1
|
Jafari E, Manafi-Farid R, Ahmadzadehfar H, Salek F, Jokar N, Keshavarz A, Divband G, Dadgar H, Zohrabi F, Assadi M. Prognostic Significance of Baseline Clinical and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET Derived Parameters on Biochemical Response, Overall Survival, and PSA Progression-Free Survival in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Undergoing [177Lu]Lu-PSMA Therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2024. [PMID: 39227023 DOI: 10.1055/a-2365-8113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, we sought to identify the clinical baseline characteristics and pre-therapy 68Ga-PSMA PET derived parameters that can have impact on PSA (biochemical) response, OS and PSA PFS in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who undergo RLT with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. METHODS Various pre-treatment clinical and PSMA PET derived parameters were gathered and computed. We used PSA response as the criteria for more than a 50% decrease in PSA level, and OS and PSA PFS as endpoints. We assessed the collected parameters in relation to PSA response. Additionally, we employed univariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank to evaluate the influence of the parameters on OS and PFS. RESULTS A total of 125 mCRPC patients were included in this study. The median age was 68 years (range: 49-89). Among the cases, 77 patients (62%) showed PSARS, while 48 patients (38%) did not show PSA response. The median OS was 14 months (range: 1-60), and the median PSA-PFS was 10 months (range: 1-56). Age, prior history of chemotherapy, and SUVmax had a significant impact on PSA response (p<0.05). PSA response, RBC count, hemoglobin, hematocrit, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), number of metastases, wbPSMA-TV, and wbTL-PSMA significantly affected OS. GS, platelet count, NLR, and number of metastases were found to have a significant impact on PSA PFS. CONCLUSION We have identified several baseline clinical and PSMA PET derived parameters that can serve as prognostic factors for predicting PSA response, OS, and PSA PFS after RLT. Based on the findings, we believe that these clinical baseline characteristics can assist nuclear medicine specialists in identifying RLT responders who have long-term survival and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmail Jafari
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Reyhaneh Manafi-Farid
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Fatemeh Salek
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Narges Jokar
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Ahmad Keshavarz
- IoT and Signal Processing Research Group, ICT Research Institute, Faculty of Intelligent Systems Engineering and Data Science, Persian Gulf University, Bushehr, Iran
| | | | - Habibollah Dadgar
- Cancer Research Center, RAZAVI Hospital, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Farshad Zohrabi
- Department of Urology, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| | - Majid Assadi
- The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Molecular Imaging, and Theranostics, Bushehr Medical University Hospital, School of Medicine, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naik M, Khan SR, Lewington V, Challapalli A, Eccles A, Barwick TD. Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1391-1404. [PMID: 38733571 PMCID: PMC11256943 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitesh Naik
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Sairah R Khan
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Valerie Lewington
- Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Amarnath Challapalli
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8ED, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Eccles
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Tara D Barwick
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kafka M, Horninger A, di Santo G, Virgolini I, Neuwirt H, Unterrainer LM, Kunte SC, Deiss E, Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A, Rasul S, Einspieler H, Shariat SF, Rajwa P, Dozauer R, Tsaur I, Medlock E, Rölz N, Rausch S, la Fougère C, Trautwein N, Roesch MC, Merseburger AS, Zattoni F, Sepulcri M, Ladurner M, Bektic J, Gandaglia G, Horninger W, Heidegger I. Real-world Outcomes and Predictive Biomarkers for 177Lutetium Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Treatment in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-institutional Observational Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:421-429. [PMID: 37604763 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association of Urology guidelines include the lutetium-177 (177Lu) PSMA-617 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) ligand as a therapy option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). A major challenge in clinical practice is to pursue a personalized treatment approach based on robust predictive biomarkers. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of 177Lu PSMA in real-world practice and to elaborate clinical biomarkers for evaluating treatment responses. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a retrospective observational study including 233 patients with mCRPC treated with 177Lu PSMA in eight high-volume European centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Baseline characteristics and clinical parameters during and after 177Lu PSMA treatment were documented. Correlations to treatment response were analyzed using χ2 and log-rank tests, with differences between groups with and without disease progression calculated using a Mann-Whitney U test. Univariate and multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were measured using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS A prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease of ≥30% was observed in 41.7%, 63.5%, and 77.8% of patients after the first, second, and third treatment cycle, respectively. Restaging performed via PSMA positron emission tomography-computed tomography revealed that 33.7% of patients had an imaging-based response, including two patients with a complete response, while 13.4% had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5 mo and the median time until the start of a consecutive antineoplastic therapy was 8.5 mo. Of importance, a PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles of 177Lu PSMA (1 cycle: p = 0.0003; 2 cycles: p = 0.004), absolute PSA after the first three cycles (1 cycle: p = 0.011; 2 cycles: p = 0.0005; 3 cycles: p = 0.002), and a PSA doubling time >6 mo (p = 0.009) were significantly correlated to treatment response. Furthermore, gamma-glutamyl transferase ≤31 U/L at the start of 177Lu PSMA therapy was correlated with 1.5 times higher risk of progression for patients without but not with visceral metastases (p = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS 177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in mCRPC in the real-world setting. A PSA decrease ≥30% after the first two cycles is an early marker of response that can be easily implemented in clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY 177Lu PSMA is a radioactive agent approved for treatment of advanced prostate cancer. We reviewed its use outside of clinical trials for patients treated at eight European centers. We found that 177Lu PSMA is an effective treatment option in real-world practice. A PSA (prostate-specific antigen) decrease of ≥30% after the first two therapy cycles is an early indicator of response to treatment and can be used in personalizing treatments for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Kafka
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Andreas Horninger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gianpaolo di Santo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Hannes Neuwirt
- Department of Internal Medicine IV - Nephrology and Hypertension, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lena M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sophie C Kunte
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Emil Deiss
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot Assisted and Reconstructive Urologic Surgery, University of Cologne and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sazan Rasul
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Holger Einspieler
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Robert Dozauer
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ellen Medlock
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Niklas Rölz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Steffen Rausch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Nils Trautwein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marie C Roesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Matteo Sepulcri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Michael Ladurner
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Jasmin Bektic
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Isabel Heidegger
- Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Piranfar A, Soltani M, Kashkooli FM, Uribe CF, Rahmim A. Spatiotemporal modeling of radiopharmaceutical transport in solid tumors: Application to 177Lu-PSMA therapy of prostate cancer. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2024; 245:108004. [PMID: 38215660 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.108004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE 177Lu-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) represents a pivotal advancement in addressing prostate cancer. However, existing therapies, while promising, remain incompletely understood and optimized. Computational models offer potential insights into RPTs, aiding in clinical drug delivery enhancement. In this study, we investigate the impact of various physiological parameters on the delivery of 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT using the convection-diffusion-reaction (CDR) model. METHODS Our investigation encompasses tumor geometry and surrounding tissue, characterized by well-defined boundaries and initial conditions. Utilizing the finite element method, we solve governing equations across a range of parameters: dissociation constant KD (1, 0.1, 0.01 [nM]), internalization rate (0.01-0.0001 [min-1]), diverse tumor shapes, and variable necrotic zone sizes. This model can provide an accurate analysis of radiopharmaceutical delivery from the injection site to the tumor cell, including drug transport in the vascular, interstitial, and intracellular spaces, and considering important parameters (e.g., drug extravasation from microvessels or to lymphatic vessels, the extracellular matrix, receptors, and intracellular space). RESULTS Our findings reveal significant enhancements in tumor-absorbed doses as KD decreases. This outcome can be attributed to the higher affinity of radiopharmaceuticals for PSMA receptors as KD diminishes, facilitating a more efficient binding and retention of the therapeutic agent within the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, tumor-absorbed doses for KD ∼ 1 [nM] show an upward trend with higher internalization rates. This observation can be rationalized by considering that a greater internalization rate would result in a higher proportion of radiopharmaceuticals being taken up by tumor cells after binding to receptors on the cell surface. Notably, tumor shape and necrotic zone size exhibit limited influence on tumor absorbed dose. CONCLUSIONS The present study employs the CDR model to explore the role of physiological parameters in shaping 177Lu-PSMA-617 RPT delivery. These findings provide insights for improving prostate cancer therapy by understanding radiopharmaceutical transport dynamics. This computational approach contributes to advancing our understanding of radiopharmaceutical delivery mechanisms and has implications for enhancing treatment efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anahita Piranfar
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - M Soltani
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, ON, Canada; Centre for Biotechnology and Bioengineering (CBB), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Farshad M Kashkooli
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
| | - Carlos F Uribe
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Arman Rahmim
- Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Functional Imaging, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gaal S, Huang K, Rogasch JMM, Jochens HV, De Santis M, Erber B, Amthauer H. Prognostic Value of the De Ritis Ratio for Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [ 177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Radioligand Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4907. [PMID: 37894274 PMCID: PMC10605155 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The De Ritis ratio (=aspartate transaminase/alanine transaminase) has shown prognostic value in different cancer types. This is the first such analysis in prostate cancer patients undergoing radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. This retrospective monocentric analysis included 91 patients with a median of 3 RLT cycles (range 1-6) and median cumulative activity of 17.3 GBq. Univariable Cox regression regarding overall survival (OS) included age, different types of previous treatment, metastatic patterns and different laboratory parameters before RLT. Based on multivariable Cox regression, a prognostic score was derived. Seventy-two patients (79%) died (median follow-up in survivors: 19.8 months). A higher number of previous chemotherapy lines, the presence of liver metastases, brain metastases, a higher tumor load on PSMA-PET, a higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, lower red blood cell count, lower hemoglobin, higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and higher De Ritis ratio were associated with shorter OS (each p < 0.05). In multivariable Cox, a higher number of chemotherapy lines (range, 0-2; p = 0.036), brain metastases (p < 0.001), higher PSA (p = 0.004) and higher De Ritis ratio before RLT (hazard ratio, 1.27 per unit increase; p = 0.023) remained significant. This prognostic score separated five groups with a significantly different median OS ranging from 4.9 to 28.1 months (log-rank test, p < 0.001). If validated independently, the De Ritis ratio could enhance multifactorial models for OS after RLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Gaal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kai Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Praxen für Diagnostische und Therapeutische Nuklearmedizin, Düppelstr. 30, 12163 Berlin, Germany
| | - Julian M M Rogasch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hans V Jochens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Barbara Erber
- Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Patell K, Kurian M, Garcia JA, Mendiratta P, Barata PC, Jia AY, Spratt DE, Brown JR. Lutetium-177 PSMA for the treatment of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer: a systematic review. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:731-744. [PMID: 37194261 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2213892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCPRC) remains an aggressive form of prostate cancer that no longer responds to traditional hormonal treatment alone. Despite the advent of novel anti-androgen medications, many patients continue to progress, and as a result, there is a growing need for additional treatment options. AREAS COVERED Lutetium-177 (177Lu) - PSMA-617 has become one of the new frontline treatment options for refractory metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer after the failure of novel anti-androgen therapy and chemotherapy. Lu-177 has been used in real-world prospective trials and is now becoming utilized in newer phase III clinical trials. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of the current literature, covering retrospective studies, prospective studies, and clinical trials that established Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) for the treatment of mCRPC. EXPERT OPINION 177Lu - PSMA-617 has been approved for treatment of mCRPC based on positive phase III studies. While this treatment is tolerable and effective, biomarkers are necessary to determine which patients will benefit. In the future, radioligand treatments will likely be utilized in earlier lines of therapy and potentially in combination with other prostate cancer treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanchi Patell
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Kurian
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jorge A Garcia
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Prateek Mendiratta
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pedro C Barata
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Angela Y Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jason R Brown
- Deparment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kostos L, Buteau JP, Hofman MS, Azad AA. Determinants of outcome following PSMA-based radioligand therapy and mechanisms of resistance in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231179309. [PMID: 37323184 PMCID: PMC10262652 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231179309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
[177Lu]Lu-PSMA has recently been approved for use in the post-taxane, post-novel hormonal-agent setting in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. As a beta-emitting radioligand targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), it delivers radiation to cells expressing PSMA on their surface. In pivotal clinical trials, patients were selected for this treatment based on positron emission tomography (PET)/CT imaging, requiring PSMA-avid disease with no evidence of discordant disease on 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT or contrast CT scan. Despite exhibiting an optimal imaging phenotype, the response for many patients is not durable, and a minority do not respond to [177Lu]Lu-PSMA at all. Disease progression is inevitable even for those who achieve an exceptional initial response. Reasons for both primary and acquired resistance are largely unknown; however, they are likely due to the presence of underlying PSMA-negative disease not identified on imaging, molecular factors conferring radioresistance, and inadequate delivery of lethal radiation, particularly to sites of micrometastatic disease. Biomarkers are urgently needed to optimize patient selection for treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA by identifying those who are most and least likely to respond. Retrospective data support using several prognostic and predictive baseline patient- and disease-related parameters; however, robust prospective data is required before these can be translated into widespread use. Further, early on-treatment clinical parameters (in addition to serial prostate-specific antigen [PSA] levels and conventional restaging imaging) may serve as surrogates for predicting treatment response. With little known about the efficacy of treatments given after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA, optimal treatment sequencing is paramount, and biomarker-driven patient selection will hopefully improve treatment and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Kostos
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - James P. Buteau
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael S. Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Arun A. Azad
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|