1
|
Chaouch MA, Hussain MI, Carneiro da Costa A, Mazzotta A, Krimi B, Gouader A, Cotte E, Khan J, Oweira H. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304031. [PMID: 38809911 PMCID: PMC11135705 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lateral pelvic node dissection (LPND) poses significant technical challenges. Despite the advent of robotic surgery, determining the optimal minimally invasive approach remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes between robotic total mesorectal excision with LPND (R-LPND) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with LPND (L-LPND). METHODS This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) 2020 and AMSTAR 2 (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Utilizing the RevMan 5.3.5 statistical package from the Cochrane Collaboration, a random-effects model was employed. RESULTS Six eligible studies involving 652 patients (316 and 336 in the R-LPND and L-LPND groups, respectively) were retrieved. The robotic approach demonstrated favourable outcomes compared with the laparoscopic approach, manifesting in lower morbidity rates, reduced urinary complications, shorter hospital stays, and a higher number of harvested lateral pelvic lymph nodes. However, longer operative time was associated with the robotic approach. No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding major complications, anastomotic leak, intra-abdominal infection, neurological complications, LPND time, overall recurrence, and local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In summary, the robotic approach is a safe and feasible alternative for Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with LPND in advanced rectal cancer. Notably, it is associated with lower morbidity, particularly a reduction in urinary complications, a shorter hospital stay and increased number of harvested lateral pelvic nodes. The trade-off for these benefits is a longer operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of visceral and digestive surgery, Monastir University Hospital, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Surgery, M. G. Vannini Hospital, Istituto Figlie Di San Camillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Bassem Krimi
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Amine Gouader
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Eddy Cotte
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital of Lyon, University of Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Jim Khan
- Department of Robotic Colorectal Surgery, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ishizuka M, Shibuya N, Hachiya H, Nishi Y, Takayanagi M, Fujita J, Ihara K, Shiraki T, Matsumoto T, Mori S, Iso Y, Nakamura T, Aoki T, Irisawa A. Clinical influence of prophylactic lateral lymph node dissection on oncologic outcomes of patients with mid-low rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: a meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:548-558. [PMID: 38583909 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although several recent meta-analyses have investigated the clinical influence of the addition of lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low rectal cancer (RC) undergoing mesorectal excision (ME), most studies included in such meta-analyses were retrospectively designed. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the clinical influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes in patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME. METHODS A comprehensive electronic search of the literature up to July 2022 was performed to identify studies that compared oncologic outcomes between patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who underwent LLND and patients with mid-low RC undergoing ME who did not undergo LLND. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects models and the generic inverse variance method to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs, and heterogeneity was analyzed using I2 statistics. RESULTS A total of 6 studies, consisting of 3 randomized and 3 propensity score matching studies, were included in this meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis of 2 randomized studies demonstrated no significant effect of prophylactic LLND on improving oncologic outcomes concerning overall survival (OS) (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.89-1.69; I2 = 0%; P = .22) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81-1.31; I2 = 28%; P = .83). CONCLUSION The results of this meta-analysis revealed no significant influence of prophylactic LLND on oncologic outcomes-OS and RFS-in patients with mid-low RC who underwent ME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Ishizuka
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
| | - Norisuke Shibuya
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Hachiya
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yusuke Nishi
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan; Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Masashi Takayanagi
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Junki Fujita
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ihara
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Shiraki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takatsugu Matsumoto
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Shozo Mori
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Iso
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takatoshi Nakamura
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Taku Aoki
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Atsushi Irisawa
- Center for Colorectal Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Su H, Xu Z, Bao M, Luo S, Liang J, Pei W, Guan X, Liu Z, Jiang Z, Zhang M, Zhao Z, Jin W, Zhou H. Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:4088-4096. [PMID: 36997652 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10033-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An innovative instrument for laparoscopy using indocyanine green (ICG) allows easy detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPLNs). Here, we investigated the safety and efficacy of lateral pelvic SLN biopsy (SLNB) using ICG fluorescence navigation in advanced lower rectal cancer and evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of this technique to predict the status of LPLN. METHODS From April 1, 2017 to December 1, 2020, we conducted lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation during laparoscopic total mesorectal excision and lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) in 23 patients with advanced low rectal cancer who presented with LPLN but without LPLN enlargement. Data regarding clinical characteristics, surgical and pathological outcomes, lymph node findings, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. RESULTS We successfully performed the surgery using fluorescence navigation. One patient underwent bilateral LLND and 22 patients underwent unilateral LLND. The lateral pelvic SLN were clearly fluorescent before dissection in 21 patients. Lateral pelvic SLN metastasis was diagnosed in 3 patients and negative in 18 patients by frozen pathological examination. Among the 21 patients in whom lateral pelvic SLN was detected, the dissected lateral pelvic non-SLNs were all negative. All dissected LPLNs were negative in two patients without fluorescent lateral pelvic SLN. CONCLUSION This study indicated that lateral pelvic SLNB using ICG fluorescence navigation shows promise as a safe and feasible procedure for advanced lower rectal cancer with good accuracy, and no false-negative cases were found. No metastasis in SLNB seemed to reflect all negative LPLN metastases, and this technique can replace preventive LLND for advanced lower rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zheng Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Mandula Bao
- Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shou Luo
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Xu Guan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zheng Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Mingguang Zhang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Zhixun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Weisen Jin
- Department of Anorectal Diseases, Third Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, 100039, People's Republic of China.
| | - Haitao Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou S, Mei S, Feng B, Yang Y, Wang X, Wang Q, Liu Q. Mesorectal excision with or without lateral lymph node dissection for elderly patients with mid-low rectal cancer: safety and feasibility analysis. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:26-34. [PMID: 36354102 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The perioperative safety and survival benefits of lateral lymph node dissection in elderly patients have been less reported. This study aimed to compare short-term and survival outcomes of total mesorectal excision and total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection in elderly patients. METHODS A total of 444 elderly patients (≥65 years) with middle-low rectal cancer were enrolled in three institutions and divided into the total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection group (n = 110) and the total mesorectal excision group (n = 334). Eighty-three matched pairs were selected for evaluation after propensity matching. Data of 297 patients (age <65 years) with middle-low rectal cancer who underwent total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection were also collected and reviewed. Clinical and pathological features, postoperative outcomes and survival data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS Compared with the total mesorectal excision group, the operation time of patients in the total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection group was significantly longer (277.6 vs. 171.4 min, P < 0.001), and the estimated blood loss was significantly more (119.6 vs. 57.5 ml, P = 0.014). Although there was no significant difference in overall complications (24.1% vs. 14.4%, P = 0.115) and grade 3-5 complications (9.6% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.576) between the two groups, the incidence of urinary retention (10.8% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.029) was higher in the total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection group. Two groups of patients achieve a similar 3-year overall survival (92.8% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.195) and 3-year disease-free survival (81.5% vs. 73.0%, P = 0.625). In addition, we compared long-term outcomes in 110 elderly patients with total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection and 297 non-elderly patients with total mesorectal excision + lateral lymph node dissection, and the results showed that 3-year (89.2% vs. 80.9%, P = 0.546) and disease-free survival (76.4% vs. 70.4%, P = 0.346) were similar between elderly and non-elderly patients. CONCLUSIONS Although urinary retention is closely related to the implementation of lateral lymph node dissection in elderly patients, total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection could be performed safely with accepted overall and grade 3-5 postoperative complications in elderly patients with rectal cancer. Moreover, elderly patients with clinical lateral lymph node metastasis can also benefit from lateral lymph node dissection as well as younger patients. Prospective studies with large sample sizes are needed to verify our results further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shiwen Mei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Bo Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yingchi Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research and National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Gastric and Colorectal Surgery, General Surgery Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Qian Liu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhou S, Jiang Y, Liang J, Liu Q. Mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low rectal cancer with lateral lymph node metastasis: efficacy and prognostic analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:97. [PMID: 35351137 PMCID: PMC8961965 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02574-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) for rectal cancer patients with LPN metastasis (LPNM) and investigate the impact of LPNM on prognosis. Methods One hundred twenty-five matched pairs were selected and divided into the total mesorectal excision (TME) group and TME + LPND group for evaluation after propensity matching. Results No significant difference was observed in the 3-year local recurrence rate between the TME group and the TME + LPND group (10.7% vs 8.8%, P = 0.817); however, the rate of distant metastasis after TME + LPND was significantly higher (15.2% vs 7.2%, P = 0.044). When the mesorectal LN and LPN groups were subdivided, 3-year RFS was not significantly different between the internal LPN and N2 groups (57.1% vs. 55.3%, P = 0.613). There was no significant difference in RFS between the external group and the stage IV group (49.1% vs. 22.5%, P = 0.302), but RFS in the former group was significantly worse than that in the N2 group (49.1% vs. 55.3%, P = 0.044). Conclusion Although patients with suspected LPNM can achieve satisfactory local control after TME + LPND, systemic metastases are more likely to develop after surgery. Patients limited to internal iliac and obturator LN metastasis appear to achieve a survival benefit from LPND and can be regarded as regional LN metastasis. However, patients with LPNM in the external and common iliac LN metastasis have a poor prognosis that is significantly worse than that of N2 and slightly better than that of stage IV, and LPND should be carefully selected.
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhou S, Jiang Y, Pei W, Liang J, Zhou Z. Prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection for middle-low rectal cancer patients with lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis: a propensity score matching study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:136. [PMID: 35109810 PMCID: PMC8812196 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is still controversy regarding the clinical value and significance of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND). The present study aimed to investigate whether the addition of LPND to total mesorectal excision (TME) confers survival benefits in rectal cancer patients with clinical lateral pelvic node metastasis (LPNM). Methods From January 2015 to January 2021, a total of 141 rectal cancer patients with clinical evidence of LPNM who underwent TME + LPND were retrospectively analysed and divided into the LPNM group (n = 29) and the non-LPNM group (n = 112). The LPNM group was further subdivided into a high-risk LPNM group (n = 14) and a low-risk LPNM group (n = 15). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary outcomes of this study were 3-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results Of the 141 patients undergoing LPND, the local recurrence rate of patients with LPNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LPNM both before (27.6% vs. 4.5%, P = 0.001) and after (27.6% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.025) PSM. Multivariate analysis revealed that LPNM was an independent risk factor for not only OS (HR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15–8.17; P = 0.025) but also DFS (HR: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.18–4.87; P = 0.016) in patients with LPNM after TME + LPND. When the LPNM group was further subdivided, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that OS and DFS were significantly better in the low-risk group (obturator/internal iliac artery region and < 2 positive LPNs). Conclusion Even after LPND, LPNM patients have a poor prognosis. Moreover, LPNM is an independent poor prognostic factor affecting OS and DFS after TME + LPND. However, LPND appears to confer survival benefits to specific patients with single LPN involvement in the obturator region or internal iliac vessel region. Furthermore, LPND may have no indication in stage IV patients and should be selected carefully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yujuan Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 17 Panjiayuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhou S, Jiang Y, Pei W, Liang J, Zhou Z. Risk factors and prognostic significance of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal patients with clinically suspected lateral lymph node metastasis. BMC Surg 2021; 21:441. [PMID: 34961494 PMCID: PMC8714447 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01443-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM It is still controversial whether the addition of lateral pelvic lymph node (LPN) dissection (LPND) to total mesorectal excision (TME) can provide a survival benefit after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer patients with pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (LPNM). METHODS Patients with clinically suspected LPNM who underwent nCRT followed by TME + LPND were systematically reviewed and divided into the positive LPN group (n = 15) and the negative LPN group (n = 58). Baseline characteristics, clinicopathological data and survival outcomes were collected and analysed. RESULTS Of the 73 patients undergoing TME + LPND after nCRT, the pathological LPNM rate was 20.5% (15/73). Multivariate analysis showed that a post-nCRT LPN short diameter ≥ 7 mm (OR 49.65; 95% CI 3.98-619.1; P = 0.002) and lymphatic invasion (OR 9.23; 95% CI 1.28-66.35; P = 0.027) were independent risk factors for pathological LPNM. The overall recurrence rate of patients with LPNM was significantly higher than that of patients without LPNM (60.0% vs 27.6%, P = 0.018). Multivariate regression analysis identified that LPNM was an independent risk factor not only for overall survival (OS) (HR 3.82; 95% CI 1.19-12.25; P = 0.024) but also for disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.02-5.14; P = 0.044). Moreover, N1-N2 stage was another independent risk factor for OS (HR 7.41; 95% CI 1.63-33.75; P = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS Post-nCRT LPN short diameter ≥ 7 mm and lymphatic invasion were risk factors for pathological LPNM after nCRT. Furthermore, patients with pathological LPNM still show an elevated overall recurrence rate and poor prognosis after TME + LPND. Strict patient selection and intensive perioperative chemotherapy are crucial factors to ensure the efficacy of LPND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicheng Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yujuan Jiang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Wei Pei
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Jianwei Liang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| | - Zhixiang Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, NO.17 Panjiayuannanli, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Numata M, Shiozawa M, Godai T, Kazama K, Okamoto H, Kato A, Katayama Y, Sato S, Sugano N, Kohmura T, Higuchi A, Saito K, Iguchi K, Atsumi Y, Aoyama T, Tamagawa H, Mushiake H, Saeki H, Yukawa N, Taguri M, Sato M, Rino Y. Prediction of lateral lymph node metastasis using OSNA method for mesorectal lymph nodes in low rectal cancer: A prospective study by the Kanagawa Yokohama Colorectal Cancer Study Group (KYCC1801). J Surg Oncol 2021; 125:457-464. [PMID: 34704609 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Contrary to the Japanese guidelines recommendations regarding lateral lymph node dissection (LatLND) for rectal cancer, its omission is common in clinical practice without reliable omission criteria. Negative pathological mesorectal lymph node metastasis (MesLNM) is reportedly highly correlated with negative pathological lateral lymph node metastasis (p-LatLNM); however, this cannot be used as a criterion because pathological features are revealed postoperatively. Herein, we prospectively evaluated the negative predictive value (NPV) of MesLNM diagnosed via the one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) method for p-LatLNM. METHODS This prospective study was conducted at a single academic study group in Japan. The key eligibility criterion was mid-to-low rectal cancer planned to be treated using mesorectal excision with LatLND. According to the study protocol, the OSNA method was considered useful if the point estimate of the NPV exceeded 95%. RESULTS Preoperative case registration was conducted between 2018 and 2020; 34 patients were registered. Among these, 16 were negative for OSNA-MesLNM, and negative p-LatLNM was confirmed in all cases. The point estimate of the NPV was 100%, with the 95% confidence interval ranging from 79.4% to 100.0%. CONCLUSIONS The OSNA method is useful in selecting patients in whom LatLND can be omitted in real-world clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masakatsu Numata
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Manabu Shiozawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Teni Godai
- Department of Surgery, Fujisawa Shonandai Hospital, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Keisuke Kazama
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hironao Okamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Aya Kato
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Katayama
- Department of Surgery, Hadano Red Cross Hospital, Hadano, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sumito Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Sugano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Takashi Kohmura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Akio Higuchi
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kentaro Saito
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kenta Iguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yosuke Atsumi
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Toru Aoyama
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Tamagawa
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Mushiake
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Yokohama Nanbu Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Saeki
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyousai Hospital, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norio Yukawa
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masataka Taguri
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Maho Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yasushi Rino
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Todate Y, Honda M, Takada T, Saginoya T, Yamaguchi H, Hamada K, Nakayama Y, Kawamura H, Takano Y, Hashimoto K. The additional diagnostic impact of positron emission tomography-computed tomography for lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer: A prospective lymph node level analysis. J Surg Oncol 2021; 124:1085-1090. [PMID: 34263452 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We conducted a prospective study to determine the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. METHODS We enrolled patients scheduled to receive curative surgery with lymph node dissection for colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CT and PET-CT before surgery and who had primary lesions of cT2 or deeper. A radiologist determined the fluorodeoxyglucose uptake and the standardized uptake value (SUV) and metabolic volume (MV) to diagnose metastasis in cases with enlarged lymph nodes (≥7 mm long in minor diameter) on contrast-enhanced CT. Two gastrointestinal surgeons intraoperatively identified target lymph nodes to assess the association between images and pathological findings. The diagnostic performance (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values) for lymph node metastasis was determined using multilevel logistic modeling. RESULTS A total of 205 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled from February 2018 to April 2020 and 194 patients were analyzed in this study. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of PET-CT were 15.3% (13.4%-17.5%), 100.0% (99.0%-100.0%), 100.0% (51.2%-100.0%), and 98.7% (98.5%-99.0%), respectively. CONCLUSION PET-CT is a useful modality for determining the presence of metastasis in swollen lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT in colorectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukitoshi Todate
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.,Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michitaka Honda
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.,Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Takada
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Saginoya
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Hisashi Yamaguchi
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Radiology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Beam Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koichi Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yujiro Nakayama
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.,Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Hidetaka Kawamura
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.,Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yoshinao Takano
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU Research Institute for Neuroscience, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Hashimoto
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|