Current status of integrating oncology and palliative care in Japan: a nationwide survey

Predictive Models for Palliative Care Needs of Advanced Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy

CONTEXT

Early palliative care is recommended within eight-week of diagnosing advanced cancer. Although guidelines suggest routine screening to identify cancer patients who could benefit from palliative care, implementing screening can be challenging due to understaffing and time constraints.

OBJECTIVES

To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting specialist palliative care needs in advanced cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy, and to investigate if predictive models could substitute screening tools.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using supervised machine learning. The study included patients aged 18 or older, diagnosed with metastatic or stage IV cancer, who underwent chemotherapy and distress screening at a designated cancer hospital in Japan from April 1, 2018, to March 31, 2023. Specialist palliative care needs were assessed based on distress screening scores and expert evaluations. Data sources were hospital's cancer registry, health claims database, and nursing admission records. The predictive model was developed using XGBoost, a machine learning algorithm.

RESULTS

Out of the 1878 included patients, 561 were analyzed. Among them, 114 (20.3%) exhibited needs for specialist palliative care. After under-sampling to address data imbalance, the models achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.89 with 95.8% sensitivity and a specificity of 71.9%. After feature selection, the model retained five variables, including the patient-reported pain score, and showcased an 0.82 AUC.

CONCLUSION

Our models could forecast specialist palliative care needs for advanced cancer patients on chemotherapy. Using five variables as predictors could replace screening tools and has the potential to contribute to earlier palliative care.

What are the barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care supporting cancer patients? A qualitative analysis of healthcare and long-term care providers' perceptions

BACKGROUND

Patients required comprehensive cancer treatment in the community based on medical collaboration between designated cancer care hospitals and community medical and nursing care facilities to help them live life on their own terms. This study aims to describe the barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care from the perspectives of healthcare providers (HCPs) and long-term care providers (LCPs) supporting cancer patients.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 88 HCPs and LCPs supporting cancer patients. We analyzed interview data to describe barriers to medical collaboration between designated cancer care hospitals and community medical and nursing care facilities using content analysis in MAXQDA.

RESULTS

Participants were mostly HCPs, with physicians accounting for the largest proportion (27.3%). Totally, 299 codes were integrated into seven barriers to medical collaboration in community-based integrated care, including lack of information provision including life perspectives and a delay in sharing cancer patients' values with HCPs to provide end-of-life care according to the patients' wishes. Furthermore, insufficient coordination of cancer and non-cancer symptom management was identified as a barrier specific to older adults with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Barriers related to cancer treatment that integrate lifestyle perspectives, end-of-life care emphasizing patient values, and medical collaboration between cancer and non-cancer care are distinctive. They emphasize the importance of utilizing professionals to connect treatment and lifestyle information, establishing a central coordinating organization led by the DCCH, and developing a community palliative care network. Moreover, connecting cancer and non-cancer care through government and medical collaboration is crucial.

Encouraging outpatients in an acute hospital for the relief of cancer-related pain: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

To identify the processes of cancer-related pain relief and exacerbation faced by outpatients in an acute care hospital and to examine the support needed for outpatient pain control.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with patients from the outpatient department of Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital in Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan. Participants were recruited by purposive sampling. From the recorded data, verbatim transcripts were made and used as textual data for analysis by consistent comparative method.

RESULTS

Between April 2018 and April 2022, interviews were conducted with 30 participants. Analysis of the verbatim transcripts generated 13 categories from 27 concepts. Category relationships were examined, and a conceptual framework was developed. Outpatients went from being in a state of hesitation towards consultation with medical professionals to receiving individual consistent follow-ups by medical professionals in the hospital and community pharmacies, which led to patient teleconsultations when their physical condition changed, leading to an improvement of pain.

CONCLUSION

The process of relief and exacerbation of cancer-related pain experienced by outpatients in the acute care hospital reveals that the provision of consistent follow-up through remote or in-person interviews has an important role to play in pain management, as it helps to build relationships between patients and medical professionals. Alternatively, when outpatients exhibited endurance, their pain worsened, and they fell into a negative cycle of poor pain control.

Development of a national health policy logic model to accelerate the integration of oncology and palliative care: a nationwide Delphi survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

Despite recommendations to deliver palliative care to cancer patients and their caregivers, their distress has not been alleviated satisfactorily. National health policies play a pivotal role in achieving a comprehensive range of quality palliative care delivery for the public. However, there is no standardised logic model to appraise the efficacy of these policies. This study aimed to develop a logic model of a national health policy to deliver cancer palliative care and to reach consensus towards specific policy proposals.

METHODS

A draft version of the logic model and specific policy proposals were formulated by the research team and the internal expert panel, and the independent external expert panel evaluated the policy proposals based on the Delphi survey to reach consensus.

RESULTS

The logic model was divided into three major conceptual categories: 'care-delivery at cancer hospitals', 'community care coordination', and 'social awareness of palliative care'. There were 18 and 45 major and minor policy proposals, which were categorised into four groups: requirement of government-designated cancer hospitals; financial support; Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control Programs; and others. These policy proposals were independently evaluated by 64 external experts and the first to third Delphi round response rates were 96.9-98.4%. Finally, 47 policy proposals reached consensus. The priority of each proposal was evaluated within the four policy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A national health policy logic model was developed to accelerate the provision of cancer palliative care. Further research is warranted to verify the study design to investigate the efficacy of the logic model.

Global Perspectives on Palliative Care for Cancer Patients: Not All Countries Are the Same

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The integration of cancer-related palliative care is essential to holistic, quality cancer care. While some similarities exist between countries, this manuscript will focus on five differences that impact palliative care for cancer patients including the epidemiology of cancer and related symptoms, cancer-specific integration into care, palliative care education, economic development of the country, and cultural and religious differences.

RECENT FINDINGS

The epidemiology of cancer varies around the world resulting in variable symptoms and the need for individualized approaches to palliative care. While palliative care is integrated in some countries, it is lacking in over half of the world, and specific integration into cancer care is virtually absent. Education and training are the key to expansion, and yet oncology-focused palliative care education is lacking or is not well-reported in the literature. To complicate this global lens even further are the economic disparities that exist. Low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs) are resource poor and have the fewest resources and least amount of integration, and yet patients with advanced cancer are over-represented in these countries. Essential to cancer-related palliative care is a tailored approach that addresses cultural and religious differences around the globe. Palliative care is developing around the globe and yet palliative care specific for cancer patients is in its infancy. Cancer care professionals should (1) understand the epidemiologic differences that exist globally and the impact this has on palliative care, (2) integrate palliative care into the cancer care arena, (3) provide cancer-specific palliative education focused on the cancer trajectory from diagnosis through survivorship and end of life, (4) advocate for LMICs, which suffer from a lack of resources and services, and (5) understand cultural and religious differences that exist to provide holistic and sensitive cancer-related palliative care.