Comparison between bidirectional Stratafix® barbed suture and conventional suture in laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective study

Barbed Sutures Compared With Conventional Sutures During Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To accumulate the currently available literature on the safety and efficacy of the use of knotless barbed sutures for the reconstruction of the uterine wall during laparoscopic myomectomy based on comparison with traditional suture studies.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar up to February 29, 2024.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and PICO criteria, we included all English-language, full-text articles that evaluated the perioperative outcomes of patients who had laparoscopic myomectomy and repair of the uterine wall defect with either barbed or traditional (extracorporeal or intracorporeal sutures).

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The application of barbed sutures resulted in significantly reduced operative time (2,111 patients, mean difference -12.04 minutes, 95% CI, -16.94 to -7.14, P<.001). This was also reflected when suturing time was separately analyzed (437 patients, mean difference -6.04 minutes, 95% CI, -7.43 to -4.65, P<.001) The mean difference in hemoglobin levels before and after surgery was significantly lower in the barbed suture group (1,277 patients, mean difference -0.40 g/dL, 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.09, P<.01) This was also observed in case of estimated blood loss, which was found to be lower in the barbed suture group (1,823 patients, mean difference -47.22 mL, 95% CI, -78.54 to -15.90, P=.003). Finally, the barbed suture group presented lower transfusion rates (1,217 patients, odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI, 0.19-1.00, P=.05). Concerning visual analog scale (VAS) score as evaluated by the surgeons for surgical difficulty, the control group proved to be more technically challenging compared with the barbed sutures group (184 patients, mean difference -1.66 95% CI, -2.37 to -0.94, P<.001). The VAS score for pain at 24 hours postoperatively, postoperative complication rates, and length of hospital stay were similar for both groups. Regarding reproductive outcomes, there was no difference in pregnancy, live birth, and birth complication rates.

CONCLUSION

The use of barbed sutures during laparoscopic myomectomy presents many clinical benefits for the patient and the surgeon in terms of shorter operative and suturing time, less estimated blood loss, and ease of use. This pioneer technology may contribute to the expansion of laparoscopy on more complex myomectomies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42023477304.

Effect of barbed suture versus conventional suture in laparo-endoscopic single-site cystectomy for ovarian mature cystic teratoma: An ambispective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of barbed suture (BS) and conventional suture (CS) on perioperative conditions and ovarian function in the excision of ovarian mature cystic teratoma (MCT) by laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS).

METHODS

The present study is an ambispective cohort study conducted in an affiliated tertiary hospital between May 2019 and October 2020. Women treated by LESS cystectomy for unilateral ovarian MCT were included. BS or CS were applied in the surgery.

RESULTS

BS and CS groups were matched 1:1 for age, body mass index and ovarian cyst volume (40 women per group). There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Mean operating time (53.89 ± 14.80 versuss 67.93 ± 19.23 min, P = 0.004) and suturing time (11.85 ± 6.68 versus 19.76 ± 12.75 min, P = 0.006) were significantly shorter in the BS group than the CS group. No significant differences were found in serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels between groups at baseline, postoperative day 1, 3 months, and 12 months. However, serum AMH was significantly lower than baseline at postoperative day 1, 3 months, and 12 months in both groups.

CONCLUSION

BS provides shorter operating and suturing time than CS, without increasing damage to ovarian function in LESS cystectomy for ovarian MCT.

Experience of a modified chest tube suture-fixation technique in uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary resection

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the feasibility and advantages of a modified chest tube suture-fixation technique in uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for pulmonary resection.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 116 patients who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (U-VATS) for lung diseases in Zhengzhou People's Hospital between October 2019 and October 2021. Patients were stratified into two groups based on the applied suture-fixation methods, i.e., 72 patients in the active group and 44 patients in the control group. The two groups were subsequently compared in the terms of gender, age, operation method, indwelling time of chest tube, postoperative pain score, chest tube removal time, wound healing grade, length of hospital stay, incision healing grade, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, age, operation method, indwelling time of chest tube, postoperative pain score, and length of hospital stay (P = 0.167, 0.185, 0.085, 0.051, 0.927, and 0.362, respectively). However, the chest tube removal time, incision healing grade, and incision scar satisfaction in the active group were significantly better compared with those of the control group (P = < 0.001, 0.033, and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In summary, the new suture-fixation approach can minimize the number of stitches, and time necessary for chest tube removal process, and avoid the pain experienced when removing the drainage tube. This method is more feasible, has better incision conditions, and provides a convenient tube removal, making it more suitable to patients.

A novel technique for myometrial defect closure after robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To introduce our novel technique for myometrial defect closure after adenomyomectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study. A total of 40 patients with adenomyosis who visited our clinic between October 2012 and January 2018 were recruited. Of those 34 patients were eligible for analysis.

RESULTS

The mean thickness of the affected uterine wall before surgery was 4.02 cm ± 1.11, dropping to 2.37 cm ± 0.84 postoperatively. This led to a mean drop of 41% in the thickness of the affected wall, which was found to be significant using a paired t-test (p < 0.0001). The mean preoperative pain score was 8.68 ± 1.12, while the postoperative mean was 0.06 ± 0.34. The mean preoperative CA 125 was 121.73 ± 117.29, dropping to 6.95 ± 2.60 postoperatively. This was found to be significantly lower using both the Wilcoxon Signed Rank and Sign tests (p = 0.0156).

CONCLUSION

Myometrial defect closure in a layer-by-layer fashion after robot-assisted laparoscopic adenomyomectomy is a reproducible technique. This uterine conserving method was effective in reducing our patients' pain. It may be the solution to maintaining adequate myometrial wall thickness, uterine layer alignment, and endometrial integrity.

How to minimize bleeding in laparoscopic myomectomy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Laparoscopic myomectomy is a common surgical procedure for symptomatic myomas. However, bleeding control during surgery may pose a challenge. Therefore, the aim of this study was to review recent evidence regarding interventions to control bleeding during laparoscopic myomectomy.

RECENT FINDINGS

The use of vasopressin resulted in less blood loss compared to placebo. Barbed sutures reduced blood loss compared to conventional sutures. Intravenous infusion of tranexamic acid (TXA) in the intraoperative period of large myomectomies showed no significant difference compared to placebo. Uterine artery occlusion (UAO) and emergency uterine artery embolization were reported to be feasible and may reduce and treat bleeding before conversion to laparotomy.

SUMMARY

Several methods can control bleeding during laparoscopic myomectomy. Vasopressin and barbed sutures resulted in decreased blood loss, and TXA did not have an impact on bleeding control. The use of UAO and emergency embolization techniques can contribute to the control of bleeding; however, further studies are needed to prove the efficacy of these and other agents.

Real-World Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Open Colorectal Surgery with Wound Closure Incorporating Triclosan-Coated Barbed Sutures: A Multi-Institution, Retrospective Database Study

Purpose

Open colorectal surgery is associated with a high rate of postoperative wound complications. This is a single-arm study of real-world outcomes of triclosan-coated barbed suture (Ethicon's STRATAFIX^TM Symmetric PDS^TM Plus Knotless Tissue Control Device [SSPP]) used in open colorectal surgery.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database. The study included patients who underwent an inpatient open colorectal surgery with wound closure using SSPP (size 0 or 1 to increase the likelihood the suture was used in fascia) between October 2015-September 2019 (N=593). Wound complications, hospital length of stay, total hospital costs (2019 US$), and all-cause readmissions post-discharge were measured. Post-hoc multivariable analyses compared wound complications between non-elective admissions and elective.

Results

The overall incidence of wound complications within 30-days post-procedure was 7.1%, with the majority of those being surgical site infections (SSI) (6.0%). Mean operation time was 190 (standard deviation [SD]=64.4) mins, postoperative length of stay was 8.1 (SD=11.9) days, 30-day readmission rate was 11.8%, and total hospital costs were $31,693 (SD=$40,076). As compared with published literature on the rate of SSI in colorectal surgery, the 30-day rate of SSI in the present study (6.0%) fell within the range of 5.4% to 18.2% for open colorectal surgery and from 4.3% to 21.5% for combined open and minimally invasive procedures. Multivariable-adjusted incidence proportions of wound complications were slightly lower for non-elective admissions and did not differ significantly from those of elective admissions.

Conclusion

The rate of wound complications observed in the present study falls within the range of rates previously reported in the literature, suggesting a safe and effective role for SSPP in open colorectal surgery. In post hoc analyses, the adjusted rate of wound complications was similar between non-elective and elective admissions. Head-to-head studies are required to determine comparative advantages or disadvantages for SSPP versus other sutures.