Comparison of Five TSH-Receptor Antibody Assays in Graves' disease: results from an observational pilot study

Minor hyperthyroidism with normal levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies: a case report

The present report describes for the first time a case of diffuse hyperthyroidism in a 30-year-old female patient who had normal levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibodies (TSHR-Ab), slightly elevated plasma levels of thyroid hormones, and slightly increased thyroid blood flow. Seven years before, after severe stress, she had Graves' disease with elevated plasma levels of TSHR-Ab. The patient's recent medical history included mental stress and autonomic dysfunction. This report describes a mild form of hyperthyroidism in terms of elevated plasma levels of thyroid hormones and Doppler ultrasonography data; this condition was first defined as 'minor hyperthyroidism'. The examination data suggest a probable secondary role of the immune system and primary role of the autonomic nervous system in the pathogenesis of Graves' disease.

Comparison of two different TSH-receptor antibody assays: A clinical practice study

Background

Graves' disease (GD) is caused by the production of TSH-receptor (TSHR) stimulating auto-antibodies. Over the years various TSHR-antibody (TRAb) detection assays have been developed. Most clinical laboratories use competitive TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assays, which measure the total amount of stimulating and blocking auto-antibodies. Selective detection of TSHR stimulating auto-antibodies (TSI) was previously only possible with functional cell-based bioassays. However, more recently an automated bridge-based binding assay to more specifically measure TSI has become available. The aim of our study was to compare the third-generation automated competitive immunoassay (TBII) with the automated bridge immunoassay (TSI) in clinical practice in an academic thyroid expert center.

Methods

A retrospective study in 356 patients with Graves' disease, Graves orbitopathy (GO), and other (thyroid) disease treated in an academic thyroid center was performed. All samples were analyzed for TBII and TSI. For both assays, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PVV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated using different cut-offs for negativity.

Results

Using the provided cut-off, the overall sensitivity appeared similar between TBII and TSI, but TSI showed higher overall specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic odds ratio. Using two or three times the cut-off for negativity resulted in a decrease in sensitivity, but an increase in specificity and PPV, which was most pronounced for the TBII-assay. Analysis in a subgroup of newly diagnosed treatment naïve GD/GO patients also revealed overall favorable results for the TSI-assay. Increasing the cut-off for negativity resulted in increased specificity for both assays, with similar results using two or three times the cut-off. Most patients with concordant positive results for TBII and TSI suffered from GD or GD + GO (n = 110, 95.6 %), while patients negative for both TBII and TSI mostly suffered from other (thyroid) disease (n = 143, 77.3 %). From patients with positive TBII but negative TSI only 42.1 % had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 57.9 % (n = 22) had other (thyroid) disease. In contrast, 88.9 % of patients with positive TSI but negative TBII had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 11.1 % (n = 2) had other (thyroid) disease.

Conclusion

In our academic thyroid center, the diagnostic performance of the TSI-assay outperformed the TBII-assay. Using a higher cut-off value for negativity can be helpful in assessing clinical relevance.

Stability of TSH receptor antibody concentrations and comparability of its immunoassays

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Graves' Disease (GD) is an autoimmune form of hyperthyroidism where autoantibodies are directed against the TSH-receptor (TSH-receptor antibodies; TRAb). GD is suspected if TRAb concentrations are above a pre-specified cut-off value. TRAb concentrations are measured using immunoassays. This study aimed to compare the performance of the recently implemented Alinity immunoassay to the KRYPTOR and Cobas TRAb immunoassays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Left-over serum samples in which TRAb concentrations were measured (KRYPTOR) were used. First, TRAb stability at -20 °C for four to six years and up to five freeze-thaw cycles were assessed. Second, TRAb measurements (n = 436) were repeated using the Alinity and Cobas immunoassay and results (scored as positive/negative based on cut-off value) were compared.

RESULTS

TRAb results were stable over five years and up to five freeze-thaw cycles. When comparing immunoassays, 86.2% of the results were similar. Total discrepancy differed between the immunoassays (5.4% Cobas vs Alinity, 8.8% Alinity vs KRYPTOR, 13.3 % Cobas vs KRYPTOR). The KRYPTOR immunoassay showed more negative TRAb results than Cobas and Alinity.

CONCLUSION

The Alinity immunoassay showed comparable TRAb results, even though slightly more positive results compared to the KRYPTORand slightly more negative results compared to the Cobas immunoassay were seen.

Establishment and analytical performance of light-initiated chemiluminescence assay method for detecting thyrotropin receptor antibody

Aim: To evaluate double-antibody competitive light-initiated chemiluminescence assay method for detecting the thyrotropin receptor antibody. Materials & methods: The optimal working concentrations of competitive antibody and rTSHR were confirmed by checkerboard titration. Assay performance was assessed by precision, linearity, accuracy, limit of blank and clinical evaluation. Results: The coefficient of variation for repeatability and intermediate precision was 3.9-5.9 and 0.9-1.3%, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.999 by least squares linear fitting in linearity evaluation. The relative deviation ranged from -5.9 to 4.1%, and the limit of blank of the method was 0.13 IU/l. Compared with the Roche cobas system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), the relationship between the two assays was shown to be significantly correlative. Conclusion: The light-initiated chemiluminescence assay method for detecting thyrotropin receptor antibody is a rapid, novel and accurate method for thyrotropin receptor antibody measurement.

Thyroid autoantibodies

Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor antibody (TSH-R-Ab or TRAb) testing plays a pivotal role in arriving at the aetiological diagnosis in patients with thyrotoxicosis. A positive test establishes the diagnosis of Graves' disease (GD) while a negative result in conjunction with imaging studies supports other possible aetiologies. In patients with GD, TRAb levels at diagnosis and at the time of withdrawal of antithyroid drugs can identify patients who are unlikely to achieve remission and guide clinical management decisions. We provide an algorithm that incorporates TRAb in the decision-making process for the management of thyrotoxicosis. The utility of TRAb in predicting the risk of fetal and neonatal thyroid dysfunction is established and widely accepted in guidelines. TRAb may also help in the diagnosis of Graves' orbitopathy, especially in euthyroid or hypothyroid patients and its role in guiding its management is evolving as a useful adjunct to the clinical parameters used in making therapeutic decisions.Anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAb) and anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) indicate thyroid autoimmunity. The most common use of TPOAb is to identify patients at a higher risk of progression to treatment-requiring hypothyroidism. They also aid the diagnosis of immune thyroiditis and Hashimoto's encephalopathy. Thyroglobulin measurement is used to help guide differentiated thyroid cancer treatment. TgAb is used as an accompanying test with thyroglobulin measurement as its presence can interfere with the thyroglobulin assay. A negative TgAb result reduces the likelihood of, but does not exclude, interference with thyroglobulin assay.

What we know about the relationship between autoimmune thyroid diseases and gut microbiota: a perspective on the role of probiotics on pediatric endocrinology

INTRODUCTION

Autoimmune diseases account for a cumulative overall prevalence of about 3-5% worldwide. Among them, autoimmune thyroid diseases (ATDs) are the most common and comprise two main entities: Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT) and Graves-Basedow disease (GD). The pathogenesis of ATDs remains not fully elucidated, however the role of microbioma has been proposed. Gut microbiota exert an important influence on the intestinal barrier, nutrient metabolism and immune system development and functions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

In this review, we describe on the main features of ATDs in pediatrics, focusing on the reciprocal influence between gut microbiota, thyroid hormone metabolism and thyroid autoimmunity and consider the role of probiotics and other microbiota-targeted therapies in thyroid diseases with a perspective on pediatric endocrinology.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Microbiome affects both endogenous and exogenous thyroid hormone metabolism and influences the absorption of minerals important to the thyroid function, which are iodine, selenium, zinc and iron. The alteration of the gut microbiota, with the consequent modifications in the barrier function and the increased gut permeability, seems involved in the development of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory diseases, including ATDs. The supplementation with probiotics showed beneficial effects on the thyroid hormone and thyroid function because this strategy could restore the intestinal eubiosis and the good strain microorganism proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Even though the evidence about the interaction between microbiota and ATDs in pediatric patients is limited, the promising results obtained in the adult population, and in other autoimmune disorders affecting children, highlight the need of for further research in the pediatric field.

Anti-TSH receptor antibodies (TRAb): Comparison of two third generation automated immunoassays broadly used in clinical laboratories and results interpretation

Graves’ disease (GD) is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-replete populations. It is an autoimmune disease caused by autoantibodies to the TSHR (TRAb). Although the diagnostic is mainly clinical, measuring TRAb improves accuracy and provides valuable prognostic information. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of two of the most widely used immunoassays i.e., EliA™ anti-TSH-R and Elecsys^® anti-TSH-R. We have carried out a comparative study measuring TRAb by the two immunoassays in consecutive sera samples referred to the laboratory for TRAb measurement. Autoantibodies were measured in all samples in parallel by the two techniques. The two techniques were highly concordant as demonstrated by a Cohen’s kappa of 0.82. At the manufacturer recommended cut-off, sensitivity of Elecsys^® TRAb test was higher (100% vs. 96.6%), while specificity of the EliA™ TRAb test was higher (99.4% vs. 95.3%). In most patients TRAb are detected by any of two tests which are both well suited for Clinical Laboratories use. However, a higher specificity may constitute an advantage for measurement used not for screening but for diagnostic purposes, as anti-TSH-R is.

Comparative performance of ELISA and dot blot assay for TSH‐receptor antibody detection in Graves’ disease

Background

Graves’ disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease, and it accounts for major cases of hyperthyroidism. Antibody against thyroid‐stimulating hormone receptor/TSHR (TRAb) is responsible for hyperthyroidism and is considered as a diagnostic marker for GD. Therefore, we developed a recombinant protein of human TSHR‐169 (hTSHR‐169), which was specifically recognized TRAb in the serum of GD patients and then compare the diagnostic performance between ELISA and dot blot of TRAb tests for their ability to diagnose GD.

Methods

20 GD patients and 20 healthy individuals from the Indonesian population were enrolled. TRAb concentration and density were quantified. Comparative analysis was performed using receiver‐operating curve (ROC) analysis.

Results

For dot blot assay, the minimum concentration to detect TRAb requiring 100 ng of antigen with antiserum diluted at 1:60. For diagnosing GD, the ELISA yielded a higher AUC compared with the dot blot assay (0.95 and 0.85, respectively). Using the recommended cutoff values, the efficiency of both assays was examined by comparing the specificity and sensitivity of the assays to the clinical diagnosis. The ELISA showed 80% and 95%, while the dot blot assay showed 70% and 95% sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

Conclusion

Although the dot blot assay exhibited lower performance than the ELISA method, the dot blot assay is a simple and rapid diagnostic assay that is suitable for diagnosing GD in rural areas, in which healthcare facilities sometimes are not accessible.

The Prediction Model Using Thyroid Stimulating Immunoglobulin Bioassay For Relapse of Graves’ Disease

Objective

Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) bioassay has a better ability to predict the relapse rate of Graves’ disease (GD) than the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin method in terms of measuring the TSH receptor antibody. However, the optimal TSI bioassay cutoff for predicting relapse after antithyroid drug (ATD) withdrawal is not well evaluated.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled GD patients who had been treated with ATD and obtained their TSI bioassay <140% from January 2010 to December 2019 in a referral hospital.

Results

Among 219 study subjects, 86 patients (39.3%) experienced relapse. The TSI bioassay value of 66.5% significantly predicted the relapse of GD (P = 0.049). The group with a TSI bioassay value > 66.5% were expected to show a 23.8% relapse rate at 2 from ATD withdrawal, and the group with a TSI < 66.5% had a 12.7% relapse rate based on Kaplan-Meier curves analysis. The TSI bioassay showed a good ability to predict relapse GD in the female group (P = 0.041) but did not in the male group (P = 0.573). The risk scoring based on the nomogram with risk factors for GD relapse, which was constructed to overcome the limitation, increased the predictive ability of GD relapse by 11.5% compared to the use of the TSI bioassay alone.

Conclusions

The cutoff value of the TSI bioassay to predict GD relapse should be lower than that for diagnosing GD. However, as the single use of the TSI bioassay has limitations, a nomogram with multiple risk factors including TSI bioassay could be helpful to predict GD relapse.

Evaluation of analytic and clinical performance of two immunoassays for detecting thyroid-stimulating receptor antibody in the diagnosis of Graves' disease

Objective

To evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of two immunoassays for diagnosis of Graves’ disease (GD), the Immulite thyroid‐stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), and Elecsys Anti‐TSH receptor (TSHR) assay.

Methods

Precision and analytical measurement range were assessed using pooled samples of patients. The comparison between the two methods was evaluated using 579 clinical samples, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn using the final diagnosis as reference. Clinical sensitivity and specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the two tests.

Results

The repeatability and intermediate imprecision coefficient of variation (CV%) of the TSI assay were 3.8% and 4.1% at 0.95 IU/L, and 3.5% and3.6% at 19.5 IU/L, respectively. The assays were linear over a range 0.27–38.5 IU/L. There was a high correlation between the quantitative results of the two methods (correlation coefficient r = 0.930). The cut‐off value obtained by ROC analysis for TSI assay was 0.7 IU/L with sensitivity of 93.7% and specificity of 85.1%. An overall qualitative agreement of 91.5% between two methods was observed. Among 44 patients with discordant qualitative results, the TSI assay provided more satisfactory results consistent with clinical diagnoses.

Conclusion

The TSI assay showed excellent analytical performance and provided a high PPV for GD.

Identification of Two Different Phenotypes of Patients with Amiodarone-Induced Thyrotoxicosis and Positive Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Tests

Introduction: Serum thyrotropin (TSH) receptor antibodies (TRAbs) are occasionally found in patients with amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis (AIT), and usually point to a diagnosis of type 1 AIT (AIT1) due to Graves' disease (GD). However, the TRAb role and function in AIT have not been clarified. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 309 AIT patients followed at a single academic center over a 30-year period. AIT TRAb-positive patients (n = 21, 7% of all cases) constituted the study group; control groups consisted of type 2 AIT (AIT2) TRAb-negative patients (n = 233), and 100 non-AIT patients with GD. Clinical and biochemical data at diagnosis and during the course of disease were compared. Histological samples of patients who had total thyroidectomy were reviewed. Stored serum samples were used for a functional assay of TRAb class G immunoglobulins (IgGs) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with complementary DNA encoding for the TSH receptor. Results: TRAb-positive patients were grouped according to color flow Doppler sonography, radioactive iodine thyroid uptake, and duration of amiodarone therapy before thyrotoxicosis in type 1 (n = 9, 43%; TRAb1) or type 2 (n = 12, 57%; TRAb2) AIT. TRAb1 patients had clinical and biochemical features indistinguishable from GD controls, and were responsive to methimazole. Conversely, TRAb2 patients had clinical features similar to AIT2 controls, and were responsive to glucocorticoids, but not to methimazole. The CHO cell functional assay demonstrated that TRAb1 IgGs had a stimulatory effect on cyclic AMP production, which was absent in TRAb2 IgGs. Pathology in TRAb1 showed hyperplastic thyroid follicles and mild lymphocyte infiltration, reflecting thyroid stimulation. On the contrary, TRAb2 samples revealed follicle destruction, macrophage infiltration, and sometimes fibrosis, consistent with a destructive process. Conclusions: Almost 60% of TRAb-positive AIT patients had a destructive thyroiditis. TRAb-positive tests in AIT patients do thus not necessarily imply a diagnosis of GD and AIT1, and should be evaluated in the clinical and biochemical setting of each AIT patient and confirmed by measuring thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins.

Changes in Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Levels Following Total Thyroidectomy or Radioiodine Therapy in Patients with Refractory Graves' Disease

Background: The actions of thyrotropin-binding inhibitory immunoglobulins (TBIIs) against thyrotropin receptors in thyroid follicular cells have been studied as important etiological factors in Graves' disease (GD). The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in the TBII levels of patients undergoing total thyroidectomy (TTx) or radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy for GD refractory to antithyroid drugs (ATDs). Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent TTx or RAI for GD with previous ATD use between January 2011 and December 2017 at the Samsung Medical Center in Seoul, Korea. Thorough retrospective reviews of medical records were performed in 130 patients. Results: Patients with goiter, ophthalmopathy, high levels of TBIIs, and high doses of ATDs received TTx. Elderly patients with arrhythmia received RAI. We observed that TBII levels continued to decrease after TTx. On the contrary, TBIIs initially increased for 138 days (estimated median time) and then decreased slowly after RAI. A faster decline in TBII levels was observed in the TTx group than in the RAI group (p < 0.001). The estimated median time for TBIIs to decrease below 4.5 IU (3 × upper normal limit, which is known to be a risk factor for fetal hyperthyroidism) was 318 days in the TTx group and 659 days in the RAI group, respectively. In the RAI group, high levels of TBII (>4.5 IU/L) were present in 70 (82%) at 6 months, 57 (67%) at 1 year, and 3 (3%) at 2 years. In the TTx group, rapid decreases in TBII levels were observed in younger patients and those with lower baseline TBII levels. In the RAI group, smaller thyroid volume was correlated with more rapid decrease in TBII levels. Conclusions: The changes in TBII levels following TTx or RAI were different in patients with refractory GD. When deciding on TTx or RAI, this difference should be considered with patient age, severity of hyperthyroidism, goiter, ophthalmopathy, and future pregnancy plans (for young female patients).

Predicting the Relapse of Hyperthyroidism in Treated Graves' Disease with Orbitopathy by Serial Measurements of TSH-Receptor Autoantibodies

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of the new TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb) assays to predict remission or relapse of hyperthyroidism in patients with Graves' disease (GD) and Graves' orbitopathy (GO). TRAbs were measured retrospectively in sera from a cohort of GD patients with GO (n=117; remission n=38 and relapse n=79-Essen GO biobank) with automated binding immunoassays: TRAb Elecsys (Cobas Roche) and TRAb bridge assay (IMMULITE, Siemens), and the TSAb (thyroid stimulating Ab) cell-based bioassay (Thyretain, Quidel Corp.). To identify relapse risk/remission of hyperthyroidism patients were followed up at least 10 months after the end of antithyroid drug therapy (ATD) therapy. ROC plot analysis was performed to calculate cut-off levels of TRAb and TSAb for prediction of relapse and remission of hyperthyroidism. Cut-off serum levels are provided for timepoints around 3, 6, 10, and 15 months after the beginning of ATD. Repeated measurements of TRAb increase the rate of relapses predictions to 60% (Elecsys), 70% (IMMULITE), and 55% (Thyretain). Patients with remission have consistently TRAb levels below the cut off for relapse in repeated measurements. The cell-based bioassay was the most sensitive - and continued to be positive during follow up [at 15 months: 90% vs. 70% (IMMULITE) and 65% (Elecsys)]. Identification of relapsing hyperthyroidism is possible with automated immunoassays and cell-based bioassay especially with serial TRAb measurements during the course of ATD therapy. Patient who need eye surgery may profit from an early decision towards definitive treatment.

The role of laboratory medicine in the diagnosis of the hyperthyroidism

Hyperthyroidism is a clinical condition characterized by inappropriately high synthesis and secretion of thyroid hormones by the thyroid gland. It has multiple aetiologies, manifestations and potential therapies. Graves' disease is the most common form of hyperthyroidism, due to the production of autoantibodies against thyrotropin receptor, capable of over-stimulating thyroid function. A reliable diagnosis of hyperthyroidism can be established on clinical grounds, followed by the evaluation of serum thyroid function tests (thyrotropin first and then free thyroxine, adding the measurement of free triiodothyronine in selected specific situations). The recent guidelines of both the American and European Thyroid Associations have strongly recommended the measurement of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies for the accurate diagnosis and management of Graves' disease. If autoantibody test is negative, a radioiodine uptake should be performed. Considering the most recent laboratory improvements, binding assays can be considered the best first solution for the measurement of thyrotropin receptor autoantibodies in diagnosis and management of overt cases of Graves' disease. In fact, they have a satisfactory clinical sensitivity and specificity (97.4% and 99.2%, respectively) being performed in clinical laboratories on automated platforms together with the other thyroid function tests. In this setting, the bioassays should be reserved for fine and complex diagnoses and for particular clinical conditions where it is essential to document the transition from stimulating to blocking activity or vice versa (e.g. pregnancy and post-partum, related thyroid eye disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis with extrathyroidal manifestations, unusual cases after LT4 therapy for hypothyroidism or after antithyroid drug treatment for Graves' disease). Undoubtedly, technological advances will help improve laboratory diagnostics of hyperthyroidism. Nevertheless, despite future progress, the dialogue between clinicians and laboratory will continue to be crucial for an adequate knowledge and interpretation of the laboratory tests and, therefore, for an accurate diagnosis and correct management of the patient.

Third generation radioimmunoassay (RIA) for TSH receptor autoantibodies (TRAb) - one step less, similar results?

Aim  TSH-receptor (TSHR)-autoantibody (TRAb) is the serological hallmark of Graves’ disease (GD). Recently, 3 ^rd -generation radioimmunoassays (RIA) employing monoclonal TRAb such as M22 or T7 instead of TSH for the inhibition of human TRAb binding with solid-phase TSHR (coated tubes) have been introduced into laboratory routine.

Methods  As current assays typically employ a consecutive incubation of patient serum and labelled monoclonal TRAb, automation of TRAb RIA is a challenge. Thus, the assay procedure using human TSHR-coated tubes and the mouse monoclonal TRAb T7 was modified by combining both steps. The novel one-step method was compared with its corresponding consecutive 3 ^rd -generation RIA by investigating 304 individuals encompassing 102 patients with active GD (GD _a ), 43 patients with GD after successful therapy (GD _t ), 31 with Hashimoto’s disease (HD), 28 with non-autoimmune thyroid diseases (NAITD) and 100 healthy subjects (HS).

Results  With the new method, the incubation time was shortened by approximately one hour. Both 3 ^rd -generation RIAs did not reveal a significantly different assay performance by comparing areas under the curve (AUC) with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (AUC one-step: 0.94, AUC two-step: 0.96, p > 0.05, respectively). The two-step TRAb RIA demonstrated sensitivity and specificity values of 87.5 % and 96.2 %, respectively, whereas the one-step revealed 84.6 % and 96.2 %, respectively.

Conclusion  One-step 3 ^rd -generation RIA may be used for the reliable detection of TRAb. The shorter and easier assay design may improve its use and enable automation in routine nuclear medicine laboratories.

Analytical performance evaluation of thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody (TRAb) immunoassays

BACKGROUND

Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-activating autoantibodies stimulate thyroid growth and hormone synthesis/secretion, causing hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease (GD). TRAb measurement helps diagnose GD and is an important first test in evaluating hyperthyroidism according to the recent American Thyroid Association guidelines. We compared the performance of the BRAHMS TRAK Kryptor (Thermo Scientific) and Roche cobas TRAb immunoassays for use in GD.

METHOD

Method comparison (n = 40) and clinical agreement were assessed between the Kryptor, cobas e411, and cobas e601. The analytical performance of Kryptor and cobas e411 were assessed for within- and between-day imprecision across 20 days, linearity, functional assay sensitivity (FAS), dilution recovery, and cut-off verification.

RESULTS

The Kryptor, e411, and e601 TRAb immunoassays correlated well (r > 0.95, overall percent agreement = 0.95, Cohen's kappa = 0.90). With a total allowable error of 20%, percent bias was within 13%, which was minimally negative at <20 IU/L, but highly positive (33%-34%) >20 IU/L. The Kryptor, but not e411, was linear across the claimed analytical measuring range (AMR). The claimed functional assay sensitivity (FAS), which was close to the clinical GD cut-off 1.8 IU/L, was verified for Kryptor and e411.

CONCLUSION

Overall, our evaluation demonstrates acceptable comparability between TRAb immunoassays with in-house imprecision up to 13% and 10% on Kryptor and e411, respectively. While Roche has preferable calibration frequency and on-board reagent stability, both platforms demonstrate acceptable imprecision using patient samples at their claimed FAS, which is important for GD diagnosis. Diluted results (using a negative patient pool as diluent) exhibits proportional positive bias on the Kryptor relative to the Roche methods.

Graves' disease

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the thyroid gland. It is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism and occurs at all ages but especially in women of reproductive age. Graves' hyperthyroidism is caused by autoantibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) that act as agonists and induce excessive thyroid hormone secretion, releasing the thyroid gland from pituitary control. TSHR autoantibodies also underlie Graves' orbitopathy (GO) and pretibial myxoedema. Additionally, the pathophysiology of GO (and likely pretibial myxoedema) involves the synergism of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) with TSHR autoantibodies, causing retro-orbital tissue expansion and inflammation. Although the aetiology of GD remains unknown, evidence indicates a strong genetic component combined with random potential environmental insults in an immunologically susceptible individual. The treatment of GD has not changed substantially for many years and remains a choice between antithyroid drugs, radioiodine or surgery. However, antithyroid drug use can cause drug-induced embryopathy in pregnancy, radioiodine therapy can exacerbate GO and surgery can result in hypoparathyroidism or laryngeal nerve damage. Therefore, future studies should focus on improved drug management, and a number of important advances are on the horizon.