How does ethnicity affect presence of advance care planning in care records for individuals with advanced disease? A mixed-methods systematic review

Co-production in practice: A qualitative study of the development of advance care planning workshops for South Asian elders

BACKGROUND

Advance care planning can improve patient and family outcomes; however, minoritised ethnic communities experience access barriers. Co-production offers a way to design culturally appropriate information and support, but evidence is needed to understand its implementation in palliative care.

AIM

To explore and describe how two charities used co-production to develop and deliver community-based advance care planning workshops for South Asian elders.

DESIGN

Workshops were co-produced by two charities. In parallel, a multi-component qualitative study was conducted comprising workshop observations, semi-structured interviews with charity staff and focus groups with workshop participants, facilitated by community co-researchers in English, Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Four workshops were held in a London (UK) community setting (each with 5-30 participants); four interviews were conducted with charity staff members, and three focus groups with 16 workshop participants.

RESULTS

We describe three main themes: Co-production in action: organic origins and trusted foundations; Co-production processes embedded in equal partnership; and Impact of the workshops. Fundamental to co-production processes was the community-led approach of the local charity, the trust of the local South Asian community and the relationship between the charities, including transparent communication and mutual respect. The workshops were reported to be useful and enjoyable, engendering a sense of agency and connection and helped disseminate awareness and knowledge through the community, benefitting the wider system.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-production can help widen access to advance care planning. Findings offer an in-depth example of co-production-in-action to inform intervention development and research.

Autism interventions designed or adapted for the Black/African American population: A systematic review

LAY ABSTRACT

Black/African American people in the United States who have a diagnosis of autism often experience service-related disparities, including not having the same access to high-quality autism and related care (e.g. behavioral interventions), and are less likely to have sustained treatment engagement across their lifespan. While interventions to support autistic people are typically designed to be universal, there is concern that these interventions not being tailored to the Black/African American population could reduce the overall impact due to a lack of responsiveness to the needs of the Black children or families who receive the intervention. The current systematic review summarized research on interventions developed for the Black autism community, including Black children with autism and their caregivers. After a comprehensive, systematic search, eight peer-reviewed publications were identified that met the study's inclusion criteria. The majority of the interventions were tailored to Black caregivers of children with autism. Autism researchers demonstrate different strategies for engaging Black caregivers in culturally responsive ways; however, more research into these interventions is needed in order to assess their effectiveness. In addition, there are still limited interventions adapted to be culturally responsive to Black/African American autistic people. The Cultural Adaptation Checklist framework is a novel approach with promise to become the standard for adapting interventions to meet the needs of culturally diverse groups. Cultural responsiveness is an important facet in the development of interventions that produce optimal outcomes for the range of diversity in the United States and is an important step to achieving equitable autism research practices.

Missed Opportunities for use of Advanced Care Planning and Palliative Care in Open Aortic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Major vascular surgery, including open aortic procedures, is associated with having a 30-day mortality rate greater than 6% and a perioperative complication rate greater than 50%. Published literature suggests that patients undergoing high-risk procedures benefit from having a care plan in place to not only maximize quality of life but also to ensure medical interventions align with care goals. Currently, there is a paucity of published data on the prevalence of goals of care conversations, advance care planning documentation, and palliative care (PC) evaluations in patients undergoing high-risk vascular operations.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent open aortic surgery at a tertiary care academic medical center from July 2014 to March 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, type and timing of advanced care planning (ACP), PC evaluations, and clinical outcomes during the periprocedural period were recorded. For patients who died during the study period, the use of PC prior to death was noted. Patients who received ACP or PC were compared with those who did not.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 192 patients who underwent major open aortic surgery. The mean age was 63 years (standard deviation [SD] 12.3) and the majority of patients were male (73.4%) and white (64.1%). Thirty-nine (20.6%) operations were classified as emergent. At the time of their operation, 16.7% (n = 32) of patients had an ACP document on file. Of the 38 documents on file, most were durable power of attorney (DPOA) (86.8%) documents while a smaller percentage were physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) (13.2%). There were no patients with do not resuscitate and/or intubate (DNR/DNI), living will, or organ/tissue donation orders noted in their chart prior to surgery. One percent (n = 2) of patients had a palliative evaluation prior to their operation. During the perioperative period, an additional 2 (1%) of patients had ACP documentation and 7 (3.7%) of patients underwent PC evaluation. Fifteen percent of patients (n = 28) died during the perioperative period and an additional 21 patients died by the end of the study period for a total mortality of 25.2% in the study population. Among patients that died during the perioperative period, 28.6% (n = 8 out of 28) received PC. Overall, 28.6% of all study patients that died (n = 14 out of 49) received a PC evaluation prior to or during their terminal hospitalization. Patients who had ACP documents or who received PC consultations prior to surgery were older (P = 0.01), more likely to be on Medicare or Medicaid (P = 0.004), and more likely to have a history of solid organ malignancy (P = 0.03). The median interval between surgery and receiving PC was 20 (interquartile range [IQR] 3-71) days. The median interval between PC and death was 5 (IQR 2-13) days. Patients who utilized ACP or PC were more likely to die at home (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high mortality and morbidity rate, ACP documentation is poor for patients undergoing major open aortic surgery. PC interventions tend to be performed closer to the end of life, suggesting a missed opportunity to define goals of care.

Acceptability and usability of the Planning Advance Care Together (PACT) website for improving patients' engagement in advance care planning

Objectives

Most prior advance care planning (ACP) interventions lack integration of the social context of patients' ACP process, which patients indicate is critically important. The current study developed the Planning Advance Care Together (PACT) website to foster inclusion of loved ones in the ACP process.

Methods

To provide feedback about the PACT website, patients with advanced cancer (N = 11), their caregivers (N = 11), and experts (N = 10) participated in semi-structured interviews. Patients and caregivers also completed standardized ratings of acceptability and usability.

Results

Overall, patient (n = 11) and caregiver (n = 11) ratings of acceptability and usability of the website exceeded benchmark cut-offs (≥24 on the Acceptability E-Scale and ≥ 68 on the System Usability Scale). Patients, caregivers, and experts liked the topic of ACP but felt that it could be emotionally challenging. They recommended focusing more on planning and less on end of life. They appreciated being able to include loved ones and recommended adding resources for caregivers.

Conclusions

Study findings support the preliminary usability and acceptability of the PACT website. Findings will be used to inform a modified prototype of the PACT website that is interactive and ready for field testing with patients with advanced cancer and their loved ones.

Innovation

We utilized a novel application of the shared mind framework to support patients with advanced cancer in engaging their loved ones in the ACP process.

Racial disparities in the frequency and timing of code status orders among women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Black/African American women with breast cancer have a disproportionately higher risk of mortality compared to other race groups, although their overall incidence of disease is lower. Despite this, advance care planning (ACP) and consequent code status documentation remain low in this vulnerable patient population. Code status orders (i.e., Full code, Do Not Attempt Resuscitation [DNAR], Do Not Intubate [DNI]) allow consideration of patient preferences regarding the use of aggressive treatments, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intubation. The aim of this study is to characterize presence of code status orders and determine whether race affects code status documentation after the first encounter for breast cancer.

METHODS

Data were derived from 7524 women with breast cancer from the University of Chicago Medical Center (UCMC) between 2016 and 2021. Cox regression was used to estimate the effects of race and adjusted for age, ethnicity, inpatient stays, metastatic breast cancer, marital status, and body mass index.

RESULTS

The sample included 60.5% White, 3.6% Asian/Mideast Indian, 28.9% Black/African American, and 7.0% other or unknown race. Results indicate that code status orders after the first breast cancer encounter were uncommon (7.2%). Black/African American race (HR = 2.74; 95% CI: 1.75, 4.28) emerged as a significant factor associated with any code status orders compared to other race groups even when adjusting for covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

Code status documentation in this sample of women with breast cancer was low overall, yet rates were higher among Black/African American patients compared to other race groups. In fact, race remains a significant predictor of code status documentation even when accounting for indirect measures of cancer severity. This could be denoting the racial disparities (e.g., higher cancer malignancy such as triple negative breast cancer) in breast cancer mortality risk. Future research is needed to identify factors unique to Black/African American women that would increase code status documentation so that goal concordant care can be prioritized among patients with breast cancer.

Advance Directives Change Frequently in Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVES

To describe the rate, timing, and pattern of changes in advance directives (ADs) of do not resuscitate (DNR) and do not hospitalize (DNH) orders among new admissions to nursing homes (NHs).

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Admissions to all publicly funded NHs in Ontario, Canada, between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2017.

METHODS

Residents were followed until discharged from incident NH stay, death, or were still present at the end of study (December 31, 2019). They were categorized into 3 mutually exclusive baseline composite AD groups: Full Code, DNR Only, and DNR+DNH. We used Poisson regression models to estimate the incidence rate ratios of AD change between different AD groups and different decision makers for personal care, adjusted for baseline clinical and sociodemographic variables.

RESULTS

A total of 102,541 NH residents were eligible for inclusion. Residents with at least 1 AD change accounted for 46% of Full Code, 30% of DNR Only, and 25% of DNR+DNH group. Median time to first AD change ranged between 26 and 55 weeks. For Full Code and DNR Only residents, the most frequent change was to an AD 1 level lower in aggressiveness or intervention, whereas for DNR+DNH residents the most frequent change was to DNR Only. About 16% of residents had 2 or more AD changes during their stay. After controlling for covariates, residents with a DNR-only order or DNR+DNH orders at admission and those with a surrogate decision maker were associated with lower AD change rates.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Measuring AD adherence rates that are documented only at a particular time often underestimates the dynamics of AD changes during a resident's stay and results in an inaccurate measure of the effectiveness of AD on resident care. There should be more frequent reviews of ADs as they are quite dynamic. Mandatory review after an acute change in a resident's health would ensure that ADs are current.

Characterising trends in the initiation, timing, and completion of recommended summary plan for emergency care and treatment (ReSPECT) plans: Retrospective analysis of routine data from a large UK hospital trust

AIM

To assess patient socio-demographic and disease characteristics associated with the initiation, timing, and completion of emergency care and treatment planning in a large UK-based hospital trust.

METHODS

Secondary retrospective analysis of data across 32 months extracted from digitally stored Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) plans within the electronic health record system of an acute hospital trust in England, UK.

RESULTS

Data analysed from ReSPECT plans (n = 23,729), indicate an increase in the proportion of admissions having a plan created from 4.2% in January 2019 to 6.9% in August 2021 (mean = 8.1%). Forms were completed a median of 41 days before death (a median of 58 days for patients with capacity, and 21 days for patients without capacity). Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation was more likely to be recorded for patients lacking capacity, with increasing age (notably for patients aged over 74 years), being female and the presence of multiple disease groups. 'Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation' was less likely to be recorded for patients having ethnicity recorded as Asian or Asian British and Black or Black British compared to White. Having a preferred place of death recorded as 'hospital' led to a five-fold increase in the likelihood of dying in hospital.

CONCLUSION

Variation in the initiation, timing, and completion of ReSPECT plans was identified by applying an evaluation framework. Digital storage of ReSPECT plan data presents opportunities for assessing trends and completion of the ReSPECT planning process and benchmarking across sites. Further research is required to monitor and understand any inequity in the implementation of the ReSPECT process in routine care.

Past Disparities in Advance Care Planning Across Sociodemographic Characteristics and Cognition Levels in the United States

We aimed to examine past advance care planning (ACP) in U.S. older adults across different sociodemographic characteristics and cognition levels. We established the baseline trends from 10 years ago to assess if trends in 2024 have improved upon future data availability. We considered two legal documents in the Health and Retirement Study 2014 survey as measures for ACP: a living will and durable power of attorney for healthcare (DPOAH). Logistic regression models were fitted with outcome variables (living will, DPOAH, and both) stratified by cognition levels (dementia/impaired cognition versus normal cognition). Predictor variables included age, gender, ethnicity, race, education, marital status, rurality, everyday discrimination, social support, and loneliness. Age, ethnicity, race, education, and rurality were significant predictors of ACP (having a living will, DPOAH, and both the living will and DPOAH) across cognition levels. Participants who were younger, Hispanic, Black, had lower levels of education, or resided in rural areas were less likely to complete ACP. Examining ACP and its linkages to specific social determinants is essential to understanding disparities and educational strategies needed to facilitate ACP uptake among different population groups. Accordingly, this study aimed to examine past ACP disparities in relation to specific social determinants of health and different cognition levels. Future studies are required to evaluate whether existing disparities have improved over the last 10 years when 2024 data is released. Addressing ACP disparities among diverse populations, including racial and ethnic minorities with reduced cognition levels, is crucial for enhancing health equity and access to care.

Advance care planning as perceived by marginalized populations: Willing to engage and facing obstacles

BACKGROUND

Health disparities exist in end-of-life (EOL) care. Individuals and communities that are marginalized due to their race, ethnicity, income, geographic location, language, or cultural background experience systemic barriers to access and receive lower quality EOL care. Advance care planning (ACP) prepares patients and their caregivers for EOL decision-making for the purpose of promoting high-quality EOL care. Low engagement in ACP among marginalized populations is thought to have contributed to disparity in EOL care. To advance health equity and deliver care that aligns with the goals and values of each individual, there is a need to improve ACP for marginalized populations.

AIM

To describe how patients from marginalized populations experience and perceive ACP.

METHODS

We used an interpretive phenomenological approach with semi-structured qualitative interviews. Participants were recruited from four primary care clinics and one nursing home in a US Pacific Northwest city. Thirty patients from marginalized populations with serious illness participated in individual interviews between January and December 2021. Participants were asked to describe their experiences and perceptions about ACP during the interviews.

RESULTS

The mean age of 30 participants was 69.5; 19 (63%) were women; 12 (40%) identified as Asian/Pacific Islanders, 10 (33%) as Black; and 9 (30%) were non-native English speakers. Our three key findings were: 1) patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP; 2) there were multiple obstacles to engaging in ACP; and 3) meaningful ACP conversations could happen when clinicians listen. Although participants from marginalized populations were willing to engage in ACP, a fragmented and restrictive healthcare system and clinicians' biased behaviors or lack of interest in knowing their patients were obstacles. Participants who felt their clinicians took time and listened were encouraged to engage in ACP.

CONCLUSION

Patients from marginalized populations are willing to engage in ACP conversations despite a common belief otherwise. However, obstacles to meaningful ACP conversations with healthcare providers exist. Clinicians need to be aware of these obstacles and listen to build trust and engage marginalized patients in mutually meaningful ACP conversations.

The Impact of Advance Care Planning on Healthcare Professionals' Well-being: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Advance care planning (ACP) improves care for patients with chronic illnesses and reduces family stress. However, the impact of ACP interventions on healthcare professionals' well-being remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature evaluating the impact of ACP interventions on healthcare professionals' well-being.

METHODS

We followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for systematic reviews and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022346354). We included primary studies in all languages that assessed the well-being of healthcare professionals in ACP interventions. We excluded any studies on ACP in psychiatric care and in palliative care that did not address goals of care. Searches were conducted on April 4, 2022, and March 6, 2023 in Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PubMed. We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for quality analysis. We present results as a narrative synthesis because of their heterogeneity.

RESULTS

We included 21 articles published in English between 1997 and 2021 with 17 published after 2019. All were conducted in high-income countries, and they involved a total of 1278 participants. Three reported an interprofessional intervention and two included patient partners. Studies had significant methodological flaws but most reported that ACP had a possible positive impact on healthcare professionals' well-being.

CONCLUSION

This review is the first to explore the impact of ACP interventions on healthcare professionals' well-being. ACP interventions appear to have a positive impact, but high-quality studies are scarce. Further research is needed, particularly using more rigorous and systematic methods to implement interventions and report results.

Across race, ethnicity, and language: An intervention to improve advance care planning documentation unmasks health disparities

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic minority groups are less likely to have advance directives and living wills, despite the importance of advanced care planning (ACP) in end-of-life care. We aimed to understand the impact of an intervention to improve ACP documentation across race, ethnicity, and language on hospitalized patients at our institution.

METHODS

We launched an intervention to improve the rates of ACP documentation for hospitalized patients aged >75 or with advanced illness defined by the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision codes. We analyzed ACP completion rates, preintervention, and intervention, and used interrupted time-series analyses to measure the differential impact of the intervention across race, ethnicity, and language.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 10,220 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall rates of ACP documentation improved from 13.9% to 43.7% in the intervention period, with a 2.47% monthly increase in ACP documentation compared to baseline (p < .001). During the intervention period, the rate of ACP documentation increased by 2.72% per month for non-Hispanic White patients (p < .001), by 1.84% per month for Latinx patients (p < .001), and by 1.9% per month for Black patients (p < .001). Differences in the intervention trends between non-Hispanic White and Latinx patients (p = .04) and Black patients (p = .04) were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

An intervention designed to improve ACP documentation in hospitalized patients widened a disparity across race and ethnicity with Latinx and Black patients having lower rates of improvement. Our findings reinforce the need to measure the impact of quality improvement interventions on existing health disparities and to implement specific strategies to prevent worsening disparities.

Barriers, blocks, and barricades: Disparities to access of palliative care in cancer care

Palliative care (PC) is specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness. PC models have stressed pain and symptom management, communication that is patient- and family-centric and longitudinal support for families living with serious illness that is contiguous across multiple settings. Despite the benefits that PC provides from a patient, family and quality of care standpoint, several barriers and disparities exist. Included in these barriers are the lack of geographic access to PC programs as well as the focus on inpatient, hospital-based PC programs versus outpatient and home-based models. Workforce shortages, challenges with defining and designing PC, and racial, cultural and language barriers have all contributed to disparities within PC. This review article outlines PC disparities including geographic access challenges, cross-cultural barriers and symptom and communication specific disparities. We discuss the impact these inequities have on patients living with cancer.

Palliative Care Clinician Perspectives on Person-Centered End-of-Life Communication for Racially and Culturally Minoritized Persons with Cancer

The aim of this study was to examine interdisciplinary clinicians' perceptions of priorities in serious illness communication and shared decision-making with racially and culturally minoritized persons at end of life. Clinicians (N = 152) read a detailed case study about a patient self-identifying as Black and American Indian who describes mistrust of the healthcare system. Participants then responded to three open-ended questions about communication strategies and approaches they would employ in providing care. We conducted a thematic analysis of participants' responses to questions using an iterative, inductive approach. Interdisciplinary clinicians from nursing (48%), social work (36%), and chaplaincy (16%), responded to the study survey. A total of four themes emerged: (1) person-centered, authentic, and culturally-sensitive care; (2) pain control; (3) approaches to build trust and connection; and (4) understanding communication challenges related to racial differences. Significant efforts have been made to train clinicians in culturally inclusive communication, yet we know little about how clinicians approach "real world" scenarios during which patients from structurally minoritized groups describe care concerns. We outline implications for identifying unconscious bias, informing educational interventions to support culturally inclusive communication, and improving the quality of end-of-life care for patients with cancer from minoritized groups.