Palliative care in day-hospital for advanced cancer patients: a study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial

Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac

Purpose

An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment.

Methods

Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results

205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as "not at all" (87%), "somewhat" (11%), "moderately" (1%) and "very much so" (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96-100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78-85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%.

Conclusion

In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.

["The total time spent by the general practitioner decreases": The referring physician's view of a palliative day care clinic]

BACKGROUND

Palliative day-care clinics (PDCCs) can complement inpatient and outpatient specialized palliative care. Some studies have shown improvements in the patients'́ symptoms, functional level and psychological well-being, while others have not. This study aimed to document the experience of referring physicians with PDCCs.

METHOD

A postal questionnaire was sent to referring physicians between 11/2020 and 3/2021. The questionnaire included open and closed questions about professional background, symptom control, medical / psychosocial benefits for patients and challenges in the collaboration. Closed, 5-point scaled questions were analyzed descriptively with IBM SPSS Statistics 25®, open questions with a thematic content analysis using MAXQDA 2020®.

RESULTS

Of the 96 referring physicians contacted, 76 questionnaires were returned (79%), 73 of which could be analyzed. Most referring physicians were general practitioners (57%), followed by oncologists (28%). 12% had completed further training in palliative medicine and had been working with patients with palliative care needs for an average of almost 19 years. On average, they had referred 24 patients (range 1-200) to a PDCC. 93% said that inpatient stays were delayed or avoided by PDCCs. 97% were of the opinion that their patients achieved a (great or rather great) benefit from medical treatment, and 96% thought that they benefited (to a great or rather great degree) from psychosocial treatment. 58% said that their own time spent with patients treated at the PDCC had decreased. In addition, a total of 227 open comments on challenges in cooperation, suggestions for optimization, reasons for referring patients and general wishes for PDCCs were analyzed.

DISCUSSION

The high response rate to the questionnaires shows that PDCCs are of great importance to referring physicians. They consider the cooperation with PDCCs to be supportive and helpful for both themselves and their patients.

CONCLUSION

PDCCs make an important contribution to palliative care. Almost all respondents believe that treatment at a PDCC prevents or delays hospitalization.

Palliative care interventions for patients with head and neck cancer: protocol for a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

A head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis significantly impacts a patient's quality of life (QOL). Palliative care potentially improves their QOL. We will conduct a scoping review to identify existing knowledge about palliative care interventions for patients with HNC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This scoping review was designed in accordance with the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis: Scoping Reviews and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Our eligibility criteria follow the Population, Intervention, Comparison or Control, Outcomes and Study characteristics framework. The population is adult patients with locally advanced, metastatic, unresectable and/or recurrent HNC. We include peer-reviewed journal articles and articles in the press, in English, reporting on palliative care interventions with at least two of the eight National Consensus Project on Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care domains; studies with and without comparators will be included. The outcomes are patient QOL (primary) and symptom severity, patients' satisfaction with care, patients' mood, advance care planning and place of death (secondary). We developed a search strategy across ten databases, to be searched from the inception to 11 September 2023: Medline ALL (Medline and EPub Ahead of Print and In-Process, In-Data-Review & Other Non-Indexed Citations), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase Classic+Embase, Emcare and PsycINFO all from the OvidSP platform; CINAHL from EBSCOhost, Scopus from Elsevier, Web of Science from Clarivate and Global Index Medicus from WHO. We will extract data using a piloted data form and analyse the data through descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not needed for a scoping review. We will disseminate the findings to healthcare providers and policy-makers by publishing the results in a scientific journal.

Implementation of palliative care day hospital for outpatients with advanced cancer

OBJECTIVES

To describe the population of a palliative care day hospital (PCDH) in oncology and analyse the end-of-life trajectory.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective cohort study of all referred patients for the first time to PCDH over an 8-month period with the data collected in all PCDH in their pathway care.

RESULTS

116 patients were included for 319 stays in PCDH. At first referral PCDH, 62 (53.4%) patients had ongoing anticancer therapy. Twenty-four (20.7%) and 63 (54.3%) patients were in an unstable and deteriorating phase, respectively. Mean (SD) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score was 2.8 (0.7). Mean (SD) stay per patient was 2.8 (2.2). For all stays, mean (SD) of joint intervention of palliative care team and oncologist was 1.2 (1.2) per patient. Mean (SD) of technical acts performed was 0.2 (0.6) per patient. Among the 109 deceased patients, 16 patients (14.7%) and 7 patients (6.4%) had received chemotherapy in the last month and 15 days before death, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our PCDH is a suitable place for a complex population still living at home. The reported patients' demographics and PCDH's organisation lead to a hybrid outpatient intervention between outpatient clinics and hospice care services. A randomised multicentric trial is ongoing to explore the impact of PCDH on patients' trajectory and the use of resources.

Status, demand and practice models of palliative day-care clinics and day hospices: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the structure, accessibility, service provision and needs of palliative and hospice day-care in Germany and abroad. Researchers, healthcare providers and policy makers would benefit from a systematic overview.

AIM

The aim was to identify, describe and summarise available evidence on status, demand and practice models of palliative day-care clinics and day hospices. A secondary aim was to disclose research gaps and present recommendations for clinical practice and future research.

DESIGN

The scoping review followed the methodological framework of Arksey and O'Malley. The analysed publications included studies of varying kinds to describe the current state of the art.

DATA SOURCES

Using a highly sensitive search strategy, the authors searched PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and Google Scholar within the publication window of inception to 12 June 2020. An additional hand search of the reference lists of the identified review articles was conducted.

RESULTS

The authors screened the titles and abstracts of 2643 studies, retrieved 197 full texts and included 32 articles in the review. The review identified nine major themes: (1) the referral process, (2) models of care, (3) patient characteristics, (4) demand, (5) the discharge process, (6) perceptions of services, (7) funding and costs, (8) outcome measurement and (9) education.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for further research to identify groups of patients who would receive the most benefit from palliative and hospice day-care and to determine any necessary revisions in admission criteria.