How do navigation programs address the needs of those living in the community with advanced, life-limiting Illness? A realist evaluation of programs in Canada

Implementation and evaluation of a navigation program for people with cancer in old age and their family caregivers: study protocol for the EU NAVIGATE International Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Cancer navigation programs aim to support, educate, and empower patients and families, addressing barriers to diagnostics, treatment, and care. Navigators engage with people to ensure timely access to services and resources. While promising for older people with cancer, these programs are scarce in Europe, and research on their effectiveness and implementation is limited. We describe the protocol of the EU NAVIGATE randomized controlled trial, aimed to evaluate (1) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of NavCare-EU, an intervention that aims to support older people with cancer throughout their illness trajectory, spanning the continuum of supportive, palliative, and end-of-life care, and (2) the intervention's implementation processes and feasibility of its integration into different health care systems in Europe, contextual barriers and facilitators for effective and sustainable implementation, and mechanisms involved in reaching the outcomes.

METHODS

We will conduct a multisite pragmatic fast-track randomized controlled trial with embedded convergent mixed-method process evaluation in Belgium, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, and Portugal. The study targets people with cancer and declining health, 70 years or older, and their close family caregivers. The trial compares the NavCare-EU intervention plus standard care with standard care alone. We will perform a baseline measurement prior to randomization and follow-up measurements at 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks in intervention and control group, and an additional measurement at 72 weeks in the control group. Primary outcomes, measured at 24 weeks are (1) the older person's global health status/quality of life, a 2-item subscale from EORTC-QLQ-C30 (revised) measuring health-related quality of life, (2) level of social support measured with Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS scale). The study will include at least 246 older persons with completed global health status/quality of life at 24 weeks.

DISCUSSION

The EU NAVIGATE trial will cross-nationally test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a navigation intervention for older people with cancer and their family caregivers, and its implementation in different health care systems in Europe. As continuity and access to health, social, and community care is a priority for patients and caregivers, the trial is timely and critically needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: identifier NCT06110312 (2023/10/31).

Exploring the feasibility of Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Introduction

Primary care settings present an opportunity for alcohol and substance use disorder (A/SUD) screening and treatment referral. However, there are recognized deficiencies in widely used treatment referral approaches, including acute care connections, vs. those that can support longer-term recovery. Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care (RMC-PC) is an intervention with an evidence base for improving treatment referral and subsequent recovery for primary care patients; however, the intervention has never been fully implemented outside of a research context. We conducted a feasibility study to inform a future hybrid study of RMC-PC that will test the implementation and effectiveness of the intervention in primary care practice.

Method

We used a convergent mixed method design. The study's setting was a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) located in a large midwestern city. RMC-PC linkage services were administered by one of two treatment linkage managers: an FQHC linkage manager (F-LM) and a research staff linkage manager (R-LM). Quantitative data included (a) rates of positive A/SUD screening among a group of FQHC patients and (b) linkage manager service data (e.g., rate of successful meeting completion and days to completing of key events). Qualitative data included (c) an assessment of linkage manager's motivational interviewing performance and (d) a focus group with FQHC staff focused on their perspectives on RMC-PC implementation determinants. Quantitative data were summarized using descriptive statistics, and linkage manager performance was compared. Qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive process.

Results

Fifty percent of patients screened met moderate-high A/SUD risk. Eleven of 16 recruited patients completed at least one linkage manager meeting, with 63% completing both meetings. The F-LM delivered RMC-PC services alongside other duties successfully; however, three primary barriers to FQHC implementation were identified (difficulties applying motivational interviewing, incompatibilities of screening with FQHC technology and workflow, and lack of billing mechanism to support services).

Conclusion

RMC-PC is feasible for FQHC staff to deliver, though issues identified must be considered to ensure successful and sustainable implementation. Knowledge gained will inform a packaged implementation strategy that will be used in a future hybrid trial.

Navigation programs to support community-dwelling individuals with life-limiting illness: determinants of implementation

BACKGROUND

As the Canadian population ages and the prevalence of chronic illnesses increases, delivering high-quality care to individuals with advanced life limiting illnesses becomes more challenging. Community-based navigation programs are a promising approach to address these challenges, but little is known about how these programs are successfully implemented to meet the needs of this population. This study sought to identify the key determinants that contribute to the successful implementation of these programs within Canada.

METHODS

A qualitative study was undertaken to understand the implementation of eleven innovative, community-based navigation programs that aim to address the needs of individuals with life-limiting illnesses as they approach the end of life. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided the study design. Key informants (n = 23) within these programs took part in semi-structured interviews where they were asked to discuss how these programs are implemented. Data were analyzed using techniques employed in qualitative description.

RESULTS

We identified key determinants of successful implementation within each CFIR domain. In the outer setting domain, participants emphasized the importance of filling gaps in care to meet client needs, developing strong relationships with clients and community-based organizations, and navigating relationships with healthcare providers. At the inner setting level, leadership support, staff compatibility, and available resources were identified as important factors. In terms of intervention characteristics, the ability to adapt was cited as a facilitator, whereas costs were identified as a barrier. For the characteristics of individuals, participants described the importance of having staff whose values align with the program, and who have the experience and skills necessary to work with complex clients. Finally, having strong champions and evaluation processes were highlighted as important process-oriented determinants of successful implementation.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights into the determinants of successful implementation of community-based navigation programs in Canada. Understanding these determinants can guide the future development and integration of navigation programs to successfully meet the needs of those with life-limiting illnesses.