Complete root coverage in the treatment of Miller class III or RT2 gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Retrospective Study on Orthodontic Gingival Recession Correction Using Clear Aligners

Background and Objectives: Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ClearCorrect® clear aligners (The Straumann Group) in improving gingival recession, which developed following prior fixed orthodontic treatment. The specific objectives were to assess changes in recession severity in patients with orthodontic gingival recessions following aligner therapy and to determine whether the initial severity of recession influenced improvement rates across three categories-mild (RT1), moderate (RT2), and severe (RT3)-as defined by the Cairo classification. Materials and Methods: Fifty-six patients with gingival recession from previous orthodontic treatment received aligner therapy for seven to twelve months, focusing on 146 recession sites, primarily in the lower anterior region. Recession severity was classified and tracked as RT1, RT2, and RT3. Statistical analyses, including a Chi-square test, assessed improvement rates across these categories. Results: Among severe recessions (RT3), 52% showed no improvement, while 48% exhibited some improvement, with 16% improving to RT1. In the moderate group (RT2), 63% improved to RT1, and 16% resolved. The mild group (RT1) showed a 58% reduction in recession depth. Chi-square testing confirmed a statistically significant difference in improvement rates across the three groups (p = 1.44 × 10-7). Conclusions: Clear aligners may contribute to gingival recession improvement, particularly in mild and moderate cases (RT1 and RT2), though severe cases (RT3) show a more limited response.

Analysis of the treatment of RT2 recessions with a xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft combined with a coronally advanced flap. A double-blinded randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical efficacy in terms of mean root coverage in RT2 recession treated with a coronally advanced flap combined with a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus a connective tissue graft.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 patients were randomized to receive one of two treatments: coronally advanced flap + xenogeneic collagen matrix (test group) and coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft (control group). Patient-related outcomes measures and professional aesthetic assessment by root esthetic score were performed. A descriptive and analytical statistical analysis of the variables was performed.

RESULTS

At 12 months, the mean root coverage was 56.48% in the test group and 69.72% in the control group (p = 0.048), with a 35% and 40% complete root coverage in the xenogeneic collagen matrix and connective tissue graft, respectively. Test group presented less pain (3.65 vs. 5.2 VAS units) (p = 0.015) and less surgical time (45 vs. 49.15 min) (p = 0.004) than control group.

CONCLUSION

The use of xenogeneic collagen matrix in RT2 recessions was effective for recession reduction to those obtained using autologous grafts; with the advantage that the duration of surgery and patient morbidity decreased. Therefore, xenogeneic collagen matrix in RT2 recessions could be an alternative to autologous grafts.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The use of xenogeneic collagen matrix decreases the surgery time and patient morbidity but connective tissue graft results in significantly better mean root coverage and complete root coverage. Xenogeneic collagen matrix can be used in the treatment of RT2 gingival recessions.

STUDY REGISTRATION

NCT03344315.

Cell-based therapy in the management of Class III Miller's recession - A case report with 45-month follow-up

Miller's Class III gingival recessions (GRs) have always posed a challenge to the clinicians in terms of achieving complete root coverage (CRC). In the present case, a cell-based therapy with autologous fibroblasts seeded onto a Type 1 collagen membrane, through an in-vitro culturing method was utilized. The fibroblasts-seeded membrane was surgically placed under a laterally repositioned flap. The patient presented with a CRC, which was stable even at the postoperative period of 45 months. In addition, a 3-mm substantial gain in the width of keratinized tissue was achieved and maintained throughout the postoperative period. Hence, the results of the cell-seeded therapy emphasize that it can serve as an effective alternative method for the management of Miller's Class III GRs.

Long-term comparison of root coverage procedures at single RT2 maxillary gingival recessions: Ten-year extension results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial

AIM

The purpose of the present study was to assess root coverage outcomes 10 years after connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap (CTG + CAF) or CAF alone, at single RT2 maxillary gingival recession.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one of the original 29 patients (11 treated with CAF + CTG and 10 with CAF alone) were available for the 10-year follow-up. A blinded and calibrated examiner performed all the measurements. Outcome measures included complete root coverage (CRC), recession reduction (RecRed), root coverage aesthetic score (RES), and keratinized tissue (KT) gain. A visual analogue scale was used to evaluate patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

CRC was maintained in 63% of the test group and 20% of the control group after 10 years, with a significant difference favouring CAF + CTG (p = .030). Furthermore, the addition of CTG was associated with greater KT gain (p = .0002) and greater papilla tip recession (p = .023) than with CAF at the last follow-up. No difference was detected regarding RecRed, RES, and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding CTG under CAF improved the probability of maintaining complete root coverage 10 years after single maxillary RT2 recession treatment.

Comparative study of the modified VISTA technique (m-VISTA) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions: a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the percentage of mean root coverage (MRC%) obtained in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 gingival recessions using the modified VISTA (m-VISTA) technique versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique, using a connective tissue graft (CTG) in both cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four patients were randomly treated with m-VISTA (test group (TG) = 12) or CAF (control group (CG) = 12). A calibrated, experienced, and blinded examiner collected data related to multiple periodontal clinical variables, especially the recession (REC) in order to calculate the MRC% at 6 and 12 months, which was the primary outcome of the study. Also, the radiological bone level, the characteristics of the CTG, and postsurgical incidences were assessed. Finally, a descriptive and an analytical statistical analysis of the variables and their associations was performed.

RESULTS

The recessions (n = 84) were located mainly in the mandible (n = 65) and in posterior sectors (premolars: n = 35; molars: n = 8). At 6 months, the MRC% was 61% (2 mm) for both study groups, and at 12 months, it increased to 73.26% (2.11 mm) in the TG and decreased to 56.49% (1.78 mm) in the CG.

CONCLUSION

When approaching multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions, there were no statistically significant differences in the MRC% at 6 and 12 months between the group treated with the m-VISTA technique and the group treated with the CAF.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The characteristics of the m-VISTA technique, such as the closed approach, the mobilization of the papilla, and the coronal stabilization of the CTG, could facilitate the maturation of the tissues in the treatment of Miller class III/RT2 recessions. This would favor better root coverage.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03258996.

Clinical comparison between different surgical techniques used to manage advanced gingival recession (Miller's class III & IV)

Advanced gingival recession is considered a complex soft tissue problem, which is increased in severity with age, and has multiple etiological factors. Therefore, the treatment is very complicated with low predictability. However, in the last decade, many clinical trials have shown highly predictable results when managing advanced recession cases by surgical intervention.

The present review shows different surgical techniques with their clinical outcomes in order to choose the most suitable technique required by the clinical condition. Although there are relatively few studies, modified tunnel technique and coronal advanced flap (CAF) showed the highest percentage of root coverage (%RC) during the first year (up to 86%). These techniques are primarily indicated to manage advanced recession in the esthetic zone. Pedicle buccal fat pad (PBFP) also had a good percentage of root coverage when used in the maxillary posterior area, as it has a high blood supply with minimal risk for infection and necrosis. Free gingival graft (FGG) can be used in the mandibular anterior area, as it creates a band of keratinized tissue that can resist recession with a fair percentage of root coverage. However, color match and graft shrinkage are the main problems of this procedure.

Correction to: Complete root coverage in the treatment of Miller class III or RT2 gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.