Preoperative predictors of enucleation time during en bloc 'no-touch' holmium laser enucleation of the prostate

Revisiting the issue of "beach balls" in holmium laser enucleation of prostate: clinical and histological characterization

PURPOSE

To clinically and histologically characterize prostatic nodules resistant to morcellation ("beach balls," BBs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive cohort of 559 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) procedures performed between January 2020 and November 2023. The BBs group comprised 55 men (10%) and the control group comprised 504 men (90%). The clinical, intraoperative, outcome, and histologic data were statistically processed for the prediction of the presence of BBs and their influence on the perioperative course and outcome.

RESULTS

The BBs group in comparison to the controls was older (75 vs 73 years, respectively, p = 0.009) and had higher rates of chronic retention (51 vs 29%, p = 0.001), larger prostates on preoperative abdominal ultrasound (AUS) (140 vs 80 cc, p = 0.006E-16), longer operating time (120 vs 80 min, p = 0.001), higher weights of removed tissue (101 vs 60 gr, p = 0.008E-10), higher complication rates (5 vs 1%, p = 0.03), and longer hospitalization (p = 0.014). A multivariate analysis revealed that larger prostates on preoperative AUS and older age independently predicted the presence of BBs which would prolong operating time. ROC analyses revealed that a threshold of 103 cc on AUS predicted BBs with 94% sensitivity and 84% specificity. BBs were mostly characterized histologically by stromal component (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

BBs are expected in older patients and cases of chronic retention. Prostatic volume is the most reliable predictor of their presence. They contribute to prolonged operating time and increased risk of complications. The predominantly stromal composition of the BBs apparently confers their resistance to morcellation.

Evaluation of the efficiency of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy according to prostate volume for patients with benign prostate hyperplasia

Background

This study evaluated the efficiency and safety of transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) using a spatula loop according to prostate volume.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 398 patients who underwent TUEB for benign prostatic hyperplasia at a single tertiary hospital between August 2018 and December 2022. The patients were divided into three groups according to estimated prostate volume (ePV): ≤40 mL (n = 67), 40-80 mL (n = 200), and ≥80 mL (n = 131). To compare the efficiency of TUEB, perioperative parameters including TUEB and enucleation efficiencies, were calculated as enucleated tissue weight per operation time and enucleated tissue weight per enucleation time, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative functional outcomes such as the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) score, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine volume (PVR), were also compared.

Results

The IPSS total score, voiding sub-score, Qmax, and PVR improved after TUEB in all groups (all p < 0.05). The TUEB and enucleation efficiencies increased with increasing ePVs (all P < 0.001). When comparing the three prostate volume groups, there were no significant differences in functional outcomes within 12 months after TUEB (all-Bonferroni adjusted P > 0.017). A total of 57 patients experienced adverse events after TUEB, with no significant differences between the three groups (p = 0.507).

Conclusion

As prostate volume increases, the perioperative efficiency of TUEB is enhanced. Meanwhile, small prostates did not show significant differences in the improvement of functional outcomes and complications in comparison with larger prostates.

Analysis of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate Fixed Operating Room Times

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors influencing fixed operating room time during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was performed for all holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) cases performed by a single surgeon over a 24-month period. Operating room (OR) time was divided into fixed and variable time. The variable time was defined as cut-to-close time. Fixed time included in room time to anesthesia release time (IRAT), anesthesia release time to cut time (ARCT), and close time to wheels out (CTWO). The effects of time of day and anesthesia personnel (AP) changes on fixed operating room time were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 406 HoLEPs were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference in nonprocedural OR times between morning and afternoon surgeries (IRAT, P=0.38, ARCT P=0.10, CTWO P=0.77). Median nonprocedural OR times accounted for 27% (IQR: 22%-31%) of the total procedure time in the AM group and 29% (IQR: 24%-33%) in the PM group (P=0.005). Of the HoLEPs,78.1% (178/228) experienced one or more AP changes during the procedure. The median fixed OR time was not significantly different between procedures with 1 AP and procedures with ≥2 APs (IRAT, P=0.53; ARCT, P=0.71; CTWO, P=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed operating room time makes up a significant portion of HoLEP procedures and should be considered when evaluating OR efficiency. The time of day and number of anesthesia personnel involved did not affect the fixed OR times.

Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Efficiency by Prostate Gland Size: Is There a Sweet Spot?

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is one of only two AUA guideline-recommended prostate size-independent surgeries for benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). The significant variation in gland size treated results in a wide range of enucleation and morcellation times. We sought to understand the effect of prostate size on HoLEP efficiency to better educate patients and improve operative room utilization. After IRB approval, we identified patients from 1 July 2016 to 1 January 2020 who underwent HoLEP by two endourologists. Our primary objectives were to assess the effects of increasing increments (25 g) of mean enucleated prostate tissue weight on enucleation and morcellation efficiency (g/min). One-way Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test was used, with significant p < 0.05. We included 675 HoLEPs with all comers mean tissue weight resected of 72.1 g (Range 1–448 g), energy used 110.00 kJ (10.73–340 kJ), enucleation time 48.6 min (5–151 min), and morcellation time 10.1 min (0.5–113 min). Average enucleation efficiency increased with increasing prostate size categories (e.g., <25 g–0.48 g/min, >325 g–3.91 g/min) (K-W ANOVA p = 0.004, Dunn’s post hoc p = 0.004). The combined average enucleation and morcellation efficiency was ≥5 g/min between 55 and 271 g. Inefficiency for cases <55 g was driven by enucleation, while >271 g case inefficiency was driven by morcellation. Increasing tissue weight at the time of HoLEP is associated with a linear relationship of increasing enucleation and decreasing morcellation efficiencies.

Comparison of different laser-based enucleation techniques for benign prostate hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To summarize the current evidence on different laser-based enucleation techniques for benign prostate hyperplasia and compare the efficacy and safety of en-bloc, two-lobe and three-lobe techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Through a systematical search of multiple scientific databases in March 2021, we performed a systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis of the primary outcomes of interest according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) Guidelines, whose protocol was registered with PROSPERO(CRD42021240684).

RESULTS

A total of 9 studies were included. All three laser enucleation techniques had no statistically significant difference in terms of enucleated prostate weight, maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), transient UI (TUI), persistent UI (PUI) and early postoperative complications. A shorter enucleation time was associated with the en-bloc technique compared to three technique (MD: -8.26, 95%CI: -12.73--3.79, p = 0.0003), whereas no significant difference was found in en-bloc versus two-lobe technique (MD:0.97,95%CI: -0.30-2.24,p = 0.13) and two-lobe versus three-lobe technique (MD: -3.19, 95%CI: -7.45-1.06, p = 0.14). A higher enucleation rate was associated with the en-bloc and two-lobe technique (MD: 0.05, 95%CI: 0.00-0.10, p = 0.03; MD: 0.09, 95%CI: 0.01-0.17, p = 0.03, respectively). A superior QoL was related to the two-lobe enucleation technique compared to three-lobe technique (MD: 0.22, 95%CI: 0.06-0.39, p = 0.009), whereas no meaningful difference was found in the group of en-bloc versus two-lobe (MD: -0.12, 95%CI: -0.62-0.37, p = 0.62) and group of en-bloc versus three-lobe (MD: -0.14, 95%CI: -0.56-0.29, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

En-bloc and two-lobe laser-based enucleation techniques are feasible and safe alternative to three-lobe technique with comparable surgical outcomes and similar functional outcomes. A superior enucleation efficiency was associated with En-bloc and the two-lobe techniques compared to the three-lobe technique.