Feasibility of subtotal esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy in selected elderly patients with esophageal cancer; a propensity score matching analysis

Survival outcome of esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in patients >75 years of age

BACKGROUND

The gold standard for resectable, locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is surgery-based treatment; however, it is unclear whether esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy is suitable for older patients. This retrospective study aimed to identify the treatment outcomes of surgery-based therapy versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) as an initial treatment for older patients with resectable, locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Data from 434 patients who received radical treatment for resectable, locally advanced ESCC were collected from January 2011 to December 2020. Of the patients >75 years of age, 49 underwent radical esophagectomy and 26 received dCRT. Survival was compared between the surgery and dCRT groups.

RESULTS

The mean ages of the surgery and chemoradiotherapy groups were 77.3 and 78.8 years, respectively. Differences in overall survival (OS) between the two groups were not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 66.2%, dCRT 55.7%, p = 0.236). Multivariate analysis for OS showed a hazard ratio of 1.229 for dCRT versus surgery (90% confidence interval 0.681-2.217). OS did not differ between the groups in any of the performance statuses. For patients who were able to receive chemotherapy using fluorouracil and cisplatin, OS tended to be better in the surgery group, but the difference was not statistically significant (3-year OS: surgery 68.1%, dCRT 51.8%, p = 0.117).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no clear difference in survival outcome between surgery-based therapy and dCRT as an initial treatment for esophageal cancer in older patients. Either treatment may be an option for older patients.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes in Elderly Esophagectomy Patients with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Choosing the appropriate treatment for elderly patients with esophageal cancer remains a contentious issue. While surgery is still a valid option, we aimed to identify predictors and outcomes in elderly esophagectomy patients with esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed characteristics, surgical outcomes, survival rates, cause-specific mortality, and recurrence in 120 patients with stage I-IV esophageal cancer. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 31 months, with 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates standing at 45.2% and 41.5%, respectively. Notably, lower body mass index (BMI ≤ 22 kg/m2) and reduced preoperative albumin levels (pre-ALB < 40 g/L) led to a significant decrease in OS rates. Postoperative pulmonary complications resulted in higher in-hospital and 90-day mortality rates. After about 31 months post-surgery, the rate of cancer-specific deaths stabilized. The most common sites for distant metastasis were the lungs, supraclavicular lymph nodes, liver, and bone. The study identified lower BMI, lower pre-ALB levels, and postoperative pulmonary complications as independent risk factors for poorer EFS and OS outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagectomy remains a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients, though the prevention of postoperative pulmonary infection is crucial. Factors such as lower BMI, lower pre-ALB levels, advanced tumor stage, postoperative pulmonary complications, and certain treatment modalities significantly influence the outcomes in elderly esophagectomy patients. These findings provide critical insights into the characteristics and outcomes of this patient population.

The effect of aging on short- and long-term results after esophagectomy: an international multicenter retrospective analysis

The optimal treatment for esophageal cancer in elderly patients is still debated and data on postoperative results are limited. This retrospective international study aims to clarify the impact of age on clinical and oncological outcomes after esophagectomy. All patients that underwent esophagectomy for cancer between 2007 and 2016 at two European high-volume Centers have been included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups according to their age: young-age group (YAG) (18-69), middle-age group (70-74) and old-age group (>74). Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes considered were 5-year disease free survival and disease related survival, 90-day morbidity and mortality, readmission rate and radicality. A total of 575 patients were included. No differences emerged in terms of morbidity and length of stay, while mortality increased with aging from 2% in YAG to 4.8% in old-aged (P = 0.003). Old-age patients had less neoadjuvant treatment (P < 0.001), a less aggressive mediastinal lymphadenectomy and presented a more advanced pathological stage. As expected, OS decreased significantly for older patients compared with the other two age groups (P = 0.044) but, on the other hand, disease free and disease related survival were comparable between the groups. Age itself should not be considered a contraindication to esophagectomy. Although in patients older than 75 years postoperative mortality is significantly increased, esophagectomy could be still an option in selected patients, favoring the use of minimally invasive techniques and enhanced recovery protocols.

Frailty Assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale is Associated with Prognosis After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple and validated tool for assessing frailty, and higher CFS scores are correlated with worse perioperative outcomes after cardiovascular surgery. However, the relationship between the CFS scores and postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 561 patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent resection from August 2010 to August 2020. We defined a CFS score of ≥4 as indicative of frailty; thus, patients were classified into frail patients (CFS scores of ≥4) and non-frail patients (CFS scores of ≤3). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the overall survival (OS) distributions with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 561 patients, 90 (16%) had frailty and 471 (84%) did not. Frail patients had a significantly older age, lower body mass index, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and greater cancer progression than non-frail patients. The 5-year survival rate was 68% in non-frail patients and 52% in frail patients. OS was significantly shorter in frail than non-frail patients (p = 0.017 by log-rank test). In particular, OS was significantly shorter in frail patients with clinical stage I-II EC (p = 0.0024 by log-rank test) but was not correlated with frailty in patients with clinical stage III-IV EC (p = 0.87 by log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative frailty was associated with shorter OS after resection of EC. The CFS score may be a prognostic biomarker for patients with EC, especially early-stage EC.

Outcomes of elderly patients following thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) is widely used for esophageal cancer treatment. However, the short- and long-term outcomes of TE in older patients remain unknown. Thus, we investigated those outcomes as well as the effectivity of TE in this patient cohort.

METHODS

A total of 228 consecutive patients who underwent TE for esophageal cancer from 2002 to 2015 were included in the study and categorized into the elderly (≥ 75 years) and non-elderly (< 75 years) groups. The background was adjusted by propensity score matching. The short- and long-term outcomes were then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the short-term outcomes between the two groups. The elderly group had significantly lower overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) than the non-elderly group. When pulmonary complications occurred, the OS and RFS were significantly decreased in the elderly group but not in the non-elderly group. Without pulmonary complications, the OS and RFS in the elderly group did not differ from those in the non-elderly group. The multivariate analysis showed that pulmonary complications were independent poor prognostic factors for OS and RFS in the elderly group but not in the non-elderly group.

CONCLUSION

TE is safe and feasible for older patients. However, the OS and RFS of the elderly group were significantly worse than those of the non-elderly group, especially when pulmonary complications occurred. Therefore, perioperative management to prevent pulmonary complications is essential to improve the long-term outcomes of older patients receiving TE.

Safety and short-term efficacy of preoperative FOLFOX therapy in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who are ineligible for cisplatin

BACKGROUND

The standard preoperative treatment for resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (LAESCC) in Japan is docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil. However, patients with renal or cardiac dysfunction and elderly patients are ineligible for a CDDP-containing regimen because of toxicities. Oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) therapy has less renal toxicity than CDDP-containing regimens and does not require hydration. However, there are limited data on preoperative FOLFOX therapy in these patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with resectable LAESCC who were aged ≥ 75 years or had renal or cardiac dysfunction and received preoperative FOLFOX between 2019 and 2021. FOLFOX was administered every 2 weeks for 3 or 4 cycles and was followed by surgery. Adverse events associated with chemotherapy, the complete resection (R0) rate, relative dose intensity (RDI), and histopathological response were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were eligible. Median age was 77 (range 65-89) years; 68.6% were aged ≥ 75 years, 74.3% had renal dysfunction, and 17.1% had cardiac dysfunction. The RDI was 70.2% and 87.1% for bolus and continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil, respectively and 85.2% for oxaliplatin. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were neutropenia (60.0%) and leucopenia (28.6%). Two patients (5.7%) had febrile neutropenia and grade 3 pneumonia. Thirty-one patients underwent surgery. The R0 resection rate was 87.1%, and there was no histopathological evidence of residual tumor in 16.1%. There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative FOLFOX had a manageable safety profile and showed favorable short-term efficacy in patients with resectable LAESCC who were ineligible for CDDP-containing treatment.

The effect of age on the opportunity to receive cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer may not receive the same opportunities for treatment as younger patients. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, we explored whether age was an independent predictor of receiving specialist consultation and treatment.

METHODS

Patients age 45-99 were identified from the Ontario Cancer Registry having a primary solid tumor diagnosed between 01/Jan/2010 and 31/Dec/2019. We used logistic regression adjusted sociodemographic and clinical characteristics to compare the likelihood of consultation or receipt of treatment using linear splines at critical ages of 65, 80, and 90 years.

RESULTS

A total 168,232 (42%), 165,205 (41%), 57,360 (14%), and 7810 (2%) patients were diagnosed age 45-64, 65-79, 80-89, and 90-99, respectively. The likelihood of surgical consultation decreased as patients reached 65 years [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.86 (0.84-0.89)], which decreased further among octogenarians [aOR 0.63 (0.59-0.67)]. Similar results were observed for consultation with a medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Receipt of surgery also decreased with age. Three-month post-operative mortality was higher among older patients [aRR 1.38 (1.26-1.50) per 10 years, p < 0.0001], an effect that remained similar as patients reached age 65 + years of age (p = 0.09 for change). For stage I patients, 3-month post-operative survival was high across all age groups, ranging from 99.8% in 45-64 year-olds, 99.4% in 65-79 year-olds, and 98.1% among octogenarians and nonagenarians (lung, colorectal, breast, cervical cancer patients).

CONCLUSION

Older patients were less likely to have specialist consultations. More comprehensive data collection on clinical factors and referral patterns is needed to improve care for elderly cancer patients.

Long-term Outcomes Following Esophagectomy in Older and Younger Adults with Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patterns of overall and disease-free survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in older adults have not been carefully studied.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients with esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at our institution was performed. Differences in outcomes were stratified by age groups, < 75 and ≥ 75 years old, and two time periods, 2005-2012 and 2013-2020.

RESULTS

A total of 1135 patients were included: 979 (86.3%) patients were < 75 (86.3%), and 156 (13.7%) were ≥ 75 years old. Younger patients had fewer comorbidities, better nutritional status, and were more likely to receive neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy (all p < 0.05). However, tumor stage and operative approach were similar, except for increased performance of the McKeown technique in younger patients (p = 0.02). Perioperatively, younger patients experienced fewer overall and grade II complications (both p < 0.05). They had better overall survival (log-rank p-value < 0.001) and median survival, 62.2 vs. 21.5 months (p < 0.05). When stratified by pathologic stage, survival was similar for yp0 and pathologic stage II disease (both log-rank p-value > 0.05). Multivariable Cox models showed older age (≥ 75 years old) had increased hazard for reduced overall survival (HR 2.04 95% CI 1.5-2.8; p < 0.001) but not disease-free survival (HR 1.1 95% CI 0.78-1.6; p = 0.54). Over time, baseline characteristics remained largely similar, while stage became more advanced with a rise in neoadjuvant use and increased performance of minimally invasive esophagectomy (all p < 0.05). While overall complication rates improved (p < 0.05), overall and recurrence-free survival did not. Overall survival was better in younger patients during both time periods (both log-rank p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar disease-free survival rates, long-term survival was decreased in older adults as compared to younger patients. This may be related to unmeasured factors including frailty, long-term complications after surgery, and competing causes of death. However, our results suggest that survival is similar in those with complete pathologic responses.

Management of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

This review focuses on the treatment about elderly esophageal cancer to clarify the current situation regarding our clinical question. Although there are several reviews about elderly esophageal cancer treatment, there are fundamental differences between Japan and the rest of the world. Two main differences are raised: histological differences and treatment strategies for resectable patients. We overview each status according to following clinical questions. First, there are no established evaluation criteria for frail. Second, selection criteria for surgery or non-surgery are not established. Third, few specific treatments for elderly patients (EPs) are investigated. In conclusion, there are many reports about treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for EPs, although treatment strategy is still controversial. We have to consider well-designed prospective trial to confirm specific treatment strategy according to each stage.

Impact of frailty on the long-term outcomes of elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the association between frailty evaluated using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) and outcomes in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 67 patients (aged ≥ 75 years) diagnosed with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (tumor depth ≥ m3) between 2011 and 2016. The patients were retrospectively evaluated and categorized according to their CFS scores (1-7) and divided into non-frailty (scores 1-2) and frailty groups (scores 3-7). Postoperative complications, 5 year survival rate, and prognostic risk factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Significant differences in performance status, American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status score, Charlson comorbidity index, and treatment type were observed between the two groups. Thirty-six patients underwent surgery, and morbidities with Clavien-Dindo grades ≥ II and ≥ IIIa were found in 72.2 and 47.2% of the patients, respectively. The remaining 31 patients underwent endoscopic resection and/or chemo (radio) therapy. The morbidity rate did not differ between the two groups. The 5 year survival rate was 75.3% overall and 92.7 and 60.8% in patients in the non-frailty and frailty groups, respectively (p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis revealed that frailty and cStage ≥ II were independent risk factors of overall survival (p = 0.005 and p = 0.013, respectively) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.048 and p = 0.027, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty greatly impacts the prognosis of elderly patients with esophageal cancer, regardless of surgical or nonsurgical treatment. The CFS score could be a useful prognostic predictor.

Perioperative Esophagectomy Outcomes in Older Esophageal Cancer Patients in Two Different Time Eras

To investigate perioperative outcomes of esophagectomies by age groups. Retrospective analysis of esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy from 2005 to 2020 at a single academic institution. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were analyzed by 3 age groups: <70, 70-79, and ≥80 years-old. Sub-analysis was done for 2 time periods: 2005-2012 and 2013-2020. Of 1135 patients, 789 patients were <70, 294 were 70-79, and 52 were ≥80 years-old. Tumor characteristics, and operative technique were similar, except positive longitudinal margins rates (all <3%) (P = 0.008). Older adults experienced increased complications (53.6% vs 69.7% vs 65.4% respectively; P < 0.001) attributable to grade II complications (41.4% vs 62.2% vs 63.5% respectively; P < 0.001). Hospital length of stay (LOS) and rehabilitation requirements were higher in older adults (both P < 0.05). 30-day readmissions, reoperation, and 30-day mortality rates (all <2%) showed no association with age group. Overall complications, LOS, discharge disposition and re-operative rates improved from 2005 to 2012 to 2013-2020 for all (P < 0.05). Increasing age was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular complications (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.23-2.46 for ages 70-79 and OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.37-5.10 for ages ≥80 ), inpatient rehabilitation (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.26-5.05 for ages 70-79 and OR 12.1 95% CI 5.83-25.04 for ages ≥80), and prolonged LOS (OR 1.64 95% CI 1.16-2.31 for ages 70-79 and OR 3.6 95% CI 1.71-7.67 for ≥80. After adjusting for time period, older age remained associated with complications (P < 0.05). Highly selected older adults at a large volume esophagectomy center can undergoesophagectomy with increased minor complication and rehabilitation needs.

Treatment Outcomes and the Safety of Chemoradiotherapy With High-Dose CDDP for Elderly Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Objective: We aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between elderly and non-elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). It is difficult to assess the causal effect of age because of possible differences in general conditions among individuals. Therefore, we adjusted the background factors of elderly and non-elderly patients using propensity score matching (PSM).

Methods: A total of 146 patients with HNSCC who received CRT were divided into an elderly (≥70 years, n = 35) and non-elderly group (<70 years, n = 111). Pre-treatment characteristics, including the performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, primary site, and TNM stage were adjusted by PSM. We compared the outcomes and safety of CRT with high-dose single-agent cisplatin (CDDP) as well as outcomes following recurrence between the groups, before and after PSM.

Results: The total dose of CDDP administered during CRT was significantly lower in the elderly group before PSM. However, it became comparable to the non-elderly group and adverse events did not differ between the groups following PSM, resulting in a comparable CRT completion rate. Overall-, disease specific-, and progression-free survivals of elderly patients were comparable to those of non-elderly patients following PSM. In contrast, elderly patients with recurrence could receive fewer salvage treatments than their non-elderly counterparts, resulting in worse survival.

Conclusions: CRT with high-dose CDDP is safe and effective for the treatment of elderly patients with HNSCC. However, salvage treatments can be rarely conducted for elderly patients with a recurrence, considering a deterioration of their general condition.

Outcomes of trimodality CROSS regimen in older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal cancer followed by Surgery (CROSS regimen) is standard of care for locally-advanced esophageal cancer. We evaluated CROSS completion rates, toxicity, and postoperative outcomes between older and younger adults receiving trimodality therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with locally-advanced esophageal cancer who underwent CROSS regimen from May 2016 to January 2020 at a single academic center. Outcomes of those aged ≥70-years-old and <70 years-old were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 201 patients, 136 were <70 and 65 were ≥70 years. Older adults were more likely to be male (91% vs. 79%; p = 0.045), have higher ECOG scores (median 1 vs. 0; p = 0.003), Charlson-comorbidity index (median 6 vs. 4; p < 0.001), and undergo open procedures (20% vs. 8% p = 0.008). Most completed CROSS regimen (78% vs. 84% respectively) with similar rates of treatment discontinuation and dose reduction (all p > 0.05). Time to surgery following neoadjuvant therapy was similar between age groups, except in those ≥80-years-old as compared to <70-years-old (p < 0.05). Overall toxicity rates were similar (68% vs. 71% respectively; p = 0.676). Only rates of delirium (19% vs. 5%) and urinary retention (9% vs. 0%) were higher in older adults (both p < 0.05). Length of stay, discharge disposition, mortality, and overall survival were similar. Age was not an independent risk factor for complication, neoadjuvant toxicity or completion, surgery timing, nor worse overall or recurrence-free survival (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Trimodality CROSS regimen for esophageal cancer in older adults is feasible, with similar completion rates and postoperative outcomes as compared to their younger counterparts.

Esophageal Cancer in Elderly Patients, Current Treatment Options and Outcomes; A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Simple Summary

Any given treatment may provide improve survival for elderly patients with oesophageal cancer compared to best supportive care. Although surgery may be related to a higher rate of complications in these patients, it also offers the best chance for survival, especially when combined with perioperative chemo-or chemoradiation. Definitive chemoradiation remains also a valid and widely used curative approach in this population. Quality of life after oesophageal cancer treatment does not seem to be particularly compromised in elderly patients, although the risk of loss of autonomy after the disease is higher. Based on the available data, excluding a priori elderly patients from curative treatment based on age alone cannot be supported. A thorough general health status and geriatric assessment is necessary to offer the optimal treatment, tailored to the individual patient.

Abstract

Esophageal cancer, despite its tendency to increase among younger patients, remains a disease of the elderly, with the peak incidence between 70–79 years. In spite of that, elderly patients are still excluded from major clinical trials and they are frequently offered suboptimal treatment even for curable stages of the disease. In this review, a clear survival benefit is demonstrated for elderly patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, and even definitive chemoradiation compared to palliative or no treatment. Surgery in elderly patients is often associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients and may put older frail patients at increased risk of autonomy loss. Definitive chemoradiation is the predominant modality offered to elderly patients, with very promising results especially for squamous cell cancer, although higher rates of acute toxicity might be encountered. Based on the all the above, and although the best available evidence comes from retrospective studies, it is not justified to refrain from curative treatment for elderly patients based on their age alone. Thorough assessment and an adapted treatment plan as well as inclusion of elderly patients in ongoing clinical trials will allow better understanding and management of esophageal cancer in this heterogeneous and often frail population.

Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients

The number of elderly patients with esophageal cancer has increased in recent years. The use of thoracoscopic esophagectomy has also increased, and its minimal invasiveness is believed to contribute to postoperative outcomes. However, the short- and long-term outcomes in elderly patients remain unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly patients. This retrospective study included 207 patients who underwent radical thoracoscopic esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at Kobe University Hospital between 2005 and 2014. Patients were divided into non-elderly (<75 years) and elderly (≥75 years) groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed for sex and clinical T and N stage, with a total of 29 matched pairs. General preoperative data, surgical procedures, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, in-hospital death, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. The elderly group was characterized by lower preoperative serum albumin levels and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists grade. Intraoperative data and postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The in-hospital death rate was 4% in the elderly group, which did not significantly differ from the non-elderly group. Cancer-specific survival was similar between the two groups. Although overall survival tended to be poor in the elderly group, it was not significantly worse than that of the non-elderly group. In conclusion, the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive esophagectomy in elderly versus non-elderly patients were acceptable. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a safe and feasible modality for elderly patients with appropriate indications.

Outcomes of curative esophageal cancer surgery in elderly: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative, surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients, which may lead to patient selection based on age. However, only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included. Therefore, it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.

AIM

To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.

METHODS

Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included. Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript, studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary and cardiac complications, delirium, 30- and 90-d, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.

RESULTS

Seven studies (4847 patients) using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients. Older patients (9.05%) had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients (3.92%), (confidence interval = 1.10-5.56). In addition, older patients (9.45%) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients (3.68%), (confidence interval = 1.01-5.91). In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy, older and younger patients had comparable 30-d, 90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.

CONCLUSION

Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.

Age-Related Differences in the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer According to Perioperative Systemic Therapy

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we retrospectively assessed the feasibility and prognostic efficacy of perioperative chemo(radio)therapy for pancreatic cancer (PC) patients according to age.

METHODS

A total of 556 consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent pancreatectomy for PC between 2000 and 2018 were enrolled.

RESULTS

Of the 556 patients who underwent resection, 95 (17%) were elderly (age, ≥75 years). Postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the 2 age groups, and postoperative prognoses were also similar (recurrence-free survival [RFS], P = 0.68; overall survival [OS], P = 0.28). In this cohort, 103 patients (19%) underwent preoperative chemo(radio)therapy, and 417 (77%) underwent postoperative chemotherapy. Perioperative therapy was found to be significantly beneficial for younger patients (preoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.006; OS, P < 0.001; postoperative therapy: RFS, P < 0.001; OS, P < 0.001). Conversely, no significant survival benefit of perioperative therapy was found for the elderly (preoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.28; OS, P = 0.44; postoperative therapy: RFS, P = 0.77; OS, P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that, although perioperative therapy is feasible for selected elderly patients with PC, this approach might not be as beneficial as it is for younger PC patients.

Surveillance of Esophageal Cancer in the Republic of Uzbekistan from 2000 to 2018

BACKGROUND

Differences in the geographical distributions of esophageal cancer (EC) are associated with environmental influences and genetic risk factors. The inhabitants of the Republic of Uzbekistan are at high-risk for EC; however, detailed epidemiological data regarding the dynamics of EC are not available.

METHODS

To address this gap in our knowledge, here we reviewed trends in the incidence of EC in Uzbekistan from 2000 through 2018. We acquired the epidemiological data for 17,144 patients with EC from the national epidemiological data base of Uzbekistan.

RESULTS

The mean incidence (per 100,000 persons) during the study period was 2.8, which peaked at 3.9 in 2007 and decreased below 2.5 in 2014 and thereafter. The incidence was highest for patients aged 61 years to 70 years (37.5%). Among patients with EC, 13,331 (80.0%) and 3,333 (20.0%) were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma, respectively. The incidences of patients with EC with adenocarcinoma were 0.6 from 2010-2018 and 0.4 from 2000 to 2009. The majority of patients were diagnosed with stage III EC, which was associated with a 5-year survival rate that increased from approximately 15% (2000-2009) and plateaued at approximately 25% (2012-2018).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that preventing the progression of EC to stage III is required to improve the prognosis of patients with EC who reside in Uzbekistan.

Strategies to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric conduit reconstruction

Background

Surgery remains the cornerstone of esophageal cancer treatment but is burdened with high procedure-related morbidity. Anastomotic leakage as the most important surgical complication after esophagectomy is a key indicator for quality in surgical outcome research.

Purpose

The aim of this narrative review is to assess and summarize the current knowledge on prevention of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and to provide orientation for the reader in this challenging field of surgery.

Conclusions

There are various strategies to reduce postoperative morbidity and to prevent anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy, including adequate patient selection and preparation, and many technical-surgical and anesthesiological details. The scientific evidence regarding those strategies is highly heterogeneous, ranging from expert’s recommendations to randomized controlled trials. This review is intended to serve as an empirical guideline to improve the clinical management of patients undergoing esophagectomy with a special focus on anastomotic leakage prevention.

Newly developed primary malignancies in long-term survivors who underwent curative esophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

PURPOSE

We evaluated the efficacy of the long-term follow-up of patients who underwent radical esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to screen for recurrence and new primary malignancies.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 448 ESCC patients who underwent radical esophagectomy. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy, computed tomography, a stool test and the assessment of the serum concentration of squamous cell carcinoma antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen were performed annually, even over 5 years after esophagectomy. The incidence of ESCC recurrence and new primary malignancies was investigated.

RESULTS

We enrolled 222 patients who survived at least 5 years after esophagectomy. A total of 104 new primary malignancies occurred in 82 patients (36.9%) after esophagectomy. Twenty-one malignancies were in the head and neck region, 14 in the residual esophagus, 13 in the prostate and 11 in the gastric tube and lung. Patients who developed new primary malignancies after esophagectomy had a significantly higher Brinkman index than those without new malignancies. An endoscopic approach successfully treated 92.9% of carcinomas in the residual esophagus, 90.9% of cancers in the gastric tube and 42.9% of carcinomas in the head and neck region.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of new primary malignancies was higher than the age-standardized incidence. Long-term follow-up and systemic screening may increase the probability of an early diagnosis and subsequent low-invasive treatment.

Characteristics Associated with Nodal and Distant Recurrence After Radical Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Thoracic Esophagus

BACKGROUND

Recurrence after radical resection of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is common. Limited evidence is available about the differences in clinical characteristics, risk factors, and prognostic significance between nodal and distant recurrence of thoracic ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 341 patients who underwent radical resection of thoracic ESCC and experienced (1) initial recurrence only in lymph nodes (n = 39), (2) recurrence only at distant organs (n = 57), or (3) no recurrences (n = 245) after follow-up ≥ 24 months. Clinicopathological characteristics, survival times, and risk factors were compared between the nodal and distant recurrence groups.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 57.8 months. Metastasectomy as initial treatment for the recurrence was performed for six (15.4%) patients in the nodal recurrence group and one patient in the distant recurrence group. Compared with the nodal recurrence group, patients with distant recurrence had significantly shorter disease-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-2.57, P = 0.0169], postrecurrence survival (HR 1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.10, P = 0.0476), and overall survival (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.12-3.51, P = 0.0193). The distant recurrence group had significantly larger macroscopic tumor size and more advanced pathological T stage than the nodal recurrence group, whereas preoperative treatment, tumor location, number of fields dissected, tumor differentiation, lymphatic involvement, and vessel invasion were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival times and recurrence risk factors differed between patients with nodal and distant recurrence after radical resection of thoracic ESCC.