Can indocyanine green during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy be considered a new intraoperative modality for leak testing?

A Green Lantern for the Surgeon: A Review on the Use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging has revolutionized surgical practice across various medical and surgical specialties. This article reviews the clinical applications of ICG in abdominal, urological, thoracic, and gynecological surgery. ICG fluorescence imaging has been widely adopted in general surgery for various applications, including perfusion assessment, intraoperative visualization of the ureter, and tumor localization. It is particularly valuable in evaluating anastomotic leaks and aiding in precise tumor resection during minimally invasive surgeries. Studies have shown mixed results on its effectiveness in reducing anastomotic leak rates, highlighting the need for further research. In thoracic surgery, ICG facilitates the identification and resection of pulmonary bullae, as well as the precise localization of pulmonary nodules during video-assisted surgery. In urology, ICG aids in localizing renal tumors and guiding selective arterial occlusion during partial nephrectomy. Its role in identifying the lymphatic pathway in prostate cancer and sentinel lymph node biopsy in gynecological cancer is also discussed. Despite its benefits, the use of ICG fluorescence faces challenges such as limited tissue penetration, the potential for false results, a lack of standardized protocols, and high equipment costs. Nonetheless, it remains a powerful tool that could improve surgical outcomes.

The Art of Sleeve Gastrectomy

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has historically evolved from gastroplasty and anti-reflux procedures into one of the most commonly performed primary metabolic surgeries in the United States and worldwide. Initially initiated in the 1980s as part of the duodenal switch procedure, its standalone effectiveness and simplicity have led to increasing popularity globally. The rise in obesity rates transcends age boundaries, alarmingly affecting not only adults but also the younger demographic. This escalating trend is concerning, as it predisposes these populations to numerous future health complications, as well as highlighting the critical necessity for a safe and potent weight loss strategy. Although sleeve gastrectomy carries a higher risk for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) compared to other bariatric procedures, it stands out as a reliable, safe and effective surgical solution for obesity. It is particularly beneficial for adolescents and patients with complex medical comorbidities, including, but not limited to, heart failure and immunocompromisation. It has also served as a bridge for transplants in morbidly obese patients with end-stage heart, liver and kidney disease due to its favorable safety profile.

Can robotic gastric bypass be considered a valid alternative to laparoscopy? Our early experience and literature review

Background

Robotic bariatric surgery serves as an alternative to laparoscopy. The technology provides the surgeon with an accurate three-dimensional view, allowing complex maneuvers while maintaining full control of the operating room.

Hypothesis

We report our experience with this innovative surgery compared with laparoscopy during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to demonstrate its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential differences between the robotic and laparoscopic techniques.

Materials and methods

Our study retrospectively identified 153 consecutive obese patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic gastric bypass (RGB) procedures over a 2-year period at the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia. Data on demographics, operative time, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, and mortality were collected and compared between two groups of patients: 82 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures and 71 who underwent robotic procedures.

Results

We analyzed 153 patients who underwent gastric bypass with a mean age of 42.58 years, of whom 74 were female; 71 were treated with a robotic approach and 82 with a laparoscopic approach. The mean operative time was 224.75 ± 10.4 min for RGB (including docking time) and 101.22 min for laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) (p < 0.05), which is statistically significant. The median length of stay was 4.1 days for the RGB group and 3.9 days for the LGB group (p = 0.89). There is only one conversion to laparoscopy in the RGB group. We observed only one case of postoperative complications, specifically one episode of endoluminal bleeding in the laparoscopic group, which was successfully managed with medical treatment. No mortality was observed in either group.

Conclusion

The statistical analysis shows to support the robotic approach that had a lower incidence of complications but a longer operative duration. Based on our experience, the laparoscopic approach remains a technique with more haptic feedback than the robotic approach, making surgeons feel more confident.This study has been registered on ClinicalTrial.gov Protocol Registration and Results System with this ID: NCT05746936 for the Organization UFoggia (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05746936).

[ICG angiography is a safety standard in bariatric surgery]

OBJECTIVE

To examine the specific characteristics of ICG-angiography during various bariatric interventions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 329 patients, with 105 (32%) undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), 98 (30%) undergoing mini-gastricbypass (MGB), 126 (38%) undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RGB). Intraoperative ICG angiography was perfomed on all patients at 'control points', the perfusion of the gastric stump was qualitatively and quantitatively assessed.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ICG angiography shows that during LSG the angioarchitectonics in the area of the His angle are crucial. The presence of the posterior gastric artery of the gastric main type is a prognostically unfavorable risk factor for the development of ischemic complications. Therefore, to expand the gastric stump it is necessary to suture a 40Fr nasogastric tube and perform peritonization of the staple line. Statistical difference in blood supply at three points were found between and within the two groups of patients (Gis angle area, gastric body, pyloric region) with a p-value <0.001. During MGB, one of the important stages is applying the first (transverse) stapler cassette between the branches of the right and left gastric arteries. This maintains blood supply in anastomosis area, preventing immediate complications such as GEA failure, as well as long-term complications like atrophic gastritis, peptic ulcers, and GEA stenosis.

CONCLUSION

ICG angiography is a useful method for intraoperative assessment of angioarchitecture and perfusion of the gastric stump during bariatric surgery. This helps prevent tissue ischemia and reduce the risk of early and late postoperative complications.

Indocyanine Green in Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review

Indocyanine green (ICG) is a fluorescent dye that can be used intraoperatively to assess tissue perfusion, as well as perform leak testing. This study aims to summarize published manuscripts on outcomes of ICG use and reduction of complications compared to traditional leak test and tissue perfusion evaluation. A PubMed search using "ICG and bariatric surgery," "ICG and gastric sleeve," "ICG and gastric bypass," and "ICG and revisional bariatric surgery" was performed. The proportion of patients who underwent an intraoperative decision change due to ICG was 3.8% (95% CI: 2.0 to 7.2%). ICG fluorescent imaging in bariatric surgery is a valuable tool, and further studies are needed to confirm its utility for routine use in both standard or complex cases (PROSPERO #418126).

Fluorescence use in minimally invasive metabolic and bariatric surgery - a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

This review aims to explore and summarise current knowledge of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence application in metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and assess its potential in improving patient safety.

METHODS

The review was prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Evidence from PubMed, ScienceDirect and Ovid MEDLINE databases was independently screened in October 2022. The primary information and outcomes were the type of fluorescence application with potential patient benefit and the complication rate. The secondary outcomes consisted of the kind of dye, the application protocol, and the equipment used.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications were included, with six prospective observational studies, five case reports and two retrospective cohort studies and involved a total of 424 patients. The publications were categorized into four groups based on the method of fluorescence application. Sixty-six percent of the cases used fluorescence for LSG, 32.3% used it for RYGB, 1.2% for revisional surgery, 0.2% during removal of an adjustable gastric band, and 0.2% for LSG combined with Rossetti fundoplication. ICG was used on its own in the majority of studies, although in one case, it was used in combination with methylene blue. ICG administration protocols varied significantly. Complications occurred in three patients (0.71%): leaks were diagnosed in two cases, and one patient required a blood transfusion.

CONCLUSION

The most popular type of use is intraoperative assessment of the blood supply. ICG application may reduce the risk of complications, with potential benefits in detecting ischemia and leaks, searching for bleeding in areas inaccessible to endoscopy, and non-invasive hepatopathy evaluation.

First Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for the Treatment of Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in a Patient With Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an immune-mediated disease that results in fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) associated with severe esophageal dysmotility is common in SSc patients, and surgical treatment with usual anti-reflux procedures such as fundoplications is associated with dismal symptomatic relief and postoperative dysphagia. We report the first robotic short-limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with a short Roux limb for the treatment of GERD in a patient with SSc with intense esophageal dysmotility. The operative time was two hours. The procedure and postoperative course were uneventful. The patient presented complete relief of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms and no postoperative dysphagia in a two-year follow-up. Therefore, short-limb RYGB is a safe and very effective alternative for the treatment of severe GERD in patients with SSc. The robotic surgical platform may have some advantages compared to conventional laparoscopy.