1
|
Chien KT, Feng HW, Chang TK, Liu YC, Chen LP, Huang YC, Lian YS, Li JY. Optimizing Disc and Cartilage Endplate Preparation in Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In-Depth Exploration of Surgical Instruments with a Technique Note and Narrative Review. World Neurosurg 2024; 189:228-247. [PMID: 38901485 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
Full-endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF) is a critical yet challenging procedure. However, extensive analyses of discectomy and cartilage endplate preparation techniques are limited. This can be attributed to the lack of universal protocols owing to diverse surgical practices and equipment preferences. Therefore, this narrative review presents a comprehensive overview of discectomy and cartilage endplate preparation techniques in FELIF. A literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases in December 2023 retrieved 490 studies, of which 53 met the predefined inclusion criteria, and 1373 patients were included in the analyses. Spinal endoscopic disc and cartilage endplate removal can be categorized into 2 main types: removal under direct endoscopic visualization and removal under radiographic guidance with the protection of a working sheath following the endoscope's removal. Removal under direct visualization ensures the safety and precision of the procedure. Radiographic guidance can enhance the efficiency of the removal process. Specially designed instruments can be utilized through the narrow working channels of spinal endoscopes for the scraping surgery. Moreover, many traditional spinal endoscopic instruments, through specific techniques and manipulations, can also aid in cartilage removal. The approaches and techniques vary significantly among physicians, but overall, these instruments and techniques aim to achieve a safe and efficient disc-scraping outcome. Thus, this review may offer a comprehensive guidance to surgeons in selecting the most efficient practices for FELIF. Uniform procedural protocols are needed to ensure broader adoption and standardized practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Ting Chien
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China; Institute of Applied Arts, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, China
| | - Hsiang-Wei Feng
- Department of Medical Education, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China
| | - Ting-Kuo Chang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taiwan, Taiwan, China
| | - Yueh-Ching Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China
| | - Lei-Po Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China; Department of Medicine, Mackay Medical College, Taiwan, Taiwan, China
| | - Yu-Ching Huang
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China
| | - Yan-Shiang Lian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan, China
| | - Jian-You Li
- Institute of Applied Arts, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schmidt BT, Chen KT, Kim J, Brooks NP. Applications of navigation in full-endoscopic spine surgery. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:429-437. [PMID: 37773448 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07918-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advancement in all surgery continues to progress towards more minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approaches. One of the platform technologies which has helped drive this trend within spine surgery is the development of endoscopy; however, the limited anatomic view experienced when performing endoscopic spine surgery requires a significant learning curve. The use of intraoperative navigation has been adapted for endoscopic spine surgery, as this provides computer-reconstructed visual data presented in three dimensions, which can increase feasibility of this technique to more surgeons. METHODS This paper will describe the principles, technical considerations, and applications of stereotactic navigation-guided endoscopic spine surgery. RESULTS Full-endoscopic spine surgery has advanced in recent years such that it can be utilized in both decompressive and fusion surgeries. One of the major pitfalls to any minimally invasive surgery (including endoscopic) is that the limited surgical view can often complicate the surgery or confuse the surgeon, leading to longer operative times, higher risks, among others. This is the real utility to using navigation in conjunction with the endoscope-when registered correctly and utilized appropriately, navigated endoscopic spine surgery can take some of the guesswork out of the minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSIONS Using navigation with endoscopy in spine surgery can potentially expand this technique to surgeons who have yet to master endoscopy as the assistance provided by the navigation can alleviate some of the complexities with anatomic understanding and surgical planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley T Schmidt
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA.
| | - Kuo-Tai Chen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Chiayi Branch, Chia-Yi, Taiwan
| | - JinSung Kim
- Department of Neurological Surgery, College of Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nathaniel P Brooks
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53792, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haibier A, Yusufu A, Hang L, Abudurexiti T. Comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:92. [PMID: 38281015 PMCID: PMC10821211 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04549-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study compares the efficacy and complications of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar fusion (Endo-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar fusion (MIS-TLIF) in treating lumbar degenerative diseases. It aims to provide reference data for clinical decision-making. METHODS We identified randomized controlled studies and non-randomized controlled studies on Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF for treating lumbar degenerative diseases based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were managed with Endnote X9 software and meta-analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. Extracted outcomes included lower back VAS score, lower extremity pain VAS score, low back pain ODI score, complication rate, fusion rate, time to surgery, blood loss, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS ① Thirteen high-quality studies were included in this meta-analysis, totaling 1015 patients-493 in the Endo-TLIF group and 522 in the MIS-TLIF group. ② Meta-analysis results revealed no significant differences in preoperative, postoperative 6-month, and final follow-up waist VAS scores, lower limb pain VAS score, ODI index, complications, and fusion rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The MIS-TLIF group had a shorter operative time (MD = 29.13, 95% CI 10.86, 47.39, P = 0.002) than the Endo-TLIF group. However, the Endo-TLIF group had less blood loss (MD = - 76.75, 95% CI - 111.59, - 41.90, P < 0.0001), a shorter hospital stay (MD = - 2.15, 95% CI - 2.95, - 1.34, P < 0.00001), and lower lumbar VAS scores both immediately postoperative (≤ 2 week) (MD = - 1.12, 95% CI - 1.53, - 0.71, P < 0.00001) compared to the MIS-TLIF group. CONCLUSION Meta-analysis results indicated that Endo-TLIF is similar to MIS-TLIF in terms of long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and complication rates. Although MIS-TLIF has a shorter operation time, Endo-TLIF can significantly reduce blood loss and hospital stay duration. Endo-TLIF offers the advantages of less surgical trauma, reduced blood loss, faster recovery, and early alleviation of postoperative back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abuduwupuer Haibier
- XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Department of Orthopedics of Trauma, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No.39 Wuxing Road, Urumqi, 830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Alimujiang Yusufu
- XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Department of Orthopedics of Trauma, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No.39 Wuxing Road, Urumqi, 830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Lin Hang
- XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
- Department of Orthopedics of Trauma, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No.39 Wuxing Road, Urumqi, 830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China
| | - Tuerhongjiang Abudurexiti
- XinJiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830054, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Orthopedics of Trauma, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Orthopedic Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No.39 Wuxing Road, Urumqi, 830002, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kotheeranurak V, Liawrungrueang W, Quillo-Olvera J, Siepe CJ, Li ZZ, Lokhande PV, Choi G, Ahn Y, Chen CM, Choi KC, Van Isseldyk F, Hagel V, Koichi S, Hofstetter CP, Del Curto D, Zhou Y, Bolai C, Bae JS, Assous M, Lin GX, Jitpakdee K, Liu Y, Kim JS. Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Approach Selection: A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:534-544. [PMID: 36745468 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of the literature to develop an algorithm formulated by key opinion leaders. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to analyze currently available data and propose a decision-making algorithm for full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy for treating lumbar disc herniation (LDH) to help surgeons choose the most appropriate approach [transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) or interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD)] for patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Full-endoscopic discectomy has gained popularity in recent decades. To our knowledge, an algorithm for choosing the proper surgical approach has never been proposed. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of the literature using PubMed and MeSH terms was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Patient samples included patients with LDH treated with full-endoscopic discectomy. The inclusion criteria were interventional research (randomized and nonrandomized trials) and observation research (cohort, case-control, case series). Exclusion criteria were case series and technical reports. The criteria used for selecting patients were grouped and analyzed. Then, an algorithm was generated based on these findings with support and reconfirmation from key expert opinions. Data on overall complications were collected. Outcome measures included zone of herniation, level of herniation, and approach (TELD or IELD). RESULTS In total, 474 articles met the initial screening criteria. The detailed analysis identified the 80 best-matching articles; after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 53 articles remained for this review. CONCLUSIONS The proposed algorithm suggests a TELD for LDH located in the foraminal or extraforaminal zones at upper and lower levels and for central and subarticular discs at the upper levels considering the anatomic foraminal features and the craniocaudal pathology location. An IELD is preferred for LDH in the central or subarticular zones at L4/L5 and L5/S1, especially if a high iliac crest or high-grade migration is found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vit Kotheeranurak
- Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
- Center of Excellence in Biomechanics and Innovative Spine Surgery, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Javier Quillo-Olvera
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Brain and Spine Care, Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Group, Spine Center, Hospital H+, Queretaro City, Mexico
| | - Christoph J Siepe
- Schön Clinic Munich Harlaching, Munich, Germany
- Paracelsus Medical University (PMU), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Zhen Zhou Li
- The Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | | | - Gun Choi
- Wooridul Spine Hospital, Pohang, South Korea
| | - Yong Ahn
- Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea
| | | | | | | | - Vincent Hagel
- University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Sairyo Koichi
- Tokushima University Graduate School, Kuramoto, Tokushima, Japan
| | | | - David Del Curto
- School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Yue Zhou
- Xinquiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongquing, China
| | - Chen Bolai
- Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Seok Bae
- Wooridul Spine Hospital, Gangnam-Gu Seoul, Korea
| | - Muhammed Assous
- Razi Spine Clinic-Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery, Amman, Jordan
| | - Guang-Xun Lin
- Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
- The Third Clinical Medical College, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Khanathip Jitpakdee
- Orthopedic Department, Queen Savang Vadhana Memorial Hospital. Sriracha, Chonburi, Thailand
| | - Yanting Liu
- Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Sung Kim
- Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao T, Dai Z, Zhang J, Huang Y, Shao H. Determining the learning curve for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18:193. [PMID: 36907913 PMCID: PMC10008607 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03682-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (PELIF) is one of the least invasive procedures for lumbar degenerative disorders (LDD). There is limited knowledge of the learning curve for PELIF. METHODS A total of 93 consecutive patients who underwent PELIF performed by a single spine surgeon for LDD failed with conservative treatment were retrospectively reviewed. The case series was split into three groups based on timing: A (earliest third of patients); B (middle third of patients); and C (latest third of patients). The following were also recorded: operating time, X-ray exposure time, complications, radiologic fusion rates, pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) scores (visual analogue scale (VAS) for back pain, VAS for leg pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association, Oswestry Disability Index and MacNab criteria), length of hospital stay, and need for revision surgeries. A learning curve was then developed by a logarithmic curve-fit regression analysis. RESULTS The operative time gradually decreased over time, and an asymptote was reached after about 25 cases. Compared with group B or C, group A had significantly longer operative time, significantly longer length of hospital stay, needed significantly more x-ray exposure time. Though not significantly different, there are fewer complications and revision surgeries over time. There is no significant difference over time in PROMs scores except for the VAS back scores. CONCLUSIONS PELIF is an alternative for minimal invasive surgery for LDD, PELIF presents a learning curve to the practicing spine surgeon with regard to operative time, x-ray exposure time, length of hospital stay, clinical PROMs and radiographic outcomes and complications. The presented PELIF learning curve provided valuable insight to surgeons interested in performing this surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingxiao Zhao
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Shangtang Road 158#, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhanqiu Dai
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Shangtang Road 158#, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.,Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Shangtang Road 158#, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.,Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China
| | - Yazeng Huang
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Shangtang Road 158#, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. .,Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui, China.
| | - Haiyu Shao
- Center for Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Shangtang Road 158#, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shi L, Ding T, Shi Y, Wang F, Wu C. Comparison of the Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e1231-e1240. [PMID: 36096389 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We compared the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Mis-TLIF) and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients who underwent single-segment Mis-TLIF or Endo-TLIF between June 2016 and June 2019 at our hospital. The patients in each treatment group were matched 1:1 for sex, age, and type of lumbar degenerative disease, and their clinical outcomes were compared at discharge and at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS Our study included 64 patients, with 32 patients in each treatment group. Operative time and fluoroscopy time were significantly higher in the Endo-TLIF versus Mis-TLIF groups, whereas estimated blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and the low back pain visual analog scale score at discharge were significantly lower. Both treatments achieved exact interbody fusion at the final-follow up. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale score or Oswestry Disability Index between the groups at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Complication rates were higher in the Endo-TLIF group (21.9%) than in the Mis-TLIF group (6.2%), although the difference was not significant. CONCLUSIONS Although there was no difference in the long-term outcomes between the treatments, Endo-TLIF had less blood loss and a lower postoperative drainage volume and low back pain visual analog scale score at discharge than Mis-TLIF. However, the longer operative time and potentially higher complication rate of Endo-TLIF suggest that surgeons may need to overcome the steeper learning curve than the procedure of Mis-TLIF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Shi
- Department of Orthopedics, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang City, Hubei Province, China
| | - Tao Ding
- Department of Spine Surgery, Sheng Li OilField Central Hospital, Dongying City, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yihua Shi
- Department of Orthopedics, Xiangyang No.1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Xiangyang City, Hubei Province, China
| | - Fang Wang
- Department of Pathology, Qujing Second People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Qujing City, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Chengcong Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, Qujing First People's Hospital: Kunming Medical University Affiliated Qujing Hospital, Qujing City, Yunnan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meng S, Xu D, Han S, Li G, Wang Y, Shen Y, Zhu K, Lin A, Wang R, Ma X, Zhou C. Fully Endoscopic 360° Decompression for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined with Disc Herniation: Technical Note and Preliminary Outcomes of 39 Cases. J Pain Res 2022; 15:2867-2878. [PMID: 36124038 PMCID: PMC9482463 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s379431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the outcomes, feasibility, and safety of endoscopic unilateral laminectomy, bilateral decompression and discectomy (Endo-ULBDD) for central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) combined with disc herniation (DH). Methods This study includes 39 patients diagnosed with CLSS combined with DH who met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery for Endo-ULBDD from April 2020 to March 2021. The mean age of the patients, operation time, hospitalization time, time in bed, and complications were recorded. Patients were followed up for at least 12 months. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low-back and lower-limb pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were evaluated preoperatively, before discharge, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. To evaluate clinical effectiveness 12 months postoperatively, the modified MacNab criteria were used. Results The mean age of the patients was 59.9 years, the mean operation time was 82.1 minutes, the mean hospitalization time was 3.7 days, and the mean time in bed was 20.9 hours. The mean VAS scores of low-back and lower-limb pain improved from 5.9 and 7.2 to 2.0 and 1.6, respectively (P < 0.05). The ODI score improved from 56.0 to 16.7 (P < 0.05). The overall excellent-good rate of the modified MacNab criteria was 89.7%. Two kinds of complications occurred in 4 patients (10.3%), including 1 patient whose inferior articular process was excessively removed and 3 patients who suffered from postoperative dysesthesia. No other severe complications were noted. Conclusion Endo-ULBDD is a safe, feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive approach to treating CLSS combined with DH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengwei Meng
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Derong Xu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuo Han
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Guanghui Li
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanqing Shen
- Operating Room, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Kai Zhu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Antao Lin
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruiting Wang
- Medical Insurance Audit Department, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuexiao Ma
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| | - Chuanli Zhou
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Accuracy and Safety of Robot-Assisted versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Posterior C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Internal Fixation for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Preliminary Study. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:8508113. [PMID: 36132077 PMCID: PMC9484877 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8508113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare the accuracy, efficiency, and safety of robotic assistance (RA) and conventional fluoroscopy guidance for the placement of C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screws in posterior atlantoaxial fusion. Methods The data of patients who underwent posterior C1–C2 screw fixation (Goel-Harm's technique) in our hospital from August 2014 to March 2021 were retrospectively evaluated, including 14 cases under fluoroscopic guidance and 11 cases under RA. The hospital records, radiographic results, surgical data, and follow-up records were reviewed. Accuracy of screw placement was assessed using the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, and clinical outcomes were evaluated by Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), modified MacNab criteria, and postoperative complications. Results Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. The mean estimated blood loss in the fluoroscopic guidance and RA groups was 205.7 ± 80.3 mL and 120.9 ± 31.9 mL, respectively (p = 0.03). The mean surgical duration was 34 min longer with RA compared to that performed with free-hand (FH) method (p = 0.15). In addition, lower intraoperative radiation exposure was detected in the RA group (12.4 ± 1.4 mGy/screw) versus the FH (19.9 ± 2.1 mGy/screw) group (p = 0.01). The proportion of “clinically acceptable” screws (graded 0 and I) was higher in the RA group (93.2%) than that in the FH group (87.5%, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the increase of JOA score and decrease of VAS score between the two surgical procedures. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in overall clinical outcome between the two groups and no neurovascular complications associated with screw insertion. Conclusions RA is a safe and potentially more accurate alternative to the conventional fluoroscopic-guided FH technique for posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:8419739. [PMID: 36072476 PMCID: PMC9444441 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8419739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) advances the principles of minimally invasive surgery, including minor collateral tissue damage, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery times. ESS allows for direct access to the spine through small incisions and direct visualization of spinal pathology via an endoscope. While this technique has many applications, there is a steep learning curve when adopting ESS into a surgeon's practice. Two types of navigation, optical and electromagnetic, may allow for widespread utilization of ESS by engendering improved orientation to surgical anatomy and reduced complication rates. The present review discusses these two available navigation technologies and their application in endoscopic procedures by providing case examples. Furthermore, we report on the future directions of navigation within the discipline of ESS.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang H, Xu D, Wang C, Zhu K, Guo J, Zhao C, Han J, Liu H, Ma X, Zhou C. Application of electromagnetic navigation in endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a cohort study. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2597-2606. [PMID: 35748953 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07280-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Clinical retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES To explore the application of the electromagnetic navigation system in Endo-TLIF. MATERIALS AND METHODS From May 2019 to March 2020, 76 patients with single-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis treated by electromagnetic navigation-assisted Endo-TLIF (NE group) and conventional Endo-TLIF (CE group) were enrolled in the study. Time of pedicle screw implantation, entire operation time, the number of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy exposures, total blood loss, incision length, ambulation time, accuracy of pedicle screws, complications, visual analog scale for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, Japanese Orthopedic Association score and postoperative fusion rates were recorded, respectively. RESULTS There were no significant differences in preoperative demographics between the NE and CE groups (P > 0.05). The mean number of intraoperative X-ray fluoroscopy exposures, guidewires insertion, entire operation time, total blood loss and adjustment rate of screws in the NE group were significantly less compared with the CE group (P < 0.05, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical parameters between the two groups at different time points in the follow-up period (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference in fusion rates between the two groups. In addition, one case of cage subsidence was observed after surgery in the CE group. CONCLUSION Electromagnetic navigation systems could be applied throughout the entire surgical course and ameliorate the shortcomings of the conventional Endo-TLIF technique to reduce radiation exposure, improve accuracy, avoid repetitive operations and shorten surgery time and the required learning curve of the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zhang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Derong Xu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Kai Zhu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Jianwei Guo
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Jialuo Han
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Houchen Liu
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China
| | - Xuexiao Ma
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
| | - Chuanli Zhou
- Department of Spinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.59 Haier Road, Qingdao, 266000, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|