The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio has a role in predicting the effectiveness of nivolumab in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study

Comprehensive Systematic Review of Biomarkers in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Predictors, Prognostics, and Therapeutic Monitoring

BACKGROUND

Challenges remain in determining the most effective treatment strategies and identifying patients who would benefit from adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of biomarkers in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and their utility in prediction of treatment response, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring in patients receiving systemic therapy for metastatic disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed database for relevant studies published between January 2017 and December 2022. The search focused on biomarkers associated with mRCC and their relationship to immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapy, and VEGF inhibitors in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and metastatic settings.

RESULTS

The review identified various biomarkers with predictive, prognostic, and therapeutic monitoring potential in mRCC. The review also discussed the challenges associated with anti-angiogenic and immune-checkpoint monotherapy trials and highlighted the need for personalized therapy based on molecular signatures.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive review provides valuable insights into the landscape of biomarkers in mRCC and their potential applications in prediction of treatment response, prognosis, and therapeutic monitoring. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating biomarker assessment into clinical practice to guide treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes in mRCC.

Hemoglobin and neutrophil levels stratified according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk predict the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab in patients with advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To identify biomarkers associated with the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab against advanced metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 75 patients treated with ipilimumab plus nivolumab at seven hospitals between August 2018 and April 2021. Prognostic biomarkers were assessed prior to initiating treatment with ipilimumab plus nivolumab. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of disease progression. The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk factors most important for predicting disease progression were determined using classification and regression tree analysis.

RESULTS

Median overall survival and progression-free survival were longer in the intermediate IMDC risk group than in the poor IMDC risk group (overall: not reached vs. 18.3 months; progression-free: not reached vs. 13.5 months). The multivariate analysis identified poor IMDC risk as a risk factor for disease progression (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval: 1.05-6.51). Based on the results of the classification and regression tree analysis, the cohort was divided into non-anemia, anemia + neutro-Low, and anemia + neutro-High groups. Median overall survival and progression-free survival were longer in the non-anemia and anemia + neutro-Low groups than in the anemia + neutro-High group (overall: not reached vs. 29.3 months vs. 4.3 months: progression-free: not reached vs. 29.0 months vs. 3.9 months).

CONCLUSION

Hemoglobin and neutrophil levels may represent crucial biomarkers for predicting the effectiveness of ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma.

The Prognostic Value of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is an aggressive cancer characterised by an increased recurrence rate and an inadequate response to treatment. This study aimed to investigate the importance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a prognostic marker for long-term survival in patients with mRCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed data from 74 patients with mRCC treated at our medical centre with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We evaluated the predictive value of NLR for overall survival (OS) in these patients.

RESULTS

The median OS was 5.1 months in the higher NLR group (≥3) and 13.3 months in the lower NLR group (<3) (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the OS between the TKI and ICI therapies in the low NLR group (12.9 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.411) or in the high NLR group (4.7 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.32). Both univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that a higher NLR was an independent prognostic factor of long-term survival in patients with mRCC treated with first-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study showed that adding NLR to other Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) variables might improve the prognostic and predictive power of these models.

Focus on the Dynamics of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: A number of studies have reported an association between the dynamics of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and clinical efficacy in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there is still a lack of a meta-analysis or systematic review. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched until September 2022 for studies reporting on the association between the change in NLR after ICI treatment and clinical outcomes. Outcome measures of interest included: change in NLR before and after treatment, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). Results: A total of 4154 patients in 38 studies were included. The pooled percentage of patients with increased NLR was 49.7% (95CI%: 43.7−55.8%). Six studies discussing the change in NLR in patients with different tumor responses all showed that the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. The upward trend in NLR was associated with shorter OS (pooled HR: 2.05, 95%CI: 1.79−2.35, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 1.89, 95%CI: 1.66−2.14, p < 0.001) and higher ORR (pooled OR: 0.27, 95%CI: 0.19−0.39, p < 0.001), and downward trend in NLR was associated with longer OS (pooled HR: 0.49, 95%CI: 0.42−0.58, p < 0.001) and PFS (pooled HR: 0.55, 95%CI: 0.48−0.63, p < 0.001) and lower ORR (pooled OR: 3.26, 95%CI: 1.92−5.53, p < 0.001). In addition, post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.52−2.18; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.93, 95%CI: 2.26−3.81), but the NLR at different time points may have a similar predictive effect on PFS (pooled HR of baseline high NLR: 1.68, 95%CI: 1.44−1.97; pooled HR of post-treatment high NLR: 2.00, 95%CI: 1.54−2.59). Conclusions: The NLR level of tumor patients after ICI treatment is stable overall, but the NLR level in patients without response to immunotherapy may increase after ICI treatment. Patients with an upward trend in NLR after ICI treatment were associated with worse clinical outcomes; meanwhile, the downward trend in NLR was associated with better clinical outcomes. Post-treatment high NLR was associated with more impaired survival than baseline high NLR.

The relationship between pan-immune-inflammation value and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond: a Turkish oncology group kidney cancer consortium (TKCC) study

BACKGROUND

Pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) is an easily accessible immune marker based on peripheral blood to estimate prognosis in patients with cancer. This study evaluates the prognostic value of PIV in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with nivolumab.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond were selected from the Turkish Oncology Group Kidney Cancer Consortium (TKCC) database. PIV was calculated using the following formula: neutrophil (10³/mm³) x monocyte (10³/mm³) x platelet (10³/mm³)/lymphocyte (10³/mm³).

RESULTS

A total of 152 patients with mRCC were included in this study. According to cut-off value for PIV, 77 (50.7%) and 75 (49.3%) patients fell into PIV-low ([Formula: see text] 372) and PIV-high (> 372) groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, PIV-high (HR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.58, p = 0.033 for overall survival (OS); HR: 1.55, 95% CI 1.02-2.38, p = 0.042 for progression-free survival (PFS)) was independent risk factor for OS and PFS after adjusting for confounding variables, such as performance score, the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk score, and liver metastasis.

CONCLUSION

This study established that pre-treatment PIV might be a prognostic biomarker in patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in the second line and beyond.

The Predictive Role of NLR and PLR in Outcome and Patency of Lower Limb Revascularization in Patients with Femoropopliteal Disease

Background: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) changes the arterial structure and function, and is the most common manifestation of the atherosclerotic process, except for the coronary and cerebral arterial systems. Inflammation is well known to have a role in the progression of atherosclerosis and, by extension, in PAD. Among the recently studied markers in the literature, we list the neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet–lymphocyte ratio (PLR). This study aims to analyze the preoperative role of NLR and PLR in the medium-term outcome of patients surgically revascularized for femoropopliteal disease. Methods: A retrospective study included patients admitted to the Vascular Surgery Clinic of the County Emergency Clinical Hospital of Târgu-Mureș, Romania, between January 2017 and December 2019, diagnosed with femoropopliteal disease and having presented an indication for surgical revascularization. The patients included in the study were classified according to the 12 months primary patency in two groups: “patency” and “nonpatency”. Results: Depending on the Rutherford classification (RC), there was a higher incidence of stages II and III in the patency group and a higher incidence of stage V in the nonpatency group. Depending on the optimal cut-off value according to ROC for the 12 months primary patency, obtained from Youden’s index (3.95 for NLR (82.6% sensitivity and 89.9% specificity), and 142.13 for PLR (79.1% sensitivity and 82.6% specificity)), in all high-NLR and high-PLR groups, there was a higher incidence of all adverse outcomes. Moreover, a multivariate analysis showed that a high baseline value for NLR and PLR was an independent predictor of all outcomes for all recruited patients. Furthermore, for all hospitalized patients, RC 5 was an independent predictor of poor prognosis. Conclusions: Our findings establish that a high value of preoperative NLR and PLR determined at hospital admission is strongly predictive of primary patency failure (12 months after revascularization). Additionally, elevated ratio values are an independent predictor for a higher amputation rate and death for all patients enrolled in the study, except for mortality in RC 2, and both amputation and mortality in RC 5.

Hematological prognosticators in metastatic renal cell cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Aim: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment hematological biomarkers in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for articles according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Results: Fifteen studies comprising 1530 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. High levels of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival. High NLR and PLR were significantly associated with worse overall survival. Conclusion: High pretreatment NLR and PLR appear to be hematological prognostic factors of progression and overall mortality in mRCC patients treated with ICIs. These findings might help in the design of correlative biomarker studies to guide the clinical decision-making in the immune checkpoint inhibitor era.

Prognostic Impact of Baseline Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Nivolumab Therapy in Second or Later Lines

Background

Inflammation is a crucial component in carcinogenesis. The neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) has been studied as a biomarker of prognosis and predictive of response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In the present study, we evaluated the relevance of baseline NER on the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes in real-world patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab in second or subsequent lines. We also assessed the association of baseline NER with objective response, as well as with toxicity and histology.

Methods

In this multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab, the last systemic absolute neutrophil and eosinophil count before treatment with nivolumab was used to calculate the NER. An additive Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the cut-off point for NER considering PFS and the patients were allocated into low and high NER groups. Median OS and median PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and survival curves of groups were compared using the log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to study OS and PFS and Fisher’s exact test was performed to evaluate the association of NER with the response, toxicity, and histology.

Results

The 49 analyzed patients had a median follow-up of nine months. The NER cut-off was established at 48, locating 29 patients in the low NER group (NER < 48) and 20 in the high NER group (NER ≥ 48). Median PFS and median OS were significantly shorter in patients with high NER versus low NER (3 vs. 30 months (p < 0.001) and 6 vs. 24 months (p = 0.002), respectively). Multivariable analyses showed that NER (HR 3.92 (95% CI: 1.66-9.23), p = 0.002) was an independent factor for PFS and that NER (HR 3.85 (95% CI: 1.33-11.17), p = 0.013) and progressive disease (HR 5.62 (95% CI: 1.88-16.83), p = 0.002) were independent factors for OS. NER was significantly associated with objective response rate (ORR) (NER ≥ 48-12.5% vs. NER < 48-87.5%, p = 0.003), immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (NER ≥ 48-10.0% vs. NER < 48-42.9%, p = 0.014), and tumor’s histology as patients of high NER group had more non-clear cell carcinoma than low NER group (35.0% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.017).

Conclusion

Our real-world data analysis of NER in patients with mRCC confirmed the prognostic value of this biomarker, supporting clinical utility in predicting survival. Results also suggested an association between lower NER and better ORR, and that irAEs occur more frequently in patients with a lower NER. However, further large-scale prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to validate this biomarker.

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Biomarker for Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There is increasing evidence to suggest that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is related to the prognosis of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, these findings are inconsistent. The present study was performed with the aim of exploring the utility of NLR in patients with RCC treated with ICIs. For this purpose, a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was performed to find studies evaluating the prognostic value of NLR. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the assessed clinical outcomes. All statistical analysis was performed using Stata version 12.0 software. The combined hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of NLR for OS and PFS were calculated using the random-effect models. Heterogeneity was evaluated based on the I ² value and Cochran's Q test. Egger's and Begg's tests were applied to precisely assess the publication bias. The "trim and fill" method was adopted to perform the sensitivity analysis to determine whether the results were stable. In total, 12 studies encompassing 1,275 patients were included in the final analysis. The results revealed that a high NLR at baseline or pre-therapy was associated with a poor OS (HR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.84-2.70; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.72-2.09; p < 0.001). During the course of treatment, a decrease in the NLR was associated with a significantly longer OS (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.20-0.56; p < 0.001) and PFS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; p < 0.001) compared to an increase in NLR. As a preliminary screening of other risk factors, age, sex, race, and IMDC risk may have a certain prognostic value for RCC treated with ICIs. People over 70 years old had better OS compared to people younger than 70 (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89). Non-Caucasians treated with immunotherapy had a worse OS (HR, 8.67; 95% CI, 2.87-26.2) and PFS (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.28-5.48) than Caucasians. Males had a worse OS than females (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.14-1.93). Compared with the IMDC favorable risk group, the OS of the IMDC poor risk group was worse (HR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.56-4.32). There was no significant publication bias or heterogeneity observed in the present study. On the whole, the present study demonstrated that an elevated NLR is associated with an adverse OS and PFS in patients with RCC treated with ICIs. The NLR may thus be used as a readily available prognostic biomarker for these patients. Age, sex, race, and IMDC risk may have potential predictive value for the prognosis of RCC treated with ICIs. However, further investigations are warranted to validate these results.

Absolute lymphocyte count is an independent predictor of survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab

OBJECTIVE

Programmed cell death-1 antibody therapy has demonstrated improved progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. However, there are limited studies on biomarkers that can predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We examined the influence of peripheral inflammatory biomarkers on the clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab.

METHODS

Data of 38 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma, who were treated with nivolumab monotherapy after receiving at least one molecular targeted therapy from November 2016 to February 2021, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly shorter in patients with low absolute lymphocyte count (<1300/μl) versus those with high absolute lymphocyte count (progression-free survival: P = 0.0102; overall survival: P = 0.0026). Median overall survival was shorter in patients with high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (≥3.0) versus those with low neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.0344). Multivariate analysis showed that absolute lymphocyte count was an independent factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 2.332, 95% confidence interval = 1.012-5.375, P = 0.0468) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 4.153, 95% confidence interval = 1.108-15.570, P = 0.0347). Increased absolute lymphocyte count, 1 month after nivolumab initiation, was a positive predictive factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.419, 95% confidence interval = 0.189-0.926, P = 0.0317) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.285, 95% confidence interval = 0.091-0.890, P = 0.0308).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that peripheral absolute lymphocyte count, before nivolumab initiation, is a predictor of poor response in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Additionally, increased absolute lymphocyte count, 1 month post-nivolumab initiation, can be a predictor of the effects of nivolumab.

Inflammatory indices and clinical factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab: the development of a novel prognostic score (Meet-URO 15 study)

Background:

Despite the survival advantage, not all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients achieve a long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Moreover, the identification of prognostic biomarkers is still an unmet clinical need.

Methods:

This multicenter retrospective study investigated the prognostic role of peripheral-blood inflammatory indices and clinical factors to develop a novel prognostic score in mRCC patients receiving at least second-line nivolumab. The complete blood count before the first cycle of therapy was assessed by calculating neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived NLR (dNLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI). Clinical factors included pre-treatment International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score, line of therapy, and metastatic sites.

Results:

From October 2015 to November 2019, 571 mRCC patients received nivolumab as second- and further-line treatment in 69% and 31% of cases. In univariable and multivariable analyses all inflammatory indices, IMDC score, and bone metastases significantly correlated with overall survival (OS). The multivariable model with NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had the highest c-index (0.697) and was chosen for the developing of the score (Schneeweiss scoring system). After internal validation (bootstrap re-sampling), the final index (Meet-URO score) composed by NLR, IMDC score, and bone metastases had a c-index of 0.691. It identified five categories with distinctive OSs: group 1 (median OS – mOS = not reached), group 2 (mOS = 43.9 months), group 3 (mOS = 22.4 months), group 4 (mOS = 10.3 months), and group 5 (mOS = 3.2 months). Moreover, the Meet-URO score allowed for a fine risk-stratification across all three IMDC groups.

Conclusion:

The Meet-URO score allowed for the accurate stratification of pretreated mRCC patients receiving nivolumab and is easily applicable for clinical practice at no additional cost. Future steps include its external validation, the assessment of its predictivity, and its application to first-line combinations.

C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are prognostic in metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of markers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) on outcomes of metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (m-ccRCC) patients treated with nivolumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated m-ccRCC patients treated with nivolumab and collected known prognostic factors and survival data. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and cox proportional hazards regression analysis to study prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) since start of nivolumab. Harrell's C-index was used to evaluate the models.

RESULTS

We included 113 patients. Median OS and PFS after initiation of nivolumab was 15 (interquartile range 7-28) and 4 months (interquartile range 3-11), respectively. Elevated baseline CRP was associated with worse OS (HR per 25 mg/l 1.35, 95% CI 1.16-1.52, P < 0.001) and PFS (HR per 25 mg/l 1.19, 95% CI 1.08-1.35, P = 0.001), independent from the international metastatic renal cell carcinoma database consortium (IMDC) prognostic criteria, increasing the model's C-index from 0.72 to 0.77 for OS and 0.59 to 0.62 for PFS. Elevated NLR was associated with worse OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17, P = 0.002) and PFS (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11, P = 0.03) independent from the other IMDC prognostic criteria. The model's C-index decreased from 0.72 to 0.70 for OS and increased from 0.59 to 0.60 for PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated baseline CRP and NLR predict worse OS and PFS on nivolumab in m-ccRCC patients. Including baseline CRP in the IMDC prognostic model improves its discriminatory power to predict OS and PFS since start of nivolumab.