Comparative study of renal drainage with different ureteral stents subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction using an in vitro ureter-stent model

It is Possible to Reduce Ureteral Stent Clogging and Stent-Related Symptoms to Soothe the Pain of the Patient: A Case Report

Introduction

Ureteral stent obstruction hinders the management of malignant diseases. Adequate stent insertion through an obstructed ureter does not necessarily guarantee renal decompression and stent-related symptoms adversely affect patient comfort. There are two major problems associated with ureteral stents: obstruction and intolerance to the stents.

Case Presentation

A 45-year-old woman was treated for cervical cancer with metastatic lymph nodes and ureteral obstruction with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and bilateral retrograde stenting. After recurrent stent obstruction, stent replacement was attempted more than 18 times over two years. In addition, stent-related symptoms adversely affected patient comfort. The patient was finally fitted with Superglide 8-French reinforced ureteral stents. Their replacement every six months was viewed by the patient as a relief compared to the all too frequent replacement of the previous stents. Moreover, the customized changes in the shape of Superglide stents improved patient comfort.

Discussion

Recent publications tend to indicate that large-lumen ureteral stents are most likely to remain permeable over time. Various modifications of the bladder or endo-ureteral part of double-pigtail stents have been increasingly reported, with the aim of improving their tolerance while maintaining effective drainage.

Conclusion

Adaptation of the internal lumen and shape of stents to the characteristics of the tumor and patient measurements appears to be important for increasing the drainage and tolerance of ureteral stents. The top priority for future ureteral stents suitable for malignant diseases should be to integrate these characteristics based on state-of-the-art data.

Effect of ureteral stent length and implantation position on migration after implantation

BACKGROUND

Ureteral obstruction is a urinary system disease that causes urinary retention, renal injury, renal colic, and infection. Ureteral stents are often used for conservative treatment in clinics, and their migration usually results in ureteral stent failure. The migrations include proximal migration to the kidney side and distal migration to the bladder side, but the biomechanism of stent migration is still unknown.

METHOD

Finite element models of stents with lengths from 6-30 cm were developed. The stents were implanted into the middle of the ureter to analyze the effect of stent length on its migration, and the effect of stent implantation position on 6-cm-long stent migration was also observed. The stents' maximum axial displacement was used to assess the ease of stent migration. A time-varying pressure was applied to the ureter outer wall to simulate peristalsis. The stent and ureter adopted friction contact conditions. The two ends of the ureter were fixed. The radial displacement of the ureter was used to evaluate the effect of the stent on peristalsis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The maximum migration occurs in the positive direction for a 6-cm-long stent implanted at the proximal ureter (CD and DE), but in the negative direction at the distal ureter (FG and GH). The 6-cm-long stent demonstrated almost no effect on ureteral peristalsis. The 12-cm-long stent diminished the radial displacement of the ureter from 3-5 s. The 18-cm stent diminished the radial displacement of the ureter from 0-8 s, and the radial displacement within 2-6 s was weaker than other time. The 24-cm stent diminished the radial displacement of the ureter from 0-8 s, and the radial displacement within 1-7 s was weaker than other time.

CONCLUSION

The biomechanism of stent migration and ureteral peristalsis weakening after stent implantation was explored. Shorter stents were more likely to migrate. The implantation position had less influence on ureteral peristalsis compared with the stent length, which provided a reference for stent design aimed at reducing stent migration. Stent length was the main factor affecting ureteral peristalsis. This study provides a reference for the study of ureteral peristalsis.

Long-term Indwelling Tandem Polymeric Ureteral Stents for Benign Ureteral Obstruction

Objective: To assess the outcome of tandem polymeric internal stents (TIS) for benign ureteral obstruction (BUO). Material and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study that included all consecutive patients treated for BUO by means of TIS in a single tertiary center. Stents were replaced routinely every 12 months or earlier, when indicated. The primary outcome was permanent stent failure, and the secondary outcomes included temporary failure, adverse events, and renal function status. Kaplan-Meier and regression analyses were used to estimate outcomes, and logistic regression was used to assess the association between clinical variables and outcomes. Results: Between July 2007 and July 2021, 26 patients (34 renal units) underwent a total of 141 stent replacements, with median follow-up of 2.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 0.75-5). Retroperitoneal fibrosis was the leading cause of TIS placement (46%). Permanent failures occurred in 10 (29%) renal units, and the median time to permanent failure was 728 days (IQR 242-1532). There was no association between preoperative clinical variables and permanent failure. Temporary failure occurred in four renal units (12%), which were treated by nephrostomy and eventually returned to TIS. Urinary infection and kidney injury rates were one event for every four and eight replacements, respectively. There was no significant alteration in serum creatinine levels throughout the study (p = 0.18). Conclusion: TIS provides long-term relief for patients with BUO and offers a safe and effective solution for urinary diversion, while avoiding the need for external tubes.

Magnetic resonance imaging of in vitro urine flow in single and tandem stented ureters subject to extrinsic ureteral obstruction

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the relative volumetric flows in stent and ureter lumina, as a function of stent size and configuration, in both unobstructed and externally obstructed stented ureters.

METHODS

Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure flow in stented ureters using a phantom kidney model. Volumetric flow in the stent and ureter lumina were determined along the stented ureters, for each of four single stent sizes (4.8F, 6F, 7F, and 8F), and for tandem (6F and 7F) configurations. Measurements were made in the presence of a fully encircling extrinsic ureteral obstruction as well as in benchmark cases with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction.

RESULTS

Under no obstruction, the relative contribution of urine flow in single stents is 1-10%, while the relative contributions to flow are ~6 and ~28% for tandem 6F and 7F, respectively. In the presence of an extrinsic ureteral obstruction and single stents, all urine passes within the stent lumen near the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem 6F and 7F stents under extrinsic ureteral obstruction, relative volumetric flows in the two stent lumina are ~73% and ~81%, respectively, with the remainder passing through the ureter lumen.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates that with no extrinsic ureteral obstruction, minimal urine flow occurs within a stent. Stent lumen flow is significant in the presence of extrinsic ureteral obstruction, in the vicinity of the extrinsic ureteral obstruction. For tandem stents subjected to extrinsic ureteral obstruction, urine flow also occurs in the ureter lumen between the stents, which can reduce the likelihood of kidney failure even in the case of both stent lumina being occluded.

Drainage of infected kidneys with ureteral stents: does size matter?

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the ability of ureteral stents with different diameters to drain pus that accumulates in an obstructed kidney using an in vitro model.

METHODS

We developed an in vitro model of an obstructed kidney filled with pus. The model included a silicon kidney unit based on computed tomography (CT) data, a 3D printed ureteral stone based on a real extracted ureteral stone, a latex ureter model, a bladder vessel, and a fluid with qualities resembling pus. Identical printed stones were inserted into four ureter models containing stents with varying diameters (4.8F, 6F, 7F, 8F), each of which was connected to the kidney unit and the bladder vessel. The kidney unit was filled with artificial pus to pressures of 30 cmH₂O to simulate an infected and obstructed kidney. The obstruction was relieved with stents in place, while artificial urine was pumped into the kidney; pressure in the kidney and remaining pus were measured continuously.

RESULTS

The rate of pressure drop and the final pressure measured in the kidney were unaffected by the diameter of the stent. For all stent diameters, the pressure reached non-obstructed levels within 30 s, final pressure was reached within 90-120 s, and minimal amounts of pus remained in the kidney after 120 min.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro experiments demonstrate that all stent diameters drain pus-filled, obstructed kidneys with the same efficacy. The common perception that larger diameter tubes are more effective under such circumstances should be re-examined.

The accumulation of particles in ureteric stents is mediated by flow dynamics: Full-scale computational and experimental modeling of the occluded and unoccluded ureter

Ureteric stents are clinically deployed to restore urinary drainage in the presence of ureteric occlusions. They consist of a hollow tube with multiple side-holes that enhance urinary drainage. The stent surface is often subject to encrustation (induced by crystals-forming bacteria such as Proteus mirabilis) or particle accumulation, which may compromise stent's drainage performance. Limited research has, however, been conducted to evaluate the relationship between flow dynamics and accumulation of crystals in stents. Here, we employed a full-scale architecture of the urinary system to computationally investigate the flow performance of a ureteric stent and experimentally determine the level of particle accumulation over the stent surface. Particular attention was given to side-holes, as they play a pivotal role in enhancing urinary drainage. Results demonstrated that there exists an inverse correlation between wall shear stress (WSS) and crystal accumulation at side-holes. Specifically, side-holes with greater WSS levels were those characterized by inter-compartmental fluid exchange between the stent and ureter. These "active" side-holes were located either nearby ureteric obstructions or at regions characterized by a physiological constriction of the ureter. Results also revealed that the majority of side-holes (>60%) suffer from low WSS levels and are, thus, prone to crystals accumulation. Moreover, side-holes located toward the proximal region of the ureter presented lower WSS levels compared to more distal ones, thus suffering from greater particle accumulation. Overall, findings corroborate the role of WSS in modulating the localization and extent of particle accumulation in ureteric stents.

Urinary Stent Development and Evaluation Models: In Vitro, Ex Vivo and In Vivo-A European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS) Initiative

Background: When trying to modify urinary stents, certain pre-clinical steps have to be followed before clinical evaluation in humans. Usually, the process starts as an in silico assessment. The urinary tract is a highly complex, dynamic and variable environment, which makes a computer simulation closely reflecting physiological conditions extremely challenging. Therefore, the pre-clinical evaluation needs to go through further steps of in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo assessments. Methods and materials: Within the European Network of Multidisciplinary Research to Improve Urinary Stents (ENIUS), the authors summarized and evaluated stent assessment models in silico, in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. The topic and relevant sub-topics were researched in a systematic literature search in Embase, Scope, Web of Science and PubMed. Clinicaltrials.gov was consulted for ongoing trials. Articles were selected systematically according to guidelines with non-relevant, non-complete, and non-English or Spanish language articles excluded. Results: In the first part of this paper, we critically evaluate in vitro stent assessment models used over the last five decades, outlining briefly their strengths and weaknesses. In the second part, we provide a step-by-step guide on what to consider when setting up an ex vivo model for stent evaluation on the example of a biodegradable stent. Lastly, the third part lists and discusses the pros and cons of available animal models for urinary stent evaluation, this being the final step before human trials. Conclusions: We hope that this overview can provide a practical guide and a critical discussion of the experimental pre-clinical evaluation steps needed, which will help interested readers in choosing the right methodology from the start of a stent evaluation process once an in silico assessment has been completed. Only a transparent multidisciplinary approach using the correct methodology will lead to a successful clinical implementation of any new or modified stent.

Comparison of Ureteral Stents on Drainage Performance Under Extrinsic Compression

PURPOSE

By investigating deformation and flow velocity of three commonly used, readily accessible ureteral stents under variant compression and surface change at three time points (new, 1 month or 3 months after implantation), we share our center's experience dealing with ureteral obstruction especially the malignant ones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ureteral double-J (DJ) stents including Cook Universa Soft, Kang Yi Bo (KYB) antireflux and Urovision Visiostar ESWL DJ stents went though scanning microscopic (SEM) analysis. Compression-deformation was measured using digital force gauge. Intraluminal flow velocity was tested with the stents under different compression levels.

RESULT

Urovision Visiostar demonstrated significantly better anti-compression capability. Cook Universa Soft and KYB antireflux showed favorable draining velocity without compression, but the velocity dropped heavily under compression; the velocity of KYB antireflux reduced heavily after 3 months of implantation; Urovision Visiostar achieved the best draining effect under compression at all three time points.

CONCLUSION

The Urovision Visiostar DJ stent demonstrated significantly greater resistance to compression than the other two, and better drainage under compression. Patients with benign or malignant ureteral compression might benefit from using the Urovision Visiostar stents. Large prospective clinical trials are needed for confirmation.

Analysis of Ureteral Tumour Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: Towards Reshaping an Optimal Stent

Introduction

Ureteral obstruction hinders the management of malignant diseases. Adequate stent placement does not necessarily guarantee renal decompression. The stent stiffness may play a major role to maintain patency. We carried out the present study in order to evaluate drainage efficiency by using stents with distinctive degrees of stiffness and to identify the physical factors that could prevent obstruction of the stent in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO).

Materials and Methods

We performed an analysis of 150 patients with MUO drainage at a single institution from June 2009 to June 2019. A progressive choice of stents was shaped to overcome each failure by focusing on the criterion of increasingly stiff stents.

Results

During the study period, 556 ureteral stent procedures (USP) were analysed separately. The stent failure with obstruction occurred in 23.0% (128/556) of USP at a mean of 4.4±3.6 months and depended on the type of stent. Stent failure occurred in 34.2% (70/205) of Vortek^® stents, in 42.9% (15/35) of Urosoft stents, in 15.4% (39/254) of Superglide or ureteral catheters and in 6.5% (4/62) of tandem stents. No significant differences were found between Vortek^® and Urosoft stents regarding stent failures, but there were significant differences between Superglide or Tandem stents and Vortek^® or Urosoft stents (p<10⁻⁷). The study demonstrated that ureteral stent obstruction significantly decreased with a larger lumen or a stiffer stent (p<10⁻⁷).

Conclusion

In the present study, Superglide and tandem stents were the best stents against stent failure, and the lumen and the stiffness of the stent have been shown to be critical factors in controlling patency. The results suggest that the lumen seems more important than the stiffness, and the stiffness would be the only means of keeping the lumen intact. Future stents for MUO should integrate the importance of the lumen of the stent.

10-Year Experience with Reinforced Ureteral Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction

Introduction

Malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) hinders the management of malignant diseases. Indwelling stent is a common method to release renal obstruction, but stent failure with obstruction is frequent. The studies conclude that stent obstruction divides survival by 2 or even 4. We carried out the present study in order to evaluate drainage efficiency and overall survival by using stents with distinctive degrees of stiffness.

Materials and Methods

We performed an analysis of 156 patients with MUO drainage at a single institution from June 2009 to June 2019.

Results

Of the 156 patients, 128 (82.1%) died with a mean survival time of 15.3 ± 14.4 months after the first ureteral stent procedure (USP). In order to study stent failure and overall survival, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 with patients died soon after only one USP (n=37). Group 2 with patients had more than one USP and no obstruction (n=41). Patients in Group 3 had more than one USP and at least one stent obstruction (n=62). During the study period, 556 USPs were analysed separately. The stent failure with obstruction occurred in 23.0% (128/556) of USP at a mean of 4.4 ± 3.6 months. In case of stent failure, a progressive choice of stents was shaped to overcome each failure by focusing on the criterion of increasingly stiff stents. Patients in Group 1 died soon at mean of 4.9 ± 4.8 months. The mean survival time of patients in Groups 2 and 3 were, respectively, 19.4 ± 11.2 and 21.5 ± 16.3 months (P = 0.19).

Conclusion

MUO is a serious disease but this study is the first to prevent survival rate from falling by choosing the stent stiffness suitable for the patient. The active detection of stent failure has been shown to be essential for preserving survival.

Influence of Single Stent Size and Tandem Stents Subject to Extrinsic Ureteral Obstruction and Stent Occlusion on Stent Failure

Background and Purpose: Drainage of obstructed kidney due to extrinsic ureteral obstruction (EUO), required to prevent renal damage, is often achieved using double-J ureteral stents. But these stents fail frequently, and there is considerable debate regarding what stent size, type and configuration offer the best option for sustained drainage. Here, we examine the impact of stent diameter and choice of single/tandem configuration, subject to EUO and various degrees of stent occlusion, on stent failure. Methods: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations and an in vitro ureter-stent experiment enabled quantification of flow behavior in stented ureters subject to EUO and stent occlusions. Various single and tandem stents under EUO were considered. In each simulation and experiment, changes in renal pressure were monitored for different degrees of stent lumen occlusion, and onset of stent failure as well as simulated distributions of fluid flow between stent and ureter lumina were determined. Results: For an encircling EUO that completely obstructs the ureter lumen, with or without partial stent occlusion, the choice of stent size/configuration has little effect on renal pressure. The pressure increases significantly for ~90% stent lumen occlusion, with failure at >95% occlusion, independent of stent diameter or a tandem configuration, and with little influence of occlusion length along the stent. Conclusions: Stent failure rate is independent of stent diameter or single/tandem configuration, for the same percentage of stent lumen occlusion, in this model. Stent failure incidence may decrease for larger diameter stents and tandem configurations, because of the larger luminal area.