Robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstructed management of multiple aneurysms in renal artery primary bifurcations: a case report and literature review

Robotic Surgery for Elective Repair of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review

Background: The treatment choice of visceral artery aneurysms in an elective setting is debated. The durability and the risk of reintervention with endovascular treatment are still reasons for concern, whereas open surgery is invasive and burdened by major complications. In anecdotal reports and isolated studies, robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide the possibility of a minimally invasive treatment and the durability of traditional open surgery, but the literature supporting this view is scarce. This review aims to collect the results of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Methods: A systematic search of the main research databases was performed: the study endpoints were mortality and conversion rates, perioperative morbidity, and freedom from late complications and reinterventions. Results: We identified 16 studies on 53 patients. All cases underwent successful resection, with three conversions to laparoscopy. Perioperative and aneurysm-related mortality were nil. Over a median follow-up of 9 months, two reinterventions were reported (3.6%). Conclusion: The robotic technique is safe and effective in treating splenic and renal artery aneurysms, and it should be considered as a valuable alternative to endovascular and open repair, although larger sample sizes and a longer-term follow-up are necessary to confirm such results.

Blood pressure and renal outcomes after renal artery aneurysm intervention: Single-center experience and review of literature

Objective

To explore the results of hypertension improvement and renal function preservation after renal artery aneurysm (RAA) repair.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed the change in blood pressure (BP) and renal outcomes of 59 RAA patients throughout either open or endovascular operations and follow-up at a large center. Patients were grouped according to the difference in their BP at the last follow-up vs. their baseline value. Logistic regression was conducted to explore risk factors for perioperative BP relief and long-term hypertension reonset. Previous studies of RAA with records of BP, blood creatinine level, or GFR/eGFR results are reviewed.

Results

Hypertension was observed in 62.7% (37/59) of the patients included. Postoperative BP declined from 132.20 ± 16.46/79.92 ± 9.64 mmHg to 122.41 ± 11.17/71.10 ± 9.82 mmHg, while eGFR changed from 108.17 ± 24.73 to 98.92 ± 23.87 ml/min/1.73 m². The median follow-up was 854 [IQR: 1,405] days. Both open and endovascular techniques significantly relieved hypertension and did not impair renal function much. Lower preoperative systolic BP (SBP) was significantly associated with hypertension relief (OR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70-0.99). Among patients with normal BP after the operation, higher postoperative SBP was significantly associated with new-onset hypertension (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01-1.29). Literature review indicated that renal function usually remained normal at follow-up, whereas relief of hypertension varied.

Conclusion

Patients with lower preoperative SBP were likely to benefit more from the operation, while higher postoperative SBP indicated a higher chance of hypertension reonset. Creatinine level and eGFR generally remained stable regardless of operation type.

Single Centre Experience in Open and Endovascular Treatment of Renal Artery Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The true incidence and natural history of renal artery aneurysm (RAA) remain unclear and still exists controversy over indication for treatment. Several techniques of conventional surgical reconstructions are described in literature, and more recently endovascular therapies have been reported with satisfying results and lower complication rate. This paper aims to investigate the outcomes of both endovascular and open repair of RAA achieved in a single institution involving 3 medical teams (urology, vascular surgery and neuroradiology).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective observational study about all patients surgically or endovascularly treated for RAA over a 15-year period. Pre-operative, procedural and post-operative data at the early, mid- and long-term follow-up were collected and analysed, focusing on operative technique used for repair and related outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (n = 17 (63%) women, mean age 58 ± 13.2, n = 26 saccular RAA) were included. Mean aneurysm was size was 18.8 ± 6.3 mm. Most diagnosis were accidental. Symptomatic RAA showed with macroscopic haematuria (n = 3, 25.9%), unstable hypertension (n = 2; 7%), chronic lumbar pain (n = 1, 3.7%) and renal infarct (n = 1, 3.7%). Conventional surgery (ex-vivo repair, aneurysmorraphy, aneurysm resection and end-to-end anastomosis) was performed in 14 (51.8%) cases and endovascular coiling embolization in 13 (48.2%). Mean hospital length of stay was 5.4 ± 3.6 days. Intensive Care Unit stay was needed only in the surgically treated patients (mean 1.1 ± 1.2 days). During the early follow-up, morbidity rate was 7/14 in surgically treated patients vs. 1/13 in endovascular group; it included bleeding, retroperitoneal hematoma, arterial thrombosis and bowel obstruction. The discharge imaging showed complete aneurysm exclusion and renal artery patency in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 39 ± 42 months, 3 patients (11%) were lost to follow up and 2 (7.4 %) died from unrelated cause. None of these patients required dialysis but a statistically significant (P = 0.09) decrease in GFR was noted between the preoperative period and last follow-up control. RAA repair neither showed blood pressure control improvement nor reduced the need for anti-hypertensive drug use.

CONCLUSION

Open or endovascular techniques are both safe and efficient to treat RAA. Even though, surgical management is burdened with higher morbidity rate, the operative technique should be selected according to anatomical features, diameters and location of RRA; and the number of renal branches involved. Further larger studies are needed to define the feasibility and safety for a wider application of the endovascular approach.

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Retroperitoneal Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair: A Rare Case Report and Literature Review

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of renal artery aneurysms (RAAs) includes surgical repair and endovascular techniques. Surgical repair is divided into open surgery repair and laparoscopic surgery repair. Laparoscopic RAA has fewer postoperative complications than open surgery. Some experiences with robotic RAA repair via transperitoneal access have been recently reported. However, no report could be found on the treatment of retroperitoneal RAA with the da Vinci robot-assisted surgery thus far.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, the surgical management of an 8.6-mm right-sided RAA via robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal approach in a 58-year-old man who presented with flank discomfort is reported. The aneurysm was resected, and the renal artery was reconstructed. The total operative time was 2 h with a warm ischemia time of 25 min, and the estimated surgical blood loss was 50 mL. The patient resumed a regular diet on postoperative day 2, and the hospital stay lasted 5 days. No intraoperative nor postoperative morbidity was reported. Follow-up imaging and functional analysis demonstrated resolution of the aneurysm and preservation of renal function after 2.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted laparoscopic retroperitoneal RAA repair is flexible and safe. The greatest advantage of retroperitoneal surgery is direct access to the renal artery. Furthermore, it could reduce the injury in the abdominal organs and avoid abdominal adhesion. This approach may also allow for improved postoperative recovery, reduce the morbidity correlated with transperitoneal RAA, and thus may be considered as an alternative to transperitoneal surgery for RAAs in the future.

Robotic Surgery For in situ Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair: Technical Note and Literature Review About a Mini- Invasive Alternative

CASE REPORT

Classical surgical options for renal artery aneurysm (RAA) are usually restricted to endovascular surgery or open repair, either using an in-situ or ex-situ approach. A 45-year-old woman presenting with a 20-mm complex RAA with hilum location, not suitable for endovascular repair renal was treated with a mini-invasive robotic approach. This approach allowed an in-situ reconstruction in a complete mini-invasive manner with the Da Vinci Xi robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). The robotic system was used for both surgical exposure and aneurysmectomy with patch closure. Clamping time was 38 minutes (warm ischemia), total operative time was 210 minutes.

LIITERATURE REVIEW

A comprehensive literature review was performed concerning the studies reporting a robotic approach for RAA. Main outcomes of interest were surgical technique, total operative time, clamping time, blood loss and postoperative renal function. Seven studies were identified, reporting a total of 20 RAAs. Most of the RAA were treated by aneurysmoraphy (n=9). Median total operative time varied between 228 and 300 min (range: 155 - 360 minutes), median clamping time varied between 26 and 44 minutes (range: 10 - 82 minutes). Median blood loss was comprised between100 and 150 mL (range: 25 - 650 mL). No alteration of renal function in the early post-operative period was reported.

CONCLUSION

RAA in-situ repair with a robotic approach is feasible and safe and should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair when endovascular technique cannot be an option.

Robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for the simultaneous management of multiple urinary tract calculi: a case report and experience sharing

Background

Urolithiasis is a clinically common benign disease in urology. Surgical treatments that are widely used in urolithiasis are percutaneous nephrolithotomy, rigid/flexible ureteroscopy, laparoscopic surgery, and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. The da Vinci surgical system is rarely used in the treatment of urolithiasis. In the current study, we report a case of multiple urinary tract calculi treated by robot-assisted laparoendoscopic single-site (RA-LESS) surgery.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with multiple urinary tract calculi. He previously underwent right ureterolithotomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Computed tomography (CT) scan and three-dimensional reconstruction CT image showed that multiple calculi were located in the right kidney, right upper ureter, and bladder. The preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were 17.81 ml/min (right kidney) and 53.11 ml/min (left kidney). We utilized the da Vinci system docking with a single-site port to perform pyelolithotomy, ureterolithotomy, and cystolithotomy, simultaneously. The operative time was 135 min and estimated blood loss was 30 ml. The postoperative hospital stay was 5 days. Three months after surgery, the serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels dropped to a normal range, and no residual fragments were found in the CT scan. The postoperative GFR were 26.33 ml/min (right kidney) and 55.25 ml/min (left kidney).

Conclusions

RA-LESS surgery is a safe and effective surgical procedure in the treatment of multiple urinary tract calculi; however, further investigation is needed to validate its long-term therapeutic effect.

Robotic Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

Renal artery aneurysm (RAA) is a rare condition, traditionally managed with endovascular or open surgical techniques.

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience with robotic RAA repair.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Nine consecutive patients underwent intracorporeal robotic surgery for 10 RAAs.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

Two patients underwent concomitant robotic partial nephrectomy. One patient had RAA in a solitary kidney. Median RAA diameter was 2.2 (1.8-3)cm. Intracorporeal transarterial hypothermic renal perfusion was performed in five patients. Robotic techniques included tailored aneurysmectomy and repair (n=5), excision with end-to-end anastomosis (n=2), aneurysmectomy with branch reimplantation (n=1), prosthetic interposition graft repair (n=1), and simple nephrectomy (n=1; this patient's data were excluded from analysis).

MEASUREMENTS

Demographics, RAA characteristics, intraoperative techniques, perioperative outcomes, and follow up data were analyzed. Aneurysms were diagnosed by computed tomography, angiography, or incidentally during the performance of a partial nephrectomy.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

All cases were performed robotically, without conversion to open surgery. Median (range) operative time was 3.8 (3-6)h, warm ischemia time 26 (19-32)min, hypothermic renal perfusion time 34 (29-69)min, and estimated blood loss 100 (25-400)ml. No intraoperative blood transfusion was required. Median hospital stay was 3 (2-6)d. One patient had a Clavien-Dindo grade II complication. At median follow-up of 16 (2-67)mo, all patients had preserved renal function. Follow-up imaging confirmed normal caliber reconstructed renal arteries with globally perfused kidneys, except for two kidneys with small segmental infarcts due to an intentionally ligated small polar vessel. Limitations include the small number of patients and the retrospective nature of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic repair of complex RAAs is feasible. Surgical expertise, patient selection, and RAA-specific vascular reconstruction are critical for success. Greater experience is needed to evaluate the proper place of robotic repair of RAAs.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We report intracorporeal robotic repair for complex renal artery aneurysms. This robotic operation is feasible and safe, and replicates open principles. However, it requires considerable experience and expertise.