Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis

Does Indocyanine Green Utilization during Esophagectomy Prevent Anastomotic Leaks? Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Indocyanine Green (ICG) is a promising technique for the assessment of gastric conduit and anastomosis perfusion during esophagectomy. ICG integration may be helpful in minimizing the risk of anastomotic leak (AL). Literature evidence is sparse, while the real effect of ICG assessment on AL minimization remains unsolved. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare short-term outcomes between ICG-guided and non-ICG-guided (nICG) esophagogastric anastomosis during esophagectomy for cancer. Materials and Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried up to 25 April 2024. Studies that reported short-term outcomes for ICG versus non-ICG-guided (nICG) anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy were considered. Primary outcome was AL. Risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) were utilized as effect size measures, whereas to assess relative inference we used 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results: Overall, 1399 patients (11 observational studies) were included. Overall, 576 (41.2%) underwent ICG gastric conduit assessment. The patients' ages ranged from 22 to 91 years, with 73% being male. The cumulative incidence of AL was 10.4% for ICG and 15.4% for nICG. Compared to nICG, ICG utilization was related to a reduced risk for postoperative AL (RR 0.48; 95% CI 0.23-0.99; p = 0.05). No differences were found in terms of pulmonary complications (RR 0.83), operative time (SMD -0.47), hospital length of stay (SMD -0.16), or 90-day mortality (RR 1.70). Conclusions: Our study seems to indicate a potential impact of ICG in reducing post-esophagectomy AL. However, because of limitations in the design of the included studies, allocation/reporting bias, variable definitions of AL, and heterogeneity in ICG use, caution is required to avoid potential overestimation of the ICG effect.

Current status of indocyanine green fluorescent angiography in assessing perfusion of gastric conduit and oesophago-gastric anastomosis

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains a significant complication after esophagectomy. Indocyanine green fluorescent angiography (ICG-FA) is a promising and safe technique for assessing gastric conduit (GC) perfusion intraoperatively. It provides detailed visualization of tissue perfusion and has demonstrated usefulness in oesophageal surgery. GC perfusion analysis by ICG-FA is crucial in constructing the conduit and selecting the anastomotic site and enables surgeons to make necessary adjustments during surgery to potentially reduce ALs. However, anastomotic integrity involves multiple factors, and ICG-FA must be combined with optimization of patient and procedural factors to decrease AL rates. This review summarizes ICG-FA's current applications in assessing esophago-gastric anastomosis perfusion, including qualitative and quantitative analysis and different imaging systems. It also explores how fluorescent imaging could decrease ALs and aid clinicians in utilizing ICG-FA to improve esophagectomy outcomes.

Impact of Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Short-Term Analysis

Background

We compared short-term clinical outcomes between robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and video-assisted thoracic esophagectomy (VATS-E) using propensity score-matched analysis.

Methods

We enrolled 114 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy at our institution from January 2013 to January 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize selection bias between the RAMIE and VATS-E groups.

Results

After propensity score matching, 72 patients (RAMIE group, n = 36; VATS-E group, n = 36) were selected for analysis. No significant differences in clinical variables were observed between the two groups. The RAMIE group had a significantly longer thoracic operation time (313 ± 40 vs. 295 ± 35 min, P = 0.048), a higher number of right recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph nodes (4.2 ± 2.7 vs. 2.9 ± 1.9, P = 0.039), and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (23.2 ± 12.8 vs. 30.4 ± 18.6 days, P = 0.018) than the VATS-E group. The RAMIE group tended to have a lower rate of anastomotic leakage (13.9% vs. 30.6%) than the VATS-E group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.089). No significant differences were found in recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (11.1% vs. 13.9%, P = 0.722) or pneumonia (13.9% vs. 13.9%, P = 1.000) between the RAMIE group and the VATS-E group.

Conclusion

Although RAMIE for esophageal cancer requires a longer thoracic surgery time, it might be a feasible and safe alternative to VATS-E for treating esophageal cancer. Further analysis is needed to clarify the advantages of RAMIE over VATS-E, especially in terms of long-term surgical outcomes.

[The first experience of fluorescent angiography with indocyanine green in primary esophagoplasty with gastric conduit in patients with malignant tumors of the esophagus]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the possibilities of intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescein angiography (ICG technology) in primary esophagoplasty by gastric conduit in patients with malignant tumors of the esophagus.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 74 patients. Depending on the localization of the tumor in the esophagus, a Lewis-type or McKeown-type operation was performed. The retrospective group (surgery without the use of ICG technology) included 53 patients who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2020 years.The prospective group (surgery with the use ICG technology) included 21 patients operated on from 2021 to 2023 years. ICG technology was used to assess microcirculation in the gastric conduit during esophagoplasty, as well as to identify the right gastroepiploic artery.

RESULTS

The ICG fluorescein angiography technique for assessing microcirculation in the gastric conduit was a simple and easily reproducible procedure. Perfusion of the gastric conduit was regarded as satisfactory in 16 (76%) cases, unsatisfactory in 5 (24%) cases, which required resection of the distal part of the conduit. All cases of poor perfusion were in patients with narrow gastric conduit and neck anastomosis location (McKeown-type operation). Anastomotic leakages occurred in 8 (15%) patients in the retrospective group, 4 (19%) patients in the prospective group (p>0.05). In 4 out of 5 cases of poor gastric conduit perfusion, anastomotic leaks occurred. Immediate postoperative results in the compared groups were also comparable. The use of ICG technology in 5 (45%) cases out of 11, when laparoscopic mobilization of the stomach was performed, helped to visualize the right gastroepiploic artery, which is the main source of blood supply to the formed gastric conduit. The use of ICG technology in 3 patients with a compromised gastrostomy stomach demonstrated the absence of significant microcirculation disorders in the stomach wall.

CONCLUSION

The first experience of using fluorescein angiography with ICG in primary esophagoplasty by gastric conduit in patients with malignant tumors of the esophagus demonstrated the safety, simplicity and availability of this technique. An objective assessment of the effectiveness of the application of ICG technology requires the accumulation of experience.