1
|
Tang BWJ, Ibrahim BB, Shorey S. Complex journeys of adolescents after induced abortion: A qualitative systematic review. J Pediatr Nurs 2024; 77:e67-e80. [PMID: 38553284 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.03.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
PROBLEM Adolescents face unique challenges in accessing sexual healthcare, particularly regarding induced abortion experiences. Prior research, often quantitative or biased towards young adults, overlooks this. This review aims to address adolescents' specific post-abortion experiences to inform comprehensive reproductive healthcare needs. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Qualitative and mixed-methods studies exploring the experiences of adolescents following induced abortion were included. Studies reporting these experiences from third-person perspectives were excluded. SAMPLE Five electronic databases (CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Embase) were searched from the databases' inception through March 2024. Of the 2834 articles retrieved, 45 studies were included in this review. RESULTS Using a meta-synthesis approach combining Sandelowski & Barroso's qualitative metasummary with Braun & Clarke's thematic analysis, three main themes emerged: Post-abortion experiences and emotions, Social dynamics and support, and Life post-abortion and future perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents who underwent abortion faced physical and emotional challenges, adopted various coping strategies, and had mixed experiences with social support and healthcare providers. To address these challenges, the provision of comprehensive reproductive health information, access to safe and legal abortion options, and support for their physical, social, and emotional well-being is necessary. Healthcare providers must ensure that adolescents are equipped with necessary skills to navigate their reproductive health journeys with informed choices and confidence. IMPLICATIONS Future research exploring adolescents' experiences, considering cultural beliefs, involving multiple stakeholders, and conducting longitudinal studies, is warranted. Healthcare providers should implement practice changes, including providing accurate information, offering tailored mental health support, and undergoing adolescent-friendly training, to enhance care for adolescents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoray Wen Jia Tang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Shefaly Shorey
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrison L, Puri M, Greene Foster D, Karkia S, Diamond-Smith NG. Predictors and experiences of seeking abortion services from pharmacies in Nepal. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003144. [PMID: 38722984 PMCID: PMC11081245 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
Abortion was legalized in Nepal in 2002; however, despite evidence of safety and quality provision of medical abortion (MA) pills by pharmacies in Nepal and elsewhere, it is still not legal for pharmacists to provide medication abortion in Nepal. However, pharmacies often do provide MA, but little is known about who seeks abortions from pharmacies and their experiences and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to understand the experiences of women seeking MA from a pharmacy, abortion complications experienced, and predictors for denial of MA. Data was collected from women seeking MA from four pharmacies in two districts of Nepal in 2021-2022. Data was collected at baseline (N = 153) and 6 weeks later (N = 138). Using descriptive results and multi-variable regression models, we explore differences between women who received and did not receive MA and predictors of denial of services. Most women requesting such pills received MA (78%), with those who were denied most commonly reporting denial due to the provider saying they were too far along. There were few socio-demographic differences between groups, with the exception of education and gestational age. Women reported receiving information on how to take pills and what to do about side effects. Just under half (45%) of women who took pills reported no adverse symptoms after taking them and only 13% sought care. Most women seeking MA from pharmacists in Nepal are receiving services, information, and having few post-abortion symptoms. This study expands the previous limited research on pharmacy provision of MA in Nepal using a unique dataset that recruits women at the time of abortion seeking and follows them over time, overcoming potential biases present in other study designs. This suggests that expansion of the law to allow pharmacy distribution would increase accessibility and reflect current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Harrison
- Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mahesh Puri
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Diana Greene Foster
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sunita Karkia
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Nadia G. Diamond-Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Atreya A, Adhikari K, Nepal S, Bhusal M, Menezes RG, Shrestha DB, Shrestha D. Striving toward safe abortion services in Nepal: A review of barriers and facilitators. Health Sci Rep 2024; 7:e1877. [PMID: 38390351 PMCID: PMC10883100 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.1877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Despite the decriminalization of abortion in Nepal in 2002, unsafe abortion is still a significant contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality. Nepal has witnessed a significant drop in abortion-related severe complications and maternal deaths owing to the legalization of abortion laws, lowered financial costs, and wider accessibility of safe abortion services (SAS). However, various factors such as sociocultural beliefs, financial constraints, geographical difficulties, and stigma act as barriers to the liberal accessibility of SAS. This review aimed to determine key barriers obstructing women's access to lawful, safe abortion care and identify facilitators that have improved access to and quality of abortion services. Methods A systematic search strategy utilizing the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase was used to include studies on the accessibility and safety of abortion services in Nepal. Data were extracted from included studies through close reading. Barriers and facilitators were then categorized into various themes and analyzed. Results Of 223 studies, 112 were duplicates, 73 did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 18 did not align with the research question; thus, 20 studies were included in the review. Various barriers to SAS in Nepal were categorized as economic, geographic, societal, legal/policy, socio-cultural, health systems, and other factors. Facilitators improving access were categorized as economic/geographic/societal, legal/policy, socio-cultural, and health systems factors. The patterns and trends of barriers and facilitators were analyzed, grouping them under legal/policy, socio-cultural, geographic/accessibility, and health systems factors. Conclusion The review identifies financial constraints, unfavorable geography, lack of infrastructure, and social stigmatization as major barriers to SAS. Economics and geography, legalization, improved access, reduced cost and active involvement of auxiliary nurse-midwives and community health volunteers are key facilitators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alok Atreya
- Department of Forensic Medicine Lumbini Medical College Palpa Nepal
| | - Kishor Adhikari
- Department of Community Medicine, School of Public Health Chitwan Medical College Bharatpur Nepal
| | - Samata Nepal
- Department of Community Medicine Lumbini Medical College Palpa Nepal
| | - Milan Bhusal
- Medical Officer Gulmi Hospital Tamghas, Gulmi Nepal
| | - Ritesh G Menezes
- Department of Pathology, College of Medicine Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University Dammam Saudi Arabia
| | - Dhan B Shrestha
- Department of Internal Medicine Mount Sinai Hospital Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Deepak Shrestha
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Lumbini Medical College Palpa Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhakal S, Puri M, Gautam P, Wagle K, Luffy S, Cooper B. Impacts of Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance policy in Nepal: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:61. [PMID: 37349800 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01016-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the legalization of abortion in 2002 and the concerted efforts of the Ministry of Health and Population, abortion services remain inaccessible for many Nepali women. In 2017, the United States government enacted the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) policy, which prohibited international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) from receiving United States global health assistance from providing abortion services or referrals or engaging in advocacy on liberalizing abortion laws that may have had an impact on abortion services. Though this policy was revoked in January 2021, there is a need to assess its impacts in Nepal and mitigate its lingering effects, if any. METHODS We conducted in-depth interviews with 21 national-level stakeholders selected purposively on the basis of their experiences and expertise in sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) in Nepal. Interviews were conducted two times: first between August and November 2020 when PLGHA was in place, and then between July and August 2021 after PLGHA was revoked. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed, translated and analysed thematically. RESULTS Most participants reported that the implementation of PLGHA created gaps in SRHR services, affecting marginalized and underserved populations in Nepal. Participants reported that this policy has compromised the work of INGOs and civil society organizations (CSOs), posing additional risk to the sustainability of SRHR program achievements made so far. Beyond funding loss, participants also mentioned that PLGHA curtailed their freedom, with limited working areas and partnerships for CSOs leading to low or no utilization of services. Most participants welcomed the revocation of PLGHA and hoped it would have positive impacts on SRHR services by permanently repealing PLGHA. Most participants believed that the revocation of PLGHA opened opportunities for new funding and could re-establish partnerships and collaboration, though immediate results had not yet been seen. CONCLUSIONS PLGHA had negative impacts on access to and quality of SRHR services. The Nepal government and other donor agencies need to bridge the funding gap created by the policy. The revocation of the policy has created the hope of bringing positive impacts in SRHR sector; however, the implementation of revocation at the ground level and impacts made on SRHR programs in Nepal remains to be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarmila Dhakal
- Center for Research On Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Lalitpur, Nepal.
| | - Mahesh Puri
- Center for Research On Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Preeti Gautam
- Center for Research On Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Lalitpur, Nepal
| | - Kusum Wagle
- Center for Research On Environment Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Lalitpur, Nepal
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mitchell A, Puri MC, Dahal M, Cornell A, Upadhyay UD, Diamond-Smith NG. Impact of Sumadhur intervention on fertility and family planning decision-making norms: a mixed methods study. Reprod Health 2023; 20:80. [PMID: 37231469 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-023-01619-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mindful of social norms shaping health among women pressured to prove early fertility in Nepal, a bi-national research team developed and piloted a 4-month intervention engaging household triads (newly married women, their husbands, and mothers-in-law) toward advancing gender equity, personal agency, and reproductive health. This study evaluates the impact on family planning and fertility decision-making. METHODS In 2021, Sumadhur was piloted in six villages with 30 household triads (90 participants). Pre/post surveys of all participants were analyzed using paired sample nonparametric tests and in-depth interviews with a subset of 45 participants were transcribed and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Sumadhur significantly impacted (p < .05) norms related to pregnancy spacing and timing, and sex preference of children, as well as knowledge about family planning benefits, pregnancy prevention methods, and abortion legality. Family planning intent also increased among newly married women. Qualitative findings revealed improved family dynamics and gender equity, and shed light on remaining challenges. CONCLUSIONS Entrenched social norms surrounding fertility and family planning contrasted with participants' personal beliefs, highlighting needed community-level shifts to improve reproductive health in Nepal. Engagement of influential community- and family-members is key to improving norms and reproductive health. Additionally, promising interventions such as Sumadhur should be scaled up and reassessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Mitchell
- Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Mahesh C Puri
- Center for Research On Environment, Health and Population Activities, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Minakshi Dahal
- Center for Research On Environment, Health and Population Activities, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | | | - Ushma D Upadhyay
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nadia G Diamond-Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Global Health Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Puri MC, Raifman S, Daniel S, Karki S, Maharjan DC, Ahlbach C, Diamond-Smith N, Foster DG. Denial of legal abortion in Nepal. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282886. [PMID: 36943824 PMCID: PMC10030013 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Nepal, abortion is legal on request through 12 weeks of pregnancy and up to 28 weeks for health and other reasons. Abortion is available at public facilities at no cost and by trained private providers. Yet, over half of abortions are provided outside this legal system. We sought to investigate the extent to which patients are denied an abortion at clinics legally able to provide services and factors associated with presenting late for care, being denied, and receiving an abortion after being denied. METHODS We used data from a prospective longitudinal study with 1835 women aged 15-45. Between April 2019 and December 2020, we recruited 1,835 women seeking abortions at 22 sites across Nepal, including those seeking care at any gestational age (n = 537) and then only those seeking care at or after 10 weeks of gestation or do not know their gestational age (n = 1,298). We conducted interviewer-led surveys with these women at the time they were seeking abortion service (n = 1,835), at six weeks after abortion-seeking (n = 1523) and six-month intervals for three years. Using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression models, we examined factors associated with presenting for abortion before versus after 10 weeks gestation, with receiving versus being denied an abortion, and with continuing the pregnancy after being denied care. We also described reasons for the denial of care and how and where participants sought abortion care subsequent to being denied. Mixed-effects models was used to accounting clustering effect at the facility level. RESULTS Among those recruited when eligibility included seeking abortion at any gestational age, four in ten women sought abortion care beyond 10 weeks or did not know their gestation and just over one in ten was denied care. Of the full sample, 73% were at or beyond 10 weeks gestation, 44% were denied care, and 60% of those denied continued to seek care after denial. Nearly three-quarters of those denied care were legally eligible for abortion, based on their gestation and pre-existing conditions. Women with lower socioeconomic status, including those who were younger, less educated, and less wealthy, were more likely to present later for abortion, more likely to be turned away, and more likely to continue the pregnancy after denial of care. CONCLUSION Denial of legal abortion care in Nepal is common, particularly among those with fewer resources. The majority of those denied in the sample should have been able to obtain care according to Nepal's abortion law. Abortion denial could have significant potential implications for the health and well-being of women and their families in Nepal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahesh C Puri
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sara Daniel
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sunita Karki
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Dev Chandra Maharjan
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Chris Ahlbach
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Nadia Diamond-Smith
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Diana Greene Foster
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, Reproductive Sciences, Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sunil B. Running an obstacle-course: a qualitative study of women's experiences with abortion-seeking in Tamil Nadu, India. Sex Reprod Health Matters 2021; 29:e1966218. [PMID: 34651568 PMCID: PMC8525933 DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2021.1966218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Irrespective of the legal status of abortion, access to abortion services for women is fraught with numerous challenges across the world. A recent study in India found that most women who had an abortion sought care outside an authorised facility or from a less qualified provider. An analysis of women’s experiences in seeking abortion services would provide a better understanding of the underlying reasons. This paper is based on a qualitative study of the experiences of 16 married women from rural Tamil Nadu, India. The in-depth interviews focused on their pregnancy and childbirth experiences and access to abortion services. The study highlights the obstacle course that women seeking to terminate an unwanted pregnancy have to traverse. Many women were not aware of the legal status of abortion, and frontline workers discouraged them and gave misleading information. The pathways to seeking an abortion were more complex for women from marginalised communities. Providers were judgemental and used delaying tactics or denied abortion services. For the less privileged women, abortion services from government health facilities were conditional on the acceptance of female sterilisation. The providers’ attitudes in government and private health facilities were disrespectful of the women seeking abortion services. To uphold the reproductive and human rights of women who seek abortion services, we need accessible and publicly funded health care services that respect the dignity of all women, are empathetic and uphold women’s right to safe abortion services.
Collapse
|
8
|
Saengruang N, Cetthakrikul N, Kulthanmanusorn A, Chotchoungchatchai S, Pudpong N, Suphanchaimat R. Self-assessment of attitudes towards conditions to provide safe abortion among new medical graduates in Thailand, 2018: an application of cross-sectional survey with factor analysis. BMC WOMENS HEALTH 2021; 21:273. [PMID: 34315442 PMCID: PMC8314509 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-021-01412-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Unsafe abortion is one of the major public health problems in Thailand. Although the penal code of Thailand and the Thai Medical Council permit doctors to perform safe abortion in certain conditions, little is known about the attitudes that new medical doctors have towards abortion. The objectives of this article are to explore the attitudes towards abortion in certain conditions among new medical graduates and to identify factors related to those attitudes. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2018 among 2017 medical graduates who attended the annual workplace selection forum. The participants came from the two main tracks of admission to Thai medical schools: normal track and special track physicians, namely, the Collaborative Project to Increase Production of Rural Doctors (CPIRD). Of these 2017 graduates, 926 returned the questionnaire with complete information. Descriptive analysis, factor analysis, and multi-variable regression analysis were performed. Results We found that most physicians agreed to perform abortions in the context of life-threatening conditions for mothers and children, but not under conditions directly related to physical health (such as pregnancy with socioeconomic problems or pregnancy in adolescents). CPIRD doctors were less amenable than normal track doctors in providing abortions if the reason for the termination of pregnancy was related to socioeconomic problems. Conclusion The study suggests that a proactive campaign for new medical graduates to raise awareness and mutual understanding of abortion services should be exercised. The CPIRD curricula relating to safe abortion should enhance the capacity of medical graduates to deal with pregnant women who face not only a physical health-related problem, but also socioeconomic difficulties and well-being as a whole. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-021-01412-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nithiwat Saengruang
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.,Bo Kluea Hospital, Nan, 55220, Thailand
| | - Nisachol Cetthakrikul
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand
| | - Anond Kulthanmanusorn
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand
| | | | - Nareerut Pudpong
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand
| | - Rapeepong Suphanchaimat
- International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand. .,Division of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rossier C, Marchin A, Kim C, Ganatra B. Disclosure to social network members among abortion-seeking women in low- and middle-income countries with restrictive access: a systematic review. Reprod Health 2021; 18:114. [PMID: 34098958 PMCID: PMC8186048 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Health care for stigmatized reproductive practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often remains illegal; when legal, it is often inadequate, difficult to find and / or stigmatizing, which results in women deferring care or turning to informal information sources and providers. Women seeking an induced abortion in LMICs often face obstacles of this kind, leading to unsafe abortions. A growing number of studies have shown that abortion seekers confide in social network members when searching for formal or informal care. However, results have been inconsistent; in some LMICs with restricted access to abortion services (restrictive LMICs), disclosure appears to be limited. Main body This systematic review aims to identify the degree of disclosure to social networks members in restrictive LMICs, and to explore the differences between women obtaining an informal medical abortion and other abortion seekers. This knowledge is potentially useful for designing interventions to improve information on safe abortion or for developing network-based data collection strategies. We searched Pubmed, POPLINE, AIMS, LILACS, IMSEAR, and WPRIM databases for peer-reviewed articles, published in any language from 2000 to 2018, concerning abortion information seeking, communication, networking and access to services in LMICs with restricted access to abortion services. We categorized settings into four types by possibility of anonymous access to abortion services and local abortion stigma: (1) anonymous access possible, hyper stigma (2) anonymous access possible, high stigma (3) non-anonymous access, high stigma (4) non-anonymous access, hyper stigma. We screened 4101 references, yielding 79 articles with data from 33 countries for data extraction. We found a few countries (or groups within countries) exemplifying the first and second types of setting, while most studies corresponded to the third type. The share of abortion seekers disclosing to network members increased across setting types, with no women disclosing to network members beyond their intimate circle in Type 1 sites, a minority in Type 2 and a majority in Type 3. The informal use of medical abortion did not consistently modify disclosure to others. Conclusion Abortion-seeking women exhibit widely different levels of disclosure to their larger social network members across settings/social groups in restrictive LMICs depending on the availability of anonymous access to abortion information and services, and the level of stigma. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01165-0. Women seeking an induced abortion in LMICs often face inexistent or inadequate, difficult to find and/ or stigmatizing legal services, leading to the use of informal methods and providers, and unsafe abortions. A growing number of studies have shown that abortion seekers contact social network members beyond their intimate circle when seeking care. However, results have been inconsistent. We searched Pubmed, POPLINE, AIMS, LILACS, IMSEAR, and WPRIM databases for peer-reviewed articles published in any language from 2000 to 2018, concerning abortion information seeking, communication, networking and access to services in restrictive LMICs. We screened 4101 references, yielding 79 articles with data from 33 countries for extraction. We grouped countries (or social groups within countries) into four types of settings: (1) anonymous access possible, hyper stigma; (2) anonymous access possible, high stigma; (3) non-anonymous access, high stigma; (4) non-anonymous access, hyper stigma. Most studies fitted Type 3. Disclosing to network members increased across setting types: no women confided in network members in Type 1 settings, a minority in Type 2 and a majority in Type 3. No setting fitted Type 4. The informal use of medical abortion did not modify disclosure to others. Abortion seekers in restrictive LMICs frequently contact their social network in some settings/groups but less frequently in others, depending on the availability of anonymous access to abortion care and the level of stigma. This knowledge is useful for designing interventions to improve information on safe abortion and for developing network-based data collection strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémentine Rossier
- Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland. .,Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques, Paris, France.
| | | | - Caron Kim
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bela Ganatra
- UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Baum SE, Ramirez AM, Larrea S, Filippa S, Egwuatu I, Wydrzynska J, Piasecka M, Nmezi S, Jelinska K. "It's not a seven-headed beast": abortion experience among women that received support from helplines for medication abortion in restrictive settings. Health Care Women Int 2020; 41:1128-1146. [PMID: 33156737 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1823981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
There are a growing number of abortion helplines where counselors provide person-centered medication abortion services in legally restrictive settings. Few researchers have explored the perceptions and experiences of the people who obtain support from these helplines. Between April and August 2017, we conducted 30 interviews with women who had a medication abortion with support from helpline counselors in Poland, Brazil, or Nigeria. Before seeking care with the helpline, women often heard negative stories about abortion and faced enacted stigma from the formal healthcare sector, or chose not to seek services from their doctors due to fear of stigmatizing treatment. Conversely, during their care with the helpline counselors, women received clear information in a timely manner, and were treated with kindness, compassion, respect, and without judgment. Many women gained knowledge and understanding of medication abortion, and some gained a sense of community among those who experienced abortion. Helpline models can provide high-quality, person-centered abortion care to people seeking abortions in legally restrictive contexts. Evidence from these service-delivery models could help improve service within the formal healthcare systems and expand access to high-quality, safe abortion by redefining what it means to provide care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Baum
- Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, California, USA
| | | | - Sara Larrea
- Women Help Women, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ijeoma Egwuatu
- Generation Initiative for Youth and Women Network, Lagos, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Sybil Nmezi
- Generation Initiative for Youth and Women Network, Lagos, Nigeria
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khatri RB, Poudel S, Ghimire PR. Factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal: Pooled analysis of the 2011 and 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223385. [PMID: 31596879 PMCID: PMC6785064 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 09/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unsafe abortion contributes to maternal morbidities, mortalities as well as social and financial costs to women, families, and the health system. This study aimed to examine the factors associated with unsafe abortion practices in Nepal. METHODS Data were derived from the 2011 and 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Surveys (NDHS). A total of 911 women aged 15-49 years who aborted five years prior to surveys were included in the analysis. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine factors associated with unsafe abortion. RESULTS Unsafe abortion rate was seven per 1000 women aged 15-49 years. This research found that women living in the Mountains (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.36; 95% CI 1.21, 4.60), or those who were urban residents (aOR 2.11; 95% CI 1.37, 3.24) were more likely to have unsafe abortion. The odds of unsafe abortion were higher amongst women of poor households (aOR 2.16; 95% CI 1.18, 3.94); Dalit women (aOR 1.89; 95% CI 1.02, 3.52), husband with no education background (aOR 2.12; 95%CI 1.06, 4.22), or women who reported agriculture occupation (aOR 1.82; 95% CI 1.16, 2.86) compared to their reference's group. Regardless of knowledge on legal conditions of abortion, the probability of having unsafe abortion was significantly higher (aOR 5.13; 95% CI 2.64, 9.98) amongst women who did not know the location of safe abortion sites. Finally, women who wanted to delay or space childbirth (aOR 2.71; 95% CI 1.39, 5.28) or those who reported unwanted birth (aOR = 2.33; 95% CI 1.19, 4.56) were at higher risk of unsafe abortion. CONCLUSION Going forward, increasing the availability of safe abortion facilities and strengthening family planning services can help reduce unsafe abortion in Nepal. These programmatic efforts should be targeted to women of poor households, disadvantaged ethnicities, and those who reside in mountainous region.
Collapse
|
12
|
Mehata S, Menzel J, Bhattarai N, Sharma SK, Shah M, Pearson E, Andersen K. Factors associated with induced abortion in Nepal: data from a nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey. Reprod Health 2019; 16:68. [PMID: 31138253 PMCID: PMC6540427 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0732-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the legalization of abortion services in 2002, unsafe abortion (abortion services conducted by persons lacking necessary skill or in substandard settings or both) continues to be a public health concern in Nepal. There is a lack of national research exploring the characteristics of women who choose to have an abortion. This study assessed abortion in Nepal and its correlates using data from a nationally representative population-based cross-sectional survey. Methods We employed data from the Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Sample selection was based on stratified two-stage cluster sampling in rural areas and three-stage sampling in urban areas. The primary outcome is report of induced abortion in the 5 years preceding the survey, as recorded in the pregnancy history. All values were weighted by sample weights to provide population-level estimates. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed using STATA 14 considering cluster sampling design. Results A total of 12,862 women of reproductive age (15–49 years) were interviewed. Overall, 4% (95% CI: 3.41–4.29) reported an abortion within the last 5 years (and less than 1% had had more than one abortion during that time). A higher proportion of women aged 20–34 years (5.7%), women with primary education (5.1%), women aware of abortion legalization (5.5%), and women in the richest wealth quintile (5.4%) had an abortion in the past 5 years. Compared to women aged < 20 years, women aged 20–34 years had higher odds (AOR: 5.54; 95% CI: 2.87–10.72) of having had an abortion in the past 5 years. Women with three or more living children had greater odds (AOR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.51–3.31) of having had an abortion than women with no living children. The odds of having an abortion in the past 5 years increased with each wealth quintile, with the richest wealth quintile having almost three-fold greater odds of having had an abortion. No significant association was observed between having an abortion and the ecological zone and place of residence. Conclusion This nationally representative study shows that abortion is associated with women’s age, knowledge of abortion legality, wealth status, number of living children, and caste/ethnicity. Targeted interventions to young women, those in the poorest wealth quintile, women from Terai caste groups, and those who reside in Province 2 would be instrumental to address disproportional access to abortion services. Overall, strengthening contraceptive provision and abortion education programs would be cornerstone to improving the health of women and girls in Nepal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suresh Mehata
- Ipas Nepal, Baluwatar, Nepal, Do Cha Marg, Ward No.: 04, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | - Jamie Menzel
- Ipas, United States, P.O. Box 9990, Chapel Hill, NC, 27515, USA
| | - Navaraj Bhattarai
- Ipas Nepal, Baluwatar, Nepal, Do Cha Marg, Ward No.: 04, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | | | - Mukta Shah
- Ipas Nepal, Baluwatar, Nepal, Do Cha Marg, Ward No.: 04, Kathmandu, 44600, Nepal
| | - Erin Pearson
- Ipas, United States, P.O. Box 9990, Chapel Hill, NC, 27515, USA
| | - Kathryn Andersen
- Ipas, United States, P.O. Box 9990, Chapel Hill, NC, 27515, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Puri MC, Raifman S, Khanal B, Maharjan DC, Foster DG. Providers' perspectives on denial of abortion care in Nepal: a cross sectional study. Reprod Health 2018; 15:170. [PMID: 30305079 PMCID: PMC6180519 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0619-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite legalization of abortion in Nepal in 2002, many women are still unable to access legal services. This paper examines providers’ views, experiences with abortion denial, and knowledge related to abortion provision, and identifies areas for improvement in quality of care. Methods We conducted a structured survey with 106 abortion care providers at 55 government-approved safe abortion facilities across five districts of Nepal in 2017. We assessed reasons for denial of abortion care, knowledge about laws, barriers to provision and attitudes towards abortion. Results Almost all providers (96%) reported that they have ever refused clients for abortion services. Common reasons included beyond 12 weeks gestation (93%), sex selective abortion (86%), and medical contraindications (85%). One in four providers denied abortion for lack of drugs or trained personnel, and one third denied services when they perceived that the woman’s reasons for abortion were insufficient. Only a third of providers knew all three legal indications for abortion -- less than or equal to 12 weeks of pregnancy on request, up to 18 weeks for rape or incest, and any time for maternal or fetal health risk. Overall, providers were in favor of legal abortion but a substantial proportion had mixed or negative attitudes about the service. Conclusions Improvements in training to address providers’ inadequate knowledge about the abortion law may reduce inappropriate denial of abortion. Establishing referral networks in the case of abortion denial and ensuring regular supply of medical abortion drugs would help more women access abortion care in Nepal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahesh C Puri
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal.
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Biddhya Khanal
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Dev Chandra Maharjan
- Center for Research on Environment, Health and Population Activities (CREHPA), Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Diana Greene Foster
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bell SO, Zimmerman L, Choi Y, Hindin MJ. Legal but limited? Abortion service availability and readiness assessment in Nepal. Health Policy Plan 2018; 33:99-106. [PMID: 29136148 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czx149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The government of Nepal revised its law in 2002 to allow women to terminate a pregnancy up to 12 weeks gestation for any indication on request, and up to 18 weeks if certain conditions are met. We evaluated the readiness of facilities in Nepal to provide three abortion services, manual vacuum aspiration (MVA), medication abortion (MA) and post-abortion care (PAC), using the service availability and readiness assessment (SARA) framework. The framework consists broadly of three domains; service availability, general service readiness and service readiness specific to individual services (i.e. service-specific readiness). We applied the framework to data from the Nepal Health Facility Survey 2015, a nationally representative survey of 992 health facilities. Overall, we find that access to safe abortion remains limited in Nepal. Of the facilities that reported offering delivery services and were thus eligible to provide safe abortion services, 44.5, 36.0 and 25.6% had provided any MVA, MA or PAC services, respectively, in the 3 months prior to the survey, and <2% were 'ready' to provide any abortion service based on our application of the SARA criteria for service-specific readiness. Among only the facilities that reported providing an abortion service in the 3 months prior to the survey, 3.2% of facilities that provided MVA, 1.5% of facilities that provided MA and 1.1% of the facilities that provided PAC had all the components of care required. Although the private sector conducted approximately half of all abortion services provided in the 3 months prior to the survey, no private sector facilities had all the abortion service-specific readiness components. Results suggest that accessing safe abortion services remains a significant challenge for Nepalese women, despite a set of permissive laws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne O Bell
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Ste W4041, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Linnea Zimmerman
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Ste W4041, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Yoonjoung Choi
- Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Ste W4041, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saavedra-Avendano B, Schiavon R, Sanhueza P, Rios-Polanco R, Garcia-Martinez L, Darney BG. Who presents past the gestational age limit for first trimester abortion in the public sector in Mexico City? PLoS One 2018; 13:e0192547. [PMID: 29414987 PMCID: PMC5802931 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 01/25/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify socio-demographic factors associated with presenting for abortion services past the gestational age (GA) limit (12 weeks), and thus not receiving services, in Mexico City's public sector first trimester abortion program. METHODS We used clinical data from four high volume sites in the Interrupción Legal de Embarazo (ILE) program, 2007-2015. We used descriptive statistics to quantify the proportion of women who did not receive an abortion due to presenting past the gestational age limit. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify associations between women's characteristics and presenting past the GA limit and calculated predicted probabilities of late presentation for key characteristics. RESULTS Our sample included 52,391 women, 8.10% (n = 4,246) of whom did not receive abortion services due to presenting past the GA limit. Adolescents (12-17) made up 8.69% of the total sample and 13.40% of those presenting past the GA limit (p< 0.05). In multivariable analyses, all age groups of adult women had significantly lower odds than adolescents of presenting past the limit (aOR = 0.77, aOR = 0.63, aOR = 0.58 and aOR = 0.37 for 19-24, 25-29, 30-39, and > = 40 years' old respectively). Women living in Mexico City and with higher levels of education had lower odds of presenting past the GA limit, and there was an educational gradient across all age groups. In the multivariable predicted probability models, adolescents at every level of education have significantly higher probabilities of not receiving an abortion due to presenting past the gestational age limit compared with adults (among women with a primary education: 11.75% adolescents vs. 9.02-4.26% across adult age groups). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that continued efforts are needed to educate women, especially younger and less educated women, about early pregnancy recognition. In addition, all women need information about the availability of first trimester legal abortion to ensure timely access to abortion services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raffaela Schiavon
- International Pregnancy Advisory Services (Ipas-Mexico), Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | | | | | - Blair G. Darney
- National Institute of Public Health (INSP), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Puri M, Singh S, Sundaram A, Hussain R, Tamang A, Crowell M. Abortion Incidence and Unintended Pregnancy in Nepal. INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2018; 42:197-209. [PMID: 28825899 DOI: 10.1363/42e2116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Although abortion has been legal under broad criteria in Nepal since 2002, a significant proportion of women continue to obtain illegal, unsafe abortions, and no national estimates exist of the incidence of safe and unsafe abortions. METHODS Data were collected in 2014 from a nationally representative sample of 386 facilities that provide legal abortions or postabortion care and a survey of 134 health professionals knowledgeable about abortion service provision. Facility caseloads and indirect estimation techniques were used to calculate the national and regional incidence of legal and illegal abortion. National and regional levels of abortion complications and unintended pregnancy were also estimated. RESULTS In 2014, women in Nepal had 323,100 abortions, of which 137,000 were legal, and 63,200 women were treated for abortion complications. The abortion rate was 42 per 1,000 women aged 15-49, and the abortion ratio was 56 per 100 live births. The abortion rate in the Central region (59 per 1,000) was substantially higher than the national average. Overall, 50% of pregnancies were unintended, and the unintended pregnancy rate was 68 per 1,000 women of reproductive age. CONCLUSIONS Despite legalization of abortion and expansion of services in Nepal, unsafe abortion is still common and exacts a heavy toll on women. Programs and policies to reduce rates of unintended pregnancy and unsafe abortion, increase access to high-quality contraceptive care and expand safe abortion services are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahesh Puri
- associate director Center for Research on Environment Health and Population Activities, Kathmandu, Nepal,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
'I felt the world crash down on me': Women's experiences being denied legal abortion in Colombia. Reprod Health 2017; 14:133. [PMID: 29058629 PMCID: PMC5651606 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-017-0391-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2006, Colombia’s constitutional court overturned a complete ban on abortion, liberalizing the procedure. Despite a relatively liberal new law, women still struggle to access safe and legal abortion services. We aimed to understand why women are denied services in Colombia, and what factors determine if and how they ultimately terminate pregnancies. Methods We recruited women denied abortion at a private facility in Bogota. Twenty-one participants completed an initial interview and eight completed a second longer interview. Two researchers documented themes and developed and applied a codebook to transcripts using ATLAS.ti. Results Participants faced barriers, such as lack of knowledge of service availability and delayed pregnancy recognition, leading to denial. Five out of eight participants ultimately received abortions in public hospitals, due to support from partners and a robust referral system; nevertheless, they received poor care. Those who continued pregnancies endured stigmatizing events and inaccurate medical counselling at referral facilities. Several women contemplated illegal abortion though were afraid to attempt it. Conclusion We propose the following recommendations: 1) increase awareness about availability and legality of abortion services to prevent delay and consequent denial; 2) provide counseling and referral upon denial; and 3) train providers in interpersonal quality abortion care.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ely GE, Hales T, Jackson DL, Bowen EA, Maguin E, Hamilton G. A trauma-informed examination of the hardships experienced by abortion fund patients in the United States. Health Care Women Int 2017; 38:1133-1151. [PMID: 28850325 DOI: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1367795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Researchers describe hardships experienced by abortion patients, examining administrative health cases from 2010 to 2015 in the United States. All patients received financial assistance from an abortion fund to help pay for abortion. Case data were analyzed to assess types and numbers of hardships experienced by age, race, and geographic origin. Hardships ranged from homelessness to parenting multiple children. Patients from the geographic South experienced the most hardships, followed by those from the Midwest. Hardships experienced by abortion fund patients are like those reported in other samples of abortion patients; hardships potentially cause or exacerbate trauma. Results are discussed in the context of a trauma-informed perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gretchen E Ely
- a School of Social Work , University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , New York , USA
| | - Travis Hales
- a School of Social Work , University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , New York , USA
| | - D Lynn Jackson
- b Department of Social Work , Texas Christian University , Fort Worth , Texas , USA
| | - Elizabeth A Bowen
- a School of Social Work , University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , New York , USA
| | - Eugene Maguin
- a School of Social Work , University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , New York , USA
| | - Greer Hamilton
- a School of Social Work , University at Buffalo, The State University of New York , Buffalo , New York , USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu WJ, Maru S, Regmi K, Basnett I. Abortion Care in Nepal, 15 Years after Legalization: Gaps in Access, Equity, and Quality. Health Hum Rights 2017; 19:221-230. [PMID: 28630554 PMCID: PMC5473051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Wan-Ju Wu
- Family planning/global women’s health fellow at Possible in Nepal and at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sheela Maru
- Women’s health advisor at Possible in Nepal, an instructor in obstetrics and gynecology at Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, and a research fellow at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kiran Regmi
- Special secretary at Nepal’s Ministry of Health
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hossain A, Moseson H, Raifman S, Gerdts C, Biswas KK, Foster DG. 'How shall we survive': a qualitative study of women's experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh. Reprod Health 2016; 13:86. [PMID: 27449219 PMCID: PMC4957356 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 06/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND About one quarter of women in Bangladesh are denied menstrual regulation (MR) due to advanced gestation [J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 41(3):161-163, 2015, Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) (3):1-8, 2012]. Little is known about barriers to MR services, and whether women denied MR seek abortion elsewhere, self-induce, or continue the pregnancy. METHODS After obtaining authorization from four health facilities in Bangladesh, we recruited eligible and interested women in to the study and requested informed consent for study participation. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 women denied MR from four facilities in four districts in Bangladesh. Interviews were translated and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers through an iterative process using a qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS Of those interviewed, 12 women sought abortion elsewhere and eight of these women were successful; four women who sought subsequent services were denied again. Two of the eight women who subsequently terminated their pregnancies suffered from complications. None of the participants were aware of the legal gestational limit for government-approved MR services. Given that all participants were initially denied services because they were beyond the legal gestational limit for MR and there were no reported risks to any of the mothers' health, we presume that the eight terminations performed subsequently were done illegally. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to seeking safe MR services need to be addressed to reduce utilization of potentially unsafe alternative abortion services and to improve women's health and well being in Bangladesh. Findings from this study indicate a need to raise awareness about legal MR services; provide information to women on where, how and when they can access these services; train more MR providers; improve the quality and safety of second trimester services; and strengthen campaigns to educate women about contraception and pregnancy risk throughout the reproductive lifespan to prevent unintended pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altaf Hossain
- Association for Prevention of Septic Abortion, Bangladesh (BAPSA), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Heidi Moseson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Raifman
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA.
| | | | | | - Diana Greene Foster
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Greene Foster
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|