Robotic adrenalectomy in the pediatric population: initial experience case series from a tertiary center

Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Extended application in children

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive surgery for paediatric adrenal tumours has evolved, but robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy (RALA) in children remains poorly studied. The current prospective study aims to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of RALA in treating children with adrenal tumours.

METHODS

A prospective institutional analysis of children presenting with neuroblastic and endocrine tumours treated with RALA was undertaken over a six year-period. For each child, clinical parameters were collected relating to diagnosis, surgery and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total 50 RALA were performed; 23 for unilateral neuroblastic tumours (87 % neuroblastomas) and 27 for endocrine tumours. Eight neuroblastic tumours (35 %) had image-defined risk factors (all due to tumour invading the renal pedicle). Median length of stay was two days. Resection margins were macroscopically clear in all cases. After median follow-up of 2.9 years (1.6-3.9), two children are under treatment for metastatic relapse (high-risk disease) and three died due to refractory disease. Sixteen children had endocrine tumours: pheochromocytoma (n = 13), or bilateral nodular adrenocortical hyperplasia with Cushing's syndrome (n = 14). One child required non-emergent conversion, and one complication occurred (grade IIIb) after median follow-up of 3.3 years (1.0-5.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study is the largest reported experience in the literature and confirms the safety and effectiveness of RALA in carefully selected children with adrenal tumours. Through an iterative process and in the setting of a dedicated paediatric robotic surgical team indications have been clarified and extended. The current study confirms RALA has particularly utility in patients with severe disease (IDRF + metastatic neuroblastomas) or genetic predisposition syndromes.

Robotic-assisted Pediatric Thoracic and Abdominal Tumor Resection: An Initial Multi-center Review

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery (RA-MIS) for tumor resection is an emerging technology in the pediatric population with significant promise but unproven safety and feasibility.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective review of patients ≤18 years undergoing RA-MIS tumor resection from December 2015-March 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, perioperative variables, and complication rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine procedures were performed on 38 patients (17 thoracic, 22 abdominal); 37% female and 68% non-Hispanic White. Median age at surgery was 8.3 years (IQR 5.7, 15.7); the youngest was 1.7 years-old. Thoracic operations included resections of neuroblastic tumors (n = 16) and a single paraganglioma. The most common abdominal operations included resections of neuroblastic tumors (n = 5), pheochromocytomas (n = 3), and angiomyolipomas (n = 3). Six patients underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for paratesticular tumors. Median operating time for the cohort was 2:52 h (IQR 2:04, 4:31). Two thoracic cases required open conversion due to poor visualization and lack of working domain. All patients underwent complete tumor resection; one had tumor spillage from a positive margin (Wilms tumor). Median LOS was 1.5 days (IQR 1.1, 3.0). Postoperatively, one patient developed a chyle leak requiring interventional radiology drainage, but none required a return to the operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic-assisted surgery is safe and feasible for tumor resection in carefully selected pediatric patients, achieving complete resection with minimal morbidity and short LOS. Resection should be performed by those with robotic expertise for optimal outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

TYPE OF STUDY

Original Clinical Research.

Establishment of a successful robotic pediatric general surgery practice

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has a variety of theoretical advantages, including tremor filtration, optimal visualization, and improvement of surgeon ergonomics. Though it has achieved wide application in pediatric urology, the majority of pediatric general surgeons do not employ RAS. This study reports our institution's experience with RAS on a pediatric general surgery team. Following IRB approval, a retrospective review of all pediatric patients at our academic children's hospital who underwent RAS between 2017 and 2022 for pediatric general surgical conditions was performed. Patient demographics, operation performed, operating time, complications, and recovery were evaluated. A total of 159 children underwent RAS, increasing from 10 patients in 2017 to 59 patients in 2022. The median age and weight were 15.3 years and 76.4 kg, and 121 (76.1%) were female. The application of RAS was successful in all cases. There were no intraoperative complications and no conversions to an open approach. Eleven patients (6.9%) had unplanned presentations to the emergency department within 30 days. Five of these patients (3.1%) required admission to the hospital. This study demonstrates that the application of RAS in an academic pediatric general surgery practice is feasible and safe. The application of RAS to pediatric general surgery should continue to increase as operative teams increase their experience and comfort.Level of evidence Level IV.

Utilization of robotics in pediatric surgical oncology

Despite increasing implementation of robotic surgery and minimally invasive techniques within adult surgical oncology and pediatric general surgery, the utilization of robotic-assisted resections for pediatric tumors has been met with controversy. The robotic platform affords numerous advantages over conventional surgical techniques. However, limited data and guidelines regarding patient selection, indications for the robotic approach, and long-term oncologic outcomes have delayed the widespread adoption of robotic-assisted resection of pediatric tumors. This paper reviews the benefits, limitations, and existing guidelines and data regarding the utilization of robotics in pediatric surgical oncology.

Surgical Approaches to Neuroblastoma: Review of the Operative Techniques

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most commonly occurring soft-tissue malignancy of childhood. Surgery plays an important role in multidisciplinary treatment and its principal aim is a local control of the disease, respecting the integrity of the surrounding structures. There is no unanimous consensus on the best surgical technique, and the operative approach largely depends on the anatomical location and the extension of the mass. To have a complete overview of the different type of treatment, we made a review of the literature from the last twenty years of all the surgical approaches applied for NBs resection, accordingly to the anatomical site.

Case Report: Pediatric Robotic Adrenalectomy for Virilizing Adrenal Tumor in a 4-year-old Female

Adrenocortical tumors in children are rare, with approximately 90% of children presenting with endocrine syndromes, most commonly virilization. The standard treatment remains an open resection, although there is increasing use of the minimally invasive approach. With the advent of robotic surgery, its advantages over open and conventional laparoscopy make it a viable option in select patients. Despite the adoption of robot-assisted surgery in pediatric urology, limited literature regarding robotic pediatric adrenal surgery exists, with only a few small case series. We present a female child with virilizing features due to a large functional adrenal tumor managed by robot-assisted adrenalectomy.

Robotics-Assisted Pediatric Oncology Surgery-A Preliminary Single-Center Report and a Systematic Review of Published Studies

AIM

The use of robotics-assisted surgery in oncology has been proved effective and safe in adults. Despite these results, the use of robotics has been rarely reported for pediatric oncology. Our review aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of robotics-assisted surgery in this field, analyzing our experience and performing a systematic review of the most recent studies.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients affected by an oncological disease who underwent a robotics-assisted procedure at our institute. We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2012 to 2021 on the subjects.

FINDINGS

A total of 14 patients underwent robotics-assisted tumor resection. Eleven procedures (median age 13.2-years old) were carried out in children with adnexal lesions (seven tumor excision and four ovariectomies). Histological diagnosis was mature teratoma (six), serous papillary cystadenofibromas of the fallopian tube (two), ovarian serous cystadenoma (one), ovarian mucinous cystadenoma (one), and ovarian seromucinous cystadenoma. The median length of stay was 2 days. No recurrences or complications at a median follow-up of 2.1-years were observed. A 5-year-old girl underwent a complete posterior resection of a type 3 sacrococcygeal tumor with a robotics-assisted approach for the dissection of a possible intraabdominal residual component of the lesion. No intra- and postoperative complications were recorded. Complete excision of a recurrent differentiating neuroblastoma of the left para-renal region was performed on a 9-year-old girl. An idiopathic anaphylactic shock occurred 1 day after the procedure. At 9 months' follow-up, no local recurrences of the lesion were observed. Overall, we reported no conversion to open surgery. Lastly, a robotic excision of a growing left superior mediastinal intermixed ganglioneuroblastoma was performed on an 8-year-old girl with no postoperative complications. Follow-up was uneventful (7 months). In the literature, the rate of complications ranges from 0 to 28%, mainly related to difficult dissection and impaired anatomy. Conversion is reported in 5% of all oncological procedures, due to more invading tumors and altered anatomical features. No robotics-related complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Robotics-assisted surgery in pediatric oncology has proven to be feasible. Nevertheless, its use should be limited to selected cases and performed by highly trained oncological surgeons. Preparation and patient positioning, alongside a correct port placement, are crucial to carrying out these procedures. Further innovations in robotics may allow a wider application of this technology in pediatric oncology.