underwent a revision procedure (one radial nerve transient palsy because of screw impingement, four nonunions in three patients with one humeral head avascular necrosis, treatment for screw-related pain in one patient, and two VFG fractures), and one patient underwent VFG removal. Donor site complications were observed in four patients (one ankle valgus deformity and three claw toes-the first toe in two patients and the other toes in the third). At the final clinical control, at a median follow-up of 176 months (range 26 to 275 months), the median MSTS score was 30 of 30 (range 28 to 30), the median ASES score was 98.3 (range 93 to 100), and the median Constant score was 93.5% (range 79% to 100%). Revision-free survival was 71% (95% CI 53% to 96%) at 5 years and 57% (95% CI 37% to 88%) at 10 and 15 years; VFG removal-free survival was 94% (95% CI 83% to 100%) at 5, 10, and 15 years.

CONCLUSION

VFG appears to be an effective reconstructive option after humeral intercalary resection for primary bone tumors. These are complex procedures and should be performed by an experienced team of surgeons who recognize that complications may occur frequently in the first years after the procedure. The frequency of mechanical complications observed in the first 5 years postoperatively may be lessened by using long spanning-plate fixation, and if successful, this reconstruction provides a long-term, durable reconstruction with excellent functional results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study.

The anti-infective outcomes of the distal femoral replacement coated with antibiotic cement in limb salvage surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to observe the anti-infective effect of the distal femoral tumor prosthesis coated with antibiotic cement during limb salvage treatment, and evaluate its potential prospect in clinic.

METHODS

In this randomized controlled trial, the en bloc resection and reconstruction were performed in 36 patients with distal femoral primary bone tumor. Patients were divided into 2 groups randomly according to the application of antibiotic bone cement coating, which included antibiotic cement coating group (16 cases) and control group (18 cases). There were 10 men and 6 women in anti-infection group, aged from 18 to 54 years (23.47 ± 3.53), and there were 12 men and 6 women in control group, aged from 19 to 56 years (24.16 ± 4.32). The tumor type, age, sex, and Enneking stage were enrolled with well-matched of the 2 groups of patients. There was no difference between bundles and routine standard care for each group. The antibiotic cement was coated on the surface of polyethylene jacket with punched holes during operation. The peri-prosthetic infection, local recurrence and distant metastasis were followed up and limb functions were evaluated by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society 93 (MSTS93) scoring system.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up till 34.7 months (range 18∼62 months). There was no periprosthetic infection in anti-infection group. Four cases in control group showed deep infection. Infection rate had significant differences between the 2 groups (P < .05). Infection-related prosthesis mortality was 0% (0/16) in anti-infection group and 16.67% (3/18) in control group. Local recurrence and distant metastasis occurred in 7 of 34 patients with primary malignant bone tumor, wherein 2 cases of local recurrence and 1 cases of distant metastasis occurred in anti-infective group; 2 cases of local recurrence and 2 cases of distant metastasis occurred in the control group. During a latest follow-up, MSTS93 function scoring revealed a mean of 25.6 ± 4.2 in anti-infection group and 18.5 ± 3.3 in control group. The survival rate of anti-infective group is 75%, and the survival rate of control group is 61.11%.

CONCLUSION

The antibiotic cement-coated technique on the surface of the polyethylene jacket of custom-made distal femoral prosthesis is simple and effective in controlling the periprosthetic infection after tumor prosthesis reconstruction.

An Initial Experience of Shoulder Resections and Reconstruction for Bone Tumours from a Cancer Centre in North-East India

Advances in surgery and multidisciplinary approach have made limb salvage surgery feasible in most patients with tumours around the shoulder joint. Although resection and reconstruction options are complex, good outcomes can be achieved when performed at a specialised centre. The data of patients with bone tumours who underwent proximal humeral resection and reconstruction in a single cancer centre were prospectively analysed. Comparison between biological and non-biological reconstruction was done in seven patients of which three patients underwent biological reconstruction and four patients had non-biological reconstruction. Measurement data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. The mean values were compared using independent t test. Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate survival with log rank test for comparison among groups. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence interval. There were six males and two female patients. Mean follow-up duration was 17.3 months. The mean age of patients was 24.7 ± 16.3 years. The mean functional score for biological reconstruction was 26.3 ± 1.16 and for non-biological reconstruction was 24.5 ± 1.3 with a p value of 0.1. Overall survival of patients with biological reconstruction was 75% and non-biological reconstruction was 100% with a p value of 0.3. Recurrence-free survival for biological reconstruction and non-biological reconstruction was 75% and 100%, respectively, with p value of 0.3. Limb salvage surgery in a dedicated cancer centre is a feasible option for most tumours around the shoulder joint. Biological and non-biological reconstructions both produced acceptable functional outcomes in our patients.

Osteosarcoma: a review of current and future therapeutic approaches

Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary bone malignancy that affects children and young adults. OS is characterized by a high degree of malignancy, strong invasiveness, rapid disease progression, and extremely high mortality rate; it is considered as a serious threat to the human health globally. The incidence of OS is common in the metaphysis of long tubular bones, but rare in the spine, pelvis, and sacrum areas; moreover, majority of the OS patients present with only a single lesion. OS has a bimodal distribution pattern, that is, its incidence peaks in the second decade of life and in late adulthood. We examine historical and current literature to present a succinct review of OS. In this review, we have discussed the types, clinical diagnosis, and modern and future treatment methods of OS. The purpose of this article is to inspire new ideas to develop more effective therapeutic options.

En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the short-term clinical efficacy and complications of en bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation for the treatment of humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.

METHODS

A total of 21 patients with humeral diaphyseal bone metastases treated with en bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation from August 2014 to August 2019 were retrospectively analysed. The visual analogue scale (VAS), Musculoskeletal Tumour Society (MSTS) scale, International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) scoring system, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scale, and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scale were used to assess pain, limb function, and quality of life. Survival of the patients was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for 12-57 months (mean: 22 months); the operative time was 68-114 minutes (mean: 76.24 min); the osteotomy length was 6.5-10 cm (mean: 8.02 cm); and the intra-operative blood loss was 95-125 ml (mean: 104.71 ml). At three, six and 12 months after surgery, the VAS and NHP scores were lower, whereas the MSTS, ISOLS, and KPS scores were higher than those before surgery, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The survival time was four to 24 months (mean: 19.46 months). Thesix month and one year survival rates were 80.95% and 52.38%, respectively. During the follow-up period, no complications occurred except for aseptic prosthesis loosening in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection and intercalary prosthesis implantation can reduce pain, improve limb function, prolong survival time, and improve quality of life in patients with humeral diaphyseal bone metastases.